RE: remote upgrade from Redhat 8.0 --> 9.0

2003-07-25 Thread Thornton Prime
> OK.. I'll bite... being realtively new to Linux..is there some doc you could > point me to that would in serious detail explain how to accomplish this The kickstart docs are part of the RHL Customization guide. http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/custom-guide/ As for gett

RE: remote upgrade from Redhat 8.0 --> 9.0

2003-07-25 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 20:35, bruce wrote: > Ed... > > Here's the situation... I have access to the boxes.. but they don't have a > separate monitor/keyboard... I've got ~15-20 servers... I'd rather not take > the CDs and stand in front of each one change the monitor/keyboard, etc... > or do a ftp/

Re: Setuid in rh9?

2003-06-17 Thread Thornton Prime
>> Works for me. Still works for me. You might want to re-check your code and take it to some perl mailinglist. > here is basically what it boils down to: > > bash-2.05b$more create > #! /usr/bin/suidperl > -rwsr-sr-x2 root root 531516 Jun 16 20:37 > /usr/bin/suidperl > > -rwsr-xr-

Re: Setuid in rh9?

2003-06-17 Thread Thornton Prime
> > Red Hat provides a setuid perl in the perl-setuid package. SetUID perl > > includes its own restrictions and security precautions. > > Yeah they sure do, except it doesnt work under any circumstance, no matter > what I do it says Can't do suid. Works for me. As mentioned, Perl has a number o

Re: Setuid in rh9?

2003-06-16 Thread Thornton Prime
> | The correct answer would've been, rebuild perl with setuid. > > No. The correct answer is to stay the hell away from setuid, > and use sudo which allows fine grained control. Red Hat provides a setuid perl in the perl-setuid package. SetUID perl includes its own restrictions and security pr

Re: plotting program

2002-12-17 Thread Thornton Prime
> Unfortunately it looks like gnuplot will not do what I need. > > I am trying to create a bar graph with the x labels being names instead > of numbers. The output needs to go to a standard graphic format i.e > png, jpg I'm no gnuplot expert, but I believe you can do both of those with gnuplot. (

Re: grub and .img files

2002-12-12 Thread Thornton Prime
> > Here is a portion of my grub.conf file and I am wondering how to make > the *.img files? (ie: /initrd-2.4.18-18.8.0.img) The easiest way is with the mkinitrd command. man mkinitrd for details. If you install or remove a RedHat kernel RPM it should add or remove associated initrd's. thor

RE: Logs

2002-12-09 Thread Thornton Prime
> Whether or not it's good depends on whether you find it useful. MRTG is > for traffic graphing, and SAR is for system activity reports. Cron > itself runs every minute, although cron jobs run when they're scheduled. I'd recommend running sar even if you don't know what it is. When you do need it

Re: Logs

2002-12-09 Thread Thornton Prime
> Im seeing the following in my apache logs. Can anyone tell me what this > means? > > Dec 9 07:00:00 Mordor CROND[13097]: (root) CMD (/usr/bin/mrtg > /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg) > Dec 9 07:00:00 Mordor CROND[13098]: (root) CMD (/usr/lib/sa/sa1 1 1) > Dec 9 07:01:00 Mordor CROND[13101]: (root) CMD (run

Re: The 'rm' command and non root users

2002-12-05 Thread Thornton Prime
> I am new to RED-HAT Linux but I was amazed at this behavior and can't > find anything on it. > > I created some dummy files as/owned by root on my WS with only "r" > permission bit set for group and world. Then I logged into the same box > as a dumb test user with no privileges and used "rm" to r

Re: Enabling python for cgi?

2002-12-02 Thread Thornton Prime
> i've decided to learn some python to do my cgi programming assignment. > However, when I try to run a basic script on my server, I am prompted > with a download box from mozilla. > this is the script: > > #!/usr/bin/python > print "Content-type: text/html\n\n" > print "Hello world\n" > >

Re: How to add a password to a compressed file

2002-11-11 Thread Thornton Prime
> As the topic, how can I add a password in a compressed file, .tar, > .gz. so I can protect it? tar c |gzip| gpg -c > archive.tar.gz.gpg archive --> compress --> encrypt --> output To de-crypt-compress-archive ... gpg -d archive.tar.gz.gpg | gzip -d | tar x thorn

Re: UDP and anonymous ports (RH ver8)

2002-11-11 Thread Thornton Prime
> After looking about for a while I found > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range > which would appear to allow you to set this range but each time I modify > the file and reboot the file gets changed back ! You don't need to reboot after changing /proc entries. They should take effect immediatel

Re: RH version upgrades automated?

