[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

On 10 Jul., 23:07, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > Hi GSW, -- don't you have a real name? > > On 07/10/2009 10:37 PM, gsw wrote: > > > Hi Ralf, > > > On 9 Jul., 12:00, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > >> I seem to be out of luck. But maybe I did something wrong. > > >> Here my steps. > > >> I downloaded and extr

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] sage-4.1

Hi folks, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:30 AM, William Stein wrote: > > Hi Sage-Release and Sage-Combinat-Devel, > > We're basically 100% done with sage-4.1, and Robert Miller will > officially make the sage-4.1.tar tarball available.  I've also built > it on a lot of machines.  However, I'm going t

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi Ralf, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide > >> The download guide in its present state needs to be further fleshed >> out with more information. Having released it early, we (Harald and I) >> thought it would encourage people to i

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

Hi Pat, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote: > > Minh Nguyen wrote: >> The purpose of a release tour is to provide a high-level summary of >> features. It should provide some explanation about a feature, some >> "useful" code samples, and pretty pictures if relevant. Your summary

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

>>> I did hg_sage.apply("http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ >>> ticket/6447/trac_6447-canvas3d.patch") and I didn't *think* I saw >>> anything that looked like and error message. It sounds like you haven't built sage (sage -b) before rerunning it. You might also try (from a fresh s

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

On Jul 10, 4:44 pm, William Cauchois wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Mike Witt wrote: > > >> Here's an example, from my comment on the ticket: > > >> {{{ > >> x, y = var('x y') > >> plot3d(sin(pi*(x^2+y^2))/2,(x,-1,1),(y,-1,1), viewer='canvas3d', > >> plot_points=(20, 20)) > > >> }}}

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Mike Witt wrote: > > >> Here's an example, from my comment on the ticket: >> >> {{{ >> x, y = var('x y') >> plot3d(sin(pi*(x^2+y^2))/2,(x,-1,1),(y,-1,1), viewer='canvas3d', >> plot_points=(20, 20)) >> >> }}} > > Hmm Well, maybe I didn't actually succeed in inst

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Categories restart

> >and source introspection for dynamic classes. Someone should > >review these (along with the rest of my changes) > > I will make this into a reviewer's patch for the dynamic_class patch > #5991, and review it. Done. Can you double check http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5991 and,

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

> Here's an example, from my comment on the ticket: > > {{{ > x, y = var('x y') > plot3d(sin(pi*(x^2+y^2))/2,(x,-1,1),(y,-1,1), viewer='canvas3d', > plot_points=(20, 20)) > > }}} Hmm Well, maybe I didn't actually succeed in installing the patch. I get: ValueError: Unknown 3d plot type: canva

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Mike Witt wrote: > > > I'd like to try this. Is there a quick example somewhere of how to use > it. I downloaded the patch, but I don't understand how to access it. After you've applied the patch to your Sage repository, you should launch the notebook and specify

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

Minh Nguyen wrote: > The purpose of a release tour is to provide a high-level summary of > features. It should provide some explanation about a feature, some > "useful" code samples, and pretty pictures if relevant. Your summary > on > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.1 MoinMoin can colorize Py

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi GSW, -- don't you have a real name? On 07/10/2009 10:37 PM, gsw wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > On 9 Jul., 12:00, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> I seem to be out of luck. But maybe I did something wrong. >> >> Here my steps. >> >> I downloaded and extracted >> sage-4.0.2-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_5.0_lenny-i686

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

>>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide > The download guide in its present state needs to be further fleshed > out with more information. Having released it early, we (Harald and I) > thought it would encourage people to improve it. I didn't dare to improve your version but rather thought th

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi Ralf, On 9 Jul., 12:00, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > I seem to be out of luck. But maybe I did something wrong. > > Here my steps. > > I downloaded and extracted > sage-4.0.2-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_5.0_lenny-i686-Linux.tar.gz. > > cd sage-4.0.2-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_5.0_lenny-i686-Linux > ./sage -

Re: Fwd: [sage-devel] Re: Categories restart

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:46:27PM -0700, David Roe wrote: >I've updated my review patches (categories-framework-ref-dr.patch and the >small categories-tensorial_rename-dr.patch). I just reviewed your reviewer patch this morning. Wow, thanks for the massive work! >Unfortunately, I

