Hi Maxim,
I would attend the get-together, would even consider talking about two
of my current related rebol projects...
Btw Maxim, I live in Sainte-Therese, I could provide car lifts for
people near my area...
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good to know they are gamers on the list... I myself am working on my
object/class library just to work on a D&D program on which I've been
working a lot in the past few years... but not really started coding
yet.
Good luck with your project... once I finish Recoil, maybe we could join
effort...
> Jaime Vargas wrote:
> -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it -- Steve Jobs
Sorry if this off-topic and seems like neat-picking, but I have way too
much respect for inovators in computer history to let this through ;)
(Those do not include (jobs/gates/linus)). Amongs said innovat
Hi,
I don't know if you're talking about RECOIL, I remember sharing part of
the code and idea with someone else... But who ??? Yep, it was a very
ugly proof of concept... But it was a proof ;)
Anyway, I need to get back in the code... And rewrite the whole thing.
Basically, it was able to suppo
Hi,
Yep, I did start work on a OO framework... I've been away from rebol for
the past two year and the reason I just subscribed back is to see if
anybody would be interested in something like that ;)
Best,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
Hi,
Some tips regarding OOP under Rebol...
- Rebol will let you design objects containing variables and functions.
- Rebol has strong datatype (ie not everything is an object !)
- Rebol OOP is more like Self than Smalltalk, Java or C++. They are no
classes, every object is an instance.
Rebol wi
Hi,
Have you looked at function ?
ie
myfunc: function [arg1 arg2] [local1 local2] [source]
or
myfunc: function [
arg1
arg2
] [
local1
local2
] [
source
]
it pretty much what you want, plus if you use the following
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
> In my view, the single most needed tool for app
> development is a good list style. I plan to make
> one after I fix up my grid some more.
> (I saw Robert M. Muench's interesting problem and
> I will keep that in mind).
In my view, the single most needed tool for app development is a rebol
Hi,
> Hi, concerning OOP for Rebol IMO we shouldn't take it to
> dogmatic. I'm still
> finding my own useage pattern for Rebol. At the moment I don't
> think OOP is the
> key to the Rebol-usage-pattern. I'm focusing on an "object
> aggregated" pattern
> and it seems to be quite OK.
I agree that
Hi Gregg,
> I've been doing OOP stuff heavily for the past 7 years (though
> SmallTalkers
> and Eiffel folks could argue about the OOP-ness of it :) and I'm
> constantly
> amazed at the code I find myself writing in REBOL compared to what I would
> have written before.
I daily think in C, Smallt
Hi,
> > I gather that your functions must do a lot of code ? OOP/Methods, when
> > clearly designed, limits development by favoring reuse. This is
> one of the
> > thing I need for my project.
>
> I kind of agree with Carl's notion that OOP is overrated. Perhaps
> the metaphor of "object" needs
Hi Gregg,
> I thought, when I started with REBOL, that I would build an OOP
> infrastructure for my projects (as I had done in the past with other
> languages), but the more I've worked with it, the more I've moved
> away from
> that line of thinking. I'm still finding my way with REBOL, from a d
Hi,
Forgot to say something about my current implementation ...
The worst/best part is that it does not support function refinements !
I can understand the power of refinements, and have even used it for some
small scripts... but at the same time I don't like it... I have found that
most of the
Hi Tim,
> I'm designing a DB-based system to service a number of clients,
> each with a variety of needs. My hope is to service all of them
> with the same application, in which most of the custom code is
> re-evaluated global data, rather than "code".
> It's been a bit of a headache to keep the
ay, April 07, 2002 9:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL : Pure OOP project ?
>
>
> Hi, Christian,
>
> I'm interested with your OO approach. Did you make tests with your lib
> (memory allocation and size, performance) ? What kind of method did you
Hi,
Considering the low number of replies I got from the list regarding this
thread : Class object inheritance library interest ? and the interest shown
in the Business object versionning thread. I begin to think that either
Rebolers are not interested in almost pure OOP with REBOL or that intere
Hi,
> The reasons that Netscape and Internet Explorer have become unusable and
> unstable (so users have upgradaphobia) roots itself in something I heard
> Alan Kay say in a video talk, "The Computer Revolution Hasn't Started
> Yet" which Jim Collas has never returned to me ;-(
Even though it so
Hi Rebolers,
Short version :
Anybody interested in helping for this kind of library ? email me privately
at: to-email rejoin ["chrismorency" "@" "videotron.ca"]
Long version :
For the past few months, I've been working on a class object inheritance
library for Rebol. I've been through several im
Hi Guys,
Enjoy the wordfile, any suggestions, flames will be accepted ;)
btw, you can remove the RSP at the end of the first line, I use that for my
Rebol Server Pages under Marteen's excellent eRebol
One reply to many replies :
Stef wrote:
>The url doesn't seems to work. Is it "normal" ? How
>
Hi,
Sorry for the delay... Been busy at the job...
I just added the enhanced wordfile for UltraEdit at http://www.palmtime.com
in the rebol section for those interested. This wordfile add-on list more
words than the one at UltraEdit, it does not do the same syntax highlight
either... highlight i
I use ultraedit too, however I changed the syntax file to include more core
2.5 fns, I also added a basic function list ;)
Best,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michael Jervis
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:22 PM
> To
Hi,
I would strongly suggest Mandrake, which has a GUI installation, offer
partitionning, etc... it's very simple to install.
