I would go with Postfix. It is the best mail server I've ever used. Very
secure. Also very fast.
Jon
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Håkon Eriksen wrote:
> >
> > Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> >
> > > On that note, i want to do the same...
> > >
> > >
>
> Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > On that note, i want to do the same...
> >
> > are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set
> > up, and still reliable?
>
> You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html
>
> It'
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On that note, i want to do the same...
>
> are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and
> still reliable?
>
> Anton
You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html
It's not exact
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On that note, i want to do the same...
>
> are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and
> still reliable?
>
> Anton
*** Postfix seems to be the "other" standard. I haven't come around to
acrtua
sday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup
On that note, i want to do the same...
are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set
up, and
still reliable?
Anton
On Tuesday 10 Jun 2003 5:47 pm, Zoki wrote:
Le 05/06/2003 13:05, « Cowles, Steve »
gt; > On Tuesday 10 Jun 2003 5:47 pm, Zoki wrote:
> > > Le 05/06/2003 13:05, « Cowles, Steve » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
> écrit :
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, June 05,
use qmail -- www.qmail.org
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Piatek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup
> On that note, i want to do the same...
>
> are there any easier al
--Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM
> >> Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup
> >>
> >> Just :
> >>
> >> mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server
> >
> > J
Le 05/06/2003 13:05, « Cowles, Steve » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup
>>
>> Just :
>>
>> mailIN
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM
> Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup
>
> Just :
>
> mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server
Just??? Your only adding an address record for your ma
Just :
mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server
/etc/mail/local-host-names:
#domain_name_of _your_mail_server
Mark Foster wrote:
> If you want to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], you will want at
> least (something like) the following in your domain.co.uk zone.
> @
If you want to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], you will want at
least (something like) the following in your domain.co.uk zone.
@ IN MX 10 mail
mailIN A 111.222.333.444
Then on your RH9 server, put a line saying
domain.co.uk
into /etc/mail/local-host-names
Restart s
03 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: e-mail recommendations for sending logs as files
AFAIK mail supports sending attachments.
Just start a line with ~r and then type in your file name. For example, if
your file is called /var/log/messages, you can simply add the following
line:
~r/va
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 09:44, Douglas, Stuart wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm investigating utilities like logwatch, logcheck, logtool, etc. wanting to get my
>log files in file form via e-mail. Since the basic mail (mailx) client doesn't
>support attachments, can anyone recommend something to use i
On 17-Jan-2003/10:44 -0500, "Douglas, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm investigating utilities like logwatch, logcheck, logtool, etc.
>wanting to get my log files in file form via e-mail. Since the basic
>mail (mailx) client doesn't support attachments, can anyone recommend
>something to us
AFAIK mail supports sending attachments.
Just start a line with ~r and then type in your file name. For example, if
your file is called /var/log/messages, you can simply add the following
line:
~r/var/log/messages
-Original Message-
From: Douglas, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: F
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:56:00AM -0600 or thereabouts, Joe Giles wrote:
>
> So, this is normal behavoir?
qmail has a wrapper that you can use called datemail, which is used like
sendmail (the qmail sendmail), to convert to local time. It is in the
/var/qmail/bin/ dir, and is used as /var/qmai
So, this is normal behavoir?
Thanks
Joe
Gordon Messmer writes:
>On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 16:02, Joe Giles wrote:
>>
>> Most of the web apps have a config.php file, and the setting
>fro TZ is correct there
>> too. Is there maybe a setting for QMAIL?
>
>IIRC, Qmail only records times in UTC, not
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 16:02, Joe Giles wrote:
>
> Most of the web apps have a config.php file, and the setting fro TZ is correct there
> too. Is there maybe a setting for QMAIL?
IIRC, Qmail only records times in UTC, not local time.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Always looking for good procmail recipes I couldn't resist this one from
Chuck. However, when I cut and pasted it into my procmailrc file it
generated lots of errors but to my great surprise it actually worked.
If you check out what word wrapping did you will easily see why it had
problems. The
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Enrico Payne wrote:
> So, to those who value their own privacy, while on company
> time and company property (including PC's and Internet
> access), Bah. If I can reduce the risk of future exposure
> to viruses by blocking or deleting attachments that could
> contain viruses,
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:08:10 Enrico Payne wrote:
[snip]
>Having said that, I too am a reasonable person, and understand that not all
>attachments are dangerous. Hence I would only prevent file types that could
>be launched by the browser, e-mail, or just by double clicking on it.
>Chuck's solution
e types that could
be launched by the browser, e-mail, or just by double clicking on it.
Chuck's solution is a good compromise! :->
Thanks for the thoughts
Regards
Enrico
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Yup...very lucky.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot wrote:
> >So, tell me...how many emails have you received with VB scripts and
> >ActiveX components that were real emails, vs. the bogus crap that has been
> >passing through the net for the last few months?
>
> I don't receive any e-mail that contain
>So, tell me...how many emails have you received with VB scripts and
>ActiveX components that were real emails, vs. the bogus crap that has been
>passing through the net for the last few months?
I don't receive any e-mail that contains those attachments. All of
my e-mail reading and sending is d
Fine and dandy if there is A) an available virus scanner and B) it
properly scans for, detects and fixes said problems.
