Michael
As far as I am aware, I didn't do anything. Do these entries look odd
then?
Regards
Ashley
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:01, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04 Feb 2003 17:39:12 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
>
> > http://127.0.0.1:901 works!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 17:39:12 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> http://127.0.0.1:901 works!! brilliant
>
> However, in case this is helping anyone else my /etc/hosts file contains
>
> 192.168.1.102 Prospect3
> 192.168.1.100 Prospect2
> 192.168.
Nick
Thanks for the help. The eth0 address is what I know as my local
machine address. As you can see from a reply to Michael, the loopback
address works as well (http://127.0.0.1:901).
Regards
Ashley
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:25, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> At 17:06 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
Michael
http://127.0.0.1:901 works!! brilliant
However, in case this is helping anyone else my /etc/hosts file contains
192.168.1.102 Prospect3
192.168.1.100 Prospect2
192.168.1.101 Prospect1 localhost
192.168.1.101 Prospect1.Prospect
Prospect 2 and 3 were entered b
At 17:06 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Nick
I don't recall seeing that IP address anywhere. Where might I find it?
From a command line:-
"ifconfig" - you're probably looking for the eth0 device if you have only
one network card.
hih
nick@nexnix
Regards
Ashley
> Use the IP address of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 16:28:38 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> However .. Now instead of Mozilla telling me I cannot connect when I
> type in the http://localhost:901/ url I get an alert message stating
> that 'The operation timed out when attempting to contac
Nick
I don't recall seeing that IP address anywhere. Where might I find it?
Regards
Ashley
> Use the IP address of the samba server instead of localhost.
> This will also allow you access from other machines so you don't
> have to run X on the server.
>
> hih
> nick@nexnix
>
--
redhat-l
At 16:28 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
However .. Now instead of Mozilla telling me I cannot connect when I
type in the http://localhost:901/ url I get an alert message stating
that 'The operation timed out when attempting to contact
www.localhost.com' This is progress of sorts I guess :-)
Any id
Bret
Thanks for that. I had to force rpm to de-install using --notriggers
--noscripts but it did clear samba out. I've now re-installed and 'rpm
-qa|grep samba' now gives
samba-2.2.5-10
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-client-2.2.5-10
samba-swat-2.2.5-10
I then did
chkconfig smb on
chkconfig sw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 13:00:40 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> samba-common-2.2.5-10
> samba-2.2.7a-1
> samba-client-2.2.5-10
>
> so it's mixed up! What now?
As "root" user:
rpm --erase samba --nodeps
up2date --nox samba-swat
The 2.2.7a-1 package is no
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 12:00, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> Bret
>
> Thanks. here is output
>
> samba-common-2.2.5-10
> samba-2.2.7a-1
> samba-client-2.2.5-10
>
> so it's mixed up! What now?
>
OK
keep in mind I am not an up2date user and there may be a better way to
do this using the tool.
This sh
Bret
Thanks. here is output
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-2.2.7a-1
samba-client-2.2.5-10
so it's mixed up! What now?
Kind Regards
Ashley
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 16:28, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> New point of view with no 8.0 experience.
>
> First, what does rpm think you have
>
> what does
>
> r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03 Feb 2003 20:57:52 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> > This is not true for Red Hat's samba-swat packages. There the server
> > line points to /usr/sbin/swat. Whatever you did, you damaged the
> > xinetd config files in several places.
>
> Whatever
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 19:57, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> Michael
>
>
> You miss the point. here is a timeline:
>
> 1/ RH6.2 Loaded sometime back
> 2/ Machine nuked
> 3/ RH 8.0 loaded including Samba
> 4/ RH autoupdate updates Samba to 2.2.7
> 5/ I get around to using it, configure Samba to run manual
Michael
> This is not true for Red Hat's samba-swat packages. There the server
> line points to /usr/sbin/swat. Whatever you did, you damaged the
> xinetd config files in several places.
Whatever I did, was done under strict direction from the install
directions from the RH8 install guide and fol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:20:19 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> Thanks for persevering. I ran the tail on messages as suggested. It
> turned out that the server= line in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file is
> pointing to something that doesn't exist (it reads
Michael
Thanks for persevering. I ran the tail on messages as suggested. It turned
out that the server= line in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file is pointing to
something that doesn't exist (it reads server=/etc/xinetd/swat i.e. itself).
The log message shows that the server doesn't exist. That got m
On Friday 31 January 2003 09:07, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> Matthew
>
> etc/xinetd.d/swat is configured as
>
> #chkconfig: 35 20 80
> #description: SWAT
>
> service swat
> {
> disable = no
> port = 901
> socket_type = stream
> wait = no
> only_from = localhost
> user = root
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:01:38 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> The 2 comment lines were the ones suggested when I read the man page
> for chkconfig (as I didn't know what it was until then).
No. The chkconfig man page doesn't suggest to add anything like
line - no joy.
Kind Regards
Mr Ashley Kitson
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: RH8.0 - Altering Security Level
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:07:37 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> etc/xinetd.d/swat is configured as
>
> #chkconfig: 35 20 80
> #description: SWAT
>
> service swat
> {
> disable = no
> port = 901
> socket_type = stream
> wait = no
> onl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:16:18 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> I got a
>
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables program
> /lib/iptables folder with lots of .so files in it
> /sbin/iptables program
>
> but no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file
>
> This on RH8.0 newly in
I got a
/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables program
/lib/iptables folder with lots of .so files in it
/sbin/iptables program
but no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file
This on RH8.0 newly installed. Any ideas as to what I should be editing?
Thanks.
Kind Regards
Mr Ashley Kitson
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ricky De
anuary 31, 2003 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: RH8.0 - Altering Security Level
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Ashley Kitson wrote:
>
> > I think I have my system open at the moment (which is a risk except I'm
> > hidden behind a cable router) and still cannot connect to SWAP using
>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ricky Deitemeyer wrote:
> What files do I have to edit to change the security settings on my
> Redhat 8.0 box? I'm trying to set up samba, but as it is, I can't even
/etc/sysconfig/iptables
--
"Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, isn't it?"
--
redhat-list mailing
First restart the service via ... service samba restartamzyÂ
___Get the FREE email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Ashley Kitson wrote:
> I think I have my system open at the moment (which is a risk except I'm
> hidden behind a cable router) and still cannot connect to SWAP using
SWAT?
> http://localhost:901/. localhost is set in
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote:
> Doug,
>
> I have run into the same issue. When I make changes using the "Security
> Level tool" and then close that tool. The settings stick. However, if the
> machine is shutdown (for any reason) or that application is opened once
> more, the secu
Ricky
Bingo. having exactly the same problem. Red-hat couldn't care less as
I am just a prole user and their support for 'personal' edition seems to
extend to 'can you see the prompt'.
Anyway, flame out of the way, I know this much:
The Security Level and Lokkit utilities *do not* read the cur
ubject: RE: RH8.0 - Altering Security Level
It should be in your iptables. Since I don't run the GUI I can't help you
through that. However, if you are root you can go to the shell and run
ntsysv and deselect the "iptables" option and then close out of that and
run
It
should be in your iptables. Since I don't run the GUI I can't help you through
that. However, if you are root you can go to the shell and run ntsysv and
deselect the "iptables" option and then close out of that and run "service
network restart". Now you should be able to do anything you w
31 matches
Mail list logo