Best,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 8:31 PM
Hi,
> I am not sure I understand you correctly, but typically assigning some
> extension for your files to be "executed", we speak "cgi". I have
> currently set-up ability to execute scripts only for /cgi-bin/ dir, and
> /fast-cgi/ for fast-cgi scripts.
> I am not sure it is a good thing to allow
Hi Pekr,
Yes, I've been watching OS lately and Qube could really become interesting.
I tried d/l the SDK but the zip file I got was not correct. Since the same
executable file will run on Win32, Dos and Linux, I would really be
interested in seeing REBOL Core/View ported to it ! Now I could insta
Hi,
> Ah, thanks! So all my pages are supposed to come to /cgi-bin/ dir,
> right? Few comments, one question though :-)
Actually no, they can be anywhere in the hierarchy of your site, however
since they have a specific extension you told Apache about, they will be
processed by rebol.exe. Yeah,
Hi Graham,
> > They would be better off using REBOL, but perhaps they
> > don't want their scripts to run and exchange data across
> > 40+ platforms
> >
>
> But then they would have to pay for Pro licenses for each
> unit so that they could have sound :)
me: make object! [
say: func [j
Hi Christian,
> some months ago I worked an a similiar project, you can find my
> code at the bottom of this mail. It's not very complete, but it
> may inspire you in a way or two :)
Thanks very much for the code, I will certainly look at it. However, my
implantation is almost complete...
> I d
Hi Phil,
> What about this scenario
>
> How would you transmit an object over an IP connection and be able to type
> it?
>
> i.e.
> parent class A -> child class B
> parent class A -> child class C
>
> C: class-C-object-instance
>
> clientfd: open tcp://localhost:
> insert clientfd C( ? )
Hi,
As I mentioned in another post earlier, I've been working for the past three
weeks on a pseudo class inheritance library for Rebol/Core. This would
enable rebol developers to use class to define object or class inheritance.
Why ? The current implementation of object "inheritance" under rebol
Hi,
Will the mailing list/rebol website host a report of the meeting ?
Best,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Carl Sassenrath
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: unsolicited email - nql
ly I was'nt pleased that moving to REBOL
meant moving to CE.
--Ryan
PS: Satellite Forms has no runtime licensing anymore.
Christian Morency wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Lately I have been really thinking about just s--- canning the Palm, and
> going
> with, well, something else t
Hi,
jeff wrote:
"Yes, the REBOL Palm port lives in a border town next to the
realm of "possibility". REBOL has even been compiled for
Palm before, but the problem is that in order for REBOL to
run (or even to boot) a segmentation paging scheme (virtual
memory) has to be used. Under such a schem
Hi,
"Lately I have been really thinking about just s--- canning the Palm, and
going
with, well, something else that can run REBOL. I might getting one of those
VR6's, just to see if I can get REBOL to run on it."
Hmm, I know some people can't stand Microsoft's products... but there might
be a c
Hi all!
"Actually, the RAM hardware the heap is in is no faster than
the rest of the RAM. The reason it is 32k is because it is
accessed using a 16-bit signed offset pointer. Other RAM
needs a change of base pointer in addition to the offset,
an operation that takes slightly longer. Palm OS is 16
area ?
Cheers
colinb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christian Morency
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL/View 1.0 Ships!
Hi,
Congratulations on the release, look forward
Colin,
Did you get my message on which I said it worked on HP 680 ? so AFAIK, it
should work on HP 620
Best,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Colin Brizell
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 4:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL]
Hi Geo,
Consider me a PDA-Geek,
I've had :
Nec MP400, HP 620LX, Nino 300, PsionS5 (shameless plug : check
http://www.palmtime.com for some nice games/utilities for EPOC)
I currently own :
HP 680LX, Casio E-125, Handspring Prism
I used to write for Team Palmtops, a french magazine about palmtop
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christian Morency
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL/View 1.0 Ships!
Hi,
Congratulations on the release, look forward using it with the script I
wrote for Rebol/Core... Any chance for a WindowsCE/P
Hi,
Congratulations on the release, look forward using it with the script I
wrote for Rebol/Core... Any chance for a WindowsCE/PocketPC version of
Rebol/View ? The PDA market would really benefits from a good generic SDK
and scripting tools like Rebol/Core + Rebol/View ?
Best,
Chris
-Origin
Hi,
Awesome !!! When ? How ? I've been playing with an idea for a multi-os
software, hope View will find it's way on WindowsCE / PocketPC ! That would
definitively make me happy !
Best,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Tretter
Hi,
Working great on PocketPC (MIPS) (E-125) and thanks to the development team
to continue supporting WindowsCE !!!
Just noticed something though, I'm not sure how v2.3 was on my device, but
if I remember correctly it was like running like this under PocketPC's
WindowsCE 2.x emulation...
Menu
Hi,
I'm back in the Rebolution, after telling every one I know how this language
is promising, after spending a lot of times on several projects, I'm back
using Rebol for personnal and professionnal reasons ;) Any idea of how I can
have the equivalent of super in smalltalk ?
Best,
Chris
--
To
42 matches
Mail list logo
