Hi,
Could revision 986795 be merged into the tag for kopete for KDE 4.3 RC 1? It
fixes a critical login error with the Yahoo! protocol.
Thanks
--
Matt
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-tea
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 11:32:01 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > KDE 4.2.1 tagging is scheduled for tomorrow around 23:59 UTC. Please make
> > sure that your fixes are included and backported to 4.2 branch until
> > then.
> >
> >
> > If t
On Monday 23 February 2009 14:00:03 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> iirc the plans are to tag 4.2.1 this week wednesday/thursday. anyone know
> of a blocking issue?
>
> the only two things I know so far is the inability to build kdebindings
> with Qt 4.5, and the upgrade bug with kssl configuration b
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:25:09PM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 08 February 2009 9:34:20 am Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > At the same time the schedule for 4.3 is fixed, what are the plans for the
> > > revision released of 4.2?
> >
> > Given that almost two weeks after KDE 4.2.
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 18:29:48 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> --\/
>
> > did anyone create a 4.2.0-blocker keyword in bugzilla yet and ask people
> > to tag bugreports with them?
>
> Somehow I misread "keyword" as "bu
On Monday 12 January 2009 14:26:48 Allen Winter wrote:
> Yes, this is tedious... but... needs to be done.
>
> Module coordinators:
>
> Please remember to transfer the In Progress and TODO items from the
> 4.2 Feature Plan into the 4.3 Feature Plan.
>
> If we split the work up between all of us it s
On Saturday 03 January 2009 09:35:17 am Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I remember correctly usually the branching happens at release candidate
> fase, does that mean that later this week trunk becomes 4.3 and open for
> features again?
>
> Toma
Correct. I, for one, can't wait until trunk reopens.
Hi,
Can we add new strings in order to fix bugs or are those strings covered as
part of the string freeze?
Also, Is there a techbase page that defines what the string freeze rules are?
I couldn't find one by searching for "string freeze" on techbase.
--
Matt
___
On Sunday 21 December 2008 12:41:48 pm Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see on IRC the question if we depend on 4.5 for the 4.2.0 release. What
> should be my answer?
>
> Best,
>
> Toma
IMHO, the answer should be 'no'.
--
Matt
___
release-team mailing list
Hi,
I know we haven't implemented the whole "always summer in trunk" scheme, but I
wonder if we can go ahead and branch KDE 4.2 and reopen trunk. Just for kopete
alone, I have 3 patches, and a whole new protocol support plugin to integrate
and I'm sure other projects would benefit from this as wel
On Monday 24 November 2008 10:57:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2008, Eva Brucherseifer wrote:
> > - besides that there are issues with telepathy. Telepathy changes spec
> > versions all the time, which makes it very difficult for others to use
> > that technology.
>
> this is con
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:45:24PM +, George Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Allen Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 11:38:23 am Torsten Rahn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Are there KDE apps that will use Decibel in KDE 4.2?
> >> > We only have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> Adding the Release Team to this discussion.
>
> On Thursday 13 November 2008 8:40:09 am Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > Hi Allen,
> >
> > I know we are a bit late, but we'd like to move the library
> >
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playgr
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
> Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
> Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
>
> * KDevelop and KDevplatform modules
> ^^ late, but will sorta be par
On Monday 20 October 2008 15:53:59 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Just curious.. the release schedule says we have an Alpha tagging on 21
> Oct.
>
> Still planned?
>
> I recall some discussions about Alpha vs. regular weekly snapshot.
> And if Alphas really made sense anymore.
>
> I don't remembe
On Friday 17 October 2008 02:14:55 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> figured out that this can be interesting for people here too.
>
> -Riccardo
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Polishing kdeartwork
> Date: Thursday 16 October 2008
> From: Riccardo Iaconelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED] d
On Sep 14, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I want to let everyone know that I am now employed by KDAB.
> I am not currently assigned any specific KDE development tasks,
> but that could change in the future.
>
Congratulations!
> This new job will definitely impact the amount
On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:27:15 Dominik Haumann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I think we do a terrible job of keeping the community informed
>>> about
>>> approaching milestones.
