Oh, I really got this wrong. So, the HTML is already constructed with
the render call, then the rest of the action is executed!
Thanks a lot.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails:
the
after_action is executed.
I understood the render() function in that way, that it only sets up
which ERB template is supposed to be used, but actual rendering would
occur only when the action has finished. Did I get this wrong?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You r
Muskalek wrote in post #1157141:
> This is expected behaviour.
I see! Thank you for pointing it out!
At times, the plethora of automatisms found in Rails is a bit creepy
I always had the habit to explicitly define my actions, so I didn't
stumble over this one earlier.
Ronald
--
didn't put one in
ApplicationController). Actually, the only other home method I have is
in a completely unrelated controller.
I wonder how it can be, that clicking on the admin_pages_home_path link,
didn't raise an exception.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You r
lass of n derives from
ActiveRecord::Base, i.e. a class, which I can't control. Now imagine
that in a new version of Rails, this class would receive a to_int method
(for example, to implicitly convert a model object into the id of the
object). This would break my code.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://ww
Hassan Schroeder wrote in post #1156593:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Ronald Fischer
> wrote:
>> In my Rails 4 application, when I have a form including a password, i.e.
>
>> I don't like the fact that the password is shown plain text in the log
>> file
In my Rails 4 application, when I have a form including a password, i.e.
<%= password_field_tag 'admpwd', nil, size:32, maxlength: 32, class:
'admentry' %>
I don't like the fact that the password is shown plain text in the log
file, and would like to disable this. I found several suggestions t
;t have any semantic on its own,
doesn't look like good design either.
What approach would you suggest?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe fro
s bitten by
it.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@goo
Rails 4, Ruby 2
Model has Card and Idiom
and Idiom belongs_to :card
In my Rails console I have an Idiom i and get the card from it:
c=i.card
=> #
Now I do:
c.is_a?(Card)
=> false
c.instance_of?(Card)
=> false
Ooops! Why false in both cases?
c.class.name
=> "Card"
c.
mmits" them to the general public. This will be important, if he
really uses <%...%> tags, because he won't have a Rails environment when
creating the pages.
What do you think about this design?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message becau
Walter Davis wrote in post #1155322:
> On Aug 16, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
>
>> Walter Davis wrote in post #1155317:
>>> But adding the two together must (I am
>>> guessing here) cause them to both be evaluated as arrays before the
>>> additio
Colin Law wrote in post #1155319:
> On 16 August 2014 11:03, Ronald Fischer wrote:
> Would it be possible to combine the two queries into one - Dict.where(
> ... or ... )? Then you would not need to concatenate them.
Technically, yes, and it likely would be a performance improv
ill is a
Dict::ActiveRecord_Relation. The conversion into an Array must come
after that, and this means it must happen inside paginate().
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk&quo
(Rails 4, Ruby 2)
I have two functions which query the database. Both yield a set of model
objects. These two sets should be catenated and presented to the user
using the will_paginate Gem. I think I understand now how to do it, but
a few issues with this are still puzzling me.
Here are the query
.. }
I would have written
-> { ... }
Are both notations exactly the same?
> Also, read this book:
Thank you for the recommendation!
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails:
rams hash, if both are empty, and I also remove the
user id, if it has not changed (because there is an index on it, and I
don't want to trigger unnecessary index update operations). After this,
I pass the params to update_attributes.
When it comes to updating profile information, I had expect
plication,
because I often have the case that I will update only some of the
attributes. I wonder *why* validates looks at attributes which are not
part of the update. Is there a use case where this makes sense?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message bec
I have a User model:
create_table "users", force: true do |t|
t.string "name"
t.string "email"
t.datetime "created_at"
t.datetime "updated_at"
t.string "password_digest"
end
add_index "users", ["name"], name: "index_users_on_name"
Then, I have the following validat
Scott Ribe wrote in post #1153641:
> And if you don't want to change the RoR default, you can think up your
> own name and add your own setting to the config.
No, the Rails default is fine. I'll go with the solution proposed by
Colin.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-foru
ions to see, whether
there is something like "getlocal" or "localtime", but there doesn't
seem to be one. to_formatted_s looked promising, but I didn't find
anysthing in the possible time format specifiers which would help me
here.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.
Ah, I have set it to :destroy!