2002-10-30 Thread Thornton Prime
>> been managing enterprise systems for about 20 years, is you should >> *never* do automated upgrades. You can certainly get automated I think this depends on context. If you have a cluster of a hundred nodes, moving from machine to machine with a stack of RH CDs doing manual upgrades and clic

Re: RH version upgrades automated?

2002-10-30 Thread Thornton Prime
> I am new to using RH for my business. I have "played" with it since ver > 4 and finally this year opened a new business and decided to use ver 7. > So my question is there a way to set up something that will allow > automated ver upgrades from the web, I heard something about this if you > belong

Re: Stupid question about SSH keys and security

2002-10-13 Thread Thornton Prime
> wrong ! With the public key and the root password known, > and files appropriately configured, the "attacker" won't > be prompted for a password. > > If the root password is known in any senario then "is all over" ! Can you clarify what you mean here? If you force key

Re: Stupid question about SSH keys and security

2002-10-13 Thread Thornton Prime
> If you have it set up like A -> B where A is your workstation and B is > your server so that A has your private key and B has your public key > what happens if you now want to log into another remote server C (A -> B > -> C)? Use agent forwarding. It will forward your key authentication-challe

Re: Stupid question about SSH keys and security

2002-10-10 Thread Thornton Prime
> > At least if you are using passwords they need to work out the other > > computer's passwords before they can SSH into them? > > Again, only if you create keys that have no passphrase. Also, if you are using a password to log into a server that's been compromised, they don't need to work out

Re: Redhat Network update unreliable

2002-09-25 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 06:05 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > SuSE you can select the miror to update from. Do I have to pay for > > service for this to get reliable? > > Yes > > OR > > You can try using autorpm or apt-get instead. OR You can set up your own RedHat Network compatible serve

Re: No video on intel 82845G/GL

2002-09-24 Thread Thornton Prime
I believe that support for this chipset only recently made it into the XFree86 CVS tree. You can either build it yourself or wait for XFree86 4.3 which will probably have it. thornton -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redha

Re: Cryptic message...

2002-09-19 Thread Thornton Prime
If I read this correctly, and making assumptions about your network topology and system configuration ... You are doing IPTables logging on your firewall and you are intercepting a port-unreachable replies from 210.11.68.47 for 204.144.132.162 which attempted to send a UDP packet to port 62408

RE: up2date

2002-09-18 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 12:08, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: > Is there a command line version like up2date? Yes, 'up2date' :) up2date will only run in GUI mode if it detects it has a X display and if the up2date-gnome package is installed. You can force text mode with the --nox option. thornton

Re: Why are apps made the way they are?

2002-09-18 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 12:28, Paul DiMarco wrote: > ...so I assume I need to install those other things first. But that isn't > my problem, my beef is why don't rpm files have all the libraries included > in them? Wouldn't that make our lives easier? I am I the only one who > finds this strange

Re: Adding a disk drive

2002-09-11 Thread Thornton Prime
> Adding a disk driveI'm coming to Linux from a platform where incorporating > additional storage could be as simple as plugging in the drive and > configuring it in online as part of any volume set. > Things don't seem as easy on Linux. I have a RH 7.3 system that was created > with one disk dri

RE: IBM ServeRAID + RedHat 7.2 + SMP = Insanity

2001-12-19 Thread Thornton Prime
I'm working with IBM to narrow the problem down. So far it only happens on SMP machines with ServeRAID and only with specific bit patterns. I haven't tried RH 7.1 yet, but that is on my list. thornton On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Jon Hoffman wrote: > I would like to know if this is a problem. I am ge

IBM ServeRAID + RedHat 7.2 + SMP = Insanity

2001-12-18 Thread Thornton Prime
I have been running into weird database corruption issues on my IBM boxes using RedHat 7.2 and ServeRAID. I finally copied the files from one machine to another and did MD5 sums. If I copy from a non-IBM RAID to a non-IBM RAID the md5sums match, good. If I copy from a non-IBM RAID to an IBM RA

