Hello,
I no longer have time to maintain the following packages:
rubygem-acts_as_list
rubygem-awesome_print
rubygem-clockwork
rubygem-factory_bot
rubygem-hashr
rubygem-http-accept
rubygem-middleware
rubygem-mimemagic
rubygem-nesty
rubygem-pundit
rubygem-rainbow
rubygem-sd_notify
Please reply inl
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:57 AM Pavel Valena wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:29 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 11. 01. 24 v 23:10 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> Working on P
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:29 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 11. 01. 24 v 23:10 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Working on Puma 6.0, I have hit this [1] issue rebuilding
>> rubygem-shoulda-matchers:
>>
&g
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Working on Puma 6.0, I have hit this [1] issue rebuilding
> rubygem-shoulda-matchers:
>
> ~~~
>
>1) shoulda-matchers integrates with Rails in a project that uses Spring
> Failure/Error: run_rake_tasks!('db:drop', 'db:create', 'db:migr
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:07 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 1
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>
>
> On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wr
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody and happy new year,
>
> Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
>
> As some of you have noticed, there are issues with expired certificates.
> I have asked back
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:07 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
> >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>> > Hi, Vít:
>> >
&
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Hi, Vít:
> >
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
> >> Please see the changes in the upstream PR
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:23 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Exploring possibilities to better organize gems, I have just discovered
> a `--vendor` option (after almost 10 years of existence of this flag
> 🤦🏻♂️):
>
> ~~~
>
> $ gem install gem2rpm --vendor --no-user-install
> Fetching gem2rpm-1.0.2.gem
>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:23 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Exploring possibilities to better organize gems, I have just discovered
> a `--vendor` option (after almost 10 years of existence of this flag
> 🤦🏻♂️):
>
> ~~~
>
> $ gem install gem2rpm --vendor --no-user-install
> Fetching gem2rpm-1.0.2.gem
>
Hello,
feel free to look at packaged licensee gem in my COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems/package/rubygem-licensee/
I haven't looked at the `.spec` for a long time. It has just some
dependencies removed, and is probably quite an old version. But maybe just
for referen
Hello,
please let me know if you think $SUBJ should be an issue (identical commits
to Rawhide). I've started the build in side-tag already.
Regards,
Pavel
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby
I agree. I was just thinking of adding it to activesupport.
Regards,
Pavel
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 2:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 7:50 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, ruby-sig folks:
> >
> > From devel list:
> >
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2023/09/22
Hello,
I'm building RoR 7.0.8 side-tag[1] for Rawhide, with some fixes for tzdata.
Hopefully it will not break anything.
I've also pushed, as usual, all the changes to my `rebase` branch in
corresponding forks in pagure, e.g.[2]
[1]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=74
Looks great, thanks!
I think the switch should rather occur on rubygems.org ...
https://rubygems.org/gems/cookiejar2 - the naming difference might create
some issues.
Alternatively, we could package it as rubygem-cookiejar2, and let it
provide Cookiejar.
Pavel
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:22 PM
Hello,
I decided to do some more testing, and found out that gem install doesn't
work:
```
# Rawhide, all updated
$ sudo dnf install ruby
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:58 ago on Wed 20 Sep 2023 05:31:53 PM
UTC.
Dependencies resolved.
===
=
Upgrade 2 Packages
Skip 2 Packages
```
Note the bundler and rdoc gems were not updated with the ruby update (I
hope they would still work ok).
Standalone install works fine & the test suite even passes (or fails or
errors the same as with Ruby 3.2).
Regards,
Pavel
On Tue,
Firstly, sorry, I run a modified test suite (another PR).
Here's a correct log (master branch), same error I think:
https://gist.github.com/pvalena/ca9e9d1a01a607d70a798e1e8cb7636e
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:58 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 13. 09. 23 v 14:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a)
Hello,
I've checked the "ruby" test suite in /tests/ namespace.
I have one test failing (run as default, virtual, F38):
https://gist.github.com/pvalena/8c3fa4ccbfa6b210517d42117d163049
Is that expected, is someone looking into it, and, lastly, do we plan to
use it for CI?
Pavel
Hello,
I've checked the PR as well - all checks out :)
I'll build it in my COPR ruby-testing repo... will keep you posted.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:17 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 12. 09. 23 v 10:08 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > * Racc is now bundled gem instead of default gem. That means
Hello,
I've just pushed latest Ruby on Rails upgrade to Fedora:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23f91f5f61
and then realized 7.0.6 was released as well [1]. Will bump to that
shortly (hopefully now without issues).
