On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:08:30AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Ok, final vote ...
homogeneous complete homegeneous complete
To summarize there was a majority for homogeneous over complete,
and everybody could live with complete homogeneous, but was finding
it long.
So
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:21:36PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
I am against this. Why is the symbol of the basis h and not c? If
you want to change homogeneous to the full name of complete
homogeneous that is fine with me. In Sagan's book he first
introduces these functions by their full
Quick and from the phone (since we are currently biking at the Baltic see):
I vote with Anne and Mike for homogeneous or complete homogeneous. Best,
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:21:36PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
I am against this. Why is the symbol of the basis h and not c? If
you want to change homogeneous to the full name of complete
homogeneous that is fine with me. In Sagan's book
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to complete. Other opinions?
He also suggests that it
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:05:39PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
I think that in the complete basis is somewhat strange to read.
How about
sage: Sym.p()
Sym; basis: powersum
sage: Sym.m()
Sym; basis: monomial
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
sage: Sym.h()
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Ok, everybody, please vote!
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
There is an issue with the above in that it makes no mention of the
base ring. Knowing the base ring is important since it causes
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:39:14AM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote:
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
There is an issue with the above in that it makes no mention of the
base ring. Knowing the base ring is important since it causes issues
with changing bases over different base
On 8/27/12 6:23 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to
On 8/27/12 2:21 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:07:15PM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
sage: Sym.e()
Symmetric Functions over Rational Field in the elementary basis
This is my vote, for coherence with the rest of Sage, using long
descriptions in
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Sym ... in the LLT spin basis at level 3.
I thought we agreed on in.
Of course ...
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message
On Tuesday, 28 August 2012 07:35:27 UTC+10, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Sym ... in the LLT spin basis at level 3.
I think it should be ... in the LLT spin basis OF level 3.
Andrew
--
You received this message because you
I want to weigh in on the choice of homogeneous/complete/homogeneous
complete.
I posted some comments on the trac server.
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to complete. Other opinions?
I am truly afraid of what Alain has to say about this subject.
He is very
14 matches
Mail list logo