So, tell me...how many emails have you received with VB scripts and
ActiveX components that were real emails, vs. the bogus crap that has been
passing through the net for the la
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot spewed into the bitstream:
V>>I need to do the following with my e-mail server...
V>>
V>>a) Block all e-mails that have .exe, .vbx, .ocx extensions
V>
V>Why? None of those extensions affect Linux/Unix boxes.
Maybe he's got Windoze clients using his machine as their
>In business situations, email is a tool, provided by the employer, to be
>used as the employer decides is appropriate. As such, the employer also
>gets to determine the type of email that enters/exits that mail system.
Instead of globally deep-sixing said extension, companies filter (ours does)
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Vidiot wrote:
> >I need to do the following with my e-mail server...
> >
> >a) Block all e-mails that have .exe, .vbx, .ocx extensions
>
> Why? None of those extensions affect Linux/Unix boxes. Also, not all
> e-mail that has those extension is bad. Deep-sixing said e-mail
>I need to do the following with my e-mail server...
>
>a) Block all e-mails that have .exe, .vbx, .ocx extensions
Why? None of those extensions affect Linux/Unix boxes. Also, not all
e-mail that has those extension is bad. Deep-sixing said e-mail in general is
a bad idea.
Plus, you have to a
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Enrico Payne spewed into the bitstream:
EP>I need to do the following with my e-mail server...
EP>
EP>a) Block all e-mails that have .exe, .vbx, .ocx extensions
Put this in /etc/procmailrc
:0
*^Content-type: (multipart/mixed|application/octet-stream)
{
:0 HB
*^Conten
I use, and really like, Arrow:
http://www.newplanetsoftware.com/arrow/
You might also look at Spruce:
http://www.xtorshun.org/spruce/
and Balsa:
http://www.balsa.net/main.html
You might even want to look at Evolution, which is supposed to be similar to Outlook
(but I wouldn't know -- I'v
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000 19:07:00 -0500, you wrote:
> nitin jain wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can anyone please tell me about an e-mail client for linux like eudora or
> > outlook express of windows.It should be easy to install and should have good
> > GUI.
> >
>
> netscape -mail.
> kent
>
I just s
nitin jain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone please tell me about an e-mail client for linux like eudora or
> outlook express of windows.It should be easy to install and should have good
> GUI.
>
netscape -mail.
kent
--
"Neurosis i
On Thu, 05 Oct 2000 07:37 nitin jain wrote:
>Can anyone please tell me about an e-mail client for linux like eudora or
>outlook express of windows.It should be easy to install and should have
good
>GUI.
Balsa has gotten pretty good except for one thing; it still interacts badly
with what I've bee
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> Hm - I hope the latest version of kmail is better than the one that came
> with KDE 1.1.2 Looking forward to 16/10/2000... :-)
Try http://master.kde.org/~bero/rh7/ for the release candidate...
LLaP
bero
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:55:11PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> kmail? (Part of kdenetwork)
Hm - I hope the latest version of kmail is better than the one that came
with KDE 1.1.2 Looking forward to 16/10/2000... :-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete quote
On 5 Oct 2000, nitin jain wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me about an e-mail client for linux like eudora or
> outlook express of windows.It should be easy to install and should have good
> GUI.
kmail? (Part of kdenetwork)
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-lis
>On my Red Hat 6.1 system, I set the /etc/sendmail.cf variable DM variable
>(as instructed in the Red Hat 6.1 Reference Guide) and stoped & starded
>sendmail. My e-mail Return-path: header is NOT being masqueraded.
>
>Any ideas on how to get e-mail masquerading working would be apprecia
Carlos Eduardo Anibarro Zelaya wrote:
> Heya all
>
> Is there any good mail au responders ?
>
> I need this:
>
> When someone emails user@server i need the system to send a quick email to
> the sender saying that the use will check the email soon.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Carlos Eduardo Anibarro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 15:32 5/14/98 +0200, Sahar Nitzan wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>I was wondering .
>Is there a way that I can publish all the e-mail addresses in my
organization to all the users
>So everybody can know everybody else e-mail address ?
> I want to do this by e-mail
There are many ways you could do this. The simplest would be to tidy up a
version of your aliases file (assuming sendmail) and send everyone that.
You could even create a majordomo broadcast-only listserve that includes
all staff members for easy broadcast messages to your users.
I do something s
Hello.
> jdk> Also, is it at all possible for ANY clients to utilize more
> jdk> than one external account, from the same linux account.
XFMail 1.3 onwards allows you to retrieve mail from multiple accounts, be it
POP3, SPOOL or IMAP. http://freshmeat.net will provide you with the
necessary
> "jdk" == jdk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jdk> Also, is it at all possible for ANY clients to utilize more
jdk> than one external account, from the same linux account. This
jdk> is something that is easily accomplished under Windows by most
jdk> clients, but seems unheard of in the
> I am a recent convert, looking for the best, most versatile, mail client
> for X. I would like one that will use the same files that Pine reads.
> That way I could still get to all my mail when shelled in from work. I
> started to use exmh, thinking that was the way IT worked, but doesn't
> ap
Hello, Pete!
How about just getting an X-based email client such as xfmail
(http://freshmeat.unreal.org/) that supports POP3, IMAP, etc? Or pine? You'd
have to provide us with some details too .. Do you mean download email from
your ISP, or receiving email directly on your Box? For the latter,
46 matches
Mail list logo
