Distribution Lists wrote:
Can someone tell the syntax for IPtable to redirect traffic to another IP
address at a port level
Thanks
Hav your read the how-to? It's all in there.
Regards,
Ed.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 21:21, tirumal b wrote:
> hello,
>
> can u tell me how can i change this to kernel code,
> will i need to modify the kernel code and recompile it
> .please let me know.
>
> Thank you
I'm afraid that's really a non-trivial task. The basic steps would
require you to includ
I have 3 workstation that are just too damn slow for the full install of RH90
with XFCE, plus OpenOffice, Access97 (via Wine). So I would like to have one
good system do X server and just have those 3 workstation run everything on that
server.
What X server (other software) I have to put on a serve
hello,
can u tell me how can i change this to kernel code,
will i need to modify the kernel code and recompile it
.please let me know.
Thank you
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 20:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> tirumal b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i have tried to create files in
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 20:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> tirumal b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i have tried to create files in /proc but i am not
> > able to do so. This is the code i have written and it
> > generates some errors.
> >
>
> /proc isn't a 'real' file system. It'
tirumal b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hello,
>
> i have tried to create files in /proc but i am not
> able to do so. This is the code i have written and it
> generates some errors.
>
/proc isn't a 'real' file system. It's a virtual representation of your
machine/os environment and kernel, and
Well, I am the guy who started this thread. XFCE is EXACTLY what I wanted. What
I did was I re-installed RH9.0 with KDE and Gnome programs I like and after that
did all 11 XFCE rpms! XFCE has almost everything I need, other stuff is taken
from KDE and XFCE launches it for me. I can tell you that I
hello,
i have tried to create files in /proc but i am not
able to do so. This is the code i have written and it
generates some errors.
#include
#include
#include
main()
{
const char* name="CPU";
mode_t mode=444;
struct proc_dir_entry *l;
l=create_proc_entry(name,mode,NULL);
}
gcc -c example.c
I
Can someone tell the syntax for IPtable to redirect traffic to another IP
address at a port level
Thanks
--
http://www.e-securenetworks.net
http://www.shopper-holic.com
http://www.planet247.net
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/li
Thank you for your replies.
Below is a more detailed description what I want to do,
Take "dc=foo, dc=com" for example, I have set up the rules as follows :
access to dn.children="ou=misc, dc=foo, dc=com"
by * read
access to dn.children="ou=sales, dc=foo, dc=com"
by * read
access to dn.children="
Can someone tell the syntax for IPtable to redirect traffic to another IP
address at a port level
Thanks
--
http://www.e-securenetworks.net
http://www.shopper-holic.com
http://www.planet247.net
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:21, Ed Wilts wrote:
> It's an ugly problem which is why I posted for more ideas. It would be
> nice if there was a hook right into wu-ftpd that did the scan during the
> upload so it only gets scanned once and can't be missed either.
>
here is a stab in the dark for you
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:38, Nick White wrote:
> yeah, I can telnet to the port, and I can even hit it using
> https://foo.example.org:995/. IE of course tells me there is an invalid
> cert, and when I accept, I see:
>
> +OK POP3 foo.example.org v2001.78rh server ready -ERR Unknown
> AUTHORIZATIO
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:01:57AM -0700, Bailo, John wrote:
>
> C'mon? 'Pentium class' as in any Pentium???
I would think so.
I don't really see speed as being a showstopper in this case.
RAM is more important.
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
I am doing this right now on my Dell i8200 I was fine with RH8. then I
upgraded over it to RH9 and ran into "issues" with stuff not working right
and all that -- especially my WiFi (Prism) card. I formatted and installed
fresh RH9. Now I'm spending more time than I should re-configuring and
tra
Ricky Boone wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 17:48, Panos Tsapralis wrote:
...so, what other options do I have to download the latest patches without using
the "up2date" mechanism? For example, can I download them via ftp into a local
directory on my system and install them as regular RPM package
> I have to admit that since digging a bit into the various chrooted ftp
> servers out there, I really like that idea. I think it is a shame that
> the openssh team apparently does not see this sort of functionality as
> part of the scope of the project.
Possibly because the OpenBSD philosophy
I don't think special accounts are necessary, because I can use pop3s
from mozilla's mail client, just not Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Lazor, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pop3s / Outlook
Does the pop3s you're
Does the pop3s you're using require the creation of seperate accounts? In other
words, does it have it's own authentication database or does it use that of the RedHat
system?
You might also want to cross-reference things using a different client, like Eudora.