Re: Netbios-ns

2001-05-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 3 May 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > Ok..:-) Just checking. :-) There was a dsl machine that sent me about half a > dozen of these puppies to my desktop machine at work (NO samba! ) For the > life of me I can't figure out why that machine was even trying to talk to my > workstation... so I

Re: Netbios-ns

2001-05-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 3 May 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > Are there any known vulnerabilities in RH 6.2 (if you're not running bind) > for netbios-ns? I've noticed a rash of "dgram to netbios-ns" in my logfiles > lately and I"m wondering if it's because of some known vulnerability or > what I get the usual

Re: what is wrong with root login for ssh2

2001-05-02 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:37:43AM -0400, Statux a ecrit: > > > > I thought that root logins were the reason why people recommend ssh in > > the first place. Is there something I don't know? :) > > This is just a guess but it must be easier to "steal

Re: root SSH login

2001-05-01 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Robert Reyes wrote: > Can I disable root login on SSH? if so, how can I do it? With openssh, in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file, modify the PermitRootLogin parameter. The values are yes, no, without-password and forced-commands-only. Yes and no are obvious. without-password

Re: Telnet disabled by default

2001-05-01 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 1 May 2001, David Talkington wrote: > >I have yet to see a real case made for using telnet over ssh. > > I don't disagree with you at all in principle, but you assume that the > administrator controls the clients, which in the ISP business, isn't > true. To provide public services, clea

Re: Telnet disabled by default

2001-05-01 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Kyle Hargraves wrote: > > ..mmm - well of course ssh is more secure than telnet but > in a secure network (i.e. non public) with a need for telnet > access to a host by PCs there is an argument for telnet. I must take strong exception with this idea. System

Re: Telnet disabled by default

2001-05-01 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Clarence Donath wrote: > I just installed RH7.1 selecting no firewall. Network access from the machine > is fine, but I cannot telnet to it at all. This is the first time I've ever > installed Linux and have not been able to telnet right away. You would think > that select

Re: traceroute and sendmail quit working

2001-04-20 Thread Thornton Prime
At 06:55 PM 4/20/01 -0600, you wrote: >Within the last week my mail quit sending out. I get messages saying "No >route to host". Mail works internally so it does send, it is a routing >error. When I run a traceroute to an outside address, it does nothing. >Telnet, ftp, www etc all work fine. I h

Re: scanning the scanner

2001-04-17 Thread Thornton Prime
More likely, that person is 0wn3d by someone who thinks they are 31337. They are launching attacks against other machines from a machine they've comprimised. You should notify the maintainer of that IP. thornton On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, kelsey wrote: > Chances are, that box is running portwatch

Re: Download versus Purchase

2001-04-16 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Watt, Tom (CXO) wrote: > Are the ISO images for 7.1 available for download IDENTICAL to the contents > that will be on the installation CD's? If not, what is the difference? Yes and no. The RH images are the complete images of the freely distributable software discs. RedH

Re: advantage of partitions and RAID

2001-04-13 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, IS wrote: > I mean besides the Linux native and swap partition for what reason should I > make partitions for /boot /home /usr /var etc. > > Once you setup the filesystem with all those partions what happens with the > size of the filesystems when I add a new disk to my RAID

Re: Telnetting

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Bryan Fields wrote: > I don't know what the Canadian Gov says about encryption over amateur radio > packet, but I know that in the FCC says it is illegal to do it. Of course i > am assuming this is going to be used over amateur radio. Openssh uses the openssl libraries, wh

Re: DNS names with "_"

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, David Brett wrote: > Does anybody know of a way to allow DNS names with "_" in them? I have a > number of servers with an underscore in them. It is going to take a lot > of work to make the change by a large number people. They aren't RFC compliant. Your best bet is to u

Re: 2.4.3 w/ ipchains?

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Thornton Prime wrote: > > > It should be a compile time kernel option to support ipchains. > > The question is - which option? I'm going over the options (again) right > now, trying to find it. Select [*

Re: 2.4.3 w/ ipchains?