But why do I get the error when I assign to pto.children? I would expect
such an error then when pfrom is deleted.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on
Matt Jones wrote in post #1152815:
> On Friday, 18 July 2014 02:24:59 UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote:
> saved_children = pfrom.children.to_a
> pfrom.children = []
> pto.children = pto.children + saved_children.
I finally found the time to rewrite this part of my application
according to this su
I am stunned!
Every day I like Rails more
Thanks a lot!
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
BOM at the moment, it is likely that
sooner or later I will also have to support uploading of files which
contain a BOM.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To u
Walter Davis wrote in post #1152668:
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
>> pfrom = Parent.find_by_id(from_id)
>> children formerly belonging to pfrom, and iterating over pfrom shows
>> the case? How then would I correctly implement the "move".
&g
encoding *can* be called - it just fails. We have nearly
everything in place. Now, if we can find out WHY set_encoding fails (and
this might be a generic Ruby question), we can find out what Rails (or
the programmer) can do to let things go smoothly
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-fo
I have a models Parent and Child, an the following association:
Parent
has_many :children, dependent: :destroy
Child
belongs_to :parent
Further, I have two Parent instances:
pfrom = Parent.find_by_id(from_id)
pto = Parent.find_by_id(to_id)
My goal is to transfer all children from pto t
As far I understand this article, this related to Rails 3 and MySQL, and
how to use UTF8 encoded data everywhere. I don't know about MySQL, but
Rails 4 and Ruby 2 with SQLite don't suffer this problem: I didn't have
any trouble, processing all kinds of Unicode characters with my
application, an
Yes, it is, as I found by trial-and-error. Note that the object is not
just a File, it is of class Tempfile. I think this is quite common when
working with a Tempfile object. To make a Tempfile threadsafe, you have
to combine the creation of the filename and the creation of the file
into one ca
Rails maybe has some built-in feature
for this which I just am not aware of.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece
In this case, it is pretty certain that ever file will contain UTF-8
characters, and in general, I think the cases are few where we can
assume input to be represented by 7-bit-ASCII.
What I do not know for sure is whether or not the file will have a BOM,
but I think Ruby can figure this out aut
constraint would require uniqueness within a certain B, I could
write
validates :ccol, uniqueness: { scope: :B_id }
But since C doesn't contain an A_id as foreign key, I can not express it
in this way.
Is there a possibility to achieve this?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-foru
My Rails application (Rails 4.1, Ruby 2.1.1) offers the user to upload a
file. This file will then be parsed by the application, and after the
parsing is done, it is deleted from the upload area.
So far, I have the following:
In my upload form, I have
<%= file_field_tag :upload, {accept: 'te
The solution is found here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24607428/rubyonrails-counting-the-result-of-a-join
Basically, I need to specify in my :dicts model, that there is an
association to :cards
# in class Dict:
has_many :idioms, through: :cards
After this, I can do:
idioms.where(kind
It's 2.1.1p76 in both cases.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@goog
cal system?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegr
which I would *really* find satisfying, so
maybe I will just go for the one which is least ugly. :-D
Thank you a lot for providing such an elaborate example
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R
ot; buttons places some code into this field (say, 0
for reject and 1 for accept) and then calls form.submit(). My controller
only checks for the 0 or 1, and is never aware of the actualy value of
the buttons. Actually, the controller doesn't need to check any button
in this solution.
Rona
ding to which button has been clicked)
into the hidden text field, and calls form.submit()
- My controller doesn't do a check on the button, but on the hidden
textfield, to determine which button has been clicked.
What do you think about this way of doing it?
