Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:37:19AM GMT, BP25 via rsync wrote: > In other words, the recursion did not happen linearly (according to > the tree structure of either the sender or the receiver). This is > very counter-intuitive: I'd expect that every line which lies > between any two lines of the

Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

Also note the SORTED TRANSFER ORDER paragraph in the rsync manual. I don't think this paragraph is relevant to my question because I understand it's only relevant to multiple nonrecursive rsync commands; whereas I have one single recursive rsync command. -- Please use reply-all for most

Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

The only explanation I can find for such behaviour is that incremental recursion is being used, which leads me to deduce that the lines with path outside of the directory "A/B/...", can only indicate folder creation. But yet I cannot buy this explanation because why would such "atypical

[HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

Dear rsync community, I hope that someone can help me with this issue, probably related to my lack of understanding of how rsync recursive works. In the output was displayed something like this (I don't remember in the lines below whether rsync was deleting or creating files

[Bug 5482] look into a hierarchical checksum algorithm that would help to efficiently transmit really large files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5482 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

leonv12 via rsync wrote: > I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a scheduled > task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? Check the environment settings, which are often the cause of differences in behavior between running from the command

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 19:45:22 -0700 (PDT) leonv12 via rsync wrote: > I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a > scheduled task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? Talk to someone who knows about task scheduling and its failure modes? Karl

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a scheduled task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Help-rsync-runs-from-command-line-fails-from-task-scheduler-hangs-at-msg-checking-charset-UTF-8

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

d/receive (code 30) at > io.c(195) [sender=3.1.2][sender] _exit_cleanup(code=30, file=io.c, > line=195): about to call exit(30)Help will be much appreciated! Reminds me of previous struggles I've had with MS Windows and byte order marks. (Something about the way it requires UTF-16 but bre

Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

nc_partial . /data/current/systemID/cygdrive/c (18 args)*msg checking charset: UTF-8*[sender] io timeout after 3000 seconds -- exiting[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=30, file=io.c, line=195): enteredrsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(195) [sender=3.1.2][sender] _exit_cleanup(

[Bug 12217] New: pogo games @1800-790-9186 support customer service phone number,support help desk phone number

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12217 Bug ID: 12217 Summary: pogo games @1800-790-9186 support customer service phone number,support help desk phone number Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All

help rsync on Cygwin cannot configure --enable-iconv

... no checking for library containing libiconv_open... no ... $ make ... $ ./rsync.exe --help |grep iconv append, no ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, symtimes, prealloc How i can say configure about libiconv? Laboratory of Medical Ultrasound Devices Scientific Department SPbSPU -- Please use

help rsync on Cygwin cannot configure --enable-iconv

... no checking for library containing libiconv_open... no ... $ make ... $ ./rsync.exe --help |grep iconv append, no ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, symtimes, prealloc How i can say configure about libiconv? -- Best regards, Roman Romanovskiy +79217447768 +78122909636 Laboratory of Medical

Re: Can I help move bug 11521 along?

fix. > > I included a reproducer script and a patch that worked well for me, but as > this is the first time I've looked at the rsync code base I wouldn't be too > surprised if I'd missed some portability implications or the like. > > I was wondering if there's anything further

Can I help move bug 11521 along?

at the rsync code base I wouldn't be too surprised if I'd missed some portability implications or the like. I was wondering if there's anything further I could do to help. Thanks, -mike [1]: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521 -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting

[Bug 10389] New: Sort the output of --help into alphabetical order

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10389 Summary: Sort the output of --help into alphabetical order Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A sherin...@gmail.com wrote: Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC has been exploited successfully and it is affected by all software that use rsync as a backup and restore tool. This is totally false. The vulnerability

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Thursday 29 August 2013 11:46 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A sherin...@gmail.com mailto:sherin...@gmail.com wrote: Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC has been exploited successfully and it is affected by all

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chown itself is not insecure. The indiscriminate chowning of all files creates security issues. You can use --fake-super on push backups. In fact that is what - --fake-super is DESIGNED FOR. You just have to make sure that - --fake-super is

Re: need help with an rsync patch

The solution is not to refuse to backup any file that is a hard link. There are legitimate reasons to have hard links and ignoring them means you aren't backing up everything. I agree that preserving hard links may be important in some situation. There are certainly legitimate reasons to

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a restore of my backup doesn't bring me back to what I had when I backed up then I don't have a backup. If I have to restore something and the relationship between files that were hard linked in the