> -Original Message-
> yea
yeah, I can telnet to the port, and I can even hit it using
https://foo.example.org:995/. IE of course tells me there is an invalid
cert, and when I accept, I see:
+OK POP3 foo.example.org v2001.78rh server ready -ERR Unknown
AUTHORIZATION state command -ERR Unknown AUTHORIZATION state command
-E
Title: Message
Can
you telnet to the port from the workstation? Have you checked your
firewall rules?
-Original Message-
Hi
All,
I'm trying
to use the ipop3s daemon instead of standard plain text
pop3. If I use the standard port 110 POP3, outlook has no
problem
Yeah, yeah... Sorry about the HTML Forgot to turn it off.
-Original Message-
From: Nick White
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pop3s / Outlook
Hi All,
I'm trying to use the ipop3s daemon instead of standard plain text pop3.
If I use the standard
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:15, Nilesh Sahita wrote:
> I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
> GNOME/KDE.
>
> However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
> entries / launchers that I have in KDE or GNOME. Is there anyway to
> import KDE / GNOME menu
Title: Message
Hi
All,
I'm trying
to use the ipop3s daemon instead of standard plain text
pop3. If I use the standard port 110 POP3, outlook has no
problem connecting to the server. But when I turn on SSL (port 995),
it won't connect... I know that the server is running properly,
becau
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:02:33PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Ah well. Life sure would be easy if there weren't all these pesky
> customers complicating things.
Yeah, but they do pay the bills...
> Do these files stay in the upload dir indefinitely or are they moved
> pretty quick?
It varies
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 04:27, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Huh. I must have done something wrong then I only installed one. Since
> this thread started I have played with Icewm and xfce on my 7.3 laptop.
> I punted on nautilus over a year ago but still use gnome. Thing are
> faster without gnome.
Th
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 17:55, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 14:35, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> > > Can't we just nuke them both?
> >
> > MS I don't care. Sun I would miss.
>
> You lack optimism. It's difficult to miss wi
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 14:35, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> > Can't we just nuke them both?
>
> MS I don't care. Sun I would miss.
You lack optimism. It's difficult to miss with a nuke.
--
Cliff Wells, Software Engineer
Logiplex Corpor
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +0200, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just installed RH9 and am having a spot of bother with KDE. The
> main thing is that since I changed my resolution from 1024 to 800x600
> all my windows are very slightly off the screen on the right side.
>
> Ca
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 16:58, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:52:06PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > can u force the uploads into an incoming dir in each directory and let
> > the scanning process mv then into the regular dir?
>
> Nope - that would require changes on the user end and
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 17:48, Panos Tsapralis wrote:
> ...so, what other options do I have to download the latest patches without using
> the "up2date" mechanism? For example, can I download them via ftp into a local
> directory on my system and install them as regular RPM packages?
Do you have B
On Thursday 26 June 2003 02:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fred Whipple wrote:
> > I have a server running right now with about 250 processes. About 150
> > of those are Java VM processes, each with between 20-100 of its own
> > threads.
> ...
> > We'r
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:52:06PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> can u force the uploads into an incoming dir in each directory and let
> the scanning process mv then into the regular dir?
Nope - that would require changes on the user end and the end users are
our customers who have already develo
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 16:33, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
You can't get around regularly scanning.
well I am not sure. I guess it depends on the definition of regular.
You could probably use fam and let it trigger a scan as soon as an
upload is complete.
You could, but if the FT
On Thursday 26 June 2003 02:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: "Richard Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> giovanna d said:
> > The program is called NISP (neutron instrument simulation package),
> > written in fortran, it's a family of monte carlo codes.
>
> What do your system logs say?
>
> The
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 16:33, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Frank Bax wrote:
> > At 04:12 PM 6/26/03, Gerry Doris wrote:
> >
> >> > Ed Wilts wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>
> >> >> Part of the problem is that all my ftp uploads are authenticated
> >> and
On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 02:41 PM, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Molnar Peter wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 22:39, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/
20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
Can't we just nuke them both?
Linus li
...so, what other options do I have to download the latest patches without using
the "up2date" mechanism? For example, can I download them via ftp into a local
directory on my system and install them as regular RPM packages?
TIA,
--
Panos Platon Tsapralis,
Software Engineer,
SAP-R/3 specialist,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:30:44PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> T. Ribbrock wrote:
> >>
> >>Can't we just nuke them both?
> >
> >
> >MS I don't care. Sun I would miss.
>
> Why would you miss Sun? There is now an open source fork of Java in the
> works.
I don't care (much) about Java, either,
Molnar Peter wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 22:39, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
Can't we just nuke them both?
