[resending, because lncsa.com bounced my mail]
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Laurent CARON wrote:
The entry that scares me is
?- ? ? ??? new
Seems to me it is a filesystem corruption.
Any other solution than rebuild
now it's unclear
what *caused* the corruptions in the first place. You'll probably
(hopefully) be able to correct this corruption with --rebuild-tree but
I'd have a close look on this filesystem for further curruptions.
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #118:
the router thinks its a printer
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:05:33PM -0700, Quinn Harris wrote:
I really doubt there is any solution that would take less than a few
hours. I am sure it is possible to recover much of the data but to
the best of my knowledge no tool exists that can recover from an
abandoned root node (for
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 12:35:04PM +0100, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
Could someone resend that info to the list? I'm sure others would be
interested too.
I just replied I'd try what Vladimir said, and so I did - successfully.
But here you go, hoping this one will come through. I even stopped
Hi folks,
a buggy script I wrote dared to mkfs a reiser4 partition after failing
to properly tar up its contents - not that my life would depend on them,
but it would save me a few hours if I could get the stuff back.
Other than mkfs.reiser4, mount and unmount, nothing was done to the
device ; )
yet?
my 0.02p...
Christian
--
BOFH excuse #102:
Power company testing new voltage spike (creation) equipment
, does it
really make a difference?
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #400:
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an
undocumented feature.
2.4.20 or 2.6.13 (apart from the fact that both kernels are quite
old)?
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #257:
That would be because the software doesn't work.
Hi Vladimir,
this fixes a bunch of random user space oddities for me. Just patched
2.6.18-rc6-mm2 with this, and some annoyances I could not trace back to
a change in user space just went bye-bye.
Thanks a lot!
Chris
pgpJBZDdCOUrz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:35:02AM +, Peter wrote:
This does not patch against 2.6.17-3 patchset however. Any possibility
this may be related to some startup issues as noted on other threads here?
I have seen the issues at bootup you noticed some time ago, but only
once after the root fs
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:01:42AM -0400, David Masover wrote:
A warning isn't good? Would you rather it be an error?
Of course not. It merely appears inconsistent to offer a root fs choice
that may cause severe problems at bootup time.
When I went to install my first SuSE (brand-new 6.1 at
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:09:42PM -0400, David Masover wrote:
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Few people keep a 32MB ext2 for /boot purposes these days, so it
really is imperative that grub can read kernel images off a reiser4
/.
I think there are patches, but I do keep a 32 meg ext3 for /boot
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
I tried to create a kernel package with reiser4 for ubuntu-server (dapper)
They ship a 2.6.15 (heavily modified) kernel upon which the current
reiser4-for-2.6.17-3.patch applies fine but unfortunately miscompiles, eg.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:57:35AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Wil Reichert wrote:
Any idea how the fragmentation resulting from re-syncing the tree
affects performance over time?
Yes, it does affect it a lot. I have no idea how much, and I've never
benchmarked it, but purely
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:05:01PM +0200, Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
I gues that extens are much harder to reuse then normal inodes so when You
have something as big as portage tree filled with nano files wich are
being modified all the time then You just can't keep performance all the
time.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:30:15PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
Is /usr/portage still faster on Reiser4? I know it was when I switched,
but that was years ago...
It is for sure. v4 is even better with fantastillions of small files
than v3.
uziel
pgpxeVIQPVXTn.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi Wil,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 02:10:04PM -0700, Wil Reichert wrote:
Hmm, looks like I have a partition to re-format now.
In order to avoid having to pull the whole tree via rsync again, you
might want to grab my script from the list and adapt it to your needs.
Kind regards,
Chris
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:39:42PM +0200, Christian Trefzer wrote:
In order to avoid having to pull the whole tree via rsync again, you
might want to grab my script from the list and adapt it to your needs.
Of course, you can tar it up manually instead. Silly me, but after
approx. 9h
Hi,
I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
I already planned on forcibly filling up something less depended upon,
like the portage tree, but studies kept me from playing and the
scheduled java vm update took
know most programs work around this by using many subdirs, but that's
really a bandaid solution.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:50:24PM -0600, Hans Reiser wrote:
Thanks Christian. You can go ahead and add something to our wiki
pointing to it if you would like. This might help tide people
over until the repacker ships.
I'd love to, but alas, wiki.namesys.com appears to have a serious
Hi,
The portage tree is such a fine testing object since it should be sort
of a best case scenario for reiser filesystems, and needs no real
backup in case of a screwup during tests.
I've been on Gentoo for years now, used reiser3 since the days when you
had to patch it into a 2.2 kernel and
to align IO
to RAID stripe boundaries.