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a restore of my backup doesn't bring me back to what I had when I backed up then I don't have a backup. If I have to restore something and the

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between the backup and restore process. On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote: On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:36 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between the backup and restore process. On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote: On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help . So, It need to be a pull type rsync with unprivileged user ?. It was not a permanent solution always. May be it is the time to present this POC

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

for rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about the implications of that. Your users could make hardlinks

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about the implications of that. Your users could

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

valuable time and help . -- -- Regards Sherin A http://www.sherin.co.in/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help . - -- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Kevin Korb Phone:(407) 252-6853 Systems Administrator Internet: FutureQuest, Inc

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

know. B) backing up each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help . - -- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Kevin Korb

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

]# If I am doing something wrong please let me know. B) backing up each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help

Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 12:23 PM, Joe wrote: Is there any way at all to say which is the original file and which is the hard link? I'll bet there isn't, although I' m not an internals guy at all. If so, this would be impossible to do. The inode is the original, but all the file table

Re: need help with an rsync patch

I'm going to give this one more shot and then wait for the experts to weigh in. I'll stick with your example of /etc/shadow, but this applies to any secured file on the system. On my system /etc/shadow is 640 (by default), so, as a normal user, I can't even see it (other than to see that it

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: But if a user create a hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , then he can read the shadow files and decrypt it . If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. Paul -- Please use

Re: need help with an rsync patch

Hello Joe, Thanks for your reply . But think about the real world users. There is not always necessary the /home will be in separate disk partition or /tmp , /var/tmp , /usr/tmp. Think about an openvz vps or disk with everything on / (most of the cloud servers) . Rsync is using in

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: But if a user create a hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , then he can read the shadow files and decrypt it . If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: But if a user create a hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , then he can read the shadow files and decrypt it . If

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I already wrote. Paul -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 14:18, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: Hardlinking a file doesn't change it's owner/group/permission (All Hardlinks have the same user/group/permissions). I never said that. You implied that by your assertion that you

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 14:20, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I already wrote. I read your sentence

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: I read your sentence differently: If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. My understanding of your sentence says: The ability to hardlink, means that anyone can read any file they can

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 15:51, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: I read your sentence differently: If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. My understanding of your sentence says: The ability to

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I already wrote. Paul So the solutions

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 07:51 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 15:51, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: I read your sentence differently: If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. My

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

there kernel to 3.6 Matthias already pointed out that the changed default behavior in new kernel is meant to help users avoid shooting themselves in the foot, but doesn't implement added security. In particular, it doesn't fix pre-existing hardlinks created by users who can't read the file; indeed

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

file instead of waiting the OS vendors for updating there kernel to 3.6 Matthias already pointed out that the changed default behavior in new kernel is meant to help users avoid shooting themselves in the foot, but doesn't implement added security. In particular, it doesn't fix pre-existing

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:43:06PM +0530, Sherin A wrote: If linux user foo , with home /home/foo , what ownership we need to give the files under his home folder , it must be foo and not root. Why? The user created the hardlink themselves, and it had root ownership, why should the

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 21:04, Sherin A wrote: On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

: if any one interested in making a patch with an additional option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

, please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about the implications of that. Your users could make hardlinks to system

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

). That way you get proper, original-owner restores. PS : if any one interested in making a patch with an additional option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me This is not something I'll be looking into, FYI. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies

need help with an rsync patch

Can some one create a patch for excluding hard link regular file from copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync --no-hardlink-copy -- -- Regards Sherin A http://www.sherin.co.in/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the

Re: command not working.. help

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Garvit Sharma garvit...@gmail.com wrote: *rsync -av --files-from=FILE --delete-before src/ dest/* For rsync's --delete to do anything, you must send an entire directory of files, e.g. if you added -r to that command and specified a directory in the files-from

command not working.. help

Hello All, *rsync -av --files-from=FILE --delete-before src/ dest/* the above mentioned command not working. I want to delete extra files on the dest that are not on the source and transferring the selected files from FILE simultaneously. Please suggest me how to do that ?? -- Regards Garvit

Re: command not working.. help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --delete and --files-from don't work together. - --files-from is for specifying an exact list of what to copy. Therefore there can't be anything to delete because there is nothing it looks at other than the specified list. Also, never ever use

Re: command not working.. help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I didn't notice the * at the beginning of the command. Yes, when I look at your original message I see a bolded command. I got the stars when I replied because my thunderbird is configured to always compose in plain text unless I tell it

