[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-07 Thread W3ML
Thanks Nate, I have read most all of the documents on RB and learned quite a bit about repeaters and the GEs. 73 John --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr wrote: > > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Douglas wrote: > > > > > Let me tell you a little story about this kind of prob

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-07 Thread Nate Duehr
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Douglas wrote: > > Let me tell you a little story about this kind of problem. I had a > similar situation on a VHF mastr II repeater where a signal sounded > great one time and noisy the next. The problem turned out to be a > hairline crack in a solder pad that

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread Ralph Mowery
--- On Tue, 10/6/09, W3ML wrote: > From: W3ML > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's > comments > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:36 PM > Well Chuck, there will be no new >> > As I

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread W3ML
686 > eme@... > www.satnetmaine.com > > > --- On Tue, 10/6/09, W3ML wrote: > > > From: W3ML > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's > comments > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 5:36 PM

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread Eric Lowell
. You may have heard this before.   Good Luck, Eric (W1EL) Eric Lowell Eastern Maine Electronics Inc. 48 Loon Road Wesley ME 04686 eme@starband.net www.satnetmaine.com --- On Tue, 10/6/09, W3ML wrote: From: W3ML Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom&#

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread W3ML
Well Chuck, there will be no new radio unless I buy it out of my pocket and that won't happen as I need a new rotor. This club has no money. I was able to get a grant for emergency communications and that is how I ended up with the stuff we have now. My big problem seems to be that I took this

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread W3ML
Doug, Thanks for the story. This next weekend I will go over the inside with a fine tooth comb and see if I can find any cracks or bad solder joints. My brain is going to but not just from this project. 73 John --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Douglas" wrote: > > > Let me tell you a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread Chuck Kelsey
John - A word of caution may be in order since you are dealing with a club. These days, the typical ham doesn't begin to comprehend the complexity of a repeater system. To many, one simply needs to go out a purchase new equipment, plug it all together, and it runs. Wrong! Don't let your club g

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-06 Thread Douglas
Let me tell you a little story about this kind of problem. I had a similar situation on a VHF mastr II repeater where a signal sounded great one time and noisy the next. The problem turned out to be a hairline crack in a solder pad that was used to bridge two circuit boards and the output conne

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom'scomments

2009-10-05 Thread Nate Duehr
On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Thomas Oliver wrote: > My thoughts exactly! He should be losing around %35 through a six > cavity > duplexer, my 4 can duplexer loses %29. > > Tom, do you have a toggle switch in the PTT line and a local speaker > you > can listen to the received signal with? This

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Nate Duehr
P.S. Before I get flame-broiled by the group for "being mean"... Realize that I'm not an ogre, and the answers you're getting from other folks might sound more friendly, and so far, they're all leading the right direction too, it'll just be a long "journey" to get there without the proper te

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Nate Duehr
Just throwing a side-comment in here... How do you know if a PA is spurious or if you're bothering your spectrum neighbors? You MUST MEASURE IT. Beg, borrow, or steal the proper test gear for working on repeaters and this whole "process of elimination by e-mail" disappears... Spectrum analy

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom'scomments

2009-10-05 Thread Thomas Oliver
Eric Lemmon > To: > Date: 10/5/2009 11:16:12 PM > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom'scomments > > Tom, > > You mentioned in an earlier posting that you had a six-cavity duplexer. > Most six-cavity duplexers will have an insertion l

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread TGundo 2003
ointed in the right direction. Let us know your findings! Tom W9SRV --- On Mon, 10/5/09, W3ML wrote: From: W3ML Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 7:33 PM Hi Tom, I did crank

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Eric Lemmon
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W3ML Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:54 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments Thanks Tom, Yes, the advice is all good and I have tried several o

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Chuck Kelsey
That's typical. Duplex is a different animal. If there's a slight problem with a connection in the antenna, it will show up in duplex service. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "W3ML" To: Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:54 PM Subject: [Repeater-Bu

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
ups.com] On Behalf Of W3ML > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:25 PM > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's > comments > > > > Thanks Mark, > > I will go read that article. Thought I re

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
gt; > transmitter may be intermittently spurious at that level. > > > > > > > > > > Watch the wattmeter when things act up and see if anything changes > > > > when you > > > > > notice the desense happening. You can also pull the TX ICOM when > > the > > >

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Eric Lemmon
Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W3ML Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:25 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments Thanks Mark, I will go re

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Parker
here are so many things that could be at fault - loose connector, bad > > > antenna, problem with transmitter, problem with receiver, intermod > > issue, > > > etc. > > > > > > Ask the people you got the radio from if they had the same problem > > with i

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
fault - loose connector, bad > > > antenna, problem with transmitter, problem with receiver, intermod > > issue, > > > etc. > > > > > > Ask the people you got the radio from if they had the same problem > > with it. > > > > > > Chuck >

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
Thanks Mark, I will go read that article. Thought I read them all, since January, trying to learn all I can. That is when I decided to get into this repeater business. It has been a great learning experience for sure. 73 John, W3ML --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" wrote: >

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Parker
gt; Ask the people you got the radio from if they had the same problem with it. > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > > > - Original Message - > From: "W3ML" > To: <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:33 PM > Subjec