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > I just realized that I can't run ipchains with kernel 2.4.3 (it says > it's incompatible). Did I just forget to turn on an option in the > kernel config, or is ipchains no longer supported in the 2.4.x series? > (I probably should read up on

Re: Re: Telnetting

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
With xinetd, you should be able to copy /etc/xinet.d/telnet to /etc/xinet.d/telnet2 and then copy add a line in /etc/services that says telnet2 24/tcp One instance of xinetd should be fine to serve telnet on both ports 23 and 24. thornton On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Mike Chambers wrote: >

Re: Telnetting

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > Yup on the SSH. But I am not sure that SSH will work over Packet Radio. > Whereas Telnet does. But it is a good thought.. If it uses TCP, then it will work with ssh. There is a little bit more overhead, so you might see more latency, but you might be a

RE: Telnetting

2001-04-11 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > Thanks for the response. I just did a grep to see if xinetd is running. > Here is what I see: > > [root@mach3 init.d]# ps ax | grep xinetd > 814 ? S 0:00 xinetd -stayalive -reuse -pidfile /var/run/xinetd.pid > > Does that look right? Looks go

Re: Telnetting

2001-04-10 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > > So - what am I missing that will allow telnetting to my system. Here is the > error people see: > > [ve1drg@mach3 ve1drg]$ telnet 142.176.139.108 > Trying 142.176.139.108... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused Run "chkconfig

Re: telnetd

2001-04-10 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > It seems that RedHat7 comes with no means of people being able to telnet to > it. I presume one has to download a telnet package to made this possible? If you install the RedHat with the server option, it will install the telnet-server package by defau

Re: Root read only access to inetd.conf

2001-04-09 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, A. Gent wrote: > I have a very strange problem: on a RH 6.2 box I can > not edit the inetd.conf file as root. > I can not mv, rm or chowm it, either. lsattr to check the Linux filesystem attributes. If you didn't set those attributes, someone else probably did to keep you ou

Re: passwd/shadow

2001-04-09 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Diogo Saad wrote: > What kind of encryption is used in the /etc/shadow file ?? MD5 > Is there a function in php that encrypts a string the same way the shadow > files does? Probably, though you might be better off exec'ing passwd. > What I wanna make is a php page that ch

RE: root remote login

2001-04-09 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Ward William E DLDN wrote: > Openssh doesn't work for this properly for various reasons; logging in as > a different user and su'ing is fine for sysadmin duties, but doesn't work > for automated logins... so my choice is to modify my config files to > allow root logins. Mayb

Re: RedHat - Quo Vadis

2001-04-08 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Lee Johnson wrote: > > I'm must admit to tiring of core dumps myself albeit willing to admit it > might be my current system and how i have it setup.. > > are there any things to do to avoid this or sytem tweaks ? ... Core dumps are the sign of a program bug or a mis-matched

Re: RedHat - Quo Vadis

2001-04-08 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote: > You buy any RH and it is full of something that's not working; --it's a > sh..t ??? It sounds like you've had a bad experience. Rather than complaining and blaming RedHat, I'd suggest you stand up, take a little responsibility for your open sour

Re: root remote login

2001-04-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jerry Garrison wrote: > Thanks to all of you for all the suggestions and caveats. I've been told > that, in this circumstance, ssh is not an option. At least now, maybe I can > convince people to just leave it the way it is. Argh. I've heard the "we can't use ssh" mantra

Re: root remote login

2001-04-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Thornton Prime wrote: > There is an O'Reilly book on the subject of SSH, and I can't recommend it > highly enough, especially for folks just learning to use SSH: > > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/sshtdg/ One of the online chapters has a full desc

Re: root remote login

2001-04-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 4/6/01 08:19 AM -0700, you wrote: > >Replacing password logins with RSA/DSA key logins makes your system hard > >as nails. > > Directions, pointers, hints, gotchas, suggestions, HOWTO's, documentation...? Your ssh documentation should have full in

Re: root remote login

2001-04-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Nitebirdz wrote: > > > > Red Hat told me that logging in remotely as root had been turned off in RH > > 6.2 for security reasons. Anyone know where the file is to turn it back on? > > I believe it's the /etc/securetty file. It is also tied to your pam configuration. PAM conf