Ronald
--
Posted via
quot; and "reject". Clicking on the first
button would pass
"judgement" => "accept"
to the application. This is exactly what I want, but I want to be able
to change the text which is visible on the button (for example, when
displaying the page in a different langu
Thanks a lot, this is the solution I was looking for!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonra
> If you just want to print out the bare text, you can just put that in
> your
> erb tag: <%= my_variable %>
This didn't work either, because the value of my_variable contains
simple quotes, and these had been replaced by an HTML entity denotation
(in this case, it is '). That's why I thought I
I have in my erb file something like this:
<%= simple_format(...) %>
The generated code is wrapped within . In my case, I need the
code be interpolated without this wrapping. Can this be done?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because y
This is an excerpt from a rails console session:
2.1.1 :011 > x=User.new({name: 'x', email: 'x...@example.org', password:
'', password_confirmation: ''})
=> #
2.1.1 :012 > x.save
(0.2ms) begin transaction
Binary data inserted for `string` type on column `name`
User Exists (
to convert the
ActiveRecord::Relation to an array is a good idea. Maybe there is a
better way to implement sorting?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe
Let's have model :parents and :children, where one parent can have many
children, and that I want to do something like this:
plist=Parent.joins(:children).select('*').where("parents.id=children.parent_id
and children.cfield=#{...}")
plist.each { |p| do_something_with(p,p.children) }
Now I learne
I have in my model :dicts, :cards and :idioms. Each Dict has many Cards
and each Cards has many Idioms. Also, :idioms has an Integer column
:kind.
I would like to find out, whether a certain dict object has at least
one Card which has at least one Idiom where :kind has a certain value.
This is
Could it be that you are running OSX 10.6? I have the same problem, and
already contacted the nokogiri supporters. At least on *this* OSX
version. it doesn't work.
I have also informed Michael Hartl to consider this in the next update
of his tutorial. You will have to do without Capybara.
--
in controllers, but they still would be
available in views too).
I see that there are several ways to do it. Could you also explain, why
my naive approach (to create a separate "lib" subdirectory below "app"
and put everything there) would be a bad idea? I have never s
My Rails application also contains classes which are independent from
the Rails framework, in that they could be reused unchanged if I would,
for example, created a non-web-based, command-line version of my app.
Such a class could be one which implements business logic, or a simple
utility class.
Walter Davis wrote in post #1150186:
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:09 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
>
>> Does this mean that I can't solve this with a *button*, but would have
>> to use a *link* instead?
>
> It's important to note that you may style a link to look like an
Does this mean that I can't solve this with a *button*, but would have
to use a *link* instead?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Walter Davis wrote in post #1150083:
> You say tainted, and I hear Soft Cell...
This too, of course ;-)
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe fr
ich don't actually fetch
> anything until you want to look at them). It's a brilliant
> implementation pattern, but counter-intuitive to newbies.
It's just "lazy evaluation" at work, and as such not so much
"counter-intuitive". It's only that it is not
rity vulnerability for SQL injection.
Oh, you are absolutely right. I see the danger.
These are the times where I'm missing Perl's concept of "tainted"
strings...
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
this warning too! While I don't feel so comfortable with
Bootstrap, I am currently looking for other libraries and will probably
face this problem again.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
o
I have nested resources
resources :dicts do
resources :cards
end
and in my form
form_for [@dict,@card] do |f|
I have the following button:
<%= f.submit('LIST ALL', url: dict_cards_path(@dict.id),
class:'kanren_button', name:'list_all', method: :get) %>
The generated HTML code is:
Thanks to all contributors! Hassan Schroeder's sharp eye finally spotted
the culprit.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr
Hassan Schroeder wrote in post #1149926:
> ?? Not, the OP originally posted:
>
> @card.idioms(:order => 'kind DESC')
>
> which is 1) not equivalent, and 2) won't work.
Oops I think that's it! Will check it on the next occasion.
(The OP is herewith
Colin Law wrote in post #1149914:
> On 17 June 2014 13:34, Ronald Fischer wrote:
>> In my schema, Idiom has an integer column kind. Given a certain card, I
>> (1) @card.idioms(:order => 'kind DESC')
>>
>> This doesn't seem to have any effect.
>
Walter Davis wrote in post #1149912:
> On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
> It sounds to me as though maybe all of your idioms have the same value
> (or null) in their kind column.
