Mesa is really not a good example of something that should be added to the
ROS tree due to desired functionality. Its src is almost 5K files by
itself, when trunk is only a little under 20K files. Then there's its
rather esoteric build setup. I'm mildly curious as to whether Kamil
actually built
Is Samuel actually still actively working on NTLM? I thought that branch of
his was pretty old. Might be something to consider a dev contract for.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Today I was finally able to finish the
t; Alex Ionescu
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Zachary Gorden
> <drakekaizer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It was not zero problems. Their entire creation of the git virtual file
> > system was to overcome git's limitations.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at
a post-commit hook to rewrite/squash
> them.
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Zachary Gorden
> <drakekaizer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The project that I worked with using git has history going back to 1988.
> > They ce
The project that I worked with using git has history going back to 1988.
They certainly didn't start with git, nor did they necessarily start with
any revision control at the beginning, but after they migrated to it they
discovered the history problem.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Colin
gt; clone, and then it has a separate command set for interacting with
> remotes.
> > Of course it's not a 1:1 match, but it's a good starting point. If you
> are
> > able to "catch" that, then learning how to work with git becomes a LOT
> > easier.
> >
> >
Until the following clumsiness in git get resolved, it remains in my
opinion an inferior revision control system to svn.
1) Attempts to push changes should not require any intervention on the part
of the user to pull and rebase if someone else got in a commit ahead of
time, this should be done
Remove it, I originally added it when I didn't realize we already had it.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Giannis Adamopoulos
wrote:
> Hey,
> I just had a look at the wiki page and was wondering why we have an item for
> BITS.
> Afaik we do have a bits service
Put out a tip jar and label of "beer money."
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:28 PM, wrote:
> We use FreeLDR for the RAM booting, which loads in RAM an ISO (not a HDD
> image yet).
> For the LiveCD for example, the following lines can be added into
> freeldr.ini:
>
> [Operating
Question actually still stands though. If wine is not inclined to use our
code just because it's in C++, should that stop us from using it? We
already basically split with shell32.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:45 AM, David Quintana (gigaherz) <
gigah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wine doesn't wrap C++,
So I've been trying to get ReactOS installed on the Windows QEMU build from
https://qemu.weilnetz.de/ and during the file copy part of the first stage
installer the thing, slows down. Substantially. And then silently comes to
a standstill. I'm not sure whether this is an I/O issue in ReactOS or
Murphy wrote:
>>> Why do we want an SSH server in the source?
>>>
>>> If someone wants to run an SSH server, they can download and install one
>>> as they would do on Windows.
>>>
>>> *From:*Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] *On Beha
I would personally be on the side arguing AGAINST any sort of
migration to git as the primary repository. We have a mirror that
already exists, I see no reason why that is insufficient.
Whether contributions are provided as a single patch versus multiple
'commits' is, in my opinion, a matter of
Welcome to the western hemisphere.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Colin Finck wrote:
> Just FYI, I can't make it at this time anymore, neither for setting up
> the IRC Server nor for the actual meeting. This is exactly when I'm
> working these days.
>
> As most devs are
Hermes was the one that packaged it and elected to keep it at second
stage to, let users pick locale and username and etc.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Franzini
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Amine Khaldi
>
That's not the most polite way of bringing up the issue, Alexander.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Rechitskiy
wrote:
> wtf iso.reactos.org is down for ages?
> I have lots of ppl wanting to test, by they cant!
>
> --
> С уважением,
> Alexander Rechitskiy
>
Uh, so that's Thanksgiving for Americans.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Aleksey Bragin wrote:
> Hello,
> Let me invite you to the monthly status meeting taking place last Thursday
> of a month, 26th of November, 19:00 UTC, as usual.
>
> IRC service will only be started
sage-
> From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Zachary Gorden
> Sent: 25 November 2015 19:16
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev@reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2015)
>
> And what does that tell you about the
t; H.
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] De la part de Zachary
> Gorden
> Envoyé : mercredi 25 novembre 2015 17:28
> À : ReactOS Development List
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2015)
>
> Uh, so that's Thanksgi
Developer meetings are closed meetings.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Alberto Vaudagna
alberto.vauda...@gmail.com wrote:
and than I need the password and username that you don't send to me.
Thanks.
2015-05-28 21:12 GMT+02:00 Alberto Vaudagna alberto.vauda...@gmail.com:
ok thanks
I see we have a volunteer for writing the post. Thanks Thomas!