>>>
>>>
On Sep 9, 2008, at 4:12 AM, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Mandag 08 september 2008 23:05:49 skrev Andreas Pakulat:
>> I've checked the apropriate techbase page and just wanted to
>> double-check wethere there's anything, besides being subscribed to
>> this
>> list and putting my name on the Release
On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately Matt Rogers recently had to step down from the role of
> Maintainer/Release Coordinator for the kdevelop and kdevplatform
> module.
>
> So we (that is the KDevelop developer team) tried to find a
On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In rescheduling the 4.2 release, it seems we missed the fact that by
> moving the schedule forward, we can no longer depend on Qt 4.5. I
> wonder if that is the right thing to do. What would be the
> disadvantage to revert this change
On Aug 17, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Sunday 17 August 2008 17:19:06 Matt Rogers wrote
>> I'm afraid I don't follow anything in the first paragraph after the
>> first 20 words or so. Perhaps you could clarify a bit more?
>
> Next year's Ak
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> should we get some more structure into Playground? I fear it will
> otherwise
> end in the state kdenonbeta has been before if it isn't already:
> Lot's of
> started projects, but most of them dead code, making people
>
On Aug 22, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The recent build problems in our kdesupport package dependencies
> needs to be addressed.
>
> I think we need to treat kdesupport libs just like any other
> external dependency.
>
> Something like the following guidelines:
>
> No KDE
On Aug 16, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Wade Olson wrote:
> Sebas,
>
> Remember with Akademy 2009 proposed to start in mid-July, we had
> discussed potentially sliding up the 4.2 and 4.3 and bugfix to
> their hearts' content at Akademy 2009 release days each one week, to
> allow for a tagging and rel
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Benoit Minisini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently committing patches to kicker for KDE 3.5.10.
>
> Some of the patches are not yet committed, because I am waiting the
> agreement
> of Aaron or other old kicker maintainers.
>
> KDE 3.5.10 was announced for "mid August"
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:50:05AM -0400, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that we have the RC1 tagging in 1 week (8 July).
>
> Please let's concentrate on fixing the more important bugs and show-stoppers.
>
> After RC1 is tagged, only urgent fixes will be permitted.
>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:04:41PM +0200, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> contrary to our previous schedule of one month per patch release, I'd like to
> delay 4.0.6 to the undefined future to not drag away ressources from KDE 4.1
> schedule, which is way more important.
>
> any objections t
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:44:51AM +0200, Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since my request on k-c-d to the developers to either move it to playground
> or announce it at k-c-d for inclusion is ignored. I wonder if it is ok if I
> move it back to playground myself. Opinions?
>
> Toma
Move it.
--
M
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 09:16:01 am Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> To avoid future confusion, rdale and I have added a new milestone
> to the 4.1 Release Plan [1] specifying a milestone for a bindings freeze:
>
> 8 July: No new additions to the language bindings, except optional bindings
> as pe
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 08:29:24 am Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Um.. .we forgot to put in a separate milestone for Doc/Handbook changes.
>
> Unless there are objections, I'd like to create one for 3 June 2008.
>
> This gives another 2 weeks for creating content.
> Then we have about 6 weeks f
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:54:32 you wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Any objection to moving KJots from kdeutils into kdepim?
>>
>> The kjots.desktop file even puts itself into the PIM Utilities category.
>>
>> One big reason to do t
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 08:58:48PM +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like a clarification on the artwork freeze. What is it and what is it
> for?
> For when stuff like the oxygen cursor set need be merged?
>
> Bye,
> -Riccardo
It needs to be merged before the artwork freeze. In this
On Monday 05 May 2008 12:50:51 Allen Winter wrote:
> Given that
> 1) new features are closed in 2 weeks (19 May)
> 2) new stuff must stay in kdereview for 2 weeks
>
> I guess kdereview should be closed for now?
>
> Which makes Decibel a no-go for 4.1.
> Drat.
>
> Also, Christopher Blauvelt wants to
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:46:48 Allen Winter wrote:
> Here's a list of our goals for 4.1.
> Please provide a status update, if you can:
>
> - Windows port (Frameworks and Applications)
> - Mac port (Frameworks and Applications)
> - OpenSolaris port
> - Plasma with widgets on canvas, makes things lik
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 19:19:13 Rafael Fernández López wrote:
> Hi Allen and release team,
>
> I have been working some time on a new widget for kdelibs. Its place would
> be kdelibs/kdeui/widgets. I need to polish its documentation, and I will
> have it ready at most for next week.
