ii/intnotes.htm##Mixed%20Pro
cessor%20Steppings). If somebody has such a reference about athlon dual
systems please send it back.
Bye,
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo!
End all weapons of mass destruction.
--
redhat-l
On Saturday 13 September 2003 15:24, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > Have you tried swapping the cpu's? Not sure if the 2 cpu's should be
> > identical. See the MB docs for that.
No, I haven't tried it... But I don't think this could be a problem, except in
case of some weird bug somewhere (B
> Hello niteowl,
> Have you tried swapping the cpu's? Not sure if the 2 cpu's should be
> identical. See the MB docs for that.
When googling for this I find references that at least for Pentium's the
stepping of cpu's in dual processor boards must be identical in most cases.
Guess that might
Hello niteowl,
> I have a very strange problem on my dual Athlon MP system since CPU
> initialization seems to be performed in a random way. In about 50% of
> bootstraps the kernel manages to correctly enable the second CPU, in the
> other 50% not.
I have no idea what causes th
Hello all.
I have a very strange problem on my dual Athlon MP system since CPU
initialization seems to be performed in a random way. In about 50% of
bootstraps the kernel manages to correctly enable the second CPU, in the
other 50% not. In the former case the system is rock solid, in the latter
recognized my AMD Athlon K7 mobile microprocessor and used a i686
kernel so, does Redhat Linux 9 supports Athlon archiquecture? Tranks.
Francisco, Barcelona-SPAIN. (sorry about my english).
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
recognized my AMD Athlon K7 mobile microprocessor and used a i686
kernel so, does Redhat Linux 9 supports Athlon archiquecture? Tranks.
Francisco, Barcelona-SPAIN. (sorry about my english).
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> so now down to the question. whats the difference between a dual
> athlon xp system and a dual athlon mp system besides a >huge< price
> difference? the dual mp motherboards are twice as expensive...as are
> the athlon mp processors.
The mp has been configured
Greetings,
The XP and MP lines are drastically different architectures, although they
use the same core.
The MP in Athlon MP means Multi-processing and it is a server chip from
start to finish, hence its higher price tag. If you aren't doing any server
specific things that requir
27;s).
Where do I get friends like yours? The "old" stuff I got is P166...
> so now down to the question. whats the difference between a dual athlon xp
> system and a dual athlon mp system besides a >huge< price difference?
Athlon MP is certified to work in dual-CP
node linux cluster (just old cheap 500 mhz
p3's). thats fun to play around with for distributed stuffs, but now i want
a dual cpu system to play around with shared memory parallel programming.
so now down to the question. whats the difference between a dual athlon xp
system and a dual a
Cannon, Andrew wrote:
I was wondering if there are any C or Fortran compilers out there that are
optimised for the Athlon and i686 architectures? I've discovered that the
GNU compilers are half the speed (literally) of the Intel Windows compilers.
(I did a test on a program that runs under
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Cannon, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there are any C or Fortran compilers out there that are
> optimised for the Athlon and i686 architectures? I've discovered that the
> GNU compilers are half the speed (literally) of the Intel Windows c
optimizations, data sets,
and after all this test, i decide on the plataform to use.
hope it helps.
raymundo
Cannon, Andrew wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if there are any C or Fortran compilers out there that are
optimised for the Athlon and i686 architectures? I've discovered that th
Hi all,
I was wondering if there are any C or Fortran compilers out there that are
optimised for the Athlon and i686 architectures? I've discovered that the
GNU compilers are half the speed (literally) of the Intel Windows compilers.
(I did a test on a program that runs under Linux and Wi
Greetings,
I'll buy one new Pc like this:
AMD MP 2000+;
RAM 512MB DDR PC 266;
02 Hard Disk 60 GB 7200;
Vídeo Ge Force 2MX400 64M;
CD-RW LG 48x48x16;
DVD 16X LG;
LG Flatron 701FT;
Do you have an experience using this Dual processor?
