Re: too many iterations - Reiser 4

Thanks, its better. > would you please try to apply the attached patch? > You should also reiserfsck your reiser4 filesystem. > ["reiser4.h.diff" (reiser4.h.diff)] > = reiser4.h 1.220 vs edited = > --- 1.220/reiser4.h2004-11-02 16:01:00 +03:00 > +++ edited/reiser4.h2004-11-09 12:54:07 +0

Re: ReiserFS V3 and linux-kernel-2.6

ed OBSOLETE and plans are to remove it asap. udev has replaced it. Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #250: Program load too heavy for processor to lift. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8

Re: new reiser4progs?

y) builds, along with a big. fat UNTESTED warning? it could be done via scripts and even if it does not build one day or the other - users would notice that and could report. thanks, Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #88: Boss' kid fucked up the machine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gnu

Re: Odd Reiser4 Compilation Question

EPREFIX install architecture-dependent files in EPREFIX [PREFIX] so if you type $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/alternative_directory the files should show up under this very directory. does it not work? any error messages you want to share then? thanks, Christian.

Re: an incident with reiser4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sergey ivanov wrote: > # fsck.reiser4 --build-fs /dev/evms/home |tee /root/reiser4.log, and > after some minutes the filesystem is consystent. > But alas, all the messages was not directed to stdout, but stderr, so > the file /root/reiser4.log was empt

Re: corrupted files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicolae Mihalache wrote: > Hi, > > I have experience some weird problems on a reiserfs partition. I tried > to copy a big archive (6.9GB) from another computer using scp or ftp and > it seems that the file gets somehow corrupted. Right now I manage to

benchmarks galore...

script is really non-interactive i plan to run benchmarks in the future too... thanks, Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #438: sticky bit has come loose -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD

2.6.12-rc3-mm2 benchmarks

ere: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/bonnie.html http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/tiobench.txt Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #173: Recursive traversal of loopback mount points -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: Reiserfs 1300G partition on lvm problem ...

will tell. sorry if i missed the rest of the thread: please make sure you're using the latest version of reiserfsprogs. ...my 2 cents, Christian. -- make bzImage, not war

file corruption, advice needed

here is interest. but i think it's rather hard to do anything now, because i don't even know if it is a filesystem thing anyway. Thank you for your time, Christian.

file corruption, advice needed

> this is with Debian/stable i386 (AMD K7 SMP), reiserfsprogs 3.6.11. oh, i forgot: kernel 2.4.21-5-k7-smp (Debian Kernel) is running. this seems to be vanilla with some patches applied, details available here: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/README.Debian.1st.gz Thanks, Christian.

Re: file corruption, advice needed

important) reiserfsck is considered as stable now, but backups are always useful, thus you would have this dozen of files backuped now. hm, yes, that makes sense. i am already suspecting some application, but i'll watch out for further corruptions. Thank you for the quick (!!) response, Christian.

Re: reiser3 in cryptoloop

er some days and watch, if you get these errors too. that way one could rule out any interference with the loopdevice. if you can, please use a current kernel too. thank you, Christian. -- make bzImage, not war

Re: plugin for cached network file system

You could try coda. http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ It supports disconnected operation and network caching. I don't know if their "venus" caching daemon blows up if you tell it to cache 20Gig's. Their admin doc says max. 300Meg's for caching. From their homepage: Coda is a distributed filesystem with

Re: Can't mount after mkfs -b 8192

On Thursday 03 June 2004 23:35, David Greaves wrote: > Help :) > > This seems odd... > > Kernel 2.6.6 > progsreiserfs 0.3.0.4-3 > > I have a raid5 array in an LVM2 VG with a 600Gb LV defined. > If I make a reiserfs with a block size of 8192 it won't mount. I'm almost sure that reiserfs supports a

Re: we need a slogan for our reiser4 t-shirt

> But shouldn't it be > Reiser4: No fsck. Or "We ain't fsck'ing around!" -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: we need a slogan for our reiser4 t-shirt

On Friday 25 June 2004 20:09, Christian Iversen wrote: > On Friday 25 June 2004 19:30, Chris Dukes wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:17:47AM -0600, Burnes, James wrote: > > > jim burnes > > > security engineer > > > great-west, denver > > > >

