Dear colleague,
This is the first announcement for the conference to be held at CIRM,
Marseille, France, from February 22, 2010 to February 26, 2010.
++
| Sage Days 20 |
++
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3.1/alpha0/sage-4.3.1.alpha0.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3.1/alpha0/sage-4.3.1.alpha0-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
The
I'm working on the unicode stuff right now. Hopefully this will be done
before the end of this week.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 at 08:17AM -0800, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
I think that it would be nice to allow localization of notebook.
Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 05:35:37 +, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Was there a good reason for choosing the name 'sgn'? It sems a bit
strange to me.
That's the standard mathematical notation for this function, see
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
[...]
Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules:
_bsddb _hashlib _ssl
bsddb185 dl gdbm
imageoplinuxaudiodev ossaudiodev
To find the necessary bits, look in setup.py in detect_modules() for
Hello everybody !!!
I just noticed the compilation of alpha0 on my computer failed... And
I am afraid I have no idea how to inquire where it comes from... I can
give you the last few lines of the install log, and you but have to
ask me which other information you may need ( and tell me how to
2010/1/4 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
[...]
Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules:
_bsddb _hashlib _ssl
bsddb185 dl gdbm
imageop linuxaudiodev ossaudiodev
To find the necessary bits,
It seems to be failing while compiling the cython code introduced by
#6583, so perhaps Robert Miller can help?
John
2010/1/4 Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com:
Hello everybody !!!
I just noticed the compilation of alpha0 on my computer failed... And
I am afraid I have no idea how to
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3.1/alpha0/sage-4.3.1.alpha0.tar
Flint will not build in 64-bit mode on my Xeo based Open Solaris
machine, so I decided to look at the package.
In patches/makefile of the flint package there are a few things that
do not make a lot of sense to me. For the most part, the original
flint makefile makes more sence, though I gather
Magma now uses MPC (
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/rel/node36.htm
)
Shouldn't we at least make it available in Sage ?
(see ticket #4446)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
YannLC wrote:
Magma now uses MPC (
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/rel/node36.htm
)
Shouldn't we at least make it available in Sage ?
(see ticket #4446)
I'm curious where you see this eventually going?
(1) MPComplexField replaces ComplexField
(2) MPComplexField
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
As you stated before many spkgs are not in a good shape to handle this.
Jaap
I've raised tickets for some of these simple spkg-install fixes.
opencdk
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7817
freetype:
Dear colleague,
This is the first announcement for the conference to be held at CIRM,
Marseille, France, from February 22, 2010 to February 26, 2010.
++
| Sage Days 20 |
++
2010/1/4 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3.1/alpha0/sage-4.3.1.alpha0.tar
It does look like descent_two_isogeny is what it is failing to
compile, but I really can't help without more information. Is there a
way to get gcc to print out why it's failing?
It occurs to me that this depends on ratpoints, which has some issues
compiling with earlier versions of gcc. What
2010/1/4 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
As you stated before many spkgs are not in a good shape to handle this.
Jaap
I've raised tickets for some of these simple spkg-install fixes.
opencdk
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7817
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 05:35:37 +, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Was there a good reason for choosing the name 'sgn'? It sems a bit
strange to me.
That's the standard mathematical notation for this
2010/1/4 Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
In light of a recent request on sage-support, can we make it very clear
that the version of Sage on http://windows.sagemath.org/index.html is
very experimental and not the standard, supported version of Sage (and
redirect people to the
Hi, Gentlemen,
I am trying to build Sage 4.3 on RHEL4 but got the following error.
Could anyone tell me how to solve it?
Thanks,
Guo
uname -a
Linux btl1lw24.btl.ms.philips.com 2.6.9-78.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jul 22
18:01:05 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
(cd
guo tang wrote:
Hi, Gentlemen,
I am trying to build Sage 4.3 on RHEL4 but got the following error.
Could anyone tell me how to solve it?