[1] https://rubyonrails.org/2023/6/29/Rails-7-0-6-has-bee
Hello,
I was wondering who the owner of the packages is (and which are mine), so
I've generated this list - same packages, but per owner:
aeperezt: rubygem-icaro rubygem-serialport
athoscr: rubygem-pathspec rubygem-sinatra-rabbit
besser82: rubygem-narray
ctria: rubygem-colorize
dcallagh: ruby
Hello,
in Fedora, there's a patch which is supposed to modify upstream behaviour
for paths which are using ruby_version config entry. Preferably replaced
by the `ruby_version_dir_name` config entry, if it's not empty. This
behaviour was broken (it was checking for `nil`), so I fixed the patch.
T
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:11 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 29. 09. 22 v 16:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15:
> >>
> >
> >> And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core:
> >>
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >>
> >> expected "\nAn error occurred while loading
> >> ./
Hello,
$SUBJ is coming to F38 (and later F37 and 36- well tested).
Here's the bodhi update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cba07364fb (will be
merged momentarily).
Here's the test log:
https://gist.github.com/03e0c21de53a8f03acc5c5f396e158a1
Let me know if you have any ques
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
> >>
> >> Which fails due to Racc:
> >>
> >>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/
> >>
> >>
> >> The issue
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:12 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>>
>>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>>
&g
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi ev
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here
> >> we go. I have just pushed
Hello Benson,
as of now, this hasn't been an issue and I think there's no obstacle with
using the javascript (the library has reported vulnerability AFAIR), but
it's not exploitable in the documentation so it's deemed safe (the library
should not be used for anything else).
The same goes for the
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:45 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 06. 02. 22 v 7:38 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/28 5:12:
> >>
> >> Dne 27. 01. 22 v 14:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> >>> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/27 22:05:
>
> >>
> >>> Thank you! Now I vote for mergi
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 2:06 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
> Hi Vit,
>
> thanks for the info. I'm still considering packaging Redmine. There are not
> so many, really free project management software options. Personally, I never
> did development in Ruby, but a student of mine is a big Ruby fan. So the
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:25 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Pavel Valena wrote on 2022/01/27 1:12:
> >
> > I've started my mass rebuild script[1] which will build all the
> > packages in the ruby-packagers-sig [2] and also which I own [3]. The
> > scratch build,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:00 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> So Fedora mass rebuild has finished (although I am not sure how does it
> look with the signing of the packages), therefore we should be good to
> go. I have requested side tag:
>
>
> ~~~
>
> $ fedpkg request-side-tag
> Side tag 'f36-build-sid
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:55 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 19. 01. 22 v 9:08 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 18. 01. 22 v 12:00 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 18. 01. 22 v 12:00 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:15 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
Also, latest changes for Ruby 3.1 PR (106; commit
a81f20ad712c29df4c847919cc46bb7bc19ca455) fail to build for me:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/ruby-testing/builds/
Failures like:
```
Expected # to be success?.
```
Not sure what's the cause.
Pavel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:53
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:00 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:15 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was rele
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:15 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was released upstream
> > and we should land it in Fedora. Unfortunately, the change proposal
> > was approved just last Thursday a
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 9:50 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 17. 01. 22 v 8:03 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Jarek Prokop wrote on 2022/01/17 7:40:
> >>
> >> On 1/14/22 12:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> >>> Hello, all:
> >>>
> >>> Jarek Prokop wrote on 2022/01/13 2:17:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/12/
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:23 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 03. 12. 21 v 13:40 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 03. 12. 21 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
&
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 03. 12. 21 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've rebuilt it in my ruby-testing COPR:
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/2999821
> >
> > And I'm also
Hello,
I've rebuilt it in my ruby-testing COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/2999821
And I'm also rebuilding dependent packages (`ruby-devel` for now) in
the rubygems-testing COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/builds/
(starting with build 30001
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:14 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/103
Hello,
it looks good.
>
>
> This ^^ is first draft of Ruby which should be compatible with OpenSSL
> 3.x. So far, I was just successful to build the package including
> passing
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:25 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 09. 21 v 11:45 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:49 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/blob/rawhide/f/macros.rubygems#_57
>>
>> Maybe
27;s not obvious what's broken).
```
if dep
abort("#{name} dependency already exists") unless dependencyt
```
Like this?
Pavel
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 14. 09. 21 v 16:21 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> I've encountered an issue while doing an upda
Hello,
I've encountered an issue while doing an update to vagrant-libvirt 0.5.3.