>
> The prope
On Monday 28 April 2008 05:30:25 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > * KCalc - scientific calculator
>
> KCalc should be replaced by speedcrunch in my opinion, but that would
> require the speedcrunch developers to propose it rathe
On Sunday 20 April 2008 06:09:22 Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On the agenda for this week is the tagging of Alpha 1. As I understand from
> IRC the fallout from the plasma hacking event is pretty big and the current
> state is less than what we want to display to our alpha testing user base.
>
On Sunday 16 March 2008 15:52:51 Mauricio Piacentini wrote:
> According to the schedule, we have a soft freeze on April 7th. For KDE
> Games, I want to be sure I know what this means. We have some games in
> playground yet, others in kdereview. Do we need to have all apps that
> will be in 4.1 in t
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:05:49AM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
>
> > Some people have expressed a desire for a more formal release around the
> > soft feature freeze date. If we let it slip a week, would that make it
> > easier
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:18:03PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to schedule 4.0.3 tagging on March 26th. Any comments?
>
> (After the flamewars on the 4.0.2 release I currently don't see the point,
> though I'd like to stick with a time based release).
>
> Another option w
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:14:58PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can we move the hard feature freeze back to the message freeze time (Around
> beta1)?
>
> Thanks,
> Dirk
Sure. Are you going to update the wiki page?
--
Matt
___
release-team
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
>
> > My impression (and the one of other, I gathered that from past discussions)
> > is that two months to stabilise a 4.x release should really be enough. More
> > time in free
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:18:11 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> > Tobias can answer for sure, but there is a server and a client
> > in kdereview/decibel. So maybe the work branch can be
> > removed now??
>
> Can we clarify that before moving things ar
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:18:58 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> > We plan to release KDevelop 3.5.1 together with KDE 3.5.9.
> >
> > Can the KDE release team do that for us ?
> > If not, what do we need to do ?
>
> which branch should be relea
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 19:01:10 you wrote:
> On Saturday 26 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > I've posted a new schedule on
> > http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Schedules/KDE4/4.1_Release_Schedu
> >le that should work as the nearly final release sch
On Monday 11 February 2008 08:25:49 am Allen Winter wrote:
> SVN commit 773599 by winterz:
>
> copied here from playground for review and eventual move to kdepim or
> kdenetwork.
>
this is not all of decibel, or the most important part. There is also
branches/work/decibel that will most likely ne
On Saturday 26 January 2008 06:52:14 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008 23:28:37 Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Taking into account the feedback received in the previous release
> > schedule, I've posted a new schedule on
> > http://techbase.
Hi,
Taking into account the feedback received in the previous release schedule,
I've posted a new schedule on
http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Schedules/KDE4/4.1_Release_Schedule
that should work as the nearly final release schedule.
Feedback is appreciated.
Thanks
--
Matt
signature
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since the
> discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been said.
> My impression from re-reading all those emails is that most people wou
On Jan 13, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Thomas Zander wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2008 14:55:44 Stephan Binner wrote:
I think it is fine in kdemultimedia.
So workspace makes sound/noise (and not few) but you have no control
over volume/mute without an additional module?
doesn't phonon provide volume
On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:42 AM, Tom Albers wrote:
Op vrijdag 11 januari 2008 00:52 schreef u:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
I think we should move kwalletmanager from kdeutils into kdebase/
apps.
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
available
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
available
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
available in
our base system.
More critical than kmix? :-) Wantin
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:37:33AM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I think we should move kwalletmanager from kdeutils into kdebase/apps.
> The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be available in our
> base system.
>
> Comments? Objections?
>
> PS. we still don't have a
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
>
> > Kinda arbitrary. It's based on people wanting a 6 month release cycle
> > combined with where my finger happened to land on the calender when i
> >
On Jan 8, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
if we do go for a june/july release of 4.1 perhaps we can also
use that
as a learning experience to see just how well it does work (though
und
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:34 AM, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
Not perfect, but it's a start. Comments?
