On 31 Oct 1999 01:17:31 -0400, David Whitehurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am into an application and I issue a system(cmd); from the
>GTK Application. Any ideas on how to display stdout on the text
>widget. I thought that I could write or redirect the output of the
>command to a file, read
Your going to break a lot if you just upgrade 5.2 to glibc2.1 (and don't
compensate for the upgrade by upgrading the packages that rely on 2.0 glib).
When I updated my system a LOT of things broke, admin tools, etc.
I didn't even bother trying to salvage it. I just reinstalled over it. Now I"m
ru
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll admit I'm not the greatest RPMer in the world... far from it in
> > fact; but what you just described sounds like the definition of a SPEC
> > file, not a src.rpm to me.
>
> The point of the src.rpm in the netscape case is to give you the
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I am into an application and I issue a system(cmd); from the
> > GTK Application. Any ideas on how to display stdout on the text
> > widget. I thought that I could write or redirect the output of the
> > command to a file, read that file, display the tex
Alan Cox wrote:
> > I am into an application and I issue a system(cmd); from the
> > GTK Application. Any ideas on how to display stdout on the text
> > widget. I thought that I could write or redirect the output of the
> > command to a file, read that file, display the text, and then remove th
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Runge wrote:
> A Godsend!
Not that I'm aware of it. ;)
> I guess Red Hat must be
> "unsetting" this in the general environment before they build.
It's never set on the build server.
> BTW, didn't you used to be with Mandrake?
Yes, until a short while ago.
LLaP
ber
>
> I'm somewhat of a newbie to NLS, /usr/share/locale, etc., so please
> forgive me if this is a silly question.
>
> I'm using a stock RH61 setup and I can't compile any SRPMS that have
> /usr/share/locale/ entries in their files listings. For example,
> gettext or some of the GNOME stuff. It
A Godsend! Thanks for the help and the quick reply. I guess Red Hat must be
"unsetting" this in the general environment before they build.
BTW, didn't you used to be with Mandrake?
Thanks again,
Chris
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Runge wrote:
>
> > I'm using a st
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> OK, I'll admit I'm not the greatest RPMer in the world... far from it in
> fact; but what you just described sounds like the definition of a SPEC
> file, not a src.rpm to me.
The point of the src.rpm in the netscape case is to give you the spec
file. Th
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Runge wrote:
> I'm using a stock RH61 setup and I can't compile any SRPMS that have
> /usr/share/locale/ entries in their files listings. For example,
> gettext or some of the GNOME stuff. It compiles okay but during the
> files phase it bombs because it can't find th
I'm somewhat of a newbie to NLS, /usr/share/locale, etc., so please
forgive me if this is a silly question.
I'm using a stock RH61 setup and I can't compile any SRPMS that have
/usr/share/locale/ entries in their files listings. For example,
gettext or some of the GNOME stuff. It compiles okay
Also why is it started with an init.d script and it is also listed in the
inetd.conf file.
Svante Signell wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Obviously the 3.x series of pidentd behaves differently than the 2.x
> versions. Earlier version created log entries like:
> identd[6577]: Connection from localhost
>
Hello,
Obviously the 3.x series of pidentd behaves differently than the 2.x
versions. Earlier version created log entries like:
identd[6577]: Connection from localhost
identd[6577]: from: 127.0.0.1 ( localhost ) for: 1932, 25
while the newer ones give
in.identd[14472]: started
How do I config
At 21:38 10/31/99 +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
>
>> At 14:35 10/31/99 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> >John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>> >> I thought the idea of src.rpms was so users can build from SOURCE CODE.
>> >We can't ship the s
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> At 14:35 10/31/99 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> >> I thought the idea of src.rpms was so users can build from SOURCE CODE.
> >We can't ship the source code to netscape. No one can.
>
> so then the point of
At 14:35 10/31/99 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>> I thought the idea of src.rpms was so users can build from SOURCE CODE.
>We can't ship the source code to netscape. No one can.
so then the point of shipping a netscape src.rpm would be . . . ?
cabb
John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > In fact, even if you sneak another vreg binary in, the resulting RPMs
> > won't run on 5.2, since the netscape binaries themselves are linked
> > against glibc-2.1.
>
> I thought the idea of src.rpms was so users can build from SOURCE CODE.
We can'
Tony Nugent wrote:
>
> Is this a bug in my ftp client, or is something weird happening with
> the redhat ftp sites?
>
> I'm using mc (midnight commander) as an ftp client (it is a brilliant at
> doing this!) to collect files from redhat's ftp sites.
>
> Every time I download a file, it hangs at
I'm desperately looking for a .spec file (and possibly a set of
patches) that will allow me to rebuild the mod_php-3 package (from
rh61) to get it to use mysql rather than postgresql.
The docs for doing this at www.php.org are now out of date (it applies
to the php3 package from rh60), and the .s
> (I've seen mention of an ftp bug in the IP masquerading of the
> 2.2.12 kernels, and I'm wondering if what I'm experiencing is
> related to this).
It isnt actually a bug just a quirk
> Has anybody got any clues as to what's going on and how to prevent
> this? Thanks.
If you use default
> I am into an application and I issue a system(cmd); from the
> GTK Application. Any ideas on how to display stdout on the text
> widget. I thought that I could write or redirect the output of the
> command to a file, read that file, display the text, and then remove the
> temp file. This seem
On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> But strange that Redhat doesn't test this properly before releasing the distro.
> At least doing some printing tests (lpd is faulty too in RH 6.1) and some
> dialup tests wouldn't take too much effort.
The PPP problem actually affects only a small perc
Is this a bug in my ftp client, or is something weird happening with
the redhat ftp sites?
I'm using mc (midnight commander) as an ftp client (it is a brilliant at
doing this!) to collect files from redhat's ftp sites.
Every time I download a file, it hangs at the end of the transfer
until it ti
23 matches
Mail list logo