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

If you really want to exclude /vault/test1/ccc, and for /vault/test2 to end up at /store/test2, then I would suggest: rsync -avz --exclude /test1/ccc src:/vault/ dest:/store rsync -avz src:/vault/test2 dest:/store that runs rsync over ssh. Note that the trailing slash on the src argument in the

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

Hi mate, Thanks for your reply. However, I think there's more common scenario I will encounter. SRC: dir: /vault/test1 file: /vault/test1/aaa file: /vault/test1/bbb file: /vault/test1/ccc dir: /vault/test2 dir: /vault/test3 dir: /vault/test4 dir: ... file: ... DEST: dir: /store file:

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 rsync -vai --exclude=ccc/ --delete /valut/test[12] dest:/store/ On 02/10/13 11:19, Lee Eric wrote: Hi mate, Thanks for your reply. However, I think there's more common scenario I will encounter. SRC: dir: /vault/test1 file:

[Bug 9211] Inconsistency between man page and help

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 --- Comment #1 from mlus...@redhat.com 2012-10-02 09:01:22 UTC --- Created attachment 7976 -- https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=7976 patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 9211] New: Inconsistency between man page and help

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 Summary: Inconsistency between man page and help Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

the latest version of rsync up and running. Any help anyone would be kind enough to provide would be much appreciated. Thanks, S.N. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

of getting the latest version of rsync up and running. Any help anyone would be kind enough to provide would be much appreciated. Thanks, S.N. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

Hello, Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured out those steps on my own (not a guru yet...). I was hoping to avoid completely anything from Apple's Developer Tools, but, apparently, this is not possible. Just to verify two things: (1) Once your instructions have been followed

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

install ciao! Banana On May 8, 2012, at 4:25 PM, s.no...@free.fr wrote: Hello, Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured out those steps on my own (not a guru yet...). I was hoping to avoid completely anything from Apple's Developer Tools, but, apparently, this is not possible

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

it with the same step: ./configure make sudo make install ciao! Banana Hello, Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured out those steps on my own (not a guru yet...). I was hoping to avoid completely anything from Apple's Developer Tools

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:48:44 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: --fuzzy aside, I'm a great believer of logrotate's dateext option. So am I, and not just for backups. It's easier to find the log file one needs with datestamps. Unfortunately, that machine not using it isn't my machine to administer.

Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

I've identified a situation where the combination of --fuzzy --fuzzy (yes: two of them) and --link-dest is not behaving as I'd expect. I'm first wondering if my expectation is wrong. Assuming that it is not, then I'm wondering how best to figure out the problem. The double use of --fuzzy is

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:13 +, Andrew Gideon wrote: Assuming my expectation is correct, and that --fuzzy should have an effect in this case, I'm wondering how best to test what's occurring. I've tried using --itemize-changes in a --dry-run, but all it tells me is f.st.. which is what

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu 22 Mar 2012, Andrew Gideon wrote: Note that the source ads_live_error.log.9.gz would not match the destination HOLD.ads_live_error.log.9.gz. Instead, it should have matched the destination ads_live_error.log.10.gz. I mention this in case that plays a role in this failure.

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

You want --exclude-from=file You can cut-and-paste those path patterns into that file just as they are. Sadly, I'm still getting the files on the destination. Any ideas? 3.0.7 on windows, 3.0.8 on mac. -- Political and economic blog of a strict constitutionalist

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The two most common problems with excludes are: 1. Excluded paths are relative to the source path. So if you are rsyncing /home/username and you want to exclude /home/username/Trash the path to exclude is actually /Trash. 2. Mistaking the fact that

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

2. Mistaking the fact that the files are in the target because they were already in the target for rsync actually transferring them.  If they were there before you ran rsync they will still be there after unless you use --delete-excluded Whoops! I thought that was the default. Thank you. --

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

at excludes. e.g. $ rsync -zav $HOME/phildobbin/ --exclude 'foo/' /destination/backup/ which works perfectly well but I'm struggling to find the right syntax to add about another half a dozen directories to the exclude list (e.g. Movies/ Music/ Virtualbox/ so on). Any help appreciated. Cheers

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

perfectly well but I'm struggling to find the right syntax to add about another half a dozen directories to the exclude list (e.g. Movies/ Music/ Virtualbox/ so on). Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 20:20 -0500, Kevin Korb wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --exclude Movies/ --exclude Music/ Or put them in a text file list and use --exlcude-from Many thanks. Happy holidays... Cheers, Phil. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to

Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

I apologize in advance for asking a beginner question, but I really could not figure this from the manual page. I want to copy some files with rsync, and not copy others. The stuff that I do not want to copy looks like this: System Volume Information/_restore*/RP* WINDOWS/Prefetch/* Documents

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You want --exclude-from=file You can cut-and-paste those path patterns into that file just as they are. For the ACL errors you are probably writing to a filesystem that doesn't support those ACLs. On 12/18/11 13:58, Michael_google gmail_Gersten

Help needed getting rsync to copy from windows to mac

I'm trying to use rsync to copy files from a Microsoft Windows machine (XP, with cygwin) to a macintosh (10.5.8, PPC). After a lot of playing with options, manual page reading, etc, I have the following command, executed on the windows machine: rsync -A -X -a --delete

hello,this question,Request help

Hello, 2010/11/15 17:40:32 [3200] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 8 bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32) 2010/11/15 17:40:32 [3200] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1550) [generator=3.0.4] What's mean this log ?? Thanks! -- Please use reply-all for

Re: hello,this question,Request help

Hi, This error could probably come from the drop of an unstable network connection. Check my recent post about it: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg26280.html In my case, the solution was to use rsync over a ssh tunnel. The ssh tunnel is more robust about network problems

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 09:55 +0200, Yan Valuyskiy wrote: I believe for this you'll have to provide a kind of next include file with --files-include option: Thank you. What is the full string for the [OPTION --file-include option], saying the file name below is rsync.list. My understanding was

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

I can not get it to work http://pastebin.com/f432bf596 On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 18:05 +0900, nomnex wrote: On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 09:55 +0200, Yan Valuyskiy wrote: I believe for this you'll have to provide a kind of next include file with --files-include option: Thank you. What is the

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

Yan, I might be tired from repeated tries. It still fail. m...@fmv:~$ rsync -rvt --include-from=rsyncfinal /home /home/rsynctest sending incremental file list [sender] hiding directory home because of pattern ** delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file total:

Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

Hi, Linux-Ubuntu here. English is not my first language. The man rsync is difficult to understand. I want to backup some folders recursively and some files, see [1] in my /home dir to an external USB HD (Ext4). I want to use a text file for the purpose. [1] /home/user/Documents

Re: Folder Structure Help

see /mnt/Data/backup/USB_HDD_4/*.*) folder and then everything is under that folder. What command can I run so its directly under the backkup folder (/mnt/Data/backup/*.*)? rsync -e ssh -p 2223 -avz --delete-after /USB/USB_HDD_4 u...@1.1.1.1:/mnt/Data/backup Thanks in advance for the help

Folder Structure Help

/USB_HDD_4/*.*) folder and then everything is under that folder. What command can I run so its directly under the backkup folder (/mnt/Data/backup/*.*)? rsync -e ssh -p 2223 -avz --delete-after /USB/USB_HDD_4 u...@1.1.1.1:/mnt/Data/backup Thanks in advance for the help. -- View this message

Help about rsync

Hi, I tried to send bash file via rsync from Ubuntu server to FreeBSD server I configure the FreeBSD as rsync server. The rsync daemon is running. I install rsync 3.0.6 on bought servers furst I type on Ubuntu rsync /home/rcbandit/buffer.sh rcban...@192.168.1.106:/home/rcbandit/ The

Re: Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6

Thanks Matt, that was great information. I think I don't need to use exclude at all and just need to user H and P flags with --filter option. Also I will need to use --delete option to remove directories filtered H flag. The below command meets exactly my requirements: rsync -avz /foo/bar/

Re: Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6

Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 26 July 2009 17:45: On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:37 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination

Re: Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6

Yup, it is working. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Carlos Carvalho car...@fisica.ufpr.brwrote: Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 26 July 2009 17:45: On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:37 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded

Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6

Hi, I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. SourceDest -- - /foo/bar/ /foo/bar/

Re: Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6

On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:37 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. SourceDest --

Re: Trivial exclude help

help very much appreciated. Please include me on any replies as I'm not subscribed to this list. Regards, Tom Sorry to pick this up again - wondering if anyone has any ideas or can suggest a way to debug this problem? No one on the #rsync IRC channel is able to explain this either... Tom

  1   2   3   4   5   >