Thanks,
Guo
uname -a
Linux btl1lw24.btl.ms.philips.com 2.6.9-78.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jul 22
18:01:05 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
(cd
The following gives a rough idea of what works on Open Solaris on a
Sun Ultra 27. ( I say 'rough' as some packages I modified, and some
may not be working as they should).
Hardware: Sun Ultra 27, 12 GB RAM, quad core 3.333 GHz Xeon, Nvidia
Quadro FX 3800
Software: Open Solaris 06/2009. Based on
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:28:46PM +, John Cremona wrote:
2009/12/29 Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com:
Excellent ! Then
__builtin__.sum([g,h],Graph())
does the job.. Thank you :-)
Just 2 cents: in our code, we systematically use the following feature
from additive monoids:
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3.1/alpha0/sage-4.3.1.alpha0.tar
David Kirkby wrote:
The following gives a rough idea of what works on Open Solaris on a
Sun Ultra 27. ( I say 'rough' as some packages I modified, and some
may not be working as they should).
Hardware: Sun Ultra 27, 12 GB RAM, quad core 3.333 GHz Xeon, Nvidia
Quadro FX 3800
Software: Open
Hi Georg,
Yes my sage folder is in /home/rado/ . Here is the output of 'which
cython'.
r...@rado-tablet:~$ which cython
/usr/bin/cython
sage subshell$ which cython
/home/rado/sage/local/bin/cython
/home/rado/sage
Any idea how to fix that issue ? I tried uninstalling my global cython
guo tang wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
guo tang wrote:
Hi, Gentlemen,
I am trying to build Sage 4.3 on RHEL4 but got the following error.
Could anyone tell me how to solve it?
Thanks,
Guo
uname -a
Linux btl1lw24.btl.ms.philips.com
Jaap Spies wrote:
David Kirkby wrote:
The following gives a rough idea of what works on Open Solaris on a
Sun Ultra 27. ( I say 'rough' as some packages I modified, and some
may not be working as they should).
Hardware: Sun Ultra 27, 12 GB RAM, quad core 3.333 GHz Xeon, Nvidia
Quadro FX
javier wrote:
How about using this?
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
b = 1
x = sys.maxint
while x:
x = x 1
b = b+1
print(b)
Cheers
J
It looks a bit better than a simple 32/64 result. 128 bit processors are in
existence now, though not for general purpose
Dear sage-devel
If I run (with checked button Typeset)
maxima(taylor(z*sin(x*y), [x,y,z],[0,pi/2,1], 8))
in notebook in Sage 4.3, the output window is too small and I can see
only small part of the expression. Is it a bug in CSS style or
somwhere else?
Robert
--
To post to this group, send
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
Dear sage-devel
If I run (with checked button Typeset)
maxima(taylor(z*sin(x*y), [x,y,z],[0,pi/2,1], 8))
in notebook in Sage 4.3, the output window is too small and I can see
only small part of the expression. Is it a bug in CSS style or
somwhere else?
There
Jaap Spies wrote:
David Kirkby wrote:
The following gives a rough idea of what works on Open Solaris on a
Sun Ultra 27. ( I say 'rough' as some packages I modified, and some
may not be working as they should).
Hardware: Sun Ultra 27, 12 GB RAM, quad core 3.333 GHz Xeon, Nvidia
Quadro FX
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
David Kirkby wrote:
The following gives a rough idea of what works on Open Solaris on a
Sun Ultra 27. ( I say 'rough' as some packages I modified, and some
may not be working as they should).
Hardware: Sun Ultra 27, 12 GB RAM, quad core 3.333 GHz
On Jan 4, 6:48 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/4 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
My build on Fedora 12 intel i7 860 64 bit failed on
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-fPIC
I've had problems building mpir in Sage, so downloaded the clean source, to try
it outside. The setup is
Sun Ultra 27 - quad core 3.333 GHz Xeon. 12 GB RAM
Open Solaris 06/2009
Sun Studio 12.1
First, the good news.