Re: New worm to affect RH

2001-04-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, David Talkington wrote: > Sure. If I had root on your system and wanted your passwords, it'd be > a whole lot easier to capture your keystrokes and upload your > passwords than it would be to upload your shadow file and run a > cracker on it. Most bad people will probably d

RE: New worm to affect RH

2001-04-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > Speaking of this > Checking my logs lately, I've been seeing a TON of "print request from [ip]" Op. Yep. One of the worms also exploits lpr. > which is usually some remote IP, often in a foreign country. Is this indicative > of a new exploit? I'm r

RE: New worm to affect RH

2001-04-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Our firewall is set to deny all inbound connection requests (SYN packets?). > Am I right in assuming that the worm couldn't get in? In all these worm cases, yes. It is worth noting that a SYN defense firewall is not impervious to all types of attac

RE: New worm to affect RH

2001-04-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry to be a pain, I'm coming in on this discussion half way through. I > was just wondering, this worm has to be executed to infect, right? It > relies on social engineering? No. Worms traditionally exploit known vulnerabilities in network serv

Re: IMAP server setup - need guidance

2001-04-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote: > Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly > Sendmail book? No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: IMAP server setup - need guidance

2001-04-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote: > I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by > safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to educate myself > more. It's not part of sendmail, but the default RH sendmail config delivers through procmail. Procmail

Re: IMAP server setup - need guidance

2001-04-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote: > The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and URL > forwarding. BUT...all the mail forwarding goes to a single e-mail address. > When the mail arrives for 4 different users into the same mail spool, can > Sendmail place the mail into the

Re: Bypassing DHCP on cable modem?

2001-03-30 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Steve Gulick wrote: > I just got cable hooked up to my office with @home and they are using DCHP > to assign ip addresses. Is there a wat to bypass this and maintain a static > ip? I also have @home in my home office and have had a static ip for a few > years now. It would m

Re: boot disk

2001-03-28 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jerry Human wrote: > I have just reinstalled RH 7.0 but this time it wouldn't creat a boot > disk. The old boot disk doesn't work. RH is on /dev/hda4, how can I > start RH to make a boot disk? Boot to the CD, or install floppy. At the prompt type linux root=/dev/hda4. It sh

Re: Change partition access permission

2001-03-27 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Sergey V. Golovchenko wrote: > Is there any way to change permission from read-only to not read-only for root (/) >partition? i am using redhat 6.1 If your system starts up correctly, it should have mounted read-write. You can verify this with the mount command. If it did

Re: Possibility to avoid passwd change for root?

2001-03-26 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > Just read the thread on how to create a new password for root (entering > single user mode, writing "linux single" at the lilo prompt then typing > "passwd" etc. ... > > How can I prevent this, because this possibility (as convenient it may be > fo

RE: [RHSA-2001:008-02] Updated vim packages available

2001-03-25 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Liguo Song wrote: > It is not the right version. The one updated is vim-5.7-8.src.rpm, > and others. The one at valinux site is vim-5.7-0.6x.src.rpm > > I am just wondering whether is violates the GPL is Red Hat fails to > provide the SRPM for that package. It would, but vi

Re: Sorry if this is already known

2001-03-24 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Miroslav Skoric wrote: > 1.) If I am logged on NT machine as an ordinary , I get a content > of /home/ directory. This is good, right? > 2.) If I am logged on NT machine as "administrator", I get not only the > stuff under /home/ directory, but 'hidden' stuff as well > (dir

Re: Chown Question

2001-03-23 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Marcus Ouimet wrote: > Is it possible to specify multiple owners (not groups, but actual users) to > a file or directory using chown? Ahy help appreciated. It is not in the > manual pages so I assuming it can't be done. No. Not with normal POSIX permissions. The eas

Re: Centralized X server

2001-03-22 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > Keep us posted on how it goes. If you deside to add some diskless > workstations, you may want to look into the Linux Terminal Server > project. You may also want look in the archives of the LVS project. I remember someone posting there that he

Re: PAM and openSSH 2.5.1p2 in redhat 6.2

2001-03-22 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jeremy Herbison wrote: > I installed openSSH 2.5.1p2 (compiled from source) on my redhat 6.2 (with > the updated PAM rpm installed) and it now denies all passwords when i try to > remote in. I know it is not a problem with the sshd.conf file since i have > tried pretty much

Re: OT: Anybody else gettin' sick of Ballmer's BS?