Can linux still auto-detect raid volumes if there's no partition table?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:41:13PM +0300, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
The patch reiser4-for-2.6.16-4 should apply just fine, I use it myself
on top of 2.6.17.
The thing is, I want to use 2.6.17-ck1 as well... I'll give it a shot with
this patch and see what happens :)
You might want to take
Hi folks,
just had this in my dmesg after git yelled at me:
reiser4[git-update-inde(24210)]: extent2tail
(/usr/src/sources/linux-git/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:662)[]:
WARNING: write_tail failed
reiser4[git-update-inde(24210)]: release_unix_file
Hi folks,
the patch below is required on top of reiser4-for-2.6.16-4 to actually
use reiser4 as a module with Linus' current git tree, mostly
2.6.17-rc5-git10. Otherwise the symbol handle_ra_miss cannot be
resolved, thus the module won't be loaded. Just pointing this out, to
avoid problems with
Hi guys,
as I am heavily using reiser4 for some time now on my stable machine, I
keep a git tree with vanilla -stable and reiser4 since -mm has sometimes
been too unreliable. Lurking on this list I collected some patches, of
which two seem to collide. The first one fixes a nasty out of memory?
fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c:120: Warnung: Initialisierung von inkompatiblem
Zeigertyp
fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c:320: Warnung: Initialisierung von inkompatiblem
Zeigertyp
(in english: Warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type)
file_plugin file_plugins[LAST_FILE_PLUGIN_ID] = {
Hi zam,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:11:49AM +0300, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
Hello,
please try the attached patch.
--
Alex.
[ skipped life-saving patch ]
I just checked my currently used reiser4 version against
reiser4-for-2.6.16-1 and noticed that this patch was not in there. The
that helps, but it should be better than starting
from scratch :-)
Perhaps someone can patch gpart to find reiser4 partitions?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:35:01PM +0300, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
I looked one more time at my second patch and realized now that is it
not needed, it solves problem which can't happen. I was thinking too
much trying to invent a situation where the first patch fails :)
Well, so I'll
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:11:49AM +0300, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote:
please try the attached patch.
Wow, that was FAST!
Will do ASAP, but for now I'll have to _hurry_ to work. I'll build a
kernel with your patch right when I come back.
Thanks a bunch!
Chris
Hi again,
small update and clarification: I wiped the laptop's volume on which the
problem occured, but my workstation's has _not yet_ been wiped. But:
kernel BUG at
/usr/src/sources/linux-2.6.16-rc5/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:29!
invalid opcode: [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked
Hi zam,
after the first build of OOo has finished (as gift for my laptop) the
machine is working on it's own copy, after a reboot with the exact same
setup yielding my BUG problems plus your patch applied. I'll keep an eye
on my syslog. Sorry for taking so long!
Regards,
Chris
Hi everyone,
I got this half an hour ago, with some processes left in D state, namely
ooffice.bin and two instances of procmail, as this happened on my /home
LV:
kernel BUG at
/usr/src/sources/linux-2.6.16-rc5/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:29!
invalid opcode: [#1]
PREEMPT
meanings, is there a
name for that? It is generally accepted to be bad style, yes?
I'd say it's definitely a layering violation - but I don't know if there's a
more specific name for this particular situation.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
, if you get
these errors too. that way one could rule out any interference with the
loopdevice.
if you can, please use a current kernel too.
thank you,
Christian.
--
make bzImage, not war
)
raid/lvm/etc: none, single disk
--
Christian
pgpi1IFQnYM1h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 12:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Sander wrote:
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote:
My 'good' system:
kernel:2.6.15-rc1-mm2
OS:Debian Sid
disks: 4x sata on Promise
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 13:17, Sander wrote:
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
For Sander's list:
http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c
strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync
I've added this one, but it segfaults at my system:
$ gcc -o reiser4-fsync reiser4-fsync.c
$ strace -T
On Monday 21 November 2005 19:06, E.Gryaznova wrote:
Hello.
Hesse, Christian wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Hesse, Christian wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies
fsync
On Monday 21 November 2005 19:44, Hesse, Christian wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 19:06, E.Gryaznova wrote:
Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you
please provide more info?:
Is this 2.6.14-mm2 bad sync/fsync performance reproducible on fresh
created reiser4
() = 0 2.092873
fsync(3)= 0 0.132579
--
Christian
pgpyj0k35mBC3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 17 November 2005 18:22, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Hesse, Christian wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Please try whether the attached patch improves anything. It simplifies
fsync by avoid commiting of transactions which do not modify file being
fsync-ed.
The patch
are seeing?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
(gratis libre) dd_rescue program instead. It will save you $50.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Monday 10 October 2005 17:19, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2005 17:06, michael chang wrote:
On 10/10/05, Yiannis Mavroukakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello :-)
I had an LVM setup of three disks, and one of them went belly
up..Obvious thought
,
or to every one of us who can't wait for reiser4 in mainline.
