Option --one-machine-only ?

2001-05-31 Thread glen
Hi! Is there any simple way to restrict a recursive rsync to just one machine, analogous to the way that --one-filesystem-only works? ie. I'd like to rsync a whole machine, crossing arbitrarily many file-system boundaries, starting at '/', but not crossing NFS mounts onto other machines.

tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread thomas graichen
did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff from host c this way (because i can't do it directly due to fire- wall limitations) host-a ssh -L873:host-c:873

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Martin Pool
On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff from host c this way (because i can't do it directly

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:48:56PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff from host c this way (because i can't do it

Re: problems encountered in 2.4.6

2001-05-31 Thread Remi Laporte
I've had rsync hangs when transferring hug filesystems (~80Gb) over network, but till i've suppress the -v option from my command line there's no hang anymore hang. The -v option under 2.4.6 is bugged, try to mutiplie v's and the hangs will increase too. ( rsync -axWP

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread thomas graichen
Michael H. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:48:56PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread thomas graichen
Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection to a host b (say mine is host a) and want to rsync stuff from host c

Re[2]: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Rusty Carruth
thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? Never needed to send that through ssh. I forward smtp and nntp and pop all the time through

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Martin Pool
On 31 May 2001, Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm. What's wrong with his syntax? (Assuming 'Martin' is a he, sorry if I'm wrong!) I use 'ssh2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -L 119:news.there.com:119' to forward nntp all the time and it works fine - what do you know that I don't? (Ok, yes, I

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:17:36PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: Michael H. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:48:56PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:16:44PM +0200, thomas graichen wrote: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? just to make clear what i mean: i only have an ssh connection

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread thomas graichen
Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31 May 2001, thomas graichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did anyone here get rsync tunneled through ssh working so far? Never needed to send that through ssh. I forward

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread thomas graichen
Michael H. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i too - but what if the other end is a public rsync server without ssh access for you? Then how would you establish the ssh tunnel to begin with? Seems like we have a rabit stew situtation (first you catch your rabbit). If you have the

Re: tunneling rsync through ssh

2001-05-31 Thread tim . conway
I was taking that same tack... then, I looked again. note: He's on host a, telling it to ssh to host-b, forwarding port 873 of host-a through the ssh connection to host-c. He isn't sshing to the rsync host. He's sshing to a machine that can rsync to host-c. I thought he was just being

Re: Option --one-machine-only ?

2001-05-31 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:32:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This'll give you what you want without a mod to rsync. ++ #!/bin/sh mount |grep -v nfs|while read fs crud do rsync -ax $fs remotehost::remotepath/`basename $fs` done ++ I wrote it into the

Re: incomplete local directory syncronisation

2001-05-31 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:48:08PM +1000, Colin Nathan wrote: Hi all, I continue to have difficulties when attempting to synchronize between two local directories. One of them is a NetWare volume mounted using NCP. The catalogue builds and the synchronization of the two directory's starts.

PATCH: better fix for rsync hang

2001-05-31 Thread Wayne Davison
I've been doing some testing where I trigger the rsync hang I talked about in my previous email (where the redo pipe to the generator process fills up and causes the receiver to deadlock). This bug is easy to trigger on a local-to-local rsync copy if I change receiver.c to retry every file