Linus lives in California, doesn't he? :D
I thought he lived in Finla
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 22:39, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
>
> Can't we just nuke them both?
>
Linus lives in California, doesn't he? :D
--
Molnar Peter <[EMAIL
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 14:48, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
> > Off the top of my head I would suggest you create a script running in cron
> > that checks for new files in the upload directly, if there are any, runs a
> > virus scan on them, and moves
Frank Bax wrote:
At 04:12 PM 6/26/03, Gerry Doris wrote:
> Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>> Part of the problem is that all my ftp uploads are authenticated
and in
>> separate directories - in excess of 500 unique directories. This does
>> make
T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
Can't we just nuke them both?
MS I don't care. Sun I would m
At 04:12 PM 6/26/03, Gerry Doris wrote:
> Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>>
>>>Off the top of my head I would suggest you create a script running in
>>> cron
>>>that checks for new files in the upload directly, if there are any, runs
>>> a
>>>virus
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
> >
> >
>
> Can't we just nuke them both?
MS I don
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:45:48PM -0400, Javier Gostling wrote:
>
> RHL9 on a P2/300 with 384 MB at home. Running as mail server, desktop,
> multiuser (there is a laptop that runs remote X sessions to the "big"
> machine), web proxy, firewall. Not blazing fast, but it gets the job done.
RHL 7.3
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:15:23PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 25-Jun-2003/11:49 -0700, "Bailo, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> >Any OSS projects to 're-invent' the wheel?
>
> Berlin (renamed to something else?).
It's now Fresco. http://www.fresco.org
HTH. HAND.
Thomas ;-)
--
Same here...
Having been influenced by what has been said in this thread, I decided to give a
try to WindowMaker / BlackBox / XCFE. As far as xfce is concerned, I only found
one RPM in SourceForge (and I don't think anything is missing).
I don't like too much, though - BlackBox seems to be my n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
Can't we just nuke them both?
--
Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of
Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments
Gerry Doris wrote:
Not really. Scan the whole system once an hour.
You could probably use permissions to hide the files until they were
scanned. Change their permissions after they pass the scan so your users
can see them.
Gerry
Could do that too.
--
Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Un
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:48:12PM +0200, Trond Hagen wrote:
> Is it any truth the rumors that 2.4.18 based enterprise kernel is in
> testing?
It's been out for quite a while>
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/SRPMS/
ncftp ...rise/2.1AS/en/os/SRPMS > ls -l ker
> Before you upgrade the kernel, did you upgrade raidtools to the latest
> version? Plus did you do all the other updates?
The raidtools RPM that's installed is version 0.90-24, which I'm assuming
is the latest since up2date doesn't mention it. As for all the other
updates, I'd have to say I've o
> Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>>
>>>Off the top of my head I would suggest you create a script running in
>>> cron
>>>that checks for new files in the upload directly, if there are any, runs
>>> a
>>>virus scan on them, and moves the finished file
I'm trying to build a PVR out of some older hardware with some measure of
success. I'm running RedHat 9 and have the console working just fine on my
T.V. When I run startx I get a blank screen however on my monitor I see my
GUI come up just fine.
I've been working with my XF86Config file. Tryin
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:36:34 +0200
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * and then Tom Pollerman declared
> > > I've just installed RH9 and am having a spot of bother with KDE.
> > > The main thing is that since I changed my resolution from 1024
> > > to 800x600 all my windows are very
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
Off the top of my head I would suggest you create a script running in cron
that checks for new files in the upload directly, if there are any, runs a
virus scan on them, and moves the finished files to either a quarantine
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
> Off the top of my head I would suggest you create a script running in cron
> that checks for new files in the upload directly, if there are any, runs a
> virus scan on them, and moves the finished files to either a quarantine
> director
Hi, I'm having big problems with creating files bigger than 2GB on a
reiserfs (3.6 format).
Spec: 2.4.9-e.24enterprise and ReiserFS version 3.6.25 [as module]
Is it any truth the rumors that 2.4.18 based enterprise kernel is in
testing?
My configuration looks like this:
IBM ESS (Enterprise Stor
> I know that Linux doesn't really have a virus problem, but my Linux FTP
> server is one of the key ways that Windows files make it into my
> company. I'm looking to integrated some sort of Wintel virus-scanning
> into wu-ftpd. Ideally, the incoming files would be virus-scanned right
> after the
Hi Ricky,
> The system is running Red Hat Linux 7.2. I am using Software-RAID for the root
> partition (/dev/hda3 and /dev/hdd1 as /dev/md0 RAID-1), and a standard ext3
> partition for /boot. I am also using kernel-2.4.9-34, but would like to
> upgrade as soon as possible.
