to the list.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
on behalf of Paul Finkelman
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:34 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: RE: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
Mine is 518 605 0296
Sent from Yahoo M
>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
The first paragraph of Paul's post about whether we should entertain the
possibility of bad fait
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
518-439-7296 (w)
518-605-0296 (c)
paul.finkel...@yahoo.com
www.paulfinkelman.com
From: "Kwall, Roberta"
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: What's happening in the Kim
thor=345249
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Finkelman, Paul [paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 10:44 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: What's hap
ederman
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
Yes, but that same statute also says that the Deputy Clerk can issue the
license, in addition to the Clerk. Ky. Rev. Stat. 402.100(1
Academics <
> religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
> Date: Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 4:56 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
> Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis
.edu]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 8:24 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
Kevin, before I attempt any elaboration of your first follow-up question below,
can you say what provision of Kentucky law you would cite as a
...@richmond.edu>>
Reply-To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Date: Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 4:56 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: What's happening in the K
day, September 12, 2015 at 4:06 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: RE: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
Brian Mason is a deputy county clerk. Is there a county clerk under whose
authority these licenses were issued, or
te: Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 4:06 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: RE: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
Brian Mason is a deputy county clerk. Is there a county clerk under whose
authority these licenses were
PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
They are one and the same. The authorization "statement" is at the top of the
form, and does not mention an official. The official is only mentioned in the
"issued by&
eligionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Marty Lederman [
> lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 6:23 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
>
> They are one and the same. T
6:23 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
They are one and the same. The authorization "statement" is at the top of the
form, and does not mention an official. The official is only mentioned in the
"issued b
e are unacceptable harms to the interests of
> plaintiffs and others similarly situated.
>
> ________________
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
> <mailto:religionlaw-boun...@list
alf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 4:34 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Michael Dorf ; Dellinger, Walter ;
Howard Wasserman ; Samuel Bagenstos
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
The license is valid even if Mason rather than Davis
gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 4:34 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Michael Dorf; Dellinger, Walter; Howard Wasserman; Samuel Bagenstos
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
The license is valid even if Mason rather than Davis signs and
arly situated.
>
>
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Marty Lederman [
> lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 10:01 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law A
15 10:01 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Michael Dorf; Dellinger, Walter; Samuel Bagenstos; Howard Wasserman
Subject: Re: What's happening in the Kim Davis case
The licenses currently being issued don't say that the Deputy Clerk is acting
"on Davis's autho
lerk could then simply add in "by the clerk of
> County" and otherwise fill out the rest of the form without mentioning
> Rowan County other than in noting his or her office. Davis has previously
> stated that such an approach would not substantially burden her exercise of
>
igionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Marty Lederman [lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 5:56 AM
To: Volokh, Eugene; Dellinger, Walter; Douglas Laycock; Howard Wasserman;
conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu; Law & Religion issues for
Davis has now filed a couple of briefs in the Sixth Circuit, and attached
the transcript of the contempt hearing to one of them . . . so now it's
possible to figure out where things are heading, at least to a certain
extent.
*1.* *Judge Bunning construes his P.I. to cover the Deputy Clerks*
The
21 matches
Mail list logo
