On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:48:25AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
For Suspend2, we ended up converting the LZF support to a cryptoapi
plugin. Is there any chance that you could use cryptoapi modules? We
could then have a hope of sharing the support.
Using cryptoapi plugins for the compression
Hi.
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 06:05 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Hmm. LZO is the best compression algorithm for the task as measured by
the objectives of good compression effectiveness while still having very
low CPU usage (the best of those written and GPL'd, there is a slightly
better one
Hi.
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 13:59 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:48:25AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
For Suspend2, we ended up converting the LZF support to a cryptoapi
plugin. Is there any chance that you could use cryptoapi modules? We
could then have a hope of
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:34:26 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch below is so-called reiser4 LZO compression plugin as extracted
from 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.
I think it is an unauditable piece of shit and thus should not enter
mainline.
Like lib/inflate.c (and this new code
On 8/27/06, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:34:26 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch below is so-called reiser4 LZO compression plugin as extracted
from 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.
I think it is an unauditable piece of shit and thus should not enter
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:34:26 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch below is so-called reiser4 LZO compression plugin as extracted
from 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.
I think it is an unauditable piece of shit and thus should not enter
mainline.
Like lib/inflate.c
Le 22.08.2006 15:08, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
Hello,
On 12 August 2006 17:26, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 03.08.2006 17:07, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55,
Hello,
On 12 August 2006 17:26, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 03.08.2006 17:07, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 01:23, Hans Reiser wrote:
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
No problem. I'll post what I find to the list; the posts will
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 01:23, Hans Reiser wrote:
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
No problem. I'll post what I find to the list; the posts will
Thanks Andrew, please be patient and persistent with us at this time, as
one programmer is on vacation, and the other is only able to work a few
hours a day due to an illness.
Hans
Am Donnerstag 17 August 2006 18:35 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
Hi,
Using the reiser4 patch 3 for 2.6.17 with a 2.6.18-rc4 kernel (I ported the
reiser4 patch by hand with help of mm kernel...) I wasn't able to boot a
nfsroot client with the image residing on a master with reiser4
partition. The
Hello,
On 17 August 2006 20:38, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Am Donnerstag 17 August 2006 18:35 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
Hi,
Using the reiser4 patch 3 for 2.6.17 with a 2.6.18-rc4 kernel (I
ported the reiser4 patch by hand with help of mm kernel...) I
wasn't able to boot a nfsroot client
Am Donnerstag 17 August 2006 19:36 schrieb Alexander Zarochentsev:
Hello,
On 17 August 2006 20:38, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Am Donnerstag 17 August 2006 18:35 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
Hi,
Using the reiser4 patch 3 for 2.6.17 with a 2.6.18-rc4 kernel (I
ported the reiser4 patch by
Hello
On Saturday 12 August 2006 17:26, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 03.08.2006 17:07, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What
Le 14.08.2006 13:50, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
On Saturday 12 August 2006 17:26, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 03.08.2006 17:07, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006
Le 03.08.2006 17:07, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:01:42AM -0400, David Masover wrote:
A warning isn't good? Would you rather it be an error?
Of course not. It merely appears inconsistent to offer a root fs choice
that may cause severe problems at bootup time.
When I went to install my first SuSE (brand-new 6.1 at
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 20:05 -0400, David Masover wrote:
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so installing
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:09:42PM -0400, David Masover wrote:
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Few people keep a 32MB ext2 for /boot purposes these days, so it
really is imperative that grub can read kernel images off a reiser4
/.
I think there are patches, but I do keep a 32 meg ext3 for
On 8/8/06, Christian Trefzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub is a bootloader and as such should (as an optimum) be able to grab
kernels off of any fs. I guess patches are accepted by upstream
developers?
Grub v1 (The one we all know) is alpha status according to their devs.
Its no longer under
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 2:05:23 AM, you wrote:
Under what, though? I don't want MS crap on my OS X (need that for work
ATM), and I can't imagine they've ported it to Linux. I have no reason
to boot Windows except for games, and if I was going to do that, I may
as well shrink
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
I tried to create a kernel package with reiser4 for ubuntu-server (dapper)
They ship a 2.6.15 (heavily modified) kernel upon which the current
reiser4-for-2.6.17-3.patch applies fine but unfortunately miscompiles, eg.
Christian Trefzer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
There also is an issue with grub. The kernel alone is fine for creating
partitions
(or loop devices) but with grub not patched we can't install boot partitions.
No biggy,
I guess, but still a problem.
Hello David,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 7:09:42 PM, you wrote:
I mean, having Grub support everything would be nice, but if you're
reformatting anyway, I don't think it's that imperative.