I miss the following information:
a) Why was July chosen? Was it because it is 4.0 + 6months? So if
it is "old
release + 6months", the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Based on the feedback so far, I've come up with the following very
rough schedule for KDE 4.1:
April 28th: Soft Feature Freeze. Features not already finished or
listed on the planned features page will have to wait until KDE 4.2.
May 19th: Ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 02:14:02 Matt Rogers wrote:
>> Why exactly do the distros matter when planning our releases? (I know
>> I've asked this and it's been expl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 18:14:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Monday 07 January 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>>> - Release 6-monthly, that would align us with downstream (distros)
>>> - Release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sunday 06 January 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 08:14:03 Urs Wolfer wrote:
>>> I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk.
>>>
>>> Bye
>>> urs
>>
On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Urs Wolfer wrote:
> I think it's now time again to enable all krazy checks for trunk.
>
> Bye
> urs
Agreed. Now that trunk is open again for all commits, let's go ahead
and reenable those checks.
--
Matt
___
release-team m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 4, 2008, at 3:59 AM, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
>
>>> Anyway... how to proceed? Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0
>>> tarball?
>> Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime.
>
> Are w
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:17:36AM -0500, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 06:20:19 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 22:04:20 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > For 4.x, where x >=1, I think we need to require maintainers for all our
> > > modules.
> >
> > While h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without objections I will move Kompare to extragear tomorrow
> evening and add it to the keg-tarball-on-release-project.
>
> The 24h waiting period starts now.
> --
I object. It's already b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:53 AM, John Tapsell wrote:
> +1 vote for not including and having a 4.1 release within 3-4 months
> of 4.0. I think everyone can be satisfied with that.
I'm not. :P You get basically two months to develop and add new
feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 12:35:29 Mauricio Piacentini wrote:
>> >I think we might want to bump pretty quickly to a 4.1 release and
>> >that's when we can enable it again (and move some gam
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 11:47:15 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Please see Andreas Hartmetz's message in kde-core-devel
> entitled "Request to merge the newssl branch".
>
> Nobody has responded to the message yet.
>
> But we should make a quick decision.
> Merging the branch might give us t
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 05:08:09 Tom Albers wrote:
> Op Tuesday 11 December 2007 03:14 schreef u:
> > If Kevin wants to take over maintenance, that's fine, but making
> > Kompare ready for KDE 4.0 seems like a goal not reachable considering
> > when the release is going to be.
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 18:18:04 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Excellent. Great News!
>>> Then I suggest you:
>>> 1) commit your patches into kdesdk/kompare
>>> 2) uncomment the add_subdirectory(kom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dimarts 11 Desembre 2007, Allen Winter va escriure:
>> On Monday 10 December 2007 18:04:16 Kevin Kofler wrote:
In Bug 153463 [1], Kevin Kofler provides some patches to make the
curre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 18:04:16 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> In Bug 153463 [1], Kevin Kofler provides some patches to make the
>>> current
>>> Kompare code in kdesk compile (and work, I guess).
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Kompare currently isn't being built in kdesdk.
> In fact, the kdesdk/CMakeLists.txt file has this line:
>
> MESSAGE(STATUS "Kompare from the branches/work/kompare/3-way-
> kompare will re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 27, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> Our current schedule says that we'll be tagging 4.0 coming week. I
> propose
> shifting the release into January and instead doing -rc2 next. That
> gives us
> one more month for getting ri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 26. November 2007 17:53:17 Dirk Mueller wrote:
>> On Sunday 25 November 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
>>> We should tap into coolo's experience here. My proposal would be
>>> to have
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 25, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them
> to be
> removed of KDE.
At least move kregexpeditor to playground. It's on my TODO to make it
work again, but I'll need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 24, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Are we willing to permit BIC changes to the Dev Platform?
>
> If so, under what conditions?
>
> There are still requests coming into k-c-d for BIC changes to kdelibs
> and I'm sure there h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2007 07:51:41 Dirk Mueller wrote:
>> On Sunday 11 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>
>>> Can we have it back already?
>>
>> I`m not opposed to re-enabling it, as long a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
>
>> Reading back on the "beta5 or rc1" thread it seems like most people
>> are for keeping to this schedule; i.e. no beta5.