2001-03-21 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > Here's what Micro$oft said about the matter themselves: > > http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/web/news/msnw/Hotmail.asp Ouch. That made my side hurt from laughing too much. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing

Re: OT: Anybody else gettin' sick of Ballmer's BS?

2001-03-21 Thread Thornton Prime
On 21 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > "jack wallen, jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The site www.hotmail.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000. > > That only say what the front web server is running... the back is > still running on Solaris, AFAIR. Microsoft's woes

Re: FTP automatic scriting with security

2001-03-21 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andrew So Hing-pong wrote: > I would like to write a ftp scripting for automation some jobs > with security. I know someone MUST suggest using scp2 or sftp2etc. Obligatatory "use scp, stfp, or rsync over ssh" statement. > But based on the user's requirement, I must usi

Re: attack !! how to fix

2001-03-21 Thread Thornton Prime
Unauthorized means they were rejected, so you are safe for now. You really should only run portmap if you absolutely need to (it is almost exclusively used for NFS). If you do run it, I'd recommend you set up a firewall. thornton On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Steve Lee wrote: > I dont think this is hap

Re: Dumb question about web serving

2001-03-20 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Thornton Prime wrote: > > Another option is thttpd, which should be smaller ... but isn't? Well, it isn't all that much smaller. The smallest option would be to set her homepage to a static file on her machine or on a shared files

Re: Dumb question about web serving

2001-03-20 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, fred smith wrote: > I'd further like to set up her netscrape so its default page is some > kind of static page on my Linux box, but I haven't a clue how to do it. > (With the idea that doing that will keep netscape from causing diald to > bring up the link to the ISp every ti

Re: Big problem

2001-03-20 Thread Thornton Prime
Please don't ask this on an Apache list. It is in no way Apache specific. This is normal HTTP/HMTL behavior, and if you want to override it you have to do some stupid JavaScript tricks. You might also be able to fix it with some silly CGI or by pre-caching the image on a previous page, but again

Re: Curiosity

2001-03-12 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > RedHat sells a number of "bundles", e.g., IBM Small Business Server, Lotus > Domino Application Sever, HP Open Mail (probably ought to drop that one as > HP has). All are bundles with RH 6.2 rather than RH 7.0. Is there a > message here we should

Re: Question Regarding Concept of Linux "Patch"

2001-03-07 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Madison, Ryan wrote: > Can someone explain how patching relates to RedHat Linux. I have > seen recent messages about up2date, which from my knowledge seems to upgrade > just the kernel. up2date is fully capable of upgrading any rpm installed software. > W

Re: Pdf files with Linux

2001-03-05 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any tool around for Linux that reads pdf files ?? Adobe has an acrobat reader for Linux. gv and ggv both work on the majority of pdf files. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Wierd password problem - root linked to user login.

2001-03-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Rilindo Foster wrote: > Feb 27 22:35:35 redhserver rpc.statd[360]: gethostbyname error for > ^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿b750 8049710 8052c28687 ... > Feb 27 22:38:20 redhserver adduser[3642]: new user: name=sql, uid=0, gid=0, > home=/bin, shell=/bin/bash DAN

Re: OT: Are you a Linux sys admin?

2001-03-03 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Marco Shaw wrote: > I'm curious to hear from people on this list that are Linux sys admins. I'm > not looking to read your resume, but would love to hear about your work > history over the last 2 years or so in about 3-5 lines. For the last 5 years I've been working in posit

Re: How does "fork()" work?

2001-02-28 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Living Dead wrote: > To put it in another way: > If I allocate 32Mb of memory in the parent process, > then I call fork(), the amount of memory needed for > both parent and child is 64Mb? The way Linux works, no, each child doesn't make a full copy in memory. Linux uses a

Re: openssh & net-pf-10

2001-02-28 Thread Thornton Prime
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Michael Ghens wrote: > modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-10 > > What module is this for? ipv6? thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: unix sys

2001-02-23 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Gustav Schaffter wrote: > > It's been up continuiously since I upgraded to the 2.4.0 kernel. The > > notable thing about mine is that there is no UPS and I live in California, > > and this is my desktop system, that my 5 year old and 3 year old pound on > > and play games on

Re: unix sys

2001-02-22 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Thornton Prime wrote: > > > > > The only legitimate reason for rebooting a Unix system would be for a > > kernel upgrade. > > > > Anything else should and is viewed as a bug in the OS.