=
[]'s
Lúcio Costa
Linux user #204519
"We do what we can,
I have an XP2100+ with an MSI motherboard running RedHat 8.0
Works great.
dhardison
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David H
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMD Athlon XP2000+ OK?
Morning,
I am
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:34:03AM -0800, David H wrote:
>
> I am trying to upgrad my computer. Does anyone know
> AMD Athlon XP2000+ works with RedHat 8.0, with
> everything installed?
FWIW, I have an Athlon XP2100 running RHL 7.3 .
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubs
My XP1800 does I don't see why the newer ones wouldn't.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: David H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMD Athlon XP2000+ OK?
Morning,
I am trying to upgrad my computer. Does anyon
Morning,
I am trying to upgrad my computer. Does anyone know
AMD Athlon XP2000+ works with RedHat 8.0, with
everything installed?
Thanks,
David
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
cessfully build a kernel before
> adding the win4lin patches and so I DLed the latest kernel source from
> updates.redhat.com, 2.4.18-19.7.x and installed it.
>
> I then copied the athlon config file from the configs dir and ran make
> menuconfig to make sure I was seeing the corre
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 00:21, Peter Davie wrote:
> Hi Bret,
> An alternative approach that worked for me: I've set up an Athlon-based
> machine (not a laptop) using the Up2date utility. I installed the
> standard RH CDs and then when up2date ran it automatically detected
Hi Bret,
An alternative approach that worked for me: I've set up an Athlon-based machine (not a laptop) using the Up2date utility. I installed the standard RH CDs and then when up2date ran it automatically detected the new kernel requirements and downloaded them. The machine is running
, 2.4.18-19.7.x and installed it.
I then copied the athlon config file from the configs dir and ran make
menuconfig to make sure I was seeing the correct .config file and sure
enough, the athlon stuff was selected.
I added test to the release name in the specfile and ran
rpmbuild -ba kernel-2.4
You need to add it to your kernel boot-up. It depends on if you use
grub or lilo.
in lilo you will add an 'append="mem=3Dnopentium"
in grub, add it to your kernel line for each kernel you have i.e:
[/boot/grub/menu.lst]
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-4SGI_XFS_1.1 rw root=/dev/hda3 hdc=ide-scsi
dev
My box crashes every twenty minutes or so and I was
told that addeding "mem=nopentium" somewhere fixes that. Where do I add
that? FYI I'm running Red Hat 8.0 with the latest kernel updates from Red
Hat.
Thnx,
~Christopher
RH 8.0 doesn't want to install:
Processor Athlon XP 1900+ stepping 02
Board: ECS Elitegroup K7VMM, VIA KM266 chipset
While booting from the RH 8.0 - CD 1, the kernel hangs after the following
message:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ stepping 02
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Ena
gt;
> > Kernel Panic: Unable to continue
> >
> > The notebook seizes at this point and requires a hard reset (it's
> > got a reset button on the bottom of the case).
> >
> > Possibly relevant hardware information: mobile Athlon XP1800+,
> > 512MB PC2
.
>
> The words on the screen are: Bank 3: b400083b at 0001fc0003b0
>
> Kernel Panic: Unable to continue
>
> The notebook seizes at this point and requires a hard reset (it's got
> a reset button on the bottom of the case).
>
> Possibly relevant hardware informat
.
Possibly relevant hardware information: mobile Athlon XP1800+, 512MB
PC2100 DDR RAM, 40GB IBM HD, DVD-ROM/CD-RW.
Any ideas? I'll be trying a copy of 7.3 tonight to see if there's any
difference.
Thanks,
John
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
I wrote:
> You probably want to install and run hdparm
>
Arg. Of course I meant lm_sensors there.
Duane
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Andrew Benton wrote:
> I am planning on building a computer with the AMD
> Athlon XP 2200+ 1.8 GHZ processor and I am wondering
> if I will be able to run linux on it. I specifically
> am looking at the ASUS A7V333 Motherboard which
> supports PC2700 DDR SDRAM and has an integ
I am planning on building a computer with the AMD
Athlon XP 2200+ 1.8 GHZ processor and I am wondering
if I will be able to run linux on it. I specifically
am looking at the ASUS A7V333 Motherboard which
supports PC2700 DDR SDRAM and has an integrated
Promise 20276 RAID controller. If there are
B. Bales wrote -
> This might be of some help.
