On Jan 7, 2008 10:55 AM, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've managed to solve the problem: The package
texlive-cyrillic (in Debian/Ubuntu) is needed to build the Sage
documentation.
Thanks!!
I've made this trac #1719
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1719
Pablo
On Jan 8, 8:50 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 11:42 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, it worked for me under Ubuntu Gutsy with
On 8 Jan., 09:37, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:50 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 11:42 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiris is a closed source commercial math software company that makes a
web-based interface
to their own custom mathematical software. They ended the
discussion by telling us that their
web-based interface is (going to be) much better than ours.
A closed source commercial software will
Hi,
In my efforts to get sage in Gentoo I came on something that looks
like a problem in gmp 4.2.2.
On Gentoo gmp 4.2.2 is marked stable and is part of the system (needed
by gcc). On the ground
that the only patch relevant to me was the new fast gcd code and that
it was a performance patch
and
On Jan 8, 7:00 am, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the AJAX notebook. But my position is that an AJAX-based
notebook that is so good it pushes the limits of what AJAX can do
would still be no where near as capable as a well-written Java
Applet-based notebook.
Well, I'm in general
On Jan 8, 10:00 am, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Francois,
In my efforts to get sage in Gentoo I came on something that looks
like a problem in gmp 4.2.2.
On Gentoo gmp 4.2.2 is marked stable and is part of the system (needed
by gcc). On the ground
that the only patch
On Jan 8, 12:26 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:09 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.9.2/local/bin/sage-sage: line 210: 4746
Segmentation fault sage-ipython -c $SAGE_STARTUP_COMMAND; $@
[EMAIL
Is there a way to construct block matrices in SAGE?
Not just the block_sum, augment and stack functions.
As an example, let A, B, C, D be matrices and i want to construct a
matrix like E=[[A,B],[C,D]]
Such a feature would be very nice.
-vgermrk-
mabshoff wrote:
On Jan 8, 12:26 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:09 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.9.2/local/bin/sage-sage: line 210: 4746
Segmentation fault sage-ipython -c
I think that the Wiris web interface is specialized so much that it
may never be better than the Sage Notebook. I currently primary use
the Sage Notebook to teach a ten year old how to program with Python.
Therefore, for me organization and revision control are far more
important than fancy
Works for me. That means #1553 is solved, though the larger SCons
issue remains in case we bring in any more software that uses it.
On my box (again, that's 64-bit RHEL5), sage -testall passes all
tests.
Kiran
On Jan 7, 9:30 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Hello folks,
and
Certainly the first example is not exactly a bug since the answer is a
priori only determined modulo 15, so 11 is as good as -4. It's only a
bug if the solution is supposed to be guaranteed minimal, which is
what the earlier business with extended gcd was all about.
John
On 08/01/2008,
On Jan 8, 1:40 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Jan 8, 12:26 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:09 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.9.2/local/bin/sage-sage: line 210:
On Jan 8, 5:04 pm, Kiran Kedlaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kiran,
Works for me.
Good to know, but that was the intention all the way.
That means #1553 is solved, though the larger SCons
issue remains in case we bring in any more software that uses it.
I meant to write the PoLyBoRi
On Jan 8, 11:55 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Jan 8, 10:00 am, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Francois,
In my efforts to get sage in Gentoo I came on something that looks
like a problem in gmp 4.2.2.
On Gentoo gmp 4.2.2 is marked stable and is
On Jan 8, 7:40 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I am confident it will be resolved. The changes gmp 4.2.1-4.2.2 were
largely config fixes and fixes for exotic platforms, so I don't expect
any problems once we remerge our patch set.
I didn't know about that minimal parameter
On Jan 8, 2008 1:46 AM, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Alex,
Hi Robert,
I'm stumped by some of the twisted notebook code. Specifically, if
the login form is set to POST instead of GET it redirects login/
You are definitely going to want the login form to always be a POST
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:34:06 -0800 (PST)
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 5:04 pm, Kiran Kedlaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That means #1553 is solved, though the larger SCons
issue remains in case we bring in any more software that uses it.
I meant to write the PoLyBoRi team
On Jan 9, 8:14 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Jan 8, 7:40 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I don't think the behavior of Maxima is affected by lisp. What version
of Maxima do you run on your system? There is at least one bug in the
Sage-Maxima interface
On Jan 8, 8:48 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:14 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Jan 8, 7:40 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I don't think the behavior of Maxima is affected by lisp. What version
of Maxima do you run on your
Hi,
Robert Miller and I are trying hard to get some sexy new hardware via
the NSF SCREMS program.