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Mark
John, I'll chime in here and agree with Chuck's suggestion to try a little more "fire in the wire"... It sounds as if your PA is less spurious now than before, but you need to dial it up more to eliminate all the spurious products. Solid state PAs, especially mobiles, are noted for this when r

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
m if they had the same problem with it. > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > > > - Original Message ----- > From: "W3ML" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:33 PM > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's > comments > >

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
Thanks Tom, The wind was calm today and knowing that the sections tend to work loose, we screwed them together with sheet metal screws. I would like to get a DB antenna but 700 bucks is not in our budget. 73 John --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Tom Parker wrote: > > Hello W3ML, > >

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread David Murman
s.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments I'd suggest turning the power up more. You have it set at about 50% and the transmitter may be intermittently spurious at that level. Watch the wattmeter when things act up and see if anything c

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Lee Pennington
I've been following it too. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. K4LJP On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Tom Parker wrote: > > > Hello W3ML, > > I've been following this thread over the weekend and I think the issue has > been addressed. I would check the antenna and rela

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Parker
Hello W3ML, I've been following this thread over the weekend and I think the issue has been addressed. I would check the antenna and related connectors. In fact, for my 2 cents, I'd replace the G7 with a commercial grade antenna, such as a DB product or equal. Now, to your scenario today, I

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "W3ML" To: Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:33 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments > Hi Tom, > > > > I did crank up the power to 55 watts out of radio and that

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use Response to Tom's comments

2009-10-05 Thread W3ML
Hi Tom, I did crank up the power to 55 watts out of radio and that gives me 45 out of the duplexer. Decided on this wattage until I can figure the problem better. It is working better than before, but still having trouble. So from what you said about power coming out duplexer, the duplexer m

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Lee Pennington
; 73 > John > > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, > "Chuck Kelsey" wrote: > > Double shielded -- specifically what type? > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > - Original Message - > From: "W3ML" > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 6:52 PM > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use > > All coax is double shielded from radio to the hardline. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- "Always drink upstream from the herd."

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W9SRV
k. 73 John --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Kelsey" wrote: Double shielded -- specifically what type? Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "W3ML" To: Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 6:52 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
OK, that's good. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "W3ML" To: Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:03 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use >I was Wrong. I have RG-214 double shielded coax running throughout. > > John >

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W3ML
73 > John > > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Kelsey" wrote: > > > > Double shielded -- specifically what type? > > > > Chuck > > WB2EDV > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "W3ML" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 6:52 PM > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use > > > > > > >> > > > All coax is double shielded from radio to the hardline. > > > > > > > > >

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W3ML
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Kelsey" wrote: > > Double shielded -- specifically what type? > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > > - Original Message - > From: "W3ML" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 6:52 PM >

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Paul Plack
73, Paul, AE4KR - Original Message - From: W3ML To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 4:46 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use No, except when it was at the 2o watts the swr was almost 1 and someone said that was the prob

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Double shielded -- specifically what type? Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "W3ML" To: Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 6:52 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use >> > All coax is double shielded from radio to the hardline. > >

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W9SRV
Ok- 1. Where are you checking the swr at in the chain? Make sure you bypass the duplexers to check the antenna, the cans can throw off the reading on some meters like you describe using. If you are less than 1.5:1 I would not worry too much more about it, any reflected power will get eaten up b

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread James Adkins
I agree with Ken. You simply cannot run a 100w GE Master II at low power, spurs everywhere. If you need to run lower power, find a lower power unit or throw an attenuator in line. On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Ken Arck wrote: > > > At 03:46 PM 10/4/2009, W3ML wrote: > > > > > >No, except whe

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Ken Arck
At 03:46 PM 10/4/2009, W3ML wrote: > > >No, except when it was at the 2o watts the swr was almost 1 and >someone said that was the problem causing the de-sense. So we were >afraid to run it higher.

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W3ML
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ralph Mowery wrote: > > You should be able to run the mobile unit around 90 watts without any > problems if it is the 110 watt unit. The very first GE Mastr ll I converted > was a unit like that over 10 years ago. I did raise it off the table it was >

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W3ML
No, except when it was at the 2o watts the swr was almost 1 and someone said that was the problem causing the de-sense. So we were afraid to run it higher. Like you said guess it was only a problem from running too little of power. Thanks and 73 John --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Ralph Mowery
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, W3ML wrote: > From: W3ML > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 5:46 PM > Thanks to all that replied. > > This is a club repeater and I am under pressure to

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread Lee Pennington
John, W3ML., Let'r rip, two meters needs repeaters folks can hear. !! After the cans, you"ll still have at least 80 watts to play with, why go half steppin'?? Your properly tuned Hustler ant will handle it Also, did you ever think of sidemounting a DB 224E with two stand offs. Just my

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread John
Have thought about getting a lower PA module John, K4AG

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W9SRV
You answered your own question : "So it appears that this radio, which is a GE Mastr II mobile, doesn't like to run at the lower wattage of 10 to 20 watts out." 110w radio will not be stable at 10-20w. If you look at your output on a spectrum you probably have spurs all over the place. Any reas

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Radio for repeater use

2009-10-04 Thread W3ML
Thanks to all that replied. This is a club repeater and I am under pressure to fixed the de-sense. So far, everything/trick I have been told really didn't help the de-sense until now. I turned up the power all the way and it appears to be a 110 watt radio. I say appears as there are no marking