Re: data logging and kernel 2.4.20

On Monday 05 July 2004 12:13, Francisco Javier Cabello Torres wrote: > Hello, > I would like to use data logging feature on a 2.4.20-vanilla kernel. > > I have tried patches from SUSE and everything goes ok. > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.20/ > > The problem is tha

Re: data logging and kernel 2.4.20

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 09:29, Francisco Javier Cabello Torres wrote: > > I'd not suggest to use these, those patches are really old and are likely > > to have bugs. > > Use ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.25/ > > and a kernel >= 2.4.25 with them. > > I have them runnin

Re: Fibration questions

On Thursday 22 July 2004 12:10, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > First question: Can I manually enable/disable a particular plugin for a > > particular directory? (like how cryptocompress is supposed to be...) > > you can change a plugin for a file if it does not destroy its structure. > Thus for an emp

Re: Using fs views to isolate untrusted processes: I need an assistant architect in the USA for Phase I of a DARPA funded linux kernel project

On Monday 02 August 2004 19:29, Hubert Chan wrote: > >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Mayrhuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> writes: > > Christian> Linux VServer might be a project that already tries to > Christian> accomplish this t

Re: Journaling mode

On Wednesday 11 August 2004 19:26, Vijayan Prabhakaran wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to Reiserfs. I think this question might have been answered > before but I couldn't find it. > > I'd like to run Reiserfs with different journaling modes > (data/ordered/writeback). Are these different journaling modes

Re: Quicker alternative to "find /"?

On Monday 16 August 2004 14:04, Felix E. Klee wrote: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:00:41 -0500 wrote: > > In that case, you may want to try a recursive "ls". But for the same > > format as "find", try using "locate" with "updatedb" on a cron job. > > Thanks for the hints. I did some benchmarks: > > fi

Re: Corrupted reiserfs filesystem: please help to solve this - No one ?

On Saturday 21 August 2004 16:40, Melis van den Brink wrote: > No one ? I'm using reiserfs with lvm on servers with 2.4.x kernels and never ever had any problem. The order of the steps you have taken seem to be the right ones. Maybe the text backup file for vgcfgrestore of the lvm config was ol

Re: kernel 2.4.27 reiserfs quotas patch

On Monday 23 August 2004 16:54, Jeff Meyer wrote: > Does anyone know where I could find or even if they exist the patches to > use reiserfs with quotas for the 2.4.27 kernel? I currently am using > reiserfs with quotas on kernel 2.4.26 utilizing the patches for kernel > 2.4.25. > > > Thanks, > > J

Re: warning: vs-8115

On Saturday 28 August 2004 16:24, Haggai Eran wrote: > vs-8115 See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=108383682117097&w=2 It basically says that this message is harmless on kernel 2.6.4. I guess the same holds true for later kernels, too. -- lg, Chris

Re: reiserfs3 filesystem corruption?

On Saturday 28 August 2004 15:27, leon breedt wrote: > hi, > > not sure if i'm going mad here: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ljb $ ls -l /usr/bin/sdiff > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24576 Apr 25 2003 /usr/bin/sdiff* > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ljb $ cp /usr/bin/sdiff . > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/lj

Re: [RFC] Pathname Semantics with //

What about using // as some URI entry point? An URI looks like: PROTOCOL://PROTOCOL_SPECIFIC_NAMESPACE_IMPLEMENTATION As no one can guarantee unix semantics in an URI space only symbolic links are allowed to and from the URL namespace. The "protocol" names are issued by the kernel to prevent clash

Re: Help on reiserfs documentation

On Tuesday 21 September 2004 23:11, Mpriyan wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm learning about reiserfs. So, I'm looking for some documentation that can > explain how the file data is organized on disk in reiserfs 3.6. The > documentation that is available in www.namesys.com says that it is for reiserfs

Re: reiserfs on Redhat Enterprise Linux

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 16:51, Ketil Froyn wrote: > Hi, > > I am investigating a migration of a system relying on reiserfs to Redhat > Enterprise Linux 3. As I understand it, reiserfs is unsupported in > RHEL3, but is available anyway in a kernel-unsupported package or > something like that. Ho

Re: reiserfs3 problem, need advice/guidance

On Thursday 21 October 2004 18:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a server vanilla 2.4.26 SMP kernel, Adaptec SCSI RAID5 w/ reiserfs, been > running fine for about 9 months. > > I recently (last 3 days) started doing some back ups with most current rsync > (2.6.3), just reading from the disk i

