> $ dnf repoquery --repo=koji-ruby30 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires
> "libruby.so.2.7()(64bit)" | cat -n
> ...
> 3 rubygem-mysql2-0.5.3-5.fc33.src.rpm
I am working on the rubygem-mysql2 package to build on rawhide.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914515 for detail.
--
Short answer is "by mistake".
Longer answer is that I accidentally keep it disabled while I was
testing the fix for armv7hl and I wanted to avoid waiting ages for the
build to finish. Re-enabling it right now, sorry. And thx for spotting.
Vít
Dne 09. 01. 21 v 0:06 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
I've run the build in my COPR, but noticed it finished quickly. And found:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/fcc584306bbaf23b7a1e895747768fd594437d70?branch=master
Why are the tests currently disabled?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1666744
Dne 08. 01. 21 v 15:04 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 15:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
6 rubygem-unicode-0.4.4.2-17.fc33.src.rpm
I have reported this to Ruby upstream and there might be fix for this:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17518
This has been built.
Vít
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54:
Some test failure
=
6 rubygem-ox-2.12.1-3.fc33.src.rpm
build fails:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59091142
Failures like:
Error: test_array_multi(Func):
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 15:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
6 rubygem-unicode-0.4.4.2-17.fc33.src.rpm
I have reported this to Ruby upstream and there might be fix for this:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17518
Vít
OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
I have submitted Bodhi update to have the side tag merged:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-215314a086
Vít
Dne 06. 01. 21 v 11:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi everybody,
So here we go. I have asked for side tag for Ruby 3.0 rebuild:
~~~
$ fedpkg request-side-tag
Side tag
Dne 08. 01. 21 v 10:37 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 15:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5 rubygem-raindrops-0.13.0-18.fc33.src.rpm
There seems to be upstream fix to this:
https://yhbt.net/raindrops.git/commit/lib?id=85486f9af18e4f249f23253e3b251e685b323912
But since it
/swig/ruby/yui_ruby.cxx:
In function 'VALUE YEvent_mywidget(YEvent*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libyui-bindings-59dfa64f05adb40c7da88325255d758f4588ab42/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/swig/ruby/yui_ruby.cxx:3287:77:
error: invalid conversion from 'YWidget*' to 'long int' [-fpermissive]
Perhaps related t
t_mywidget(YEvent*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libyui-bindings-59dfa64f05adb40c7da88325255d758f4588ab42/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/swig/ruby/yui_ruby.cxx:3287:77:
error: invalid conversion from 'YWidget*' to 'long int' [-fpermissive]
Perhaps related to ruby 3.0 change, however for now I don't know in de
ILD/libyui-bindings-59dfa64f05adb40c7da88325255d758f4588ab42/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/swig/ruby/yui_ruby.cxx:3287:77:
error: invalid conversion from 'YWidget*' to 'long int' [-fpermissive]
Perhaps related to ruby 3.0 change, however for now I don't know in detail.
Note that build for rawhide succe
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 8:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
1 kf5-kross-interpreters-20.08.3-1.fc34.src.rpm
build fails:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59090361
/builddir/build/BUILD/kross-interpreters-20.08.3/ruby/rubyinterpreter.cpp:69:5:
error: 'rb_set_safe_level' was not
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 11:20 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file
to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is
encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages?
the ruby-lang page is not mentioned on Ruby 2.7, I think we can
start to mention it from Ruby 3.0.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.7
Well, the page was prepared in advance prior Ruby 3.0 release, therefore
it needs to be updated if the info should be there. So it is not about
2.7, I think we can
start to mention it from Ruby 3.0.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.7
--
Jun | He - His - Him
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le
> Upgrade/compatibility impact
Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file
to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is
encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/76
We might also add the
> Ruby 3.0.0.preview1 NEWS
Above link text and the actual link
(https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v3_0_0_preview1/NEWS.md) for the
preview 1 are outdated.
--
Jun | He - His - Him
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Hi Rubyists,
>
> The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
> after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It
> is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 9:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
rubygem-snmp - builds ok
This one ^^ is noarch and should not have devepnedncy on ruby-devel
IMO. Should not need rebuild.
I have rather updated the package.