I have come up to that conclusion too. If someone would be getting
an r4-enabled kernel on an already
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
hi
I have built today an r4-patched ubuntu kernel package (yes, debs!)
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Please note, that this is done all under virtualization
(Microsoft Virtual PC).
Not to nitpick, but isn't
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so installing
is a real snap.
Not to nitpick, but isn't that emulation? Or have they actually done
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so installing
is a real snap.
Under what, though? I don't want MS crap on my
I know it is very easy to create ubuntu kernel packages (I have done a few)
I might try to do one for current dapper kernel for i386. But it would have
to wait due to time my personal constraints (projects, etc.)
Answering myself...
I tried to create a kernel package with reiser4 for
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:55:57AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for inclusion (search for Silent semantic changes in Reiser4):
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
cache tree to this new FS (cache size was about
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:55:57AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for inclusion (search for Silent semantic changes in Reiser4):
The furor was caused
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
that include reiser4?
Suse excluded reiser4 from 10.1 because they want to keep the kernel cleaner
than
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
that include reiser4?
One more
Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for
It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to edgy
features.
Could you contact him for us, and ask? It is more convincing when users
On 03/08/06, Maciej Sołtysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to edgy
features.
Could you
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
Sander Sweers wrote:
With the approval of Namesys I would like to add a new entry to the wiki
frontpage.
It would be very appreciated.
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:26:55 +0100
Denis Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reiser4 thread seem to be longer than usual.
Meanwhile here's poor old me trying to find another four hours to finish
reviewing the thing.
Thanks Andrew.
The writeout code is ugly,
Hello David,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 11:46:34 PM, you wrote:
You must be new here...
;-)
I wanted to point out that because:
Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
lkml collide.
and:
The speed of a nonworking program is irrelevant.
The
Hello
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 20:18 -0600, Hans Reiser wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4 writeouts atoms. Most of pages get into atoms via
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4 writeouts atoms. Most of pages get into atoms via
Hello
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 07:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Do you think that if reiser4 supported xattrs - it would increase its
chances on inclusion?
Probably the opposite.
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:28 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 11:46:34 PM, you wrote:
You must be new here...
;-)
I wanted to point out that because:
Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
lkml collide.
and:
On 8/1/06, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:24:37 +0400
Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writeout code is ugly, although that's largely due to a mismatch
between
what reiser4 wants to do and what the VFS/MM expects it to do.
Yes. reiser4
Hello Ingo,
there is a new reiser4 / lock validator problem:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:57, Laurent Riffard wrote:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
mv/29012
On 8/1/06, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Do you think that if reiser4 supported xattrs - it would increase its
chances on inclusion?
Probably the opposite.
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory
Hello Sander,
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote:
Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an
ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-Sources
Debian has reiser4progs and kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4:
- stable:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello Sander,
Hey
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote:
Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an
ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-Sources
Nate Diller wrote:
On 8/1/06, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
I could be entirely wrong, though. I speak for neither
Hans/Namesys/reiserfs nor LKML. Talk amongst yourselves...
i should clarify things a bit here. yes, hans' goal is for there to
be no
I think that most of our problem is that we are too socially insulated
from lkml. They are a herd, and decide things based on what thoughts
echo most loudly. That none of the shy developers working for me
actively post on lkml hurts us quite a bit.
It might even be socially effective to shut
Hans Reiser wrote:
I think that most of our problem is that we are too socially insulated
from lkml. They are a herd, and decide things based on what thoughts
echo most loudly.
To be fair, it's not the whole lkml you have to convince, just the few
people directly responsible for filesystems
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:08 -0500, David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
It might even be socially effective to shut down reiserfs-list until
inclusion occurs.
Maybe. It will be an inconvenience for me, if we have to. I'm not even
on LKML, and I'd rather not be -- even this list can
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 20:57 +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
cache tree to this new FS (cache size was about 20~30 Mbytes).
Something like:
# mkfs.reiser4
Hello David,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 1:30:47 AM, you wrote:
Amen. I do not want to see Reiser4 not succeed because of politics, and
it really looks like the only way to win the political war is not to
play. The technical stuff is really the last way in, but neither side
has said anything
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
- it is more expensive to:
a) succeed at kernel inclusion
b) argue
c) waste time
You must be new here...
Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
lkml collide.
Is option A possible? The speed of a nonworking
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Hi,
I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
Hmm, I'm curious, though... How does it react to a few billion files?
Sorry, I can't test this, but I will be testing MythTV, if not
Christian Trefzer wrote on 07/30/06 15:38:
Hi,
I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
Lucky you. I tried -rc2-mm1 today, and out of habit, the first thing I do is an
fsck on my reiser4 partitions. And
Thanks Christian. You can go ahead and add something to our wiki
pointing to it if you would like. This might help tide people over
until the repacker ships.