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Faber thomas.fa...@reactos.org
wrote:
Well, we don't need to be jailbroken, so we can be secure. ;)
Let's fix it, blog about it, and get someone to publish something along
the lines of Open
Due to a combination of work and travel due to the July 4th holiday,
I'll be missing the meeting.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
We'll be doing an upgrade of Fisheye and hopefully Jira, so expect downtime
until the all clear is given.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Fisheye was upgraded successfully, Jira went off the rails and took us
about three hours to recover from. Please report any data loss as we had to
restore from backups.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
It takes a day or so for the credentials sync to happen due to the way
we have accounts linked.
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Varnin fenix...@mail.ru wrote:
Hello!
I have registered on main site, because I want to login to JIRA, but
JIRA says now that my login is incorrect. Does
Uh, this is really, really old Mesa code that's been effectively imported
into ReactOS. See http://reactos.org/newsletter-95 the first section. Some
of Jerome's plans have changed since then, but the basic gist is still
there.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de
Reschedule.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org wrote:
I forgot to mention: It's thanksgiving day in America. Is it ok to have the
meeting the same day, or should we reschedule?
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
On 27.11.2013 14:44, Aleksey Bragin wrote:
Hello,
Please refrain from making demands of a non-profit, volunteer driven
project. It's impolite bordering towards insulting to the people
working on the project.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Ameer Ali ameerali...@gmail.com wrote:
Again its happeningpls don't repeat..
Sent from my Windows
Colin, not sure if you saw this on the forum:
http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25t=12723
Some of the community members have already been exploring alternate icon sets.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Ameer Ali ameerali...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some great icon with me
Going to try to upgrade fisheye so expect code.reactos.org to be
non-responsive for however long the upgrade/rollbackififail takes.
Z
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Fisheye back up with some help from Pierre. Jira upgrade tomorrow.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Zachary Gorden drakekaizer...@gmail.comwrote:
Going to try to upgrade fisheye so expect code.reactos.org to be
non-responsive for however long the upgrade/rollbackififail takes.
Z
Any dev that's interested already has access. Any external contributor
would need to initially provide patches before they are granted access, a
decision the dev team will ultimately make.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:13 PM, J. C. Jones jaibudu...@gmail.com wrote:
At some point I will have to
Sounds like you're trying to print out unicode characters as ascii.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Naumann snaumann2...@yahoo.dewrote:
Hello.
I am the guy writing an updater for ReactOS. Recent tests show some
difficulties and errors in data from reactos bootcds; mainly
, schrieb Zachary Gorden:
Sounds like you're trying to print out unicode characters as ascii.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Naumann
snaumann2...@yahoo.demailto:
snaumann2...@yahoo.de** wrote:
Hello.
I am the guy writing an updater for ReactOS. Recent tests show
some
Look at your calendar.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:21 PM, J. C. Jones jaibudu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but does this mean what I think it
means?
:)
Best Regards,
-John
-Original Message-
From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zachary Gorden drakekaizer...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM
Subject: Do NOT attempt to translate Book pages
To: ReactOS General List ros-gene...@reactos.org, ReactOS Web List
ros-...@reactos.org
The development guide is using Drupal
Where did you get the 4 days ago from? As far as drupal is concerned, the
French download page was created on 3/11. by you. The only other
possibility is yours was one of the pages that got purged when a couple of
the main English pages got broken.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM, larmbr zhan
Note that I've already created an ideas page for 2013 here:
http://reactos.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2013_Ideas
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Colin Finck co...@reactos.org wrote:
Hi all,
Google will host its Summer of Code again this year. Let's try to get in
again after our
Umm, all of those services are developer related.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Sylvain Petreolle spetreo...@yahoo.frwrote:
You should send those to our other mailing lists too.
Our users need to know about this.
Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
--
*De :*
Guys, we have a wiki page: http://www.reactos.org/wiki/ARM_Port
The ARM team explicitly states that the ARMv4 and ARMv5 MMUs are
incompatible with ROS. They used an ARMv7 chip but do not mention if
ARMv6's MMU is of the same type as v4 and v5. Check that first before
you expend any more
Seems like spam.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Александр art1st...@yandex.ru wrote:
What it's all about?
24 Pull Requests is a yearly initiative to encourage developers around the
world to send a pull request every day in December up to Xmas.