Re: [patch] Repacker stats

On Friday 22 October 2004 19:38, Spam wrote: > > Hello, > > I was interested in testing the repacker statistics tool that Piotr > Neuman wrote (and others later added to). But from what I can see > the repacker is disabled in 2.6.9-rc4-mm1, because of this patch: > > http://kernel.

too many iterations - Reiser 4

> Hello > I have got Problems with the Kernel 2.6.9 and reiser 4. I am using the > nitro Patch. http://sepi.be/nitro.php > When I boot Linux, I got this error messages. What shoud I do? > > reiser4[ls(30795)]: traverse_tree (fs/reiser4/search.c:488)[nikita-1481]: > > WARNING: Too many iteratio

RE: too many iterations - Reiser 4

sn't start and function. The PC hangs on the Skript. The output is from syslog. Yes, the numbers continue endlessly. I have only the boot processes. Some days ago the PC is freeze when I use konqueror. I can't work anymore. Distribution: Gentoo thanks christian

Reiserfs kernel config description outdated

I think the sentence "Additional patches are needed for NFS and quotas, please see for links." should be dropped in 2.6. Full message: Reiserfs support (REISERFS_FS) Stores not just filenames but

Re: when will it end?

On Thursday 18 November 2004 06:07, David Masover wrote: > I was talking about perception. People already have Windows, therefore > they already have Windows Defrag. It's "free" in the sense that > Internet Explorer is "free". Imagine how little Firefox's market share > would be if it cost mone

mongo.pl: 2.6.9-cko3, xattrs + journaling

Hi, I did some runs of mongo to see how the journaling filesystems compare to each other on a recent kernel. My focus has been how the fs's compare with enabled acls and xattrs. Summary: 1) data=ordered + acl: reiserfs is best for writing, ext3 for reading. I guess reiserfs becomes s

Re: mongo.pl: 2.6.9-cko3, xattrs + journaling

On Saturday 20 November 2004 20:02, you wrote: > Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I did some runs of mongo to see how the journaling filesystems compare to each > >other on a recent kernel. > >My focus has been how the fs's compare wit

Re: Status of quota support for reiserfs on 2.6.x kernels

On Tuesday 23 November 2004 10:53, Philippe Gramoullé wrote: > > Hello, > > Currently we use some Linux NFS servers with 2.4.25 kernel patched to support quotas. > > Since we face some I/O issues, i'd like to try out a 2.6.x kernel but quota support is mandatory. > > So my question: is quota

Re: file as a directory

On Wednesday 24 November 2004 16:02, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > On 24 Nov 2004 09:16:03 +, Peter Foldiak > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I would really like to implement this for the next version of Hans' file > > system. > > I don't undersand how you want to use Xpath for not XML fil

Re: Question on Reiser4 regarding power failures

On Thursday 25 November 2004 16:37, Bernhard Prell wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have a simple question about Reiser4. I already tried to find the answer in > http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html but I'm not completly sure if I understood > everything :-) > > *Background: > I 'm administrating

Re: Max file size of ReiserFS

On Friday 26 November 2004 10:21, Albert van Dam wrote: > Hi > > I want to know what the maximum file size is of any file on a ReiserFS > partition. > > I'm using SuSE 9.1, with kernel 2.6. Don't know which ReiserFS but it is the > stock one - If you need the version, tell me how to get it and I

Re: file as a directory

On Friday 26 November 2004 19:19, Hans Reiser wrote: > For the case Peter cites, yes, it does add clutter to the pathname to > say "..metas" (actually, it is "" now in the current reiser4, not > "..metas"). This is because you aren't looking for metafile > information, you are looking for a

Re: file as a directory

On Saturday 27 November 2004 12:09, Peter Foldiak wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:13, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > Regarding namespace unification + XPath: > > For files: cat /etc/passwd/[. = "joe"] should work like in XPath. > > I don't understand this.