Before you upgrade t
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:18, Javier Gostling wrote:
> Another issue (derived from the dual X sessions above) is scalability.
> How scalable is a compressing protocol? What would be the consequences
> of compressing data streams in a 50 user multiuser application server?
> My instincts tell me it
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:00, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> The spare CPU cycles only help if your bus can fill them. That's the
> meaning of the phrase you quote. A 1Ghz processor is no faster and has
> no more CPU cycles to spare than the 500Mhz processor (depending on the
> bus speed - some newer
Ed Wilts wrote:
I know that Linux doesn't really have a virus problem, but my Linux FTP
server is one of the key ways that Windows files make it into my
company. I'm looking to integrated some sort of Wintel virus-scanning
into wu-ftpd. Ideally, the incoming files would be virus-scanned right
aft
> I know that Linux doesn't really have a virus problem, but my Linux FTP
> server is one of the key ways that Windows files make it into my
> company. I'm looking to integrated some sort of Wintel virus-scanning
> into wu-ftpd. Ideally, the incoming files would be virus-scanned right
> after the
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:48:44AM -0700, Rick Warner wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:40, Javier Gostling wrote:
>
> >
> > It will depend on the specific situation. Compression will do lots of
> > good for bandwidth scarce situations, but on a LAN or standalone system
> > it will just waste CPU
I know that Linux doesn't really have a virus problem, but my Linux FTP
server is one of the key ways that Windows files make it into my
company. I'm looking to integrated some sort of Wintel virus-scanning
into wu-ftpd. Ideally, the incoming files would be virus-scanned right
after they're dropp
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:59:15AM +1000, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> emacs for a word processor...
Hmm... I think you mean emacs for a text editor and LaTeX for a word
processor... Now THAT almost scares even me... ;-)
Cheers,
--
Javier Gostling D.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
u
The spare CPU cycles only help if your bus can fill them. That's the
meaning of the phrase you quote. A 1Ghz processor is no faster and has
no more CPU cycles to spare than the 500Mhz processor (depending on the
bus speed - some newer buses go beyond this).
In addition, you mention servers as be
Gads,
Sorry for the typo's. Here's a corrected question...
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
remote_mai
Gads,
Sorry for the typo's. Here's a corrected question...
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
remote_mai
On 26-Jun-2003/11:47 -0400, David Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For some reason KDE has decided that today's maillog is an HTML file
>which means that it opens in Mozilla. So far, the only way to change the
>file properties that I can find is to add .txt (Postfix - fortunately -
>makes the chang
Rich,
Yes, that fixed it! Thank you!
I'm posting your advice on the lists so someone else can benefit.
Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't reply to the list, but anyway!
Alter your boot loader and append "noapic" to it, that should solve the
problem.
Generally speaking, you can ignore the
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:40, Javier Gostling wrote:
>
> It will depend on the specific situation. Compression will do lots of
> good for bandwidth scarce situations, but on a LAN or standalone system
> it will just waste CPU.
This is so lame. Any PC less than 2-3 years old and not being used
as
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:33:04AM -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:01, Bailo, John wrote:
> > C'mon? 'Pentium class' as in any Pentium???
>
> I run RH8 on a P100 w/64MB as a firewall. Works fine. For a desktop
> that's pushing it a bit ;) I'd say P2/400 minimum. RAM is re
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:27:19PM -0700, Rick Warner wrote:
>
> It is not IPC, which has a specific meaning. It is network
> communication. There is overhead, but it can be optimized. 10 years
> ago there was a battle over which competing compressed stream
> implementation to adopt. In the en
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:39:46AM -0700, Lazor, Ed wrote:
> Nope - no hard drive, just ram and rom. You flash the rom to upgrade the OS.
> Everything runs remotely through Citrix.
Actually, the HD vs. flash is not the issue here. It's the local boot of
WinCE (with associated license) vs. the net
Hi Jon, Fred,
> I think the problem is the 2.4 scheduler.
> 2.6 (and possibly RH9 has a patched 2.4) has an O(1)
> scheduler that should alleviate you.
The O(1) scheduler is also backported to the 2.4.20 kernel for RH 7.3.
> In addition, RH9 has a completely
> new threading implementation that
Hello,
I posted this to the sendmail list but know there're some very smart
folks here too!
remote_mail_server.com acts as a front end server and spam filter for
another domain's (relayed_domain.com) mail and then forwards it on to
the mail server at:
mailhost.relayed_domain.com
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:55, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> > and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
> > to configure.
