On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 00:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
minimum install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one CD? :^) SuSE
As Matthew pointed, there are several
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 20:38, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 00:34, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
minimum install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
snip
That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
and non-enterprise. Since the personal is the base for sales (as in:
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003
01:13:40 -0700
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
snip
That said, RH is already beginning to
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
minimum install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one CD? :^) SuSE
As Matthew pointed, there are several kernels and several glibc shipped
with the distribution.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
snip
As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
this way:
The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
install. It decreases the number of discs, and speeds my install. This
is not an
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
snip
As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
this way:
The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
install. It decreases the number of
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:41, Nicholas Marsh wrote:
So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?
If it like the beta (8.0.94), here are the release notes:
http://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/beta/phoebe/en/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES
In there it says:
If you are performing anything
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Also: Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD.
Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange them such that the most commonly
used and smallest installs be on the first disc, then the second, and
the third being
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Also: Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD.
Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange them such that the most commonly
used and smallest installs
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Also: Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD.
Seems like a bug to me. Why not arrange them such that
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:47, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:08, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:26:48PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Also: Minimal installations currently require more than a single CD.
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
snip
That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
and non-enterprise. Since the personal is the base for sales (as in:
the smallest one), that would be a good start, IMO.
13 matches
Mail list logo