This is the site to help promote the project,
Will not be present due to impending deadline with grad school project.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Pierre Schweitzer pie...@reactos.org wrote:
Hi,
due to technical issues, the meeting has to be relocated.
It will take place on #reactos-meeting on freenode at 19UTC.
The appropriate
He's not a formal member of the PR team yet.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org wrote:
Hello Ben,
thanks for your interest in ReactOS. We always provide logs (meeting
minutes), so please feel free to use them for PR releases.
Best regards,
Aleksey Bragin.
July 2012 Meeting A Minutes
2012-07-05
19:00 UTC
dev.reactos.org, #meeting
Proceedings
===
* Meeting started at 19:16 UTC by Aleksey Bragin.
* Point 0: CD/Product Store
* Point 1: Update/Team Plan
* Point 2: Website Update
* Point 3: Internet Declaration
Due to scheduling constraints
There was no agenda in that one. :P
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org wrote:
On 03.07.2012 5:38, Zachary Gorden wrote:
Barring any last minute hiccups, we expect to have a meeting this
Thursday. I am sending out this email because we have a PR topic we
Barring any last minute hiccups, we expect to have a meeting this
Thursday. I am sending out this email because we have a PR topic we need
to discuss and I would like as many devs present as possible, and
considering Aleksey is likely asleep by now, I felt we needed this out
before tomorrow to
No we do not, nor would it help.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
1. Wrong mailing list, this should be going to the ros-web mailing
list. Post to there if you wish to continue this discussion.
2. There are no logs of moderators deleting the thread nor has his
account been deactivated/deleted.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl
Victor had a really nice collage image that I think is fitting.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Ged Murphy
gedmurphy.mailli...@gmail.com wrote:
All Facebook fanpages will be to switch to the new timeline layout this
weekend. This means we need a cover picture for our reactos fan page.
If
Again, GPL compatibility has no relevance for this project when it
comes to user mode applications. The majority of the user mode
libraries are from Wine in the first place, and they use LGPL.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Adam geekdun...@gmail.com wrote:
It divides the settings into tabs
Would also be nice if we could turn off the whole sound alert thing.
Some of us find it a bit irritating.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:11 PM, cae...@myopera.com wrote:
After a quick look into your problems with patchbot it seems that vbox
scripts were missing some errorlevel checks, which should
Last I heard there was no automated mechanism to build an arwinss
image. Aleksey has been copying arwinss binaries by hand into a
vanilla ROS build before making the image. Until someone with enough
motivation automates this, the rate of arwinss updates will remain at
the current pace.
On Thu,
DLLs and win32k.sys.
Changes are, of course, not committed. But building arwinss ISO is as easy
as typing makex bootcd.
WBR,
Aleksey.
On 01.03.2012 22:19, Zachary Gorden wrote:
Last I heard there was no automated mechanism to build an arwinss
image. Aleksey has been copying arwinss binaries
A note of caution, regardless of the vote for 0.3.15, it is entirely
possible, even likely from the perspective of several of us, that the
state of ROS trunk will preclude the ability to roll out a 0.3.15.
We're talking about a 3 week, more likely 2 week, turnaround, which is
absurdly if we wanted
Dev meetings are closed to the general public.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:07 AM, mikey sibert mik...@live.com wrote:
I won't be able to go to the meeting maybe I will get some new drivers tested
but I lost my usb card and need to find it.
___
Yes.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:18 PM, mikey sibert mik...@live.com wrote:
does it count as general public if i am on the mailing list.
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:47:36 -0600
From: drakekaizer...@gmail.com
To: ros-dev@reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Developer meeting
Dev meetings are
I'll be missing the meeting due to a meeting at work.
2012/2/21 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo elh...@gmail.com:
im going to swimming pool at 20 p.m. Spanish time, i dont know if i will be
able to attend meeting...
4. 0.3.14 release party. this sounds cool!
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at
A second RC for 0.3.14 has been posted here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/reactos/files/ReactOS/0.3.14/0.3.14-RC2.iso/download
The main purpose of this RC is to see whether the hack Cameron Gutman
provided works around the memory manager issue causing hangs while
copying mshtml.dll during
The licensing of ReactOS is not that straightforward. We have the
core OS with its kernel, some of which is GPL v2 and some of which is
BSD, we have a lot of Wine code which is LGPL, and we have a
scattering of bundled programs and utilities under differing licenses.