Please see and comment on the attached proposal. Any typos, thoughts,
etc., are welcome.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/grants/screms/
NSF evaluates proposals based on scientific value, etc.,
On Jan 7, 2008, at 23:50 , William Stein wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 11:42 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, it worked for me under Ubuntu Gutsy with firefox...
On Jan 8, 2008 12:07 PM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 23:50 , William Stein wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 11:42 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:22 pm, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:13 AM, Francois [EMAIL
On Jan 8, 2008, at 11:09 AM, alex clemesha wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 1:46 AM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Alex,
Hi Robert,
I'm stumped by some of the twisted notebook code. Specifically, if
the login form is set to POST instead of GET it redirects login/
You are
On Jan 8, 8:54 pm, Burcin Erocal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:34:06 -0800 (PST)
mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 5:04 pm, Kiran Kedlaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That means #1553 is solved, though the larger SCons
issue remains in case we bring in any more
On Jan 9, 8:58 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Ok, we would certainly welcome any kind of participation from the
Gentoo community.
Hopefully some support may be drummed there, I myself may be soon
claimed
by a non-academic real-life that could put me on hiatus.
Which
Good luck!
@ Isn't it a bit obvious to say that you will be doing computations
which go beyond what has been done before?
@ You say that the previous NSF grant has had a broad impact on
mathematics -- that should be justified or it just sounds like hype.
[Later I see that you do justify this
On Jan 8, 9:55 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:58 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Ok, we would certainly welcome any kind of participation from the
Gentoo community.
Hopefully some support may be drummed there,
Excellent.
I myself may be soon
Sorry I didn't read it all - a bit busy tonight, but some comments:
There is a typo on the third last line of the summary: research -
researchers ?
The phrase impact on mathematics or something equivalent is used too
often in the summary. It's too generic.
I personally think it is a good move
For people who are seriously interested into developing SAGE into a
tool that can easily be used for teaching and/or student assignments,
I warmly recommend that they look into LON-CAPA. It has the advantage
that it is already based on open source technology. Maxima is already
packaged with it
Francois wrote:
And it is supposed to work with what? On Linux I get a blank page with
firefox and konqueror - opera just went and crashed.
I certainly won't take seriously a product of that kind, that I cannot
test on Linux.
It takes a while for the applet to load the first time. I had to
Justin C. Walker wrote:
A brief comment:
I think Harald's comment is apt.
+1
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options,
Ted Kosan wrote:
Harald wrote:
but I'm more
and more convinced that a huge java applet is not the best way for any
webbased project. There are two things to consider: 1. it is much
heavier, concerning load time/memory and so on.
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing
Harald wrote:
but I'm more
and more convinced that a huge java applet is not the best way for any
webbased project. There are two things to consider: 1. it is much
heavier, concerning load time/memory and so on.
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast
A brief comment:
On Jan 8, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
Harald wrote:
but I'm more
and more convinced that a huge java applet is not the best way for
any
webbased project. There are two things to consider: 1. it is much
heavier, concerning load time/memory and so on.
With
Sage devel might be interested in this -- it's screencasts of a tool that
numerical python people that DoD / supercomputing sorts
have developed
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jose Unpingco
Date: Jan 8, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: these are the links I mentioned...
To: [EMAIL
On Jan 9, 12:42 am, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I encourage more thought and discussion on this.
Yes, this should be discussed. I think the shortest path at first
would be integrating SAGE-evaluation-boxes in the already shipped
moinmoin Wiki. This is then a nice place to build a
Here at the joint meetings, there has been some interest from some
course management folks in working with sage. In particular, someone
from WebWork stopped by and suggested we should look for complementary
features.
I think some sort of open source course management functionality in
sage would
On Jan 8, 2008 4:18 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sage devel might be interested in this -- it's screencasts of a tool that
numerical python people that DoD / supercomputing sorts
have developed
Wow, this is cool. We have an ipython1 screencast now :) I'd never
heard of
Jaap wrote:
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast becoming a non-issue.
I've heard that before! But I don't believe this is the panacea!
The exponential growth of computing indicates that by 2020, a $1000
computer will have the same capacity as a
On Jan 9, 1:31 am, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaap wrote:
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast becoming a non-issue.
I've heard that before! But I don't believe this is the panacea!
The exponential growth of computing indicates that by
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast becoming a non-issue.
I've heard that before! But I don't believe this is the panacea!
