Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
Hm, does this cause a actual problem? I thought this is covered in
type-widening.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15606
This bug only affects the complex type, (`ArrayType`, `StructType`, and
`MapType`)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
**[Test build #67435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67435/consoleFull)**
for PR 13891 at commit
[`a6b5a16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67435/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15607
**[Test build #67443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67443/consoleFull)**
for PR 15607 at commit
[`0b9fa4f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15607
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67443/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15606
**[Test build #67437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67437/consoleFull)**
for PR 15606 at commit
[`ba880d8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15606
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15606
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67437/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
The build has just proved that my thinking was correct. I think I'll
propose few other (more agressive) changes to clean the code up a little bit
more. I'd appreciate any comments (or accepta
Github user priyankagargnitk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
actually, its not covered in type widening... So, if any of my expression
is calling if expression ( in nested) .. its failing because of this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
**[Test build #67436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67436/consoleFull)**
for PR 15553 at commit
[`ec49e8b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67436/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67444 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67444/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
[`c4a906f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
**[Test build #67439 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67439/consoleFull)**
for PR 15566 at commit
[`d4fbeb2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15588
I think this fix cannot really handle this imbalance receiver allocation
problem, also blindly waste the CPU time.
What @lw-lin mentioned is a feasible solution to wait for executors to be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67439/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603#discussion_r84640346
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -93,15 +91,15 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
/** Stop the server behin
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603#discussion_r84640931
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +133,7 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
private[spark] abstract cla
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
@HyukjinKwon @gatorsmile on the question just above, I'm neutral. I don't
think either style is particularly better. All else equal, leave it as is, as
we've got a ton of changes in flight here.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
@priyankagargnitk Could I please ask some codes which I can reproduce this
issue? It seems fine the sql below:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT if(true, cast('2014-01-01' as date), cast('201
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10162
I am trying different ways to solve the problem without renaming the
columns and it seems that a better place to change the column names would be
here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67445 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67445/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`b57f009`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598#discussion_r84643826
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
} catch {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r84643899
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2508,6 +2508,27 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user priyankagargnitk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
Actually our use case is little different, we are not invoking it with the
Select queries.. We are using JS to let user type expressions and then we have
created out own layer on top of spa
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598#discussion_r84644113
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
} catch {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
Then, wouldn't the responsibility of type coercion be your own layer? I
guess this PR virtually mean every expression handled in `TypeCoercion` should
be fixed too. For example, I guess
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
I assume this will proceed after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15605
@tejasapatil this didn't work?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
I definitely will.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15579
What's another use case? I can't think of one. We wouldn't do this with env
variables anyway. (PS you need to fix up the title/description in any event)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15585
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15585
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15450
@sethah let me know how you feel about it at this stage
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84646984
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84646230
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84649236
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648114
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84649225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84644855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648544
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648531
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84649904
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2678,4 +2678,45 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Share
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648767
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84649180
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84643784
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648796
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84649130
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -120,4 +123,80 @@ class In
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84646519
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84643941
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84646767
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648636
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r84648323
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,20 +74,98 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441#discussion_r84650620
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/AllJobsPage.scala ---
@@ -586,12 +592,28 @@ private[ui] class JobPagedTable(
override def row(job
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441#discussion_r84650695
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -59,21 +59,25 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
val killEnabled = sc.map(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15609
@priyankagargnitk this should be covered in type widening. The `trueValue`
and `falseValue` expressions should have the same type by the time we reach the
execution phase. The `IfCoercion` rule s
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603#discussion_r84653856
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -93,15 +91,15 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
/** Stop the serv
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603#discussion_r84653954
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +133,7 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
private[spark] abst
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15597#discussion_r84655429
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -293,15 +293,19 @@ abstract class UnaryNode
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15597#discussion_r84655214
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -293,15 +293,19 @@ abstract class UnaryNode
Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15410
@ajbozarth @tgravescs @andrewor14 - updated the implementation to always
display "Last Updated Date-Time" when we have atleast one completed scan of the
event log directory. I have changed the imp
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
@zsxwing I may have to shelve this; I can't figure this out. It passes
locally with Python2/3 but always times out with Python3 on Jenkins. No idea ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67445/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`b57f009`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67445/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67444/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
[`c4a906f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67444/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053
**[Test build #3371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3371/consoleFull)**
for PR 15053 at commit
[`d384a95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67448/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`15deb72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15579
**[Test build #3370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3370/consoleFull)**
for PR 15579 at commit
[`a24aff9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67447 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67447/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`5acefad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598
**[Test build #67446 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67446/consoleFull)**
for PR 15598 at commit
[`3ee6120`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15579
**[Test build #3370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3370/consoleFull)**
for PR 15579 at commit
[`a24aff9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67448/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67448/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`15deb72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053
**[Test build #3371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3371/consoleFull)**
for PR 15053 at commit
[`d384a95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67447/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`5acefad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67447/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67449 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67449/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`15c02ca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053#discussion_r84680715
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -320,10 +323,13 @@ def alias(self, *alias):
def cast(self, dataType):
""" Convert the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053#discussion_r84680654
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -320,10 +323,13 @@ def alias(self, *alias):
def cast(self, dataType):
""" Convert the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053#discussion_r84681021
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -553,34 +560,16 @@ def register(self, name, f, returnType=StringType()):
def _test():
import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053#discussion_r84684716
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -612,9 +616,12 @@ def load(self, path=None, format=None, schema=None,
**options):
:param sc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598
**[Test build #67446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67446/consoleFull)**
for PR 15598 at commit
[`3ee6120`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15598
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67446/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67450/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`035baef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
I think it is ready for a final look. I will take another look tomorrow
though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
1 - 100 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