However, this is 90%
I'm actually going all the way back to 0.3.12, there's a lot of mixup
with CLT with 0.3.13 which made it hard to find the actual release
specific changes. One quick question is:
http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-diffs/2010-October/038758.html
What got changed in
The user visible change list is published at time of release.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 26-1-2012 9:50, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef:
well... there are several regressions between 0.3.13 and 0.3.14-RC
Is there a list
There's not much justification from a technical perspective for the
behavior of the kernel maintainers in the CK patchset incident. One
of the grad students that worked with my group did profiling of Linux
kernel scheduling behaviors and he examined some of the work that
happened. What it boiled
A note, while a quick 0.3.15 was proposed, it was not agreed upon.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org wrote:
Thanks, many already asked about it.
WBR,
Aleksey.
On 17.01.2012 23:36, Jérôme Gardou wrote:
Hello everybody.
You will find attached to this
Yeah uh, Thursday is Thanksgiving in the States. Granted the majority
of the team are Europeans, you're still going to be missing a good
chunk of us.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:20 AM, James Tabor jimtabor.ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of us are on holiday this week. 8^(
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at
I can probably handle your half of the release work. You wrote up a
guide for it, no?
2011/11/19 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo elh...@gmail.com:
well, i told you some time ago that i wanted to learn about building
RosBE.
but you should have patience with me ... ^^
On Sun, Nov 20,
Though the August minutes were already posted on the forum, they are being
resent here for people who may have missed them.
August Summary
A proposal was made to do winesyncs before a release to force the project to
do a better job keeping things in sync and perhaps do a better job making
syncs
While Alex was trying to avoid build breakages, that recent incident with
his deletion of functions does highlight quite nicely why rbuild needs to be
put down.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote:
Am 22.07.2011 00:38, schrieb cae...@myopera.com:
CMake
The names in folders are for copyright notification, or at least I treat it
as such. The people listed are people who have actually added something and
thus have a copyright claim to some of the work in the file. Format
shifting, which is what this utf-8 conversion is, does not constitute
Indeed. I objected earlier when a forum user's name was added just because
he brought a library to the project's attention. This seems of a similar
vein. While these people do deserve to have their contributions noted,
anything beyond a simple patch by X in the SVN logs for this kind of stuff
We would have to build the driver ourself. Aleksey, any objections to this?
2011/6/5 Carsten Krüger c.krue...@gmx.org
Hello,
I've tried to contact the original author, he didn't reply.
Here is the SF one,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vfd/files/
That is only a copy that someone
Ionescu
On 2011-06-03, at 11:38 AM, Zachary Gorden wrote:
Spoke with Amine and Daniel. I've agreed to the lesser evil of
bundling the FULL cmake. Reasons are if we want the BE to be flexible
enough to be used for more than just building ROS, we can't gimp cmake
with
the belief that no one
@Ged The user is able to choose which BEs they want to install, so if they
only want the x86 BE, they can deselect the x64 or ARM features. That's a
pretty standard functionality of MSI after all.
@Daniel If that's the route being taken, you're going to have to go with #2.
You can't run 2 MSIs
The only developer I know who would be majorly impacted by increased BE
download size is Eric. Eric, any comments on this topic?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote:
Am 03.06.2011 16:46, schrieb Zachary Gorden:
@Ged The user is able to choose which BEs
Spoke with Amine and Daniel. I've agreed to the lesser evil of bundling the
FULL cmake. Reasons are if we want the BE to be flexible enough to be used
for more than just building ROS, we can't gimp cmake with the belief that no
one will need the things we didn't include. This is again on
I object highly to the idea of bundling cmake with the BE. Most platforms
already have binaries built of cmake, either by the distro or for Windows,
the people who make cmake provide an installer. We provide the compilers
and linkers and we provided rbuild because it was our own thing, but cmake
the bleeding edge fersion of cmake, and we
may be ahead of it. And it's not that big actually.
Le 03/06/2011 00:01, Zachary Gorden a écrit :
I object highly to the idea of bundling cmake with the BE. Most platforms
already have binaries built of cmake, either by the distro or for Windows
Commit messages should include the component name that your commit changes.
Messages like the following:
[nyadav] 51882: Fix a Deadlock (nya...@svn.reactos.org)
will result in me coming after you when I need to do the changelog for the
next release. Messages should be formatted like this:
I will hopefully be present but may not be immediately responsive.
