Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-20 Thread Anne Schilling
On 1/19/12 3:50 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Hi Travis! > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:16:34PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> Here's the new patch: >> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12314 > > Note: this patch breaks later patches in the queue (tested on Sage > 4.7.2): > >

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-19 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Travis! On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:16:34PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > Here's the new patch: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12314 Note: this patch breaks later patches in the queue (tested on Sage 4.7.2): - displayhook-fh.patch - concrete_combinatorial_statistics_a

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Anne Schilling
On 1/12/12 10:35 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >>> Here you mean latexing a partition using it's Ferrers diagram? Then this is: >> >>>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4355 >> >>> which has been in need for a volunteer for three years. >> >> Yes, so Travis please use this ticket number fo

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > It has been done. I basically just called output.tex_from_array() with > a list of \phantom{x} (strings). So what needs to be done for this > trac ticket? In principle, the ticket description (with the referenced MuPAD doc and cod

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Anne Schilling
On 1/12/12 8:10 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: >> But for partitions, I think a latex method is very desirable anyway. >> We need it for rigged configurations (which contain partitions) and for >> drawing >> nice posets containing par

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 08:04:48AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > But for partitions, I think a latex method is very desirable anyway. > We need it for rigged configurations (which contain partitions) and for > drawing > nice posets containing partitions (like weak and strong order that Florent >

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Anne Schilling
On 1/12/12 1:14 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:44:53PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: >>> - The change: since #11498, strings are now rendered using \verb|...| >>>instead of \texttt. >>> - The issue: is that dot2tex >> >> Is there something missing in this sentence?

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-12 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:44:53PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > > - The change: since #11498, strings are now rendered using \verb|...| > >instead of \texttt. > > - The issue: is that dot2tex > > Is there something missing in this sentence? Oh, yes: The issue is that dot2tex does not han

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-11 Thread Anne Schilling
On 1/11/12 6:15 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:58:19AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: >> I also seem to have some trouble with view. >> >> sage: B = CrystalOfTableaux(['A',2],shape=[1]) >> sage: view(B, pdflatex=True, tightpage=True) >> >> works fine. But the following code

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-11 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi! > Anne, >I tried reproducing your error first on my usual VM setup, and > received a long list of latex errors (similar to the list when I first > tried to get the crystal graphs to compile). Then I copied the latex > output using latex(H) to my host tex editor/compile which generated > th

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-11 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:26:20AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >    I added ImageMagick (since it's Fedora: "yum install > ImageMagick" ), did the jsmath_avoid_list('tikz') command, and I was > able to properly view the pdf. However it does not work if I don't do > the jsmath_avoid command. John

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-11 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:58:19AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > I also seem to have some trouble with view. > > sage: B = CrystalOfTableaux(['A',2],shape=[1]) > sage: view(B, pdflatex=True, tightpage=True) > > works fine. But the following code gives an error: > > sage: ord = lambda x,y: y.dom

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-09 Thread Anne Schilling
On 12/26/11 2:48 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:52:00AM -0800, John H Palmieri wrote: >> I copied the latest version of TikZ / PGF (using a shared folder) >> to the VM and installed it. I was able to compile the .tex file using >> the VM's latex compiler

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-03 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:25:28AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > John, >I tried using it and I got the following error: > > Error: convert (from the ImageMagick suite) does not > appear to be installed. Displaying PDFLaTeX output > requires this program, so please install and try again. >

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-26 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:52:00AM -0800, John H Palmieri wrote: > I copied the latest version of TikZ / PGF (using a shared folder) > to the VM and installed it. I was able to compile the .tex file using > the VM's latex compiler and view the output .pdf from my host OS > (W

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-26 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi! On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:54:53PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >Here's the results of the tests I have done and my interpretations. > Calling view() (from the notebook) calls the underlying OS's latex > compiler, and then I believe the notebook displays the resulting pdf > in th

RE: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-20 Thread Sagan, Bruce
m] on behalf of Nicolas M. Thiery [nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:48 AM To: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:55:11AM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote: > Formidable! This installed d

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:48:00 AM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:55:11AM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote: > > Formidable! This installed dot2tex. Thanks so much!! One last > question. When I went back to the notebook and ran a view command (I just > copied

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:55:11AM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote: > Formidable! This installed dot2tex. Thanks so much!! One last question. > When I went back to the notebook and ran a view command (I just copied the > first example of using this command from the section Crystals of Tableaux in

RE: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-19 Thread Sagan, Bruce
: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com [sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Florent Hivert [florent.hiv...@lri.fr] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 3:47 PM To: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat Hi Bruce > (1) None

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-19 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi Bruce > (1) None of these options worked to get back to mouse *outside* of the > sage/VM window. The only way I could get the mouse back for the rest of my > desktop was to do Control-Alt-Delete, tell the machine I was logging off, > and then cancelling when it asked me to force shutdown

RE: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-19 Thread Sagan, Bruce
sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat Hi Bruce, On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:51:29PM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote: > I am now one step further: I can open the sage shell as explained in the > README document (thanks, Nicolas, for pointing me to i

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-18 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi Bruce, On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:51:29PM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote: > I am now one step further: I can open the sage shell as explained in the > README document (thanks, Nicolas, for pointing me to it). But then I have > two problems. > > (1) My mouse arrow disappears making it impossib

RE: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-18 Thread Sagan, Bruce
ombinat-devel@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Nicolas M. Thiery [nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 4:55 PM To: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat Dear Bruce, On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce

RE: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-09 Thread Sagan, Bruce
: Friday, December 09, 2011 5:05 PM To: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat On 12/9/11 1:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Dear Bruce, > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Sagan wrote: >> I had the

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-09 Thread Anne Schilling
On 12/9/11 1:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Dear Bruce, > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Sagan wrote: >> I had the same problem as William, but I am even further back. I >> don't understand how to get sage -sh to work. I am running sage in >> notebook form via Virtual

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-12-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Bruce, On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Sagan wrote: > I had the same problem as William, but I am even further back. I > don't understand how to get sage -sh to work. I am running sage in > notebook form via VirtualBox on a Windows 7 machine. Typing the > command in

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-11-22 Thread Anne Schilling
On 11/21/11 11:02 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Anne Schilling wrote: >> On 11/21/11 8:24 AM, William Stein wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: This means you have graphviz spkg installed under macosx... I cannot seem to be abl

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-11-21 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Anne Schilling wrote: > On 11/21/11 8:24 AM, William Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> This means you have graphviz spkg installed under macosx... >>> I cannot seem to be able to accomplish this: >>> http://trac.sagemath.or

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-11-21 Thread Anne Schilling
On 11/21/11 8:24 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> This means you have graphviz spkg installed under macosx... >> I cannot seem to be able to accomplish this: >> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7438 > > I installed graphviz under OS X b

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-11-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, 22 November 2011 00:24:46 UTC+8, William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > This means you have graphviz spkg installed under macosx... > > I cannot seem to be able to accomplish this: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7438 > > I i

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2011-11-21 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > This means you have graphviz spkg installed under macosx... > I cannot seem to be able to accomplish this: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7438 I installed graphviz under OS X by installing it from the Graphviz website, instead