```
DEBUG: + echo 'gemspec_file = '\''../vagrant-libvirt-0.5.3.gemspec'\''
DEBUG:
DEBUG: name = '\''rexml'\''
DEBUG: requirements = nil
DEBUG:
DEBUG: type = :runtime
DEBUG:
DEBUG: spec = Gem::Specification.lo
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 9:59 AM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:51 PM Dan Allen wrote:
> >
> > Will the RPM build for a gem package pick up dependencies needed to run the
> > test suite from Gemfile, or do they have to be declared as development
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:51 PM Dan Allen wrote:
>
> Will the RPM build for a gem package pick up dependencies needed to run the
> test suite from Gemfile, or do they have to be declared as development
> dependencies in the gemspec?
Hello,
you need to explicitly state the build dependencies (
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:05 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 24. 06. 21 v 13:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > Dne 24. 06. 21 v 13:31 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >> This is simple grep over Fedora .spec files:
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >>
> >> $ grep -R -e 'BuildRequires:.*rubygem(rspec).*<.*3'
> >> rubygem-bu
* There is no package depending on this package.
> * rubygem-ditz
> * There is no package depending on this package.
> * rubygem-trollop
> * A dependency of rubygem-ditz and rubygem-rbvmomi.
> * I can not remember why I am the main admin of this package.
> * rubygem-term-ansicol
d against Ruby, right?
>
> ### 8.
>
> non-executable-script errors.
>
> => Some parts are nice to fix.
>
>
> ## rpms/ruby CI to add rpmlint test.
>
> Can we check the rpmlint issues on an early timing: pull-request and push?
> I think adding the rpmlint che
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 6:42:25 PM
> Subject: Re: rubygem-openssl is going to be bundled in Ruby
>
>
>
> This have finally landed in Rawhide (ruby-3.0.0-145.fc34). Please let me know
> should y
I've run the build in my COPR, but noticed it finished quickly. And found:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/fcc584306bbaf23b7a1e895747768fd594437d70?branch=master
Why are the tests currently disabled?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1666744
https://copr.fedo
t.org/koji/tasks?view=toplevel&owner=pvalena&state=all&method=all&order=-id
Regards,
Pavel
>
>
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:30 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
>
>
> Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:14 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 11:54:30 AM
> Subject: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> So here we go. I have asked for side tag for Ruby 3.0 rebuild:
>
> ~~~
>
> $ fedpkg request-side-tag
> Side
- Original Message -
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 11:47:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
>
> Dne 23. 12. 20 v 11:06 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> >> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedorapr
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:16:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is another snapshot build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026964
Hello,
TL;DR:
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 9:23:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
>
> Dne 17. 12. 20 v 3:16 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > - Original Message -
> >&
ost notable change is removal of WEBRick from Ruby. I am not
> > completely sure how much disruption this could cause in Fedora. I
> > wonder if it is worth of packaging it as a separate package. Thoughts?
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> > P.S. @jaruga + @pvalena thx fo
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 5:10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is yet another update:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56776529
>
> The changes are a
to address that issue- more bellow.)
I don't feel like just simply overriding `rbconfig.rb` file in `%install` for
ruby. Also I'm not sure what would be the implications? (Apart from those test
packages building again.)
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> Dne 20. 11. 20 v 1:59 P
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 6:12:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> @Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
> calling the `%gem_install`? That sets the `CXX` env variable.
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 9:39:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Vít Ondruch"
> > To: ruby-sig@lists.f
> >> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/11/13 17:46:
> >>>
> >>> Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> >>>> - Original Message -
> >>>>> From: "Pavel Valena"
> >>>>> To: &
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Dan Čermák"
> Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Čermák&quo
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 7:19:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Two stage Ruby compilation / Bootstrapping
>
> Wow, it has been year since I started this thread. Time flies.
>
> But since I was fighting again
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/vagrant-testing/
I'll write a summary here once some the builds finish (~1week).
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
__
other_Review_Requests
I'd also advise to tools like mock:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Test_Your_Package
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
__
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi all,
>
> Another update to the most recent version of Ruby 3.0 is here:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 10:28:42 AM
> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3
>
>
> Dne 01. 10. 20 v 20:21 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > ---
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 12:02:02 PM
> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3
>
>
> Dne 01. 10. 20 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > ---
,
> > for example the gem `cucumber-expressions` was renamed to
> > `cucumber-cucumber-expressions`.
>
>
> Yes, there were huge reorganization in upstream cucumber. Any help with
> getting recent cucumber into Fedora would be appreciated.
Ok, let me check what requires the olde
- Original Message -
> From: "Jun Aruga"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 10:01:44 AM
> Subject: Re: ruby-rails group in Koschei & RoR 6.0.3.3
>
> The list of packages `ruby-rails` group in Koschei is useful to manage
> the packages related to Ruby on Rails
hing for you. You can see my test
passing here:
https://gist.github.com/pvalena/350309be47258e9bdb0e01f7e04fde12
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
- Forwarded Message -----
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing lis
91528e2be22ce
[1] https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/ruby-rails
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
s and ActiveStorage testsuites are still disabled, but'll fix+enable
those soon.