ZWabbit
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Sylvain Petreolle spetreo...@yahoo.frwrote:
Hi all,
I won't be able to attend the meeting today.
Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
*De :* Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org
*À
USB keyboards and mice can work if you're lucky, but that driver does not
implement the entire USB standard. Therefore for anything more complicated
we need a genuine USB stack, not just a driver.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Minas Abrahamyan minas.s...@gmail.comwrote:
But I've read that
We already have the capability to merge the two. But there's nothing
fundamentally broken in having two versions until such time as we can
actually install from the liveCD. Until that happens, I don't see a
convincing argument for merging the two, since the ones outlined above seem
to boil down
The Security Control idea was intentionally broad because ROS is missing
quite a few things with respect to security. It can be used as a basis for
I want to work on OS security in ROS but you will need to refine which
part of OS security in your proposal. Ged seems to be pointing you in the
Any reason we're going with 2k3 and not a newer one?
2011/1/14 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@laposte.net
I for one, only have a winXP pro license on which I do my tests.
Le 14/01/2011 16:46, Colin Finck a écrit :
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English
Each seat comes with a number of builtin licenses. There is a slightly
different set of rules with respect to terminal services, but adhering to
those and achieving what Colin wants to provide is not impossible or even
difficult.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Ged Murphy gedmur...@gmail.com
] *On
Behalf Of *Zachary Gorden
*Sent:* 14 January 2011 17:26
*To:* ReactOS Development List
*Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project?
Each seat comes with a number of builtin licenses. There is a slightly
different set of rules with respect to terminal
I think you're on the wrong mailing list. We aren't the robot operating
system, we're the ReactOS project.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:53 PM, GANESH KUMAR pkganes...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not able to get the wubble simulation working for the ua-ros-pkg at:
http://code.google.com/p/ua-ros-pkg
The root of this problem, and it's not one that can be dealt with in the
short term, is because we are treating trunk as basically the stable
branch for stable releases. Most mature projects have a separate branch
for every major release point where things are either known to work or known
to not
Right. It's that lack of division that causes quite a few of the situations
that leads to trunk locking. And I'm not advocating for one right now. But
there is a divide between how some people view trunk. Some view it more as
a stable repo, others more as an unstable. Causes all sorts of
Did you even read any of the other responses or try to understand what was
going on before agreeing with Alex?
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
It was a quick hack while Amine waits for a proper conversion from Timo.
It's not meant to stay.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Just a reminder to all involved in this discussion, the work with cmake has
one goal, which is to remove our dependency on rbuild and the maintenance
load that using it entails. rbuild has a lot of issues by itself,
irrespective of the problems it causes in combination with the directory
I also support a reshuffling of the directories, but not in the cmake
branch. Let that be used JUST for getting cmake up and running and if/once
that is merged into trunk, then we look into changing the structure. Best
not to complicate one task by adding more to it.
Do you have any specific proposals, Ged?
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
The person who said it was a mess was me, and the last time around due to
the inconsistent commit message formats used by different devs it did create
one. And as one of the people responsible for formatting the changelog, my
workload increased due to it. Which was why I wanted a
Any reason to still keep 2005?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy gedmur...@gmail.com wrote:
I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for
rbuild. Our current implementation had completely outgrown its original
design and was becoming very difficult to manage,
To keep people from committing new changes that might break things. This is
common practice before a release and has been done for at least the last
year or so.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Sir Gallantmon ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the heck was the trunk even locked in the first
Two reasons. The first was problems with our CMS and hosting system that
made banning impossible. That's now been resolved, so we will be handing
out bans in the future. The other is nute, while managing to piss off a lot
of people, is not guilty of intentional malice. Incredibly bad judgment
What point would be served by sharing swap partitions?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Dmitry Gorbachev gorbac...@reactos.orgwrote:
in my opinion, a swap partition is not a very optimal way for organizing
a swapping space nowadays. A swap file is way better in this regard.
It would be
http://opendn.org/rapps.jpg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Steven Edwards winehac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:02 PM, dchapys...@svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: dchapyshev
Date: Tue Aug 4 21:02:56 2009
New Revision: 42388
URL:
Why would we need the X server for remote access if we have terminal
services?
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Yay for excuses that let me delay writing the newsletter :D
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.orgwrote:
Don't jump into fast conclusions :-)
I will explain thoroughly and in all details what's being done. Just let me
commit the remaining of my stuff first.
100 matches
Mail list logo