The exponential growth of computing indicates that by 2020, a $1000
Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast becoming a non-issue.
I've heard that before! But I don't believe this is the panacea!
The exponential growth of computing indicates that by 2020, a $1000
computer will have the same
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
With bandwidth and memory capacity increasing exponentially, this is
fast becoming a non-issue.
I've heard that before! But I don't believe this is the panacea!
The exponential growth of computing
This is a fun thread :-)
Anyway, what I am more interested in than specific Sage client types
is a good way for all client types to talk with Sage. Here is Wiris's
communication architecture:
http://www.wiris.com/images/stories/architecture_en.jpg
What I would like to have in Sage is a
Hello,
Sage 2.10.alpha0 contains an updated FLINT release. As per usual I
forced to run make check and the following happened in 64 bit mode
with gcc 4.2.2 on Itanium:
Testing _fmpz_poly_mul_KS()... GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory
(old_size=8 new_size=4294959128)
./spkg-check: line 51: 13014
On Jan 8, 2008 5:34 PM, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a fun thread :-)
Anyway, what I am more interested in than specific Sage client types
is a good way for all client types to talk with Sage. Here is Wiris's
communication architecture:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
Ok, I once thought java was the way to go, but now I'm a convert.
I hate java.
Truth be told, I like programming in Python better than Java when this
is feasible. For rich cross-platform browser-based applications,
however, it is difficult
On Jan 9, 5:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
Ok, I once thought java was the way to go, but now I'm a convert.
I hate java.
Truth be told, I like programming in Python better than Java when this
is feasible. For rich cross-platform
On Jan 8, 2008 8:48 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
Ok, I once thought java was the way to go, but now I'm a convert.
I hate java.
Truth be told, I like programming in Python
On Jan 8, 2008 11:51 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick question: Isn't Flash a closed-source commercial product, hence
completely unsuitable for use as a core technology in Sage? (In contrast,
Java is (supposed to be?) GPL'd now. )
-- William
Yes it is closed (btw,
William wrote:
Just to break up the tension in this thread a little bit, here's my
idea of what it might look like:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/architecture_en.jpg
The idea of separating the Sage computation engine from the notebook
server looks interesting. I took
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, William Stein wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 8:48 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 5:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jaap wrote:
Ok, I once thought java was the way to go, but now I'm a convert.
I hate java.
Truth
On Jan 8, 2008 4:27 AM, vgermrk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to construct block matrices in SAGE?
Not just the block_sum, augment and stack functions.
As an example, let A, B, C, D be matrices and i want to construct a
matrix like E=[[A,B],[C,D]]
Such a feature would be very
Hi,
Can some Mac user try this code submission from NASA out
and make it part of Sage? It looks pretty sweet.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ted Wright @ NASA
Date: Jan 8, 2008 10:44 AM
Subject: Sage Mac application bundle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Thanks for Sage - it's
OK, I've made this sage mac app thing trac #1731:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1731
On Jan 8, 2008 10:45 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can some Mac user try this code submission from NASA out
and make it part of Sage? It looks pretty sweet.
--
On Jan 9, 7:43 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:27 AM, vgermrk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to construct block matrices in SAGE?
Not just the block_sum, augment and stack functions.
As an example, let A, B, C, D be matrices and i want to
On Jan 8, 2008 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 7:43 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:27 AM, vgermrk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to construct block matrices in SAGE?
Not just the block_sum, augment and stack
On Jan 9, 10:00 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Jan 8, 9:55 pm, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:58 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Ok, we would certainly welcome any kind of participation from the
Gentoo community.
Hopefully
Sage's MatrixSpace and matrix don't have support for this.
numpy (which you get via import numpy) might have support
for numerical matrices like this.
CVXOPT also has support for this:
http://abel.ee.ucla.edu/cvxopt/examples/short-examples/creating-matri...
And, just to be clear,
It was my impression that he didn't want a matrix with matrix entries,
but instead wanted the matrix whose entries were given by the entries
of the submatrices.
--Mike
On Jan 8, 2008 11:12 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That will be really easy to implement, I'll do it right now.
- Robert
On Jan 8, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
It was my impression that he didn't want a matrix with matrix entries,
but instead wanted the matrix whose entries were given by the entries
of the submatrices.
--Mike
Very cool. I'm interested, at some magical future point when I have
time, in pushing Sage on supercomputers. I have access to various
large systems at the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, I just
haven't had time to pursue it. I'll have to learn more about Vision,
it looks like there are
64 matches
Mail list logo