[sage-devel] Re: 3D using processing.js

On Jun 29, 12:09 pm, William Cauchois wrote: > At the behest of William I took a stab at implementing this very type > of renderer in Sage. My work, [with patch], is available at > for anyone who might > be interested. I'd like to try this. Is the

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi Ralf, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > Hi Minh > >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide > > Much better. > > Excuse me if I now still have some comments. > > 1. > "When your computer boots, it probably displays a startup screen that > indicates the name of your oper

[sage-devel] Re: sage -upgrade 4.0 to 4.1

William Stein wrote: [...] > > I've also fixed this in the official upgrade server, so it shouldn't > cause trouble to anybody else. > > Thanks again for reporting this. > So it is save to do upgrade #81 to my systemwide sage install starting with sage-1.5.1,2? Latest install is sage-4.0.2. C

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi Minh > http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide Much better. Excuse me if I now still have some comments. 1. "When your computer boots, it probably displays a startup screen that indicates the name of your operating system." I think that when you only distinguish between Windows/Linux/MacOS

[sage-devel] Re: Who wants to try the first version of Coin-Or for SAGE ?!

I am still missing equality constraints. Sure, you can just add 2 inequalities, but since CoinPackedVector seems to support lower and upper bounds for each row, why not set them directly? Otherwise I'm quite satisfied, after playing around a bit. On Jul 9, 6:36 pm, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello e

[sage-devel] Re: sage -upgrade 4.0 to 4.1

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > sage -upgrade 4.0 to 4.1: > > > Finished extraction > > Host system > uname -a: > Linux hamerkop 2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 22:12:12 UTC 2009 > x86_64 GNU/Linux

[sage-devel] Re: Integration in new Sage symbolics

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:13 AM, rjf wrote: > > > > On Jun 23, 7:29 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > > >> >> +1, I agree, this is badly needed.  We should ask maxima/sympy to >> compute an integral when algorithm within Sage fails. That way >> one can implement the integration algorithm within

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

Hi Franco, On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Franco Saliola wrote: > I've added some information and examples for #5878 since I wrote the > code. Feel free to edit and change things as you see fit. Perhaps it > is too long? Too many examples? The purpose of a release tour is to provide a high-

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The Sage 4.1 milestone is now over and the merge window for Sage 4.1.1 > is open. A release note will be posted to sage-devel and sage-announce > in a day or two. A draft of the release tour for Sage 4.1 can be found > at > > h

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and numerics

On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5081 . >>> >>> sage: numpy.array([1, 10, 100]).dtype >>> dtype('int64') >> >> Following up on this, I've als

[sage-devel] Re: Integration in new Sage symbolics

On Jun 23, 7:29 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > > +1, I agree, this is badly needed.  We should ask maxima/sympy to > compute an integral when algorithm within Sage fails. That way > one can implement the integration algorithm within Sage which are > not yet implemented in maxima/sympy. J

[sage-devel] Re: SPKG computing modular cohomology rings of finite p-groups

Dear William, On 9 Jul., 22:50, William Stein wrote: > It would be very useful if you could post on the ticket *PRECISELY* > what you think a person should do to referee it and sign off on it > being officially added to the optional package repo. > I.e., > >   1. Install on the following hardwar

[sage-devel] sage -upgrade 4.0 to 4.1

Hi sage -upgrade 4.0 to 4.1: Finished extraction Host system uname -a: Linux hamerkop 2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 22:12:12 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux ***

[sage-devel] Re: Quaternion Algebra on Q(i) and Cocompact/Uniform Lattices in SL2(Z[i])

Thanks John! On Jul 10, 4:04 am, John Cremona wrote: > I forwarded the whole thread to sage-nt (which I see you have joined, > Lenny) and changed the title there, > > John > > 2009/7/10 Leonard Foret : > > > > > Is possible to change the name of this discussion?  I made a mistake, > > the lattic

[sage-devel] Re: Substitute method for argument of derivative operator

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:24:18 -0300 Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Burcin Erocal > wrote: > > > > I'll try to spare some time for pynac this weekend, and look at the > > changes you need for the derivatives to work. > > Thanks! > > > I'm not convinc