>
> Try to start the install by typing "linux mem=128m" or "linux
> mem=64m" This worked for me.
>
> Another person with the same problem wrote to say he turned off
> everything in the bios and started turning them back on until it
>failed. It
002 02:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > A buddy of mine has a rather peculiar problem: he can install RH 7.1 on
> > > his home system but 7.2 and 7.3 bomb out. Soltec motherboard with
> > > athlon CPU. Anybody have any clues? A google search only came up with
> > &g
** Reply to message from Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 May 2002
10:56:10 +0200
> On 10/05 2002 02:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A buddy of mine has a rather peculiar problem: he can install RH 7.1 on
> > his home system but 7.2 and 7.3 bomb out. Soltec mo
On 10/05 2002 02:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A buddy of mine has a rather peculiar problem: he can install RH 7.1 on
> his home system but 7.2 and 7.3 bomb out. Soltec motherboard with athlon
> CPU. Anybody have any clues? A google search only came up with some hits
> about radi
Where does it bomb out at?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RH no install on athlon board
A buddy of mine has a rather peculiar problem: he can install RH 7.1 on
his home system
A buddy of mine has a rather peculiar problem: he can install RH 7.1 on
his home system but 7.2 and 7.3 bomb out. Soltec motherboard with athlon
CPU. Anybody have any clues? A google search only came up with some hits
about radi controllers being a problem.
jb
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Darryl Harvey wrote:
> If I have an Athlon CPU, what advantages do I get from running the
> Athlon kernel ?? Is it more stable? Faster? Optimised??
Ummm...more lockups, random segfaults, and probably data corruption.
Compile with K6 optimizations until the kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 29 April 2002 10:21 pm, Darryl Harvey wrote:
> If I have an Athlon CPU, what advantages do I get from running the
> Athlon kernel ?? Is it more stable? Faster? Optimised??
The Athlon kernel is optimized for the Athlon CPU.
If you
If I have an Athlon CPU, what advantages do I get from running the
Athlon kernel ?? Is it more stable? Faster? Optimised??
What disadvantages do I get if I do NOT use it and stick with the
standard kernel???
Thanks
Darryl
___
Redhat-list mailing
Has the Redhat kernel-smp-2.4.9-31.athlon.rpm been patched to fix
the apic error message occuring with some new motherboards
(particularly the asus 7m266-d)?
Is there any penalty incurred by booting with -noapic ?
Alternatively it has been suggested to set the MPS to 1.1 from the
1.4 table
: Re: Athlon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:34
* Mike Burger said
> You should be able to..in fact, you should be able to install i586 RPMs on
> an Athlon system. The trick comes if you try to install i686 binaries.
I thought Athlon'
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Burger
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Athlon
Well, if you're not planning on changing processors, you can probably go
to the Athlon binaries and be happy
Well, if you're not planning on changing processors, you can probably go
to the Athlon binaries and be happy.
If you think there's a chance that you might have to change hardware, you
might want to stick with the i386/586 binaries for compatibility's sake.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002
Some of the Not to my knowledge. They *may* be 686 compatible, but i686
processors are actually Pentium Pro, Pentium 2, Pentium III and Pentium
IV. There have been a number of issues with people trying to run i686
binaries on Athlon processors.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote
Hi,
With an Athlon XP, Redhat installation , installed i686 binaries.
Is it better to change kernel and binaries to Athlon or i586/386 ?
--
Cedric
Quoting Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You should be able to..in fact, you should be able to install i586 RPMs
> on
> an Athl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:34
* Mike Burger said
> You should be able to..in fact, you should be able to install i586 RPMs on
> an Athlon system. The trick comes if you try to install i686 binaries.
I thought Athlon's were 686?
