Respectfully and only with respect -- I think it suggests a lot about character
when I read your reply Mr. Dengler.
TASMA does not *yet* have a band plan but you are fully aware of a motion
placed before the board recommending the continued use of the SCRRBA band plan
as it exists. Therefore, T
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Nate Duehr" wrote:
> The above CRAP jobs are often why hams aren't welcome at commercial
> sites. I hate it when hams do this. Had to vent. There were some
> "newbies" along on the trip, and I think they got the point when I
> stated, "If you ever inst
+1
excellent idea
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> From: wb2...@roadrunner.com
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:48:13 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Ham installation quality/non-quality
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nate
As Hams being involved in this Type of Communications ,We need to keep an
Eye on this Bill
73 De Don KA9QJG
Section Summary, April 2009
The text of a new U.S. House of Representatives Bill, HR 2160, is to be
found
at: http://www.arrl.org/govrelations/HR2160.pdf
. This bill, introduced by
Sometimes a job is a job, until you find your next one
Joe
skipp025 wrote:
> Fairly low pay and all the pride you can swallow...
>
> :-)
> s.
>
>
>> Just though I would pass this along for those RF heads who
>> may be job hunting.
>>
>> Motorola will be at booth 452 if you are interes
Sorry about that, I was reading the Dayton Hamfest and forgot that I
switched to Repeater-Builder.
Dayton Hamfest, booth 452
Joe
n6...@cox.net wrote:
> Booth 452 of what?
>
> Joe wrote:
>
>> Just though I would pass this along for those RF heads who may be job
>> hunting.
>>
>> Motor
On Tue, 05 May 2009 17:01:43 -0400, "Daniel L. Fargo"
said:
> Well the real question is when is the Federal Government going to wake
> up and get rid of the no longer need advanced CB radio people! When they
> removed the tech from Ham radio it died. And what a gold mine they are
> sitting on
Fairly low pay and all the pride you can swallow...
:-)
s.
> Just though I would pass this along for those RF heads who
> may be job hunting.
>
> Motorola will be at booth 452 if you are interested in
> talking to them about a possible career.
I agree. There's a nice article on r-b about what you should think about and do
when building a repeater. That's great if you already have an inkling about
what to do. But people don't always have the same vision after reading
something, so pictures definitely are worth thousands of words. Ther
On Tue, 5 May 2009 16:48:13 -0400, "Chuck Kelsey"
said:
> Nate -
>
> May I suggest that you do a write-up with photos that could be posted on
> the
> RB site? Maybe "the right way" and "the wrong way" would be helpful for
> guys
> making installs. And explain why it's done this way, not that w
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Daniel L. Fargo wrote:
> Well the real question is when is the Federal Government going to wake
> up and get rid of the no longer need advanced CB radio people! When
> they removed the tech from Ham radio it died. And what a gold mine
> they are sitting on (frequencies) the
Booth 452 of what?
Joe wrote:
> Just though I would pass this along for those RF heads who may be job
> hunting.
>
> Motorola will be at booth 452 if you are interested in talking to them
> about a possible career.
>
> 73, Joe, K1ike
>
>
>
>
>
>
Well the real question is when is the Federal Government going to wake
up and get rid of the no longer need advanced CB radio people! When they
removed the tech from Ham radio it died. And what a gold mine they are
sitting on (frequencies) the government just did it to the tv stations
why are
I concur - I would *love* to see a write up with photos (preferrably with
arrows and captions pointing out actual issues rather than playing Where's
Waldo?) up on the RB site.
Half the battle is encouraging folks to do it right the first time - the
easier we, as a community, make it for new and so
Nate -
May I suggest that you do a write-up with photos that could be posted on the
RB site? Maybe "the right way" and "the wrong way" would be helpful for guys
making installs. And explain why it's done this way, not that way.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: "Nate Duehr"
To
On Tue, 05 May 2009 12:32:57 -, "Louis" said:
> Interesting, this looks like one of those Hams/bash-hams discussions
> that is not suppose to take place on this forum!
Sometimes you just have to rant when you see something this bad. I
didn't name names, and I didn't attack any individual.
Just though I would pass this along for those RF heads who may be job
hunting.
Motorola will be at booth 452 if you are interested in talking to them
about a possible career.
73, Joe, K1ike
Hi All,
For those of you that are planning to travel to Dayton next week, I found
this on the net:
http://www.whiotv.com/video/19322933/index.html
"Smart pills are placebos, you can't fix stupid."
Just watch the power dissipation. You wouldn't
want to risk melting the coax. There's next to no
cooling - conduction, convection or radiant from a
sealed paint can.
My rule of thumb - figure what the attenuator is
going to dissipate - let's say that you are going
to take a 20 watt transmitter
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "travis8303" wrote:
> TRavis, did you find a IFR-7550 manual. I need a copy also. Thanks. Sid.
> Hello group,
>
> I am looking for an Operations manual for an IFR A-7550.
> Paper, CD or electronic.
>
> Service manual would be nice as a second find
Having been involved with many repeater installs, it's very simple. You
either do it the right way or not at all.
It's so important to use propper filtering, and make sure your repeater
meets code. I've heard hams whine and complain so many times, and i tell
them all the same thing, do what they
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> From: k1...@yahoo.com
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:32:57 +
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Ham installation quality/non-quality
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Interesting, this looks like one o
And...
I should have read the rest of the thread before replying!
Dang Digest Mode!
Apologies to all!
Louis - K1STX
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Louis" wrote:
>
> Interesting, this looks like one of those Hams/bash-hams discussions that is
> not suppose to take place on this fo
Ryan,
It is not always just a privilege for an Amateur Radio Repeater to be on a
tower. In many instances, the Amateur Radio operator and/or club pay just as
much as whatever commercial outfits are on that tower. In other instance, the
Amateur Radio repeater and/or club takes care of the main
Interesting, this looks like one of those Hams/bash-hams discussions that is
not suppose to take place on this forum!
Yes, I will agree their are those that cause havoc with a tower site owner, or
other lessors, but the number is minor compared to those Amateur Radio installs
that are done pro
The condition is often referred to as "tin whiskers". There's a lot of info
about that on the web. NASA has done a lot of research about it. It's the
growth of tiny filaments mainly on tin-plated RF assemblies.
In the MSF5000, this condition can be found inside the two VCOs, inside the
mixer c
26 matches
Mail list logo