No, they have correct values (1, 2 and 3). Actually, the logic of the
application ens
I have in my model
class Card < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :idioms,dependent: :destroy
end
class Idiom < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :card
end
In my schema, Idiom has an integer column kind. Given a certain card, I
would like to have all associated idioms, but sorted in descending or
Hassan Schroeder wrote in post #1149759:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Ronald Fischer
> wrote:
> (assume that ) box = Box.find(box_id)
>
> box.cards # has the cards you want *if* you need all the attributes
>
> box.cards.pluck(:id) # builds a query to fetch *only* th
Colin Law wrote in post #1149753:
> On 15 June 2014 09:29, Ronald Fischer wrote:
> Assuming that you have the relationships setup accordingly (so card
> belongs_to box and box has_many cards or something similar)
Actually I have both (belongs_to in :cards and has_many :cards in box);
e SQL query would be so simple that I don't fear
I would run into compatibility problems when exchanging one database for
another, I wonder whether there is a simpler solution, using just
ActiveRecord functions.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this messag
Thanks a lot for the helpful answers! Both solutions make sense to me.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e
I used rails generate scaffold for part of my application, and this
looks fine so far. Now I would like to change a style for the
element, which happens to be defined in scaffold.css.scss. I don't want
to touch the generated file, so I place the definition into my own file.
I have one (rkanren.cs
I don't understand the following example from the ActiveRecord::Base
section in http://api.rubyonrails.org/ :
==
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
serialize :preferences, Hash
end
user = User.create(preferences: %w( one two three ))
User.find(user.id).preferences# raises SerializationType
I'm using Ruby 2.1.1 and Rails 4.1.1, with SQLite and, respectively,
Postgres.
All my strings are supposed to be UTF-8 encoded.
Now, assuming I create a field in my model as
data:string{20}
can I safely assume, that this will store up to 20 characters, even if
each character happens to be 3
tribute, or
Got it! I now can see my mistake. The label should be
<%= d.label :filtertype_lefteq, 'Starts with...', value: 'lefteq' %>
> 2. The label wraps around the button and does not have a "for"
> attribute.
Just out of curiosity: How can *that* b
Thank you so much to go through all the trouble and even lay out an
example for the code.
While I have meanwhile already redesigned the login logic, reading the
short tutorial of Reform on github, and also your example, let's me
think that I could use Reform well for another piece of my applica
My form essentially looks like this:
<%= form_for :xxx, url: xxxs_path, method: 'get', enforce_utf8:true do
|d| %>
<%= d.text_field('filter', value: @filter, maxlength:64, size:16) %>
<%= d.radio_button(:filtertype, 'regexp') %>
<%= d.label :filtertype_regexp, 'Regular Expression', value: 'r
mike2r wrote in post #1148859:
> I do think that ajax is a good recommendation. Selecting, creating, or
> changing a dictionary could be accessed from any page making it much
> more
> user friendly and a success growl is fine, but again, you should be
> prepared to handle the case where a user tri
Jesse Knutsen wrote in post #1148836:
> On 6/4/14, 1:19 PM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
>> However, the form has two buttons, and one is (from the viewpoint of
>> logic) doing a GET and the other one should do a POST. Of course I can't
>> have both. Maybe it is the form which
Jesse Knutsen wrote in post #1148812:
> On 6/4/14, 10:08 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
> Essentially you are calling two different actions right now (in your
> design) where the first leads to the second through a redirect. This
> redirect will actually redirect the user on the browser le
Jesse Knutsen wrote in post #1148818:
> On 6/4/14, 10:30 AM, Colin Law wrote:
>>
> You are 100% correct, but he was going to redirect to Dicts#new.
Only as a work-around, but as I said, I was not so happy with this
either.
> DictController
> ...
> new
> if params[:new_dict]
>
Walter Davis wrote in post #1148806:
> I would definitely not mix the login logic with the "show the home page"
> logic as you seem to have done here
I fully agree that from a programmer's viewpoint it would make the
problem much cleaner to solve. However, when developing software, I try
to see th
Jesse Knutsen wrote in post #1148805:
> I am not a huge fan of an approach that would need to redirect in this
> way.
>
> Instead, why not create a new class called login or something like that.
>
> You will need to adapt a bit to your needs, but the basics are sound and
> should apply nicely.
I d
My application should behave like this:
- My application manages (among others) a resource called "Dicts", i.e.
there is a dicts_controller, and my routes.rb contains a "resources
:dicts".
- I have a home page (starting page), which will eventually contain some
user authentification (not implemen
I've put my favicon into app/assets/images and include in my header
<%= favicon_link_tag 'my_favicon.jpg' %>
The favicon is correctly recognized by the browser, so it works
perfectly. When viewing the source code, I see to my surprise that the
following HTML code is generated:
Aside from
ntication part of the tutorial.