- --
You should be able to..in fact, you should be able to install i586 RPMs on
an Athlon system. The trick comes if you try to install i686 binaries.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Gordon Stewart wrote:
> Dear List
>
> Can you install i386 RPMs on an Athlon system?
&g
erm yes in a word...
thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Athlon
> Dear List
>
> Can you install i386 RPMs o
Dear List
Can you install i386 RPMs on an Athlon system?
Gordon
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has had success running redhat linux on Elite
Athlon PC's (these are getting quite cheap on Ubid). I called ElitePC and
they used to support it, but do not any longer. I have tried to check the
hardware lists, but can find no references. Any help apprec
Hi Bill and Stu,
> Just clarifying, what kernel did you select for the installation?
I am not sure you can choose this, but by default the i686 kernel will be
installed. So an easy fix could be to install the i586 kernel (boot from CD,
mount the filesystem containing /boot, in
> I am trying to install RedHat 6.2 on a machine running an Athlon
> > Thunderbird 850MHz (Socket A), with an Asus A7V motherboard.
> > The installation programs works fine but once thr process is complete
> > and I try to boot into my new OS the kernel crashes with a general
For those that are interested, I found the solution by using the
parameter 'x86_serial_nr=1' at the lilo prompt. I can then atleast get
into the system and rebuild the kernel to remove the problem.
Stu Owen wrote:
> I am trying to install RedHat 6.2 on a machine running an Athlon
I am trying to install RedHat 6.2 on a machine running an Athlon
Thunderbird 850MHz (Socket A), with an Asus A7V motherboard.
The installation programs works fine but once thr process is complete
and I try to boot into my new OS the kernel crashes with a general
protection fault right at the
> Emmanuel,
>
> I want to thank you for this. You haven't a clue how much this little
> item helped me today! And I didn't even ask for it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kevin
>
Just a quick note: I had the same problem on my Athlon 700, but 7.0
installed and booted wit
> I've heard that there are optimizations specifically for Athlon
> processors. Yes? If so, which are they?
>
> This machine has a Matrox Millenium G400, a SCSI CDRW, SoundBlaster
> Live!(tm) sound card and wouldn't mind getting better support on some of
> these. In an
> I've heard that there are optimizations specifically for Athlon
> > processors. Yes? If so, which are they?
>
> I tried to install RedHat Linux 6.2 on an Athlon 800Mhz this weekend
> and couldn't get it to boot after install. The boot would start
> correctly and t
kf wrote :
>
> I'm running rh6.1 and want to upgrade my kernel.
>
> I've heard that there are optimizations specifically for Athlon
> processors. Yes? If so, which are they?
I tried to install RedHat Linux 6.2 on an Athlon 800Mhz this weekend
and couldn't get
I'm running rh6.1 and want to upgrade my kernel.
$ uname -a
Linux hei.secar.com 2.2.12-20 #1 Mon Sep 27 10:40:35 EDT 1999 i686 unknown
I've heard that there are optimizations specifically for Athlon
processors. Yes? If so, which are they?
This machine has a Matrox Millenium G4
>On 10-Oct-00 at 01:40:55 Vidiot wrote:
>> I picked up a Gigabyte GA-71XE motherboard. I have the Athlon Slot A
>> 950 GHz processor. There is a switch on the motherboard for setting the
> ^^^
>
>WOW!!
>-
On 10-Oct-00 at 01:40:55 Vidiot wrote:
> I picked up a Gigabyte GA-71XE motherboard. I have the Athlon Slot A
> 950 GHz processor. There is a switch on the motherboard for setting the
^^^
WOW!!
John.
John
>I personally don't yet own Athlon system but doing research. The setting is
>100mhz and the Athlon multiplier is locked to 9.5 for 950mhz.
Thanks, I've been so informed.
Thanks for responding.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys?
I personally don't yet own Athlon system but doing research. The setting is
100mhz and the Athlon multiplier is locked to 9.5 for 950mhz.