Re: unix sys

2001-02-22 Thread Thornton Prime
The only legitimate reason for rebooting a Unix system would be for a kernel upgrade. Anything else should and is viewed as a bug in the OS. thornton On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Mahalakshmi wrote: > > here's a problem 'bout unix . > > Is there any limitation for UNIX machines that they should be re

Re: blackhole firewall rules

2001-02-17 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, SoloCDM wrote: > > You've never had a cracker break through the ipchains REJECT? It is no more possible than it is for them to break through a rule with DENY. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://list

Re: blackhole firewall rules

2001-02-17 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, SoloCDM wrote: > Why the story? Ipchains has reject and from all appearances it allows > the worm, as it so happened long ago, into the system. Deny doesn't > seem to entertain any thought of accepting anything. In fact, it > seems to baffle bad or good systems into not kn

Re: Which port bind by which process

2001-02-15 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Andrew So Hing-pong wrote: > Hi Forks, > > Anyone knows any freeware which can listed down which > port is "bind" by which process. netstat does it. netstat -altup will give you a nice list. thornton ___ Redhat-list mailing l

Re: Secure file sharing?

2001-02-14 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, kevin wrote: > Just a quick question. What's the best way to support file > sharing over the internet? > > I know all about the security nightmares of NFS/SMB/NCP so > it looks like I'm stuck with ftp. My problem is that my lusers > have enough problems remembering to insert

Re: extract file from RPM

2001-02-13 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Uday Pai wrote: > Hi all, > Is there any option to extract a file from a rpm? Yes ... no ... rpms store files basically in cpio format. You can use the rpm2cpio command to convert an rpm to cpio format and then pipe the results through cpio to extract the file you want. t

Re: Routing problems (home network setup)

2001-02-09 Thread Thornton Prime
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adahma wrote: > I have a cable modem connected to my Red Hat 7 box on eth0, and eth1 > connecting to a 5 port hub which I'd like to setup on the 192.168 > private ip's and do masqerading for. Here's my applicable files: ... snip ... (looks fine) > I do have masqerading rul

Re: windows doc to linux ???

2001-02-08 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, eric clover wrote: > is there anything that will convert a windows doc made with word into some > kind of linux format? here at work(windows machine) i'd like to be able to > make a doc and xfer it to home convert it to some linux format and print it > out on my home(linux) m

RE: DNS named permissions

2001-02-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, David Brett wrote: > Who should have the permissions. Right now only root has write > permissions to this directory. Named typically will run as user 'named' so make sure the directory (and probably all the files) are read-writeable by named. It probably makes sense to have

Re: kernel headers in RH7.0?

2001-02-06 Thread Thornton Prime
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Scott Sharkey wrote: > Is it just me, or is the kernel-header package in rh7.0 actually a > 2.4 header, but with a 2.2.16 kernel? I just compiled a module that > I need, and now it's complaining about the version mismatch. I know > I can force the module, but why is RedHat

Re: dual monitors

2001-02-05 Thread Thornton Prime
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Tom Heibel wrote: > Which dual head video card are you using? We are trying to get the Matrox > G450 to work, but have had no luck. I was using two different Matrox cards. I think there are still issues with the G450 that are worked out in newer releases. thornton

Re: Routes

2001-02-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote: > > The IP for the W2K machine is 205.150.20.254. And I checked it out myself it > > has the same gateway and netmask... > > > Well, you can always cheat and make the netmask > 255.255.255.0.:-) Microsoft does

Re: Routes

2001-02-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, John Aldrich wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Anthony Capone wrote: > > Hi Gurus! > > > > I have a question! I have a redhat system. When I setup the basic host > > information ie: IP address, Netmask and Gateway. Then I restart the system. > > If I try to ping the gateway, I ge

  1   2   >