Hans
Mike Benoit wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 07:34 -0500, David Masover wrote:
The compression will probably mostly be about speed. Remember, if
we're
talking about people who want to see tangible, visceral results,
we're
probably also talking about end-users. And trust me, the vast
majority
David Masover wrote:
And it's not just databases. Consider BitTorrent. The usual
BitTorrent way of doing things is to create a sparse file, then fill
it in randomly as you receive data. Only if you decide to allocate
the whole file right away, instead of making it sparse, you gain
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 23:53 -0600, Hans Reiser wrote:
We have 3 levels of optimization: 1) at each modification, 2) at each
flush, and 3) at each repack. Each of these operates on a different
time scale, and all 3 are worthy of doing as right as we can.
Now, the issue of where should
Mike Benoit wrote:
Could you not also write a small little app that gathers all kinds of
stats about a file system and sends it to a Namesys server in hopes of
finding better statistical data? I'm sure there are thousands of users
Assuming the results are all made available, essentially
Hi,
The portage tree is such a fine testing object since it should be sort
of a best case scenario for reiser filesystems, and needs no real
backup in case of a screwup during tests.
I've been on Gentoo for years now, used reiser3 since the days when you
had to patch it into a 2.2 kernel and
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 07:34 -0500, David Masover wrote:
The compression will probably mostly be about speed. Remember, if
we're
talking about people who want to see tangible, visceral results,
we're
probably also talking about end-users. And trust me, the vast
majority
of most of my
Hello Andreas,
Saturday, July 22, 2006, 1:06:54 AM, you wrote:
On 17:45 Fri 21 Jul , David Masover wrote:
Question, then: Can the ext2 defrag work on a raw ext3 partition, without
having to convert it first?
Dunno, but I don't think so
I tried that once, back in 2002 i think. defrag
Mike Benoit wrote:
code. Even just compressing that small portion though I could probably
save between 5-10GB. The difference is though I can do a df before, and
a df after, and I can instantly see I got my moneys worth. Same with
encryption.
In the case of encryption, it's also got
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
On a more positive note, Reiser4.1 is getting closer to release
Good news! But it's been awhile since I've followed development, and
the homepage seems out of date (as usual). Where can I find a list of
changes since v4?
By out of date, I
Sigh, no, the repacker will probably be after 4.1
The list of tasks for zam looks something like:
fix bugs that arise
debug read optimization code (CPU reduction only, has no effect on IO),
1 week est. (would be nice if it was less)
review compression code 1 day per week until it
Hans Reiser wrote:
I am not sure that putting the repacker after fsync is the right choice
Does the repacker use fsync? I wouldn't expect it to.
Does fsync benefit from a properly packed FS? Probably.
Also, while I don't expect anyone else to be so bold, there is a way
around fsync
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 02:44 -0600, Hans Reiser wrote:
fix fsync performance (est. 1 week of time to make post-commit writes
asynchronous, maybe 3 weeks to create fixed-reserve for write twice
blocks, and make all fsync blocks write twice)
write repacker (12 weeks).
I am not sure that
Mike Benoit wrote:
Tuning fsync will fix the last wart on Reiser4 as far as benchmarks are
concerned won't it? Right now Reiser4 looks excellent on the benchmarks
that don't use fsync often (mongo?), but last I recall the fsync
performance was so poor it overshadows the rest of the performance.
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:06 -0500, David Masover wrote:
Mike Benoit wrote:
Tuning fsync will fix the last wart on Reiser4 as far as benchmarks are
concerned won't it? Right now Reiser4 looks excellent on the benchmarks
that don't use fsync often (mongo?), but last I recall the fsync
On 14:37 Fri 21 Jul , Mike Benoit wrote:
No Linux file system that I'm aware of has a defragmentor, but they DO
become fragmented, just not near as bad as FAT32 used to when MS created
their defragmentor.
Forgotten ext2? ;-) Funny thing: If your ext3 got too fragmented:
convert it back to
Mike Benoit wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:06 -0500, David Masover wrote:
Mike Benoit wrote:
Tuning fsync will fix the last wart on Reiser4 as far as benchmarks are
concerned won't it? Right now Reiser4 looks excellent on the benchmarks
that don't use fsync often (mongo?), but last I recall
Andreas Schäfer wrote:
On 14:37 Fri 21 Jul , Mike Benoit wrote:
No Linux file system that I'm aware of has a defragmentor, but they DO
become fragmented, just not near as bad as FAT32 used to when MS created
their defragmentor.
Forgotten ext2? ;-) Funny thing: If your ext3 got too
On 17:45 Fri 21 Jul , David Masover wrote:
Question, then: Can the ext2 defrag work on a raw ext3 partition, without
having to convert it first?
