On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Mike Swanson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:45 +, Oliver Schneider wrote:
>> I have worked with reposurgeon for nearly three years and it's the
>> only
>> comprehensive tool, I know of, to achieve lossless copies of a repo
>> in
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:45 +, Oliver Schneider wrote:
> I have worked with reposurgeon for nearly three years and it's the
> only
> comprehensive tool, I know of, to achieve lossless copies of a repo
> in
> another version control system. It even comes with a companion tool
> to
> verify the
sideration for migrating from Subversion to Git
Hi Mike,
So I was about to finish my ongoing server work in the next few days and
then push for a move to Git on the mailing lists. Thanks for spoiling those
plans! :)
I totally agree with all your raised points. I'm using Git every day at work
now, so
ase the likelihood of patches from outside the
>> team, then that in itself is a good enough reason to move IMO.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.mailli...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 25 February 2016 11:26
>> To: 'ReactOS De
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM, David Quintana (gigaherz)
wrote:
I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is reducing
the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been mentioned already,
almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send patches" contribution
system,
t List' <ros-dev@reactos.org>
> Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Consideration for migrating from Subversion to Git
>
> > I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is
> > reducing the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been
> > mentioned a
Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.mailli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 February 2016 11:26
To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev@reactos.org>
Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Consideration for migrating from Subversion to Git
> I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is
> reducing the en
> I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is reducing
> the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been mentioned already,
> almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send patches" contribution
> system, to Git/Hg with Pull Requests have got non-negligible growth
I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is reducing
the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been mentioned already,
almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send patches" contribution
system, to Git/Hg with Pull Requests have got non-negligible growth in
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Ged Murphy
wrote:
> Are we not just looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't really
> exist? Is SVN stopping us from doing anything, or from changing to a better
> way of working for our project style? The move from CVS to
-dev] Consideration for migrating from Subversion to Git
Hi Mike,
So I was about to finish my ongoing server work in the next few days and
then push for a move to Git on the mailing lists. Thanks for spoiling those
plans! :)
I totally agree with all your raised points. I'm using Git every day
Hi all,
want to share some thoughts and experiences regarding a VCS migration.
On 2016-02-25 07:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
> The poor usability of Git on non-*nix platforms is one of the reasons
> why I'm still a huge fan of Mercurial. Also, the SVN-like CLI workflow
> means that's it's less
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Colin Finck wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> So I was about to finish my ongoing server work in the next few days and
> then push for a move to Git on the mailing lists. Thanks for spoiling
> those plans! :)
>
> I totally agree with all your raised points.
Hi Mike,
So I was about to finish my ongoing server work in the next few days and
then push for a move to Git on the mailing lists. Thanks for spoiling
those plans! :)
I totally agree with all your raised points. I'm using Git every day at
work now, so do several of our developers. For some of
14 matches
Mail list logo