>>
>> So... we need to c
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:45:22AM -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2007, Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 November 2007, Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > > of course, our show stoppers themselves are somewhat funny (as in "they
> > > smell funny ... ") since last time i looked we di
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 11:56:53PM -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday 11 November 2007, Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > > Let's just do RC1 and get this thing out the door. I'm tired of
> > > watching the release date slip and we don't do anything for the
> > > project by allowing it to slip further.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Can we have it back already?
>
> Please?
>
> Albert
Please justify why you need it. If you're running out of things to
work on, there are plenty of bugs in trunk. :)
- --
Matt
-BEGIN PG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 10, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2007, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> I always thought kdesupport held projects "close to KDE" but were
>> essentially independent. For example, taglib is also released
>> indepe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom Albers wrote:
> Op Saturday 10 November 2007 22:54 schreef u:
>> On Saturday 10 November 2007 22:01:09 Tom Albers wrote:
>>> Based on the beta goals page, we are getting closer to a release
>>> candidate
>>> but not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2007 1:09 pm, Allen Winter wrote:
>> On Saturday 10 November 2007 10:14:04 Tom Albers wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As a conclusion to the thread this week I want to propose to mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 10, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2007 10:14:04 Tom Albers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As a conclusion to the thread this week I want to propose to move
>> everything except kdewin32 to extragear/libs.
>>
>> The
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:33:47PM +0100, Tom Albers wrote:
> > qca from current kdesupport trunk is working fine. I compile with it on a
> > daily basis. AFAIK, the only place QCA is currently used at the moment is
> > in
> > kdenetwork for kopete. Perhaps we should let things stand as they are
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 06:23:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> At Wednesday 07 November 2007 13:03, you wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 07 November 2007 schrieb Thomas Zander:
> > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 11:34:05 Sebastian K�gler wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 09:51:50 Tom Albers wrote:
>
On Monday 05 November 2007 13:34:03 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The okular developers are ready to take over full responsibility for .ps
> files. And it doesn't seem that kghostview4 works at all.
>
> So it is time to follow through with the plan [1] to "Move to extragear
> pending GS support
On Sunday 21 October 2007 10:09:41 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 11:02:43 am Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:48:23 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > I hope it doesn't come to this.
> > > If there are KDEPIM4 apps that are cause data loss or *really suck*
> > >
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:09:53 pm Urs Wolfer wrote:
> On Friday 28 September 2007 02.16:19 Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 September 2007 06:34:13 am you wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 25. September 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > > > Is this still the ca
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:39:16 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> After 3 October, what is our policy toward kdebase/runtime and kdebindings?
>
> Are they hard-frozen? soft-frozen? not frozen?
>
> I think kdebase/runtime/kstyles should be given more time for sure.
>
> Richard Dale told me a few
On Thursday 27 September 2007 06:34:13 am you wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25. September 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > Is this still the case, given our new release date in December?
> >
> > Indeed it is. Kopete is basically in the same state it was when I wrote
> > this mai
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 15:23:07 Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284171 (short version:
> > > > lazy symbol resolving in glibc is not threadsafe and can deadlock)
> > > > This bug can cause spurious d
On Monday 24 September 2007 11:37:50 am Allen Winter wrote:
> On Thursday 09 August 2007 8:53:26 pm Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's not listed on the modules page, but we (as in the Kopete developers)
> > would like to hold Kopete out of the KDE 4.0 release
On Sunday 23 September 2007 15:12:20 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 23.09.07 14:26:04, Troy Unrau wrote:
> > Hey guys, perhaps this should go on your list at
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals
> >
> > KWin Composite has performance issues (big ones) on hardware where
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 1, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Saturday 01 September 2007 11:45:07 am Thomas Zander wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 September 2007 17:30:34 Matt Rogers wrote:
>>> That's no different than what we have n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 1, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Allen Winter wrote:
>
>>
>> I can only say that I tried to switch my development desktop to
>> KDE4, and it
>> is still very painful, as barely anything works, and I'm busy
>> compiling after
>> krazy check changes in
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 02:17, you wrote:
> On Friday, 10. August 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > I suppose Dirk could comment out the
> > > macro_optional_add_subdirectory(kopete) line
> > > from the tagged kdenetwork/CMakeLists.txt file.
> > > Dirk
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