Re: Question on Reiser4 regarding power failures

On Monday 29 November 2004 10:25, Bernhard Prell wrote: > Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > I'd suggest to do the following for pull the plug scenarios on productive > > systems with reiserfs: > > > 1) Disable write caching for ide drives with "hdparm -W 0 /dev/hdX&

Re: Question on Reiser4 regarding power failures

On Monday 29 November 2004 14:31, Dieter Nützel wrote: > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging > 2.4.25 is "current" for data=ordered|journal > > Greetings, > Dieter > I had these patches running on 2.4.26 and 2.4.27 kernels. Both working fine. I don't know about these patche

Re: Status of quota support for reiserfs on 2.6.x kernels

On Wednesday 15 December 2004 01:29, Klaus Thorn wrote: > Christian Mayrhuber gmx.net> writes: > > > Quotas are in kernel 2.6 and supported by ext2,ext3,reiserfs,xfs. > > Reiserfs doesn't need an extra patch for quotas, data journalling > > or extended attribute

Re: Need Warm Fuzzies, ReiserFS (3)

On Monday 20 December 2004 06:41, Jim Miller wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have recently been burned by the XFS file system -- After a recent > system crash/hang we experienced a lot of file corruption and needed to > restore from a backup that was ~12hrs old. It seems that XFS keeps a > lot of

Re: Need Warm Fuzzies, ReiserFS (3)

On Monday 20 December 2004 16:38, Tom Vier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:31:25PM +0100, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > The barrier mount option should provide protection against a corrupted > > journal during power failure for drives with write caching enabled. > > (Mos

Re: Need Warm Fuzzies, ReiserFS (3)

On Monday 20 December 2004 20:23, Tom Vier wrote: > I was under the impression that they were on by default. I wish this was > documented somewhere; it's very important and i bet a LOT of sysadmins don't > even consider the problems of having write-back caching enabled. At least > most scsi drives

Re: Need Warm Fuzzies, ReiserFS (3)

On Monday 20 December 2004 17:32, Spam wrote: > What happen with the performance when these barriers are active? It's faster than with disk writecache off. I didn't benchmark barriers=flush and writecache on. > > Is it only during power failure the data in the write cache is lost? No. See ht

Re: Need Warm Fuzzies, ReiserFS (3)

On Monday 20 December 2004 21:31, Spam wrote: > > > On Monday 20 December 2004 17:32, Spam wrote: > > >> What happen with the performance when these barriers are active? > > It's faster than with disk writecache off. > > I didn't benchmark barriers=flush and writecache on. > > >> > >> Is it

Re: data corruption on reiserfs

On Thursday 23 December 2004 04:55, Sujeet Kumar wrote: > patni Stationery > > > Hi , > > My log file reported data corruption on reiserfs filesystem. > > The reiserfs version used by log file was 3.6.2-41 where the reported > > defect took place . I ran it again on reiserfs version 3.6.9-33 ,

Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up

ons does this occur? I have 5 installs of debian linux on reiserfs here at home, and I have never had such problems. Is it only in directories with thousands of other files? -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up

> > I also reacted to this response. > > A flaw in the filesystem, in my opinion, is equivalent to the space > ship crashing and all crew members die. To be more exact, it's equal to a mars probe stranding and making many scientists very nervous :-) -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Metafs @ sourceforge

Hi, I came across: http://metafs.sourceforge.net/ About: MetaFS allows users to access information about their files (such as MP3 tags or JPEG EXIF tags) easily and consistently using extended attributes. It also allows them to perform fast searches using this information. It can be easily

Re: reiser4 for windows

x27;s turned off by default. I think a fair share of programs _should_ work, even though they all _ought_ to work. Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more "windows-native"? -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: reiser4 for windows

tivity, not case-crushing. This means that the original case has to be saved, but the crushed case has to be searched. I don't know if that's easy with a hash function, but it seems mightly slow to me. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: reiser4 for windows

On Wednesday 02 February 2005 02:18, David Masover wrote: > Christian Iversen wrote: > | On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:52, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > |>On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: > |>>>Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be mo

reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

Hello, a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze. Therefore he didn't know he couldn't undelete a file on a reiserfs partition with ext2 undelete tool %-( When he called me it was already too late. He had overwr

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote: > Hello > > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > a friend of mine shredded his data (70GB) when he tried to undelete an > > accidentally deleted file. He normally works with windoze

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Wednesday 09 February 2005 10:34, you wrote: > Christian Placzek wrote: > >On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote: > >>Hello > >> > >>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrote: > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>&g

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 February 2005 09:47, you wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:21, Christian Placzek wrot

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:50, you wrote: > Hello > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:54, Christian Placzek wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote: > Hello. > > Christian Placzek wrote: > >On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:01, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > >>Hello > >> > >>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:04, Christian Placzek wrote: > >>>On We