Dunno, but I don't think so
pgp3cS9WVSQCi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your detailed explanation is appreciated David and while I'm far from a
file system expert, I believe you've overstated the negative effects
somewhat.
It sounds to me like you've gotten Reiser4's allocation process in
regards to wandering logs correct, from what I've read anyways, but I
think
Mike Benoit wrote:
On top of that, I don't see how a repacker would help these work loads
much as the files usually have a high churn rate.
I think Reiserfs is used on a lot more than squid servers. For them,
80% of files don't move for long periods of time is the usual industry
statistic
Mike Benoit wrote:
Your detailed explanation is appreciated David and while I'm far from a
file system expert, I believe you've overstated the negative effects
somewhat.
It sounds to me like you've gotten Reiser4's allocation process in
regards to wandering logs correct, from what I've read
: Frieder Bürzele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.16 (version 3)
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.16/reiser4-for-2.6.16-3.patch.gz
contains the most recent reiser4 code which is considered stable
Hans Reiser wrote:
On a more positive note, Reiser4.1 is getting closer to release
Good news! But it's been awhile since I've followed development, and
the homepage seems out of date (as usual). Where can I find a list of
changes since v4?
By out of date, I mean things like this:
Thanks. Now with debug enabled I've gotten:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/panic1.txt.gz
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/fsck1_--check.txt.gz
Hello
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 07:28 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
Thanks. Now with debug enabled I've gotten:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060719/panic1.txt.gz
the attached patch fixes a problem nikita-2967 reports about. Would you
please check whther it
I haven't hit nikita-2967 again, but I got several other interesting
results.
The first panic didn't cause corruption:
reiser4 panicked cowardly: reiser4[pdflush(16048)]: scan_by_coord
(fs/reiser4/flush.c:3431)[nikita-3435]:
Kernel panic - not syncing: reiser4[pdflush(16048)]:
Hello
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:24 +0200, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Hello,
I just got this warning:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
nautilus/3229 is trying
Hello
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:52 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
Thanks for the patch, but I can still reproduce the problem. I've been
running the attached program to try to speed up the testing process a
bit. Interrupting and restarting the compilation loop also seems to
help.
ok
If I
Hello
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has my previous post
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfsm=115259665831650w=2) been
overlooked, or have I not provided enough information? Do I need to
reproduce these issues on 2.6.18-rc1-mm2? Should I be trying any
Hello
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 18:10 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 12:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has my previous post
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfsm=115259665831650w=2) been
overlooked, or have I not provided enough information? Do I
Thanks for the patch, but I can still reproduce the problem. I've been
running the attached program to try to speed up the testing process a
bit. Interrupting and restarting the compilation loop also seems to
help.
If I had hours to wait, it would probably crash eventually without
additional
I tried 2.6.17-mm6 (was the latest at the time) and reiser4 still always
fails when it runs out of memory. My test has been building a kernel
with enough jobs to exhaust memory. Expecting problems, I began by
testing reiser4 with debugging enabled.
The first time, I got the panic below after
It doesn't look like this issue has been fixed:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060702/reiser4_kio_http.txt.gz
Again fsck showed a clean filesystem. Should I try -mm?
This is somewhat difficult to reproduce because the critical factor
seems to be using all
Hello
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 01:18 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
It doesn't look like this issue has been fixed:
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/AMD64_reiser4_debug/20060702/reiser4_kio_http.txt.gz
Again fsck showed a clean filesystem. Should I try -mm?
Yes, please try to check
This seems to be fixed with 2.6.17-mm6.
-Joe
Joe Feise writes:
I consistently get cowardly panic errors during bootup with 2.6.17-mm5 (I also
had that with -mm3, and had hoped -mm5 would have fixed it.)
It corrupts the partition this is happening on (/var)
I don't have dmesg or syslog
Hello
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 14:56 -0400, Diego Pinheiro wrote:
I'm having another problem when running reiser4 on top of software raid 0
(dmraid)...
I can work the filesystem fine (mount, copy, create, delete, move, etc...) -
even big ammount of data ( 3Gb) as a separate (non / - root
that other mail posted on the mailing
archives, which I have no idea how to reference it from here... the meta-data
of such email is:
List: reiserfs
Subject:Re: reiser4 oops
From: Jake Maciejewski maciejej () msoe ! edu
Date: 2006-07-03 22:24:29
Message-ID
Hello
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 22:24 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote:
I'm seeing this on 2.6.16.20 with the -4 patch, amd64 with preempt. The
OOM killer was called even though I have 1GB RAM and 4GB swap. My logs
are available at:
101 - 200 of 1292 matches
Mail list logo
