Hello!
I really like the new look, and even if I think the horizental menues
are useful for this type of programs, i think the traditional
menues on the left will ease the usage for the unexcercised
users.
But when will there be the first 3.8. Could you give
an rough estimate?
I installed
Hello Kenn,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm using the default Resolved template which is associated to the default
scrip On Resolve Notify Requestors with template Resolved.
The rights that are set for the Global group are:
AssignCustomFields
CommentOnTicket
CreateSavedSearch
DelegateRights
I like the new look but, to be honest, I'm more concerned about features
which will be added and/or removed.
Mathew
Jesse Vincent wrote:
http://fsck.com/~jesse/rt-3.8/ has screenshots of the new RT 3.8 theme
I've been working on over the past few days.
Also, it's now much easier for you
OK, my two cents...
1. The new Design looks brilliant, but like all previous version, the font are
much too big, i'm not blind, and i think the hughe fonts are really not
neccessary?!? Btw, we can hopefully easily change the CSS for this ;-)
2. The menu at the right hand is perfekt, i never
Hi,
I have a lot of auto-created users in my RT installation, they are
readed from a LDAP directory when an e-mail is received.
The question is that those users do not appear on every drop-down, so I
can't select them as search criteria and etc.
Is there a way to make them appear?
RT 3.6.1-4
I have a user who would like the subject to be a drop down list of choices. I
have not seen how to do this, so I have decided to create a custom field of
a drop down list of choices, and if the subject is blank, move this custom
field choice into the subject. I am not being successful. I have 2
Jesse,
I agree with Todd. It makes navigation easier to see and is therefore
more user-friendly. I hope we get a choice.
Kenn
LBNL
On 3/25/2008 6:04 PM, Todd Chapman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Jesse Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would go with a variation of
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/SelectRequestor
Instead of selects to populate the box, just pre-define some and use the
javascript to let a user enter his or her own subject.
lgrella wrote:
I have a user who would like the subject to be a drop down list of
Jesse,
Kool. Very Kool. (So I'm OLD! So what! I was there when Fortran 4 was
the language to use along with 360 Assembler! HA!).
Kenn
LBNL
On 3/25/2008 7:08 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
Jesse,
It looks like you are getting
Hi Laura,
I think your approach should work, but I don't think you can set the
subject with a direct assignment like that.
Try $self-TicketObj-SetSubject($subject) instead.
Also, I don't think you should be replacing spaces with underscores in the
CF name; leave the spaces.
Regards,
Gene
At
Hi,
Just installed RT and was wondering if it's possible to interface to MS
Exchange?
If so, is there howtos or anything about setting it up?
RT is installed on a Centos5 box.
___
Louis Bohm wrote:
I am currently running RT 3.6.6 on Centos 5.0 and I want RT to authorize
users from an LDAP directory (specifically sun one directory). I have tried
the different methods listed on the LDAP wiki page with little success. The
Overly method seems to give the best response.
Does http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/MSExchangeRelay help?
Nelson Pereira wrote:
Hi,
Just installed RT and was wondering if it’s possible to interface to
MS Exchange?
If so, is there howtos or anything about setting it up?
RT is installed on a Centos5 box.
Yes, that's what I was looking for... Thanks...
Now, just trying to get this centos5 box to accept connections from the
Exchange sever Can't seem to figure that one out. Can't telnet to
port 25 on the centos5 box running rt.
Nelson Pereira
Senior Network Administrator
Protus IP
If you are running Sendmail and can connect to localhost:25, you need to
modify the original configuration file or regenerate it from the mc
file:
. yum install sendmail-cf
. cd to /etc/mail
. edit sendmail.mc:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl
.
That's the problem I can't telnet to localhost 25 I get
connection refused although sendmail is running
Nelson Pereira
Senior Network Administrator
Protus IP Solutions Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 613.733. ext.528
MyFax: 613.822.5083
www.myfax.com
Refer your friends
Easiest way:
Create a mailbox for RT's mail to go into. However you want to do this.
Install Fetchmail onto your RT server. (yum has it)
Configure Fetchmail to collect mail from your exchange server (POP3 or
IMAP)
Have your local MTA deliver the mail into RT.
I've had that
Thank you Gene, it works perfectly!
--Laura
Gene LeDuc wrote:
Hi Laura,
I think your approach should work, but I don't think you can set the
subject with a direct assignment like that.
Try $self-TicketObj-SetSubject($subject) instead.
Also, I don't think you should be replacing
I don't want to create a user box on the exchange system and have RT
fetch the mail.
We are having a hard time getting the exchange to send email to RT.
I used MUTT to send an email to the email address configured in RT for
the Queue, but getting this error:
This is the error Mutt receives:
It's already there. Just don't grant rights to see and/or modify the
field to other users. And I think it's even described in the doc.
http://search.cpan.org/~ruz/RT-Extension-SLA-0.01/lib/RT/Extension/SLA.pm#Access_control
PS: Don't forget to write to rt-users or rt-devel lists.
On Wed, Mar
Good mid-morning (my time),
I am looking for a possible solution to what I see as a possible issue that
may arrive in our use of RT.
A good Example would be a family
Person email address Account
Dad [EMAIL PROTECTED] dad
Mom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg,
Actually, that could be done a couple ways. Which way is best would be
determined on what you want to do with the account info. All four
members of the family could be members of Group Family. This group has
the rights to create, own, modify, delete, etc. tickets in the queue
F350,
Well, first off, you have some redundancies that could easily make
debugging harder. For example, if you have granted the
CreateSavedSearch Globally for Privileged users, then you do not
need to grant the same right again to the global group as they are
privileged users (a user
Fabio,
It all depends on how you grant rights' to the queues. If you have
groups with the correct rights to the correct queues, then you will need
to add these users to one of your existing groups OR grant some of these
rights globally to Everyone, Privileged, Requestor, or whatever
24 matches
Mail list logo