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote: > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > Christian Placzek wrote: > > > >On Wednesday 09 February 20

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files - SOLVED

On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote: > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:09, you wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > Christian Placzek wrote: > > > >On Wednesday 09 February 20

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files

On Thursday 10 February 2005 15:52, you wrote: > Hello > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 15:50, Christian Placzek wrote: > > No, I wasn't. It seems mount doesn't recognize the true file system, > > although the magic exists. > > > > > > 0001 30 76 0D

Re: reiserfs3 rebuild-tree successful but no files - SOLVED

On Friday 11 February 2005 08:54, you wrote: > Hello > > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 10:38, Christian Placzek wrote: > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 16:25, you wrote: > > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:02, Christian Placzek wrote: > > > > > > what if

Re: Plugin for corruption resistance?

nd, surely, updating a hash value when 1 byte changes in a gigabyte file, would be much faster from kernel space where you can actually see the changeset? -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

Hi, If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when running ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/tridge/dbench/dbench-3.02.tar.gz for about an hour with the following script. -- #!/bin/s

Re: Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

Hi! Thanks. I noticed there is already dbench-3.03 available: ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/tridge/dbench/dbench-3.03.tar.gz E.Gryaznova wrote: Hello. We use dbench-2.0 in our testing. Well, dbench-3.02 is added to stressing suit too. Thanks, Lena. -- lg, Chris

Re: Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

Vladimir Saveliev schrieb: Hello On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 02:23, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: Hi, If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when running When you say "hang reiser4" do you mean that system freezes completely (does

Re: Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

Vladimir Saveliev schrieb: Hello On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 00:21, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: Vladimir Saveliev schrieb: Hello On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 02:23, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: Hi, If I'm running plain 2.6.11(.0) patched with reiser4-for-2.6.11-broken-out.2.gz I can hang reiser4 when ru

Re: Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

Vladimir Saveliev schrieb: This problem is fixed, but running your test during several hours caused reiser4 crash. It just happened, so, tomorrow I will take a look at it. I was able to deadlock kernel 2.6.11 + reiser4-for-2.6.11-3.patch.gz + elevator=cfq. This time it happend during the first dben

Re: what happened to reiser4-for-2.6?

David Masover schrieb: reiser4-for-2.6 stops at 2.6.10, and after that, all I can find are patches to mm. Reiser4 seems stable for me, mm does not. Are there still patches somewhere? Also, whoever's in charge of this list, I know my address was bouncing mail for a bit -- did I get kicked from the

Re: Reiser4/2.6.11 dbench hang

David Masover schrieb: sergey ivanov wrote: So how about this deadlock? Is there any expectation about fix for it? Wbr, Sergey. Christian Mayrhuber wrote: Vladimir Saveliev schrieb: This problem is fixed, but running your test during several hours caused reiser4 crash. It just happened

Re: ReiserFS IFSD for Windows

:) I'd also be happy to test it. Is there any chance the read-write code will eventually be integrated? -- Regards, Christian Iversen pgpjpFwNWhjUW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: peak performance

> "Reiserfs: for those of us who are filesystem challenged" "Reiserfs: Makes fsck'ing feel good again" -- Regards, Christian Iversen pgpHHiQe2VzaV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

Hubert Chan schrieb: How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy? Damn, I was wondering how long it would take until someone would come up with a compromise solution ; ) Compromises everywhere will lead to n

Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

Hans Reiser schrieb: Christian Trefzer wrote: Hubert Chan schrieb: How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy? Makes me happy. Nice, how about the others? Hey, if we nee

Re: XFS corruption during power-blackout

Al Boldi wrote: Hi Nathan, You wrote: { On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:08:05PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: True now, not so around 2.4.20 when XFS was rock-solid. I think they tried to improve on performance and broke something. I wish they would fix that because it forced me back to ext3, as in con

Re: Testimonials page

ench, period is for the thousands separator, and > comma is the decimal point. AFAIK it's the same in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, and in fact most of Europe. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: Testimonials page

On Monday 18 July 2005 00:18, Hubert Chan wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:22:32 +0200, Christian Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> In particular, in French, period is for the thousands separator, and > >> comma is the decimal point. > > > > AFAIK i