CH
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I would try 100mhz. I believe the older slotted Athlons use multiple of a
100 mhz bus. The newer socketed use a 200 mhz front side bus and 100-133mhz
for RAM, PCI, etc.
I have linux running on both a 500mhz (slot A) and a 700 mhz (socket A).
Neither, however is using a gigabyte board.
You
re.
It is actually a generic Athlon installation question.
I picked up a Gigabyte GA-71XE motherboard. I have the Athlon Slot A
950 GHz processor. There is a switch on the motherboard for setting the
"CPU Speed Setup," but all the manual says is that CPU speed must match
the frequency ra
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Hidong Kim wrote:
= Hi,
=
= Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
= getting one. Thanks,
=
=
Yeah, I'm using it, an Athlon 650MHz on a Microstar MS-6195 (no sound).
Shop for parts carefully. See <http://www1.amd.co
I understand that in the future, all Athlon processors (not just the
Duron) will be socket A based.
Yes. All future AMD processors are going to be socket A.
(thunderbird, hammer, etc.)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Anthony Lawson wrote:
> Socket A is AMD's counterpart to the Intel Socket 370. The AMD DURON
> (Socket A) will replace the K6-II (Socket 7).
I understand that in the future, all Athlon processors (not just the
Duron) will be socket A based.
It was explained t
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 11:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: athlon socket a
socket A?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Hidong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
> getting one. Tha
OK so far.
Hidong Kim wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
> getting one. Thanks,
>
> Hidong
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Hidong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
> getting one. Thanks,
>
I have an Athlon machine, runs well. It's slot A though, 800 MHz.
Bill Carlson
Systems Progr
socket A?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Hidong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
> getting one. Thanks,
>
>
>
> Hidong
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-l
Hi,
Is anyone here using the socket A athlon with Linux? I'm thinking about
getting one. Thanks,
Hidong
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re: Athlon processor
>
>
> %-> There is a patch to fix the problem with Windows 95 OSR 2.xx series.
It
> %-> can be found from the AMD web site (http://www.amd.com). Most of the
> %-> time you can get 95 stable enough to run it...the tr
%-> There is a patch to fix the problem with Windows 95 OSR 2.xx series. It
%-> can be found from the AMD web site (http://www.amd.com). Most of the
%-> time you can get 95 stable enough to run it...the trick is to actually
%-> get it to go into safe mode. Easiest way to do that is to actually
%->
There is a patch to fix the problem with Windows 95 OSR 2.xx series. It
can be found from the AMD web site (http://www.amd.com). Most of the
time you can get 95 stable enough to run it...the trick is to actually
get it to go into safe mode. Easiest way to do that is to actually
switch the power o
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 07:52:33AM -0700, Johnnio wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> U [unfortunately] have to build up a Win95[OS2R] computer
> for my daughter one of these days and I know it is 'a bit' off topic
> but
> what did you mean by 'the Win95SR2.0 & AMD-K6 disasters"?
>
> I probably will use
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 09:17:39PM +1030, lloy0076 wrote:
>
> Zoki!
>
> > problems etc. Intel CPU's have been experiencing. What's the reason for
> > people being so afraid when it's not an Intel CPU?
>
> I honestly think the reason is that Microsoft bases its (in)operating
> systems on the Int
i got one of the Altura machines from buypogo.com and it is running
supurbly.
yous said:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, lloy0076 wrote:
->I have an Athlon on an MSI-6167 board, I740 Video Excel AGP card, stock
->standard IDE hard drives and two CD (one ROM, other RW/RECORD). I have
->had abso
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, lloy0076 wrote:
->I have an Athlon on an MSI-6167 board, I740 Video Excel AGP card, stock
->standard IDE hard drives and two CD (one ROM, other RW/RECORD). I have
->had absolutely no problems, in fact I simply clicked in my hard drive
->and Linux booted with
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/25/00
at 07:52 AM, Johnnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> 'the Win95SR2.0 & AMD-K6 disasters"?