[sage-devel] Re: Substitute method for argument of derivative operator

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote: > > I'll try to spare some time for pynac this weekend, and look at the > changes you need for the derivatives to work. Thanks! > I'm not convinced that > adding a new field to the function_options class to switch the > application of t

[sage-devel] Re: Substitute method for argument of derivative operator

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:09:54 -0300 Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > Hi Burcin, > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Burcin Erocal > wrote: > > > If you share your code creating an SFunction called 'integral', I > > can produce patches for Sage and pynac to special case that > > function when comp

[sage-devel] Re: Integration in new Sage symbolics

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:38:11 -0700 William Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Burcin Erocal > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300 > > Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal > >> wrote: > >> >> > I plan

[sage-devel] showcasing your features in Sage 4.1

Hi folks, The Sage 4.1 milestone is now over and the merge window for Sage 4.1.1 is open. A release note will be posted to sage-devel and sage-announce in a day or two. A draft of the release tour for Sage 4.1 can be found at http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.1 At the moment, that page lists feat

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and numerics

Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5081 . >>> >>> sage: numpy.array([1, 10, 100]).dtype >>> dtype('int64') >> >> Following up on this, I've also posted http://trac.sagemath.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and numerics

Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5081 . >> >> sage: numpy.array([1, 10, 100]).dtype >> dtype('int64') > > Following up on this, I've also posted http://trac.sagemath.org/ > sage_trac/ticket/6506 . This br

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi Ralf, On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > 2) On the download page I would have expected to see posted a few > differences of the binary and the source distribution of sage. > The design with 'sage -f' and your hint of how I can recompile is great, > but without asking I w

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

On 2009-Jul-10 10:55:03 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >Not even "cat /proc/cpuinfo" shows me what you asked for... It should on Linux - on a convenient Xeon box, I see: flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss h

[sage-devel] a Sage download guide

Hi folks, Recently, some people have reported that the download pages for Sage is confusing and has little information on how to select the appropriate distribution to download. See for example this thread in sage-devel: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/53ae33d0324d

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > On 07/10/2009 09:52 AM, peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote: >> On 2009-Jul-09 00:31:46 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >>> likely fail with ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION errors! The following processor >>> flags were on the build machine but are not on this computer: >>> >>> pni ssse3 >>

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

Hi, On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > I've just downloaded > ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/linux/32bit/sage-4.0.2-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_5.0_lenny-i686-Linux.tar.gz > and typed as described in > ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/linux/32bit/README.txt: > >  >./s

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

On 07/10/2009 09:52 AM, peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote: > On 2009-Jul-09 00:31:46 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> likely fail with ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION errors! The following processor >> flags were on the build machine but are not on this computer: >> >> pni ssse3 > > I've seen this test repor

[sage-devel] Re: Implementing numerator and denominator for multivariate polynomials [with patch]

I don't think we can hope to have a mathematically consistent definition of numerator and denominator which works consistently in all rings and fields! I guess that in the cases where we think we know what we mean, it is because the ring in question is constructed (mathematically) from another ri

[sage-devel] Re: Implementing numerator and denominator for multivariate polynomials [with patch]

On 9 jul, 16:36, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:34 AM, John Cremona wrote: > > > I can see another problem here.    One could argue that the > > denominator of (x+y)/2 was 2 while you code gives 1.  So the > > documentation needs to be very clear, stating that the denominator o

[sage-devel] Re: Quaternion Algebra on Q(i) and Cocompact/Uniform Lattices in SL2(Z[i])

I forwarded the whole thread to sage-nt (which I see you have joined, Lenny) and changed the title there, John 2009/7/10 Leonard Foret : > > Is possible to change the name of this discussion? I made a mistake, > the lattice is in SL(2, CC) and not SL(2, Z[i]). > > Lenny > > On Jul 9, 8:02 pm, L

[sage-devel] Re: sage installation

On 2009-Jul-09 00:31:46 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >likely fail with ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION errors! The following processor >flags were on the build machine but are not on this computer: > >pni ssse3 I've seen this test report not report processor flags correctly (though I'm not sure this is Sage's

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and numerics

On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5081 . > > sage: numpy.array([1, 10, 100]).dtype > dtype('int64') Following up on this, I've also posted http://trac.sagemath.org/ sage_trac/ticket/6506 . This brings up an interface question, and