Vít
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:23:36 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
The PR was merged and should be available in the side tag. Shou
)
The scratch-builds themselves can be found here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?view=toplevel=pvalena=all=all=-id
Regards,
Pavel
Vít
Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:30 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:14 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
One new change in Ruby 3.0 is `%{gem_dir
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 8:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
=
4 rubygem-debug_inspector-0.0.3-11.fc33.src.rpm
build fails:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59090797
current directory:
Pavel Valena wrote on 2021/01/07 14:19:
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:23:36 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
The PR was merged and should be available in the side tag. Should anybo
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:23:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
>
>
>
> The PR was merged and should be available in the side tag. Should anybody
Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:14 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
One new change in Ruby 3.0 is `%{gem_dir}/plugins` directory, which now
contains are rubygems plugins to load.
Example change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-yard/pull-request/1#_2__64
Good catch. I have completely missed
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 11:54:30 AM
> Subject: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> So here we go. I have asked for side tag for Ruby 3.0 rebuild:
&g
Hi and happy new year!
So Ruby 3.0 were released over Christmas and therefore I closed the old
PR and created a new one, which should be the final version:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/75
The scratch build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
Dne 22. 12. 20 v 13:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi everybody,
Here is another snapshot build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026964
All changes are in private-ruby-3.0 branch.
I think I should be able to prepare one more snapshot tomorrow and
that should be it prior
Dne 23. 12. 20 v 11:47 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 23. 12. 20 v 11:06 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:16:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi everybody,
Here is another snap
Dne 23. 12. 20 v 11:06 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:16:12 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi everybody,
Here is another snapshot build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koj
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:16:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is another snapshot build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
Hi everybody,
Here is another snapshot build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026964
All changes are in private-ruby-3.0 branch.
I think I should be able to prepare one more snapshot tomorrow and that
should be it prior Ruby 3.0 release. This is the last change
Hi everybody,
The ruby 3.0.0.rc1 was released over the weekend, so here is the scratch
build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57950773
And I already updated to the latest snapshot. The build is runnig here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57955859
I
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
> > Another snapshot is available in private-ruby-3.0 branch and the build
> > is running here:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57585626
> >
> > Most notable change is removal of
> Another snapshot is available in private-ruby-3.0 branch and the build
> is running here:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57585626
>
> Most notable change is removal of WEBRick from Ruby. I am not completely
> sure how much disruption this could caus
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 9:23:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
>
> Dne 17. 12. 20 v 3:16 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> > - Original Message -
> >&
Dne 17. 12. 20 v 3:16 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Jaroslav Prokop"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 7:05:03 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi,
WEBrick is default in some applications, IIRC - e.g Sinatra [0]
- Original Message -
> From: "Jaroslav Prokop"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 7:05:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi,
>
> WEBrick is default in some applications, IIRC - e.g Sinatra [0] or
> Jekyll
,
Another snapshot is available in private-ruby-3.0 branch and the build
is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57585626
Most notable change is removal of WEBRick from Ruby. I am not
completely sure how much disruption this could cause in Fedora. I
wonder if it is worth
Hi,
Another snapshot is available in private-ruby-3.0 branch and the build
is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57585626
Most notable change is removal of WEBRick from Ruby. I am not completely
sure how much disruption this could cause in Fedora. I wonder
> All build results can be found here:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/builds/
Hi Pavel,
You might need to build the packages on your copr f34 (rawhide) now
again if it is easy to do.
Because there is new gcc-11 on rawhide now. And for example the
ster branch.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jaruga/rpms/ruby/c/ae692f4f294ac4f3e474581b0298060dc66ed759?branch=wip%2Fprivate-ruby-3.0-gcc-11
Here is my patch for the private-ruby-3.0 branch
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jaruga/rpms/ruby/c/ae692f4f294ac4f3e474581b0298060dc66ed759?branch=wip%2Fprivate-ruby-3.
> I will report it to the upstream, and let you know the result here.
Here is the upstream ticket I opened now.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17385
> I am running the SRPM on the private-ruby-3.0 branch for f33 too just in case.
>
> ```
> $ koji build --scratch --nowait
>40 | RBIMPL_CAST((int)(sizeof(VALUE[RVALUE_EMBED_LEN_MAX]) /
> > sizeof(T)))
> > ```
> >
> > I suspect this is new gcc warning. Or should we report this upstream?
>
> Here is the failure of the scratch build on the private-ruby-3.0 branch.