Could you please keep your personal idea of which filesystem is more
interesting to yourself? It doesn't help anybody accomplish anything.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
(not affiliated with namesys..)
to do. Yes there are 3rdparty programs such as
su.exe that will help tremendously in this, and yes you can just add
administrators with full control to all files, but it's still bad design
IMHO.
Who ordered the fresh rants?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
more. I just wanted to say that, so
that all will know that it is only the implementation and UI that I
object to, not the objective. The objective is good.
I mostly agree with that - I'm sorry I didn't make it very clear in the post.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
of test data, ranging in size from 200MB to 900MB. I've
disabled atime updates, but that didn't help much. The controller and disks
are plenty fast, so I feel something is amiss.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
running the
drive for the same amount of time. You really have to have extremely few
spin-ups for this to have any positive effect, IMHO.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
is a killer.
I've seen a java library that solves this exact problem - I can't remember
what it was called, but it's page talked about massive speedups because it
could somehow avoid the insane wrap-unwrap for each little object. Maybe it
could help.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Saturday 20 August 2005 12:23, PFC wrote:
Isn't this the RAM-based Prevalence ?
Yes, I believe that was it.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
for this task.
[...] Are there independent implementations of Reiser4 (as in: not
derived from Namesys, Inc. code)?
Are there independent implementations of QT?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 02:03, you wrote:
On 8/16/05, Christian Iversen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there independent implementations of QT?
Well... Google harmony project qt.
:)
Well, funny as it may be :-), harmony project ceased to exist after qt
became GPL, and thus
On Monday 18 July 2005 00:18, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:22:32 +0200, Christian Iversen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In particular, in French, period is for the thousands separator, and
comma is the decimal point.
AFAIK it's the same in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany
, Norway, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, and
in fact most of Europe.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
Al Boldi wrote:
Hi Nathan,
You wrote: {
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:08:05PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
True now, not so around 2.4.20 when XFS was rock-solid. I think they
tried to improve on performance and broke something. I wish they would
fix that because it forced me back to ext3, as in
Hubert Chan schrieb:
How about something of the form nikita-955(file:line)? Or the
reverse: file:line(nikita-955). Would that keep everyone happy?
Damn, I was wondering how long it would take until someone would come up
with a compromise solution ; ) Compromises everywhere will lead to
Hans Reiser schrieb:
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Hubert Chan schrieb:
How about something of the form nikita-955(file:line)? Or the
reverse: file:line(nikita-955). Would that keep everyone happy?
Makes me happy.
Nice, how about the others?
Hey, if we need some objective
using
the latest version of reiserfsprogs.
...my 2 cents,
Christian.
--
make bzImage, not war
Reiserfs worked for him, but somehow I don't see Hans listing
this one on the Reiserfs success stories page. ;)
hahahaha fantastic!
And why not? Imagine something like..
Reiserfs: for those of us who are filesystem challenged
Reiserfs: Makes fsck'ing feel good again
--
Regards,
Christian
it.
Is there any chance the read-write code will eventually be integrated?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
pgpjpFwNWhjUW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/bonnie.html
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/tiobench.txt
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #173:
Recursive traversal of loopback mount points
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
-interactive i plan to run
benchmarks in the future too...
thanks,
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #438:
sticky bit has come loose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCZ5MvC/PVm5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolae Mihalache wrote:
Hi,
I have experience some weird problems on a reiserfs partition. I tried
to copy a big archive (6.9GB) from another computer using scp or ftp and
it seems that the file gets somehow corrupted. Right now I manage to
David Masover schrieb:
sergey ivanov wrote:
So how about this deadlock? Is there any expectation about fix for it?
Wbr,
Sergey.
Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Vladimir Saveliev schrieb:
This problem is fixed, but running your test during several hours caused
reiser4 crash. It just happened
David Masover schrieb:
reiser4-for-2.6 stops at 2.6.10, and after that, all I can find are
patches to mm. Reiser4 seems stable for me, mm does not. Are there
still patches somewhere?
Also, whoever's in charge of this list, I know my address was bouncing
mail for a bit -- did I get kicked from
Vladimir Saveliev schrieb:
This problem is fixed, but running your test during several hours caused
reiser4 crash. It just happened, so, tomorrow I will take a look at it.
I was able to deadlock kernel 2.6.11 + reiser4-for-2.6.11-3.patch.gz
+ elevator=cfq.
This time it happend during the first
Hi!
Thanks. I noticed there is already dbench-3.03 available:
ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/tridge/dbench/dbench-3.03.tar.gz
E.Gryaznova wrote:
Hello.
We use dbench-2.0 in our testing.