Let me know if you run into any issues!
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproj
Hello,
reviews for 2 new packages are needed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859416
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859414
Any takers?
Ruby on Rails packages are built in my COPR pvalena/ruby-on-rails; and PRs are
ready on src.fedoraproject.org.
https://fedorapr
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 6:11:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Retired "rubygems" package
>
> Resurrecting this thread after long time.
>
> I have unretired the package indeed. But it was lying around without
>
; > It might result in significant changes to a way we (un)bundle gems from
> > Ruby. I am really considering to keep the StdLib bundled in Ruby.
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> > Dne 05. 02. 20 v 14:17 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> >> Hello,
> >>
&g
Hello,
as you probably know with Ruby 2.7, there came some incompatible changes. One
of them is that `racc` was gemified and is not installed by default into a
buildroot.
From my brief investigations of build failures (the list may not be complete or
a bit outdated), I've encountered these:
> > /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.1.2/lib/openssl/cipher.rb:24: warning:
> > already initialized constant OpenSSL::Cipher::BF
> > /usr/share/ruby/openssl/cipher.rb:24: warning: previous definition of BF
> > was here
> >
> > ~~~
> >
> >
> > To m
Hello,
it seems Ruby 2.7 came with some openssl surprise, because for some reason
Vagrant testsuite breaks:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pvalena/vagrant/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01195186-vagrant/builder-live.log.gz
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41097171
f.e
and weechat (source broken)
> cannot be fixed
> due to the issues completely unrelated to ruby27 change, I think now it is
> already
> good time to get the rebuilt package merged into f32 buildroot.
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
Regards,
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engi
- Original Message -
> From: "Jun Aruga"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 5:50:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.7
>
> Hi Ruby SIG people,
>
> For the releasing of Ruby 2.7 to Fedora, seeing following note in Ruby
> developers community.
> Ruby 2.7.1 can have a
- Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 04. 12. 19 v 17:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > Currently, I've experimentally built Rspec 3.9, and I'm trying to enable
> > tests, and I'm getting:
> >
>
> It seems that you have omitted the important part of the me
Currently, I've experimentally built Rspec 3.9, and I'm trying to enable tests,
and I'm getting:
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
to more packages.
Let's invite them personally, after they're active on the ML. Until that point
they can submit PRs.
Pavel
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> Dne 07. 05. 19 v 16:57 Jaroslav Prokop napsal(a):
> > Fixed, thanks for input :)
> >
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 4:33:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Fake libraries for gem builds?
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jun Aruga"
> > To: &
; ruby.spec
>
> ```
> %files -n rubygems-devel
> %{_rpmconfigdir}/macros.d/macros.rubygems
> %{_rpmconfigdir}/fileattrs/rubygems.attr
> %{_rpmconfigdir}/rubygems.req
> %{_rpmconfigdir}/rubygems.prov
> %{_rpmconfigdir}/rubygems.con
> ```
>
> --
> Jun
- Original Message -
> From: "Jaroslav Prokop"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 1:15:49 PM
> Subject: Draft for new Ruby SIG wiki page
>
> Hello,
>
> I've created a draft for the SIG page [0]. I've added section about how
> to join the ruby-sig and deleted the
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:17:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild
>
>
> Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Hello, ruby-sig folks:
> >
> > Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/01/22
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:26:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild - postgresql-plruby
>
>
>
>
> Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>
>
>
> 3 postgresql-plruby-0.5.7-1.fc30
Hello,
I've upgraded Rails to 5.2.1 in Rawhide - sorry for late notice.
I do not plan to rebase it in stable Fedoras, but if you're on F28 and want to
try it, you can use my copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/ruby-on-rails/
Let me know if something broke.
Regards,
Pavel
__
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kostadinov"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:44:16 PM
> Subject: bundler changes in Fedora 28
>
> Hi,
>
> anybody know what changed so that bundler now tries to install either
> via `sudo` or in `vendor/bundle`?
Hell
://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rails/adduser
[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rails/addgroup
FYI on your web page, the Fedora url[1] no longer works. Current is [2].
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/achernya
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/achernya
Regards,
Pavel
Hello,
Rails 5.2 should be fully built in my Copr[1](feel free to test it) and I
started to rebuild the packages in Rawhide.
Some of the new dependencies are still missing, and await the Review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586199 - rubygem-mini_magick
https://bugzilla.redha
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