> https://koji
is new gcc warning. Or should we report this upstream?
Here is the failure of the scratch build on the private-ruby-3.0 branch.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57140928
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/928/57140928/build.log
Yes, I think we should report it. ide
Note that Ruby 3.0.0 preview2 was released yesterday on December 8th.
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/08/ruby-3-0-0-preview2-released/
--
Jun | He - His - Him
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 5:10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is yet another update:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/t
Hi everybody,
Here is yet another update:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56776529
The changes are available in private-ruby-3.0 branch, but nothing really
stands out. Please give a test and let me know should you find any issue.
Thx
Vít
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It
is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any
controversy. But anyway, please review and let me know if you have any
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 17:02 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 10:51:46 AM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
What if we provided `%{ruby_vendorlibdir}/rbconfig.rb`, which would fix
the `CXX` as well as the rhbz#1284684? WDYT?
I'm not entirely sure how that'd
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 16:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running
- Original Message -
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 10:51:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> What if we provided `%{ruby_vendorlibdir}/rbconfig.rb`, which would fix
> the `CXX` as well as the rhbz#1284684? WDYT?
I'm not entirely sure how that'd work TBH.
Would it overri
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55942586
I have not noticed anything
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 18:22 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 16:52 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure &
19, 2020 6:12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
@Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
calling the `%gem_install`? That sets the `CXX` env variable. Does it help?
Sure, -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/1775666
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/17
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 6:12:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> @Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
> calling the `%gem_install`? T
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 16:52 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure & make
& make install", everything runs on single
@Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
calling the `%gem_install`? That sets the `CXX` env variable. Does it help?
Vít
So CONFIG["CXX"] is not yet set ( in /usr/lib64/ruby/rbconfig.rb on
x86_64) (see:
> This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
> good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
> tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure & make
> & make install", everything runs on single machine :/
>
> Does anybody have a tip
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 22:18 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
Additionally, 'st.h' is missing for rubygem-ruby-libvirt:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/1768458
gcc -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/ruby/backward -I/usr/include -I.
-DRUBY_EXTCONF_H=\"extconf.h\"-fPIC -O2 -flto=auto
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 9:39:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Vít Ondruch"
> > To: ruby-sig@lists.f
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 2:23:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
>
> Dne 13. 11. 20 v 11:25 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/11/13 19:18:
ing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Čermák"
To: "Vít Ondruch"
Cc: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 4:41:46 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi Vít,
Vít Ondruch wri
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/11/13 19:18:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/11/13 17:46:
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Valena"
To: "Dan Čermák"
Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/11/13 17:46:
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Valena"
To: "Dan Čermák"
Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
- Orig
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Valena"
To: "Dan Čermák"
Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Čermá
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Dan Čermák"
> Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Čermák&quo
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Čermák"
> To: "Vít Ondruch"
> Cc: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 4:41:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi Vít,
>
> Vít Ondruch writes:
>
> > Hi all,
>
ji/taskinfo?taskID=54978639
>
> From the notable changes, there is ongoing effort to gemify StdLib.
>
> As always, please let me know if you encounter any issues with the
> package.
Any idea what is the state of vagrant w.r.t Ruby 3.0? I know upstream
struggled quite a bit with 2
Hi all,
Here is once again freshly updated Ruby. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
and you can find the scratch build in Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54978639
From the notable changes, there is ongoing effort
Dne 13. 10. 20 v 14:29 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Pavel Valena wrote on 2020/10/13 21:00:
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Vít Ondruch"
>>> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:52:07 PM
>>> Subje
Pavel Valena wrote on 2020/10/13 21:00:
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:52:07 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi all,
Another update to the most recent version of Ruby 3.0 is here:
https://src.fedorap
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> Hi all,
>
> Another update to the most recent version of Ruby 3.0 is here:
>
> https://src.
Hi all,
Another update to the most recent version of Ruby 3.0 is here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53075655
The main difference is RubyGems patch fixing issues with build of
rubygem- packages pvalena encountered
Hi all,
After quite long hiatus, I am back with preview of next Ruby, which
seems to be Ruby 3.0. Therefore I have closed the original PR and opened
new one:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
From private-ruby-3.0 branch, which is branched from private-ruby-2.8
branch
76 matches
Mail list logo