Thanks, I will do so. I already started to read the tutorial you
recommended, and I must say it's really well written!
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on
Thank you for the suggestions. I went through the tutorial found on the
web (which was explaining the concepts using the example of making a
blog site), but could relate what I have learned, only to the concept of
the idioms in my project, but not to the rest of my application.
I now see that i
Walter Davis wrote in post #1147134:
> @dict = Dict.where(:dictname => dict_name).first
>
> It will either return a record, or nil.
Thanks a lot. This works perfectly well!
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
You did grasp the concept of my application amazingly well, only that
the only possible ways to "edit" a dict is to add and remove idioms
(would you see this as editing the dictionary, or as manipulating the
Idiom class?).
The reason why I did not follow the CRUD way - and maybe this I was
mis
g from the API docs
the information I need.
Just for my understanding: Could you also please explain, why my
original (complicated) version failed?
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rai
nt to
display an error message to the user. Hence, find_or_create isn't
suitable for me.
BTW, I also tried
Dict.find(:dictname => dict_name)
but this too complained that there is a hash, which can't be converted
to an integer.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.c
I thought this is an easy one, but: I have created a record, and later
would like to retrieve it again.
Here is an excerpt of my schema:
create_table "dicts", force: true do |t|
t.string "dictname"
...
end
My model ensures that dictname is unique:
validates :dictname,
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanations. Two remarks for this:
As for the naming, my application evolves a dictionary of foreign
language idioms, and the main purpose it to train the user in the usage
of these idioms. From the perspective of the user, there are 3 types of
"screens" (HTML pag
he email
address mentioned at the bottom of the apidock.com page. I'm still
pretty new in the development with Rails, as you certainly have noticed,
and at this stage, "fixing" something - even if it is only in the docs -
could do more harm than good.
Ronald
--
Posted via htt
mike2r wrote in post #1146887:
> I would use resources, as
> Scott
> suggests, but limit the actions that you really need such as:
>
> resources :dicts, only: [:show]
Now in my case, the action has a "non-standard" name, i.e. ":manage".
Can I use this too in the "only:" array, or should I instead
Евгений Шурмин wrote in post #1146886:
> get 'dict/:id/manage', to: 'dict#manage' , as: :dict
Could you please kindly explain, what the effect of the "as: :dict" is
in this case? I understood that I need the "as:" parameter for those
cases where I want to name the route differently, but in this
Thanks for the explanation! I noticed your response only now, and it
would have at least partially answered my other question I had posted in
this forum too ;-)
I think I get the idea with nested routing now. What I still don't
understand is a *syntactic* issue: How to map this feature to the
I have a problem passing control from one controller to the next. Here
are the details:
I have a model 'Dict' with primary key :dictname. I have two
controllers, named 'Login' and 'Dict'. The application starts in
views/login/index.html.erb, where I have - among other stuff - an entry
field for th
(Crossposting Note: This topic has been posted already at
https://railsforum.com/topic/1933-link-to-with-array-parameter-for-url-what-does-it-mean
, but did not get a reply so far)
I found in http://guides.rubyon...-a-partial-form the following example:
link_to 'Destroy Comment', [comment.article
tamouse m. wrote in post #1146720:
> As much as I hate to say is, this *might* be a case for single table
> inheritance...
So be it! ;-)
Thank you for the confirmation.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rub
In my application, I have 3 models. Let's call them X, Y and Z for
brevity. Their relationship are as follows:
- One X has an arbitrary number (maybe zero) items of type Y.
- One Y has 2 or 3 items of type Z. Moreover, these items are *ordered*,
i.e. I need to record somehow, which is the first o
Fab Forestier wrote in post #1146691:
> If you take a look in the helper ( rails generate model -h) the options
> are after attributes of your model like this rails generate model Word
> repr:string level:integer atari:integer triple:references -p
Thanks so much! Now it's obvious...
--
Posted v
Rails 4.1.1, Ruby 2.1.1, OSX 10.6
This works:
rails generate model Word repr:string level:integer atari:integer
triple:references
This does not:
rails generate model -p Word repr:string level:integer atari:integer
triple:references
It raises the error message:
.../ruby-2.1.1/gems/spring-1.1.3
became obvious!!
Thanks a lot.
Ronald
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
