Hi !
With the forthcoming bunch of sage-combinat patches, to test a parent we call
sage: TestSuite(P).run()
which by default returns nothing if everything is ok and raise an
AssertionError
if not. There is also a verbose mode
sage: TestSuite(P).run(verbose=True)
Dear Nicolas,
I just spent/lost one hour on the following missfeature (at least in my
opinion) of TestsSuite... Mind the ... ;-) Those dots are particularly
heavy
dots... Still don't get it ?
Try
myself._test_my_reaction() ... done ?
Anything happening ? No ? Really
Dear Florent, dear Mike,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:49:06AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
With the forthcoming bunch of sage-combinat patches, to test a parent we call
sage: TestSuite(P).run()
which by default returns nothing if everything is ok and raise an
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:36:58AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
I think it is ridiculous to have doctests of the form
sage:sga = SymmetricGroup(3)
sage: TestSuite(sga).run(verbose=True)
running ._test_an_element() .. done
running ._test_associativity() .. done
Hi !
With the forthcoming bunch of sage-combinat patches, to test a parent we call
sage: TestSuite(P).run()
which by default returns nothing if everything is ok and raise an
AssertionError
if not. There is also a verbose mode
sage: TestSuite(P).run(verbose=True)
Hi Florent,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:05:23AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
I just spent/lost one hour on the following missfeature (at least in my
opinion) of TestsSuite... Mind the ... ;-) Those dots are particularly
heavy
dots... Still don't get it ?
Try
My impression is that the notebook is best for demonstrations,
exploration and rapid development. When I need to turn the results of
a worksheet into a module, I use emacs and/or the sage shell to
aggregate the code developed in a worksheet and test it.
I'd look at the features of Eclipse you'd
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Emacs ( and I am interested in knowing which softwares you
are using ), but so far I mainly failed to convince people this was
also the best option for them.
I use Emacs for everything.
Most of
What sort of features are you looking for? Eclipse has a PyDev plugin
which can be used to write Python code.
I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python,
which prevented the two from working together.
OK, I put one up at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.2.1-osx-10.5-32bit-i386-Darwin.dmg
My home connection was flaky, so I had to split that into pieces and
re-assemble it. I'll try to test it later today, or perhaps someone
else can before its put on the download page.
Dear category fans,
Latest status report for the category patches:
- They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 with all test passing :-)
(This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
sage-4.3.patch in the Sage-Combinat queue)
Remains to do:
- Final comments on Groupoid
On Nov 17, 1:33 pm, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python.
If you start eclipse from inside the sage environment it should work.
I remember doing
On 17 lis, 13:00, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am using Emacs ( and I am interested in knowing which softwares you
are using ), but so far I mainly failed to convince people this was
also
Hi,
The official Clay Math Institute website and schedule are up for Sage Days 18:
http://www.claymath.org/workshops/sage/
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
Nathann Cohen wrote:
What sort of features are you looking for? Eclipse has a PyDev plugin
which can be used to write Python code.
I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python,
which prevented the two
Hi,
I used to use this IDE for Sage development, long ago:
http://eric-ide.python-projects.org/eric4-screenshots.html
I know that Glenn Tarbox's uses Sage from Eclipse.
Now I use a mix of emacs, vim and the notebook, depending on what I'm doing.
-- William
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:00
Hi
Something in between the IDE (eclipse, spe, idle, whatever)
and the text editor (YaY vim!) that is very newbie friendly is gedit
with an embedded terminal (which we use to teach) with ipython
(or sage) in the embedded terminal. It is the standard gnome
terminal, and needs gedit-plugins to be
And is there any known way to have eclipse use auto-completion on Sage
classes ?
Nathann
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Nov 17, 8:35 am, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
And is there any known way to have eclipse use auto-completion on Sage
classes ?
That would probably be tough within Eclipse proper although there may
be another approach...
First, I have used Eclipse successfully with Sage
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
trup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again,
2009/11/16 William Stein wst...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
trup...@gmail.com wrote:
It usually means that you need to install libqscintilla2-dev and
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr/bin/gfortran before building. I get the following
error when building R:
OK, I tested it and it seems fine.
-Marshall
On Nov 17, 6:37 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I put one up at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.2.1-osx-10.5-32b...
My home connection was flaky, so I had to split that into pieces and
re-assemble it. I'll try
Yeah, but occasionally enormously useful. So I think it should be
advertised, at least in sage -advanced, if not just so that I don't
ask Mike about it a third time. I'll post a patch to trac.
Also, it could *easily* be fixed so that it 100% works. I just never
got to that. Somebody
2009/11/17 William Stein wst...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
trup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again,
2009/11/16 William Stein wst...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
trup...@gmail.com wrote:
It usually means
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr/bin/gfortran before building.
François Bissey wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
Hi Dan!
I played with sagetex today. That's cool stuff :-)
I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
\begin{sageexample}
sage: 1 + 1
sage: def f(x):
... x^2
sage: f(3)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Francois Maltey fmal...@nerim.fr wrote:
Dear all,
I'm looking for success stories from people who have used Sage in
their undergraduate teaching, particularly at the lower years.
Also,
I honestly didn't get the chance to work with it, but when I installed
sage-mode in emacs, I found it very useful, because it does this
integration of a powerful editor (also sufficiently newbie friendly)
with a sage embedded terminal
Try sage-mode and emacs!! :)
Maurizio
On 17 Nov, 17:31, Jan
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:35:18AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
Rob Beezer wrote:
A few quick comments:
* I think talk=True was a bad choice of option name. It's limiting,
potentially conflicts with other options, etc.
+1 This seems to happen often; an option gets implemented as
Hi Franco,
This is indeed good news: another Sage workshop. On the workshop
website, I see that reflection groups algorithms is a tentative topic.
I didn't know you guys do reflection groups. I better get started on
reading some literature on that topic (I can't attend the workshop,
but I heard
Hi there,
I really like to see the following questions answered and the answer
implemented in sage. There has been already at least 5 or 6 discussion on
sage-devel about improving the doc... few of them are conclusive. I think we
should push this discussion to its end...
Though I'm far
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
François Bissey wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:53:27PM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
Just to be sure: do we agree to let this verbose list is the
documentation of a non-trivial category to expose the tests which
are actually run, and to systematically remove it everywhere else ?
I just made a grep, and I think so,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
trup...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these -- PyQt4, QT 4.5.1, etc. -- all standard Ubuntu packages?
Or did you have to build them from source?
QT and PyQT are standard Ubuntu packages. You need both installed to run the
QT environment.
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 11:32PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
\begin{sageexample}
sage: 1 + 1
sage: def f(x):
... x^2
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
François Bissey wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and
have to explicitly tell the build process about the fortran
compiler and library location. Do this by typing
export SAGE_FORTRAN=/exact/path/to/gfortran
export SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB=/path/to/fortran/libs/libgfortran.so
Okay, that worked. I didn't understand the
William Stein wrote:
have to explicitly tell the build process about the fortran
compiler and library location. Do this by typing
export SAGE_FORTRAN=/exact/path/to/gfortran
export SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB=/path/to/fortran/libs/libgfortran.so
Okay, that worked. I
Hi,
Dozens of times over the years, people have complained because in Sage
symbolic variables names don't magically spring into existence, and
also about object-oriented method call notation. We have defended
this design forever, not even considering providing a non-default
optional mode what
Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30:11 -0600
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
It would be nice if we could do something like:
sage: f(x,0)=e^x
sage: f(x,t)=x*t
or
sage: f(0)=0
sage: f(x)=sin(x)/x
Is there an elegant way to have multiple
41 matches
Mail list logo