>
> XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
> with the RPM's, there ar
Fred Whipple wrote:
I have a server running right now with about 250 processes. About 150
of those are Java VM processes, each with between 20-100 of its own
threads.
...
We're starting to see the server fail to execute new processes (such as
killall or shutdown!) with a "segmentation fault" an
I use primarily fluxbox. The install is just a tgz so its pretty simple. I
think the download file is about 500K...so its nice, small, yet powerful.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Todd A. Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
A. Sopicki wrote:
For example:
access to attribute=userPassword
by dn="cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com" write
by anonymous read
by self write
by * none
Not the best example, as it's almost certainly what you do *not* want to
do. How about this instead:
access to attri
Callan K L Tham said:
> http://konst.org.ua/centericq/
Wow, and here I was thinking it was going to be a unanimous vote for Gaim!
Actually, Centericq looks really intriguing. I've been hunting for a
text-mode AIM client for quite some time for use on my console-only Deb
laptop. This looks prom
If you screwed up the shell, specify it manually:
su -l -s /bin/bash
should force a bash shell.
--
Sen. Orrin Hatch thinks destroying private property to ensure bigger
campaign contributions from media cartels is "good politics." Let your
senators know that supporting corporate vigilant
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
> to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
with the RPM's, there are *way* too many of them to consider it a newbie
installation. L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Try Gaim.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim/
Eric
Gaim[0] freaking rocks! It support ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo (a few others),
multiple sign in's for the same protocol (I have 3 ICQ UIN's, 6 AIM
SN's, 2 Yahoo SN's and one MSN SN all signed in at once!). It's t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:45, Michael Kalus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messenger for Linux / Redhat?
>
> Trillian works great for Windows and Fire is great on MacOS X but I am not
> aware of anything for Linux, anybody her
Hi,
Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messenger for Linux / Redhat?
Trillian works great for Windows and Fire is great on MacOS X but I am not
aware of anything for Linux, anybody here is?
Thanks.
Check out GAIM. Works perfectly with MSN, Yahoo, Jabber, and many more...
--
*Eduardo S
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 13:45, Michael Kalus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messenger for Linux / Redhat?
>
> Trillian works great for Windows and Fire is great on MacOS X but I am not
> aware of anything for Linux, anybody here is?
Take a look at GAIM.
I don't remember
Michael Kalus said:
> Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messenger for Linux / Redhat?
Michael,
Try Gaim (http://gaim.sourceforge.net). It has a number of plugins that
allow it to connect to just about every IM and messaging protocol out
there. It works fine for me for AIM, Yahoo, ICQ, a
Michael,
Try Gaim.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gaim/
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kalus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Multi Protocol Instant Messenger?
Hi,
Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messeng
Hi,
Does anybody know of any Multi Protocol messenger for Linux / Redhat?
Trillian works great for Windows and Fire is great on MacOS X but I am not
aware of anything for Linux, anybody here is?
Thanks.
--
Michael Kalus
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
giovanna d said:
> The program is called NISP (neutron instrument simulation package),
> written in fortran, it's a family of monte carlo codes.
Giovanna,
What do your system logs say?
The total sum of my knowledge of Fortran could fit in less than a single
dendrite. Is it an interpreted langu
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:21, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 08:02, Rade Trimceski wrote:
> > Hello all --
> >
> > I'm running RH9 with kernel 2.5.72 on a Sony Vaio PCG-GRX600 (laptop).
> >
> > I can't get my touchpad to work, but it has worked on this machine under
> > RH8.
>
> It p
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 00:23, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> I agree with you there Mike, but things are getting better. I have also
> seen friends et al frown upon my linux offerings, but the bottom line is
> that things are getting better, slowly but surely.
>
> I must say that I have more confidence t
* and then Tom Pollerman declared
> > I've just installed RH9 and am having a spot of bother with KDE. The
> > main thing is that since I changed my resolution from 1024 to
> > 800x600 all my windows are very slightly off the screen on the right
> > side.
> >
> > Can anyone help with that ple
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:01, Bailo, John wrote:
> C'mon? 'Pentium class' as in any Pentium???
I run RH8 on a P100 w/64MB as a firewall. Works fine. For a desktop
that's pushing it a bit ;) I'd say P2/400 minimum. RAM is really the
key factor.
--
Cliff Wells, Software Engineer
Logiplex Corpo
I am working with a customer on this issue. He has an IBM x305 server,
Adaptec ultra 160 scsi controller, and a quantum atl superloader dlt drive.
Linux sees the drive as does the software he plans to use (arkeia). He is
able to do a status on the drive below and it shows ok if there is no tape
i
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