There's a timing problem where W95 OSR2 fails if the K6 is faster than
333. You can find more about this on either the AMD or the MS web sites.
>I probably will use a
Hi David,
U [unfortunately] have to build up a Win95[OS2R] computer
for my daughter one of these days and I know it is 'a bit' off topic
but
what did you mean by 'the Win95SR2.0 & AMD-K6 disasters"?
I probably will use an AMD K6 processor in the box.
Will it be a bad combination with Win
Zoki!
> problems etc. Intel CPU's have been experiencing. What's the reason for
> people being so afraid when it's not an Intel CPU?
I honestly think the reason is that Microsoft bases its (in)operating
systems on the Intel chips and have been known to do dumb things in the
past like base I/O t
I have an Athlon on an MSI-6167 board, I740 Video Excel AGP card, stock
standard IDE hard drives and two CD (one ROM, other RW/RECORD). I have
had absolutely no problems, in fact I simply clicked in my hard drive
and Linux booted without a glitch...Windows on the other hand required
four
Thanks to all those who responded.
Sounds like that is one hot little chip. I may have to investigate
getting one for myself.
Thanks again.
Carey
==
<> Carey F. Cox, PhD | PHONE: (409) 880-8770 <>
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Carey F. Cox wrote:
->
->I remember reading some posts recently about the Athlon processor. I didn't
->pay attention to those at the time, but now I have someone asking about
->putting Linux on one of those chips. How compatible are these chips
->w
35PM -0500, Michael George wrote:
> On Jan 20, J. Scott Kasten wrote:
> > search the news groups archives. A friend of mine is really happy with his
> > Athlon 550. There's all kinds of tuning that you can do such as mtrr to
> > speed up video, 3Now!, IDE params, etc
&
IRC, The
> HCL at Red Hat's web site claims that some Athalon MB's are partially
> incompatible with Linux but the chip itself is no problem.
>
> At 03:10 PM 1/20/00 -0600, Carey F. Cox wrote:
> >
> >I remember reading some posts recently about the Athlon process
Thing only thing i'm waiting for is the KX133 chipsetwhich
has just gone into production and we should see motherboards Q1
'00. Good god!!! Imagine a having a 800MHz athlon sitting on your
desk.i'm definitely buying one.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Hirs
g some posts recently about the Athlon processor. I didn't
>pay attention to those at the time, but now I have someone asking about
>putting Linux on one of those chips. How compatible are these chips
>with RH6.0 or greater? What are the problems being experienced?
---
Alan D. Mea
The biggest problem I have had with the Athlon Proc is envy. Yes, pure,
green, envy. I built one around an ASUS K7M board... and I want it. bad.
128 megs ram, 32meg video just watching it do a memory test in less
than 1/2 second gives me shivers.
Bye bye pentiums... I'm going Athlon
; the chip to really sing that's in those kernels. You should go to deja and
> search the news groups archives. A friend of mine is really happy with his
> Athlon 550. There's all kinds of tuning that you can do such as mtrr to
> speed up video, 3Now!, IDE params, etc
I
s. You should go to deja and
search the news groups archives. A friend of mine is really happy with his
Athlon 550. There's all kinds of tuning that you can do such as mtrr to
speed up video, 3Now!, IDE params, etc
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Carey F. Cox wrote:
>
> I
* Carey F. Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I remember reading some posts recently about the Athlon processor. I didn't
> pay attention to those at the time, but now I have someone asking about
> putting Linux on one of those chips. How compatible are these chips
> w
I remember reading some posts recently about the Athlon processor. I didn't
pay attention to those at the time, but now I have someone asking about
putting Linux on one of those chips. How compatible are these chips
with RH6.0 or greater? What are the problems being experienced?
T
I will not be answering this question again.
it *should* work with Athlon, but not K6
Allen
- Original Message -
From: "David C Niemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Allen Bolderoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 4:29 PM
Subject:
Hello, guys!
Just to tell you that I bought Scott Mueller's Upgrading and Repairing PC's,
LINUX edition from Amazon. Looks really good. Comes with diagnostics CD
(unfortunately based on Debian).
-Manuel.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