Re: KDE integration with ReiserFS 4

've heard would be > > well-suited for this task. > > [...] Are there independent implementations of Reiser4 (as in: not > derived from Namesys, Inc. code)? Are there independent implementations of QT? -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: KDE integration with ReiserFS 4

On Wednesday 17 August 2005 02:03, you wrote: > On 8/16/05, Christian Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there independent implementations of QT? > > Well... Google "harmony project" "qt". > > :) Well, funny as it may be :-), "harmon

Re: 15M files

wrapping overhead is a killer. I've seen a java library that solves this exact problem - I can't remember what it was called, but it's page talked about massive speedups because it could somehow avoid the insane wrap-unwrap for each little object. Maybe it could help. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: 15M files

On Saturday 20 August 2005 12:23, PFC wrote: > Isn't this the RAM-based Prevalence ? Yes, I believe that was it. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: Howto make reiser-3.6 a bit more standby friendly?

s that a spin-up/spin-down cycle costs significantly more "lifetime" than running the drive for the same amount of time. You really have to have extremely few spin-ups for this to have any positive effect, IMHO. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: reiser fs slow on mksf and mount

to do "ls -l" on a directory with a 0-10 GB data in it. Is that normal? There's usually less than 50 files of test data, ranging in size from 200MB to 900MB. I've disabled atime updates, but that didn't help much. The controller and disks are plenty fast, so I feel something is amiss. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: WinFS beta out

r an admin to get file X owned by user U, he has to either - Log in as U - Replace the file permissions onX both of which are not easy to do. Yes there are 3rdparty programs such as su.exe that will help tremendously in this, and yes you can just add "administrators" with "full control" to all files, but it's still bad design IMHO. Who ordered the fresh rants? -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: WinFS beta out

n issue, not anything more. I just wanted to say that, so > that all will know that it is only the implementation and UI that I > object to, not the objective. The objective is good. I mostly agree with that - I'm sorry I didn't make it very clear in the post. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

with them, but saying that "ocfs2 is much more exiting" is just plain bashing, and it's not fair to Hans, to Namesys, or to every one of us who can't wait for reiser4 in mainline. Could you please keep your personal idea of which filesystem is more interesting to yourself? It doesn't help anybody accomplish anything. -- Regards, Christian Iversen (not affiliated with namesys..)

Re: Reiser4 file recovery

27;s easier to have backups. As usually, Gibson "Research" is skimpy on details, so I'm not entirely sure if spinrite is anything more than a disk imager. If not, just use the free (gratis && libre) dd_rescue program instead. It will save you $50. -- Regards, Christian Iversen

Re: Reiser4 file recovery

On Monday 10 October 2005 17:19, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote: > Christian Iversen wrote: > >On Monday 10 October 2005 17:06, michael chang wrote: > >>On 10/10/05, Yiannis Mavroukakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Hello :-) > >>> > >>>I

[reiserfs-list] What is the most stable solution/kernel for nfs and reiserfs?

Hi, I searched in the mailinglist archives but did not find a clear answer which kernel and nfs daemon to use to export space on a raid array formatted with reiserfs. Here is what I want to do: -- Export a 130GByte Raid Array to various servers containing webspace and the

Re: [reiserfs-list] kernel-2.4.6-pre3 to 2.2.19 NFS tests

Am Friday 22 June 2001 11:39 schrieben Sie: > > Try testing with Bonnie++, the file creation and deletion tests will give > interesting results! ;) > > In one test I had an AIX machine that was moderately grunty (two fast > POWER CPU's, 6 hard drives on a 160MB/s bus, 256M of RAM). When running

Re: [reiserfs-list] optimizing reiserfs for large files?

Hi all! at the moment i'm testing some FS for our low coast filer, is an dual P3 866MHz, ICP Vortex(64Bit PCI), Easyraid(HW-Raid,250GB), 512MB Ram with Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.5 from kernel.org, knfsd_patch, umount fix patch. now my I/O results with bonnie++, file size 1GB, fsync() enabled !!! Sequ

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 + reiserfs PRODUCTION STABILITY

On Thursday 12 July 2001 14:09, Totoro wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > On Thursday 12 July 2001 10:57, Totoro wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've been running a single processor, ICP Vortex

[reiserfs-list] knfsd Problem - short question

knfsd patch, thought its very stable and would use it for an production system - Christian Gottschalch / / _ UNIX-Spezialist

  1   2   >