Well, dbench-3.02 is added to stressing suit too.
Thanks,
Lena.
--
lg, Chris
Vladimir Saveliev schrieb:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 02:23, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with
reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when running
When you say hang reiser4 do you mean that system freezes completely
(does not respord
Vladimir Saveliev schrieb:
Hello
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 00:21, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Vladimir Saveliev schrieb:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 02:23, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
Hi,
If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with
reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when running
Hi,
If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with
reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when running
ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/tridge/dbench/dbench-3.02.tar.gz
for about an hour with the following script.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sergey ivanov wrote:
# fsck.reiser4 --build-fs /dev/evms/home |tee /root/reiser4.log, and
after some minutes the filesystem is consystent.
But alas, all the messages was not directed to stdout, but stderr, so
the file /root/reiser4.log was empty.
files in EPREFIX
[PREFIX]
so if you type
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/alternative_directory
the files should show up under this very directory. does it not work? any
error messages you want to share then?
thanks,
Christian.
PS: just tried it by myslf: be sure
, along with a big.
fat UNTESTED warning? it could be done via scripts and even if it does not
build one day or the other - users would notice that and could report.
thanks,
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #88:
Boss' kid fucked up the machine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux
are to remove it asap. udev has
replaced it.
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #250:
Program load too heavy for processor to lift.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCD292C/PVm5
On Friday 11 February 2005 08:54, you wrote:
Hello
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 10:38, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote:
what if you zero the first 64K with
dd conv=notrunc if=/dev/zero
On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:50, you wrote:
Hello
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:54, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote
On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote:
Hello.
Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21
On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote:
Hello.
Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09
On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote:
Hello.
Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09
On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:52, you wrote:
Hello
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 15:50, Christian Placzek wrote:
No, I wasn't. It seems mount doesn't recognize the true file system,
although the magic exists.
snip
0001 30 76 0D 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 00 00 00
0v
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze. Therefore he
didn't know he couldn't
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:34, you wrote:
Christian Placzek wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote:
Hello
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote:
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file
Hello,
a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an
accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze. Therefore he
didn't know he couldn't undelete a file on a reiserfs partition with ext2
undelete tool %-(
When he called me it was already too late. He had
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 02:18, David Masover wrote:
Christian Iversen wrote:
| On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:52, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
|On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
|Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more
|windows-native
, but the crushed case has to be searched.
I don't know if that's easy with a hash function, but it seems mightly slow to
me.
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more windows-native?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
Hi,
I came across:
http://metafs.sourceforge.net/
About:
MetaFS allows users to access information about their files (such as MP3 tags
or JPEG EXIF tags) easily and consistently using extended attributes. It also
allows them to perform fast searches using this information. It can be easily
members die.
To be more exact, it's equal to a mars probe stranding and making many
scientists very nervous :-)
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
have never had such problems. Is it only in
directories with thousands of other files?
--
Regards,
Christian Iversen
On Thursday 23 December 2004 04:55, Sujeet Kumar wrote:
patni Stationery
Hi ,
My log file reported data corruption on reiserfs filesystem.
The reiserfs version used by log file was 3.6.2-41 where the reported
defect took place . I ran it again on reiserfs version 3.6.9-33 , but this
On Monday 20 December 2004 06:41, Jim Miller wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have recently been burned by the XFS file system -- After a recent
system crash/hang we experienced a lot of file corruption and needed to
restore from a backup that was ~12hrs old. It seems that XFS keeps a
lot of
On Monday 20 December 2004 16:38, Tom Vier wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:31:25PM +0100, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
The barrier mount option should provide protection against a corrupted
journal during power failure for drives with write caching enabled.
(Mostly IDE)
There's a mount
On Monday 20 December 2004 20:23, Tom Vier wrote:
I was under the impression that they were on by default. I wish this was
documented somewhere; it's very important and i bet a LOT of sysadmins don't
even consider the problems of having write-back caching enabled. At least
most scsi drives
On Monday 20 December 2004 17:32, Spam wrote:
What happen with the performance when these barriers are active?
It's faster than with disk writecache off.
I didn't benchmark barriers=flush and writecache on.
Is it only during power failure the data in the write cache is lost?
No. See
On Monday 20 December 2004 21:31, Spam wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2004 17:32, Spam wrote:
What happen with the performance when these barriers are active?
It's faster than with disk writecache off.
I didn't benchmark barriers=flush and writecache on.
Is it only during
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 01:29, Klaus Thorn wrote:
Christian Mayrhuber christian.mayrhuber at gmx.net writes:
Quotas are in kernel 2.6 and supported by ext2,ext3,reiserfs,xfs.
Reiserfs doesn't need an extra patch for quotas, data journalling
or extended attributes. Everything
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