1) Configuring like this works
$ export CC=/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/cc
$ export
In common lisp (part of Maxima) one can do this:
(integer-decode-float (exp 1.0d0))
which produces 3 values:
6121026514868073
-51
1
In maxima you would have to prefix this with :lisp.
In Sage, perhaps
maxima :lisp (integer-decode-float
Though how Sage treats multiple-value
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:06:57 -0800 (PST), John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
My build on Fedora 12 intel i7 860 64 bit failed on
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC
-I/home/jaap/downloads/sage-4.3.1.alpha0/local/include/cudd
Jaap Spies wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
next report
j...@opensolaris:~/Downloads/sage-4.3.1.alpha0$ ls spkg/installed
blas-20070724 gnutls-2.2.1.p5
pyprocessing-0.52.p0
boehm_gc-7.1.p2 graphs-20070722.p1
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I'll fix the atlas package now. I don't guarantee it will build, but I'll fix
this ctypes issue, by putting something a bit more portable. That will
hopefully
report the system as 64-bit and not leave a blank, which is possibly what
screwing atlas up.
Hope so! I'll
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I'll fix the atlas package now. I don't guarantee it will build, but I'll fix
this ctypes issue, by putting something a bit more portable. That will
hopefully
report the system as 64-bit and not leave a blank, which is possibly what
screwing atlas
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 at 03:06PM -0800, John H Palmieri wrote:
sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.cpp: In function ‘PyObject*
__pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_10polynomial_5pbori_easy_linear_factors(PyObject*,
PyObject*)’:
sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.cpp:38652: error: ‘easy_linear_factors’ was
not
Dan Drake wrote:
The new polybori spkg is over three times as large as the previous one!
Does anyone know why? I see that the source got updated, but why did it,
in two months, triple in size?
Dan
The ticket's title is:
#7271: some small polybori interface fixes
so it does seem odd in
If anyone has a spare minute, here's something that must be about as simple as
they come to review. The additional code is all on one line.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7067
cddlib fails to build with the Sun compiler, complaining:
Undefined first referenced
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If anyone has a spare minute, here's something that must be about as simple
as
they come to review. The additional code is all on one line.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7067
cddlib fails to build with the Sun compiler, complaining:
Undefined
On Jan 4, 5:30 pm, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 at 03:06PM -0800, John H Palmieri wrote:
sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.cpp: In function ‘PyObject*
__pyx_pf_4sage_5rings_10polynomial_5pbori_easy_linear_factors(PyObject*,
PyObject*)’:
On 01/04/2010 11:11 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py
**
File /home/jaap/downloads/sage-4.3/devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, line
897:
sage: browse_sage_doc(identity_matrix, 'html',
I note that gfan hard-codes the compiler names gcc/g++. Trying to fix that, I
soon discovered the Sun compiler thinks there is an error in the code, with
something supposed to return a value, but not doing so.
gfan-0.3.p6/patches/
gfan-0.3.p6/patches/Makefile
Finished extraction
Hi,
Does anybody reading this message use gfan in Sage? Maybe gfan
shouldn't be included in Sage. I would be OK with removing it if
there isn't any support for it. That it never gets updated is
suggestive.
William
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net
On Jan 5, 4:21 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody reading this message use gfan in Sage? Maybe gfan
shouldn't be included in Sage. I would be OK with removing it if
there isn't any support for it. That it never gets updated is
suggestive.
William
Doing a
Well, this is basically a clone of mathematicas SphericalPlot3d only
that i thought the 3d was redundant.
I've published the function here: http://www.sagenb.org/pub/1319/ .
And cloned the examles in
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/SphericalPlot3D.html
So there. This would be my
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 at 06:38PM -0800, John H Palmieri wrote:
The new polybori spkg is over three times as large as the previous one!
Does anyone know why? I see that the source got updated, but why did it,
in two months, triple in size?
Unpacked, the two aren't that different in size.
Okay, I'm late to this party, but I'm very interested in this issue, as
I have plans to write a book that would be licensed under something like
GFDL or CC by-sa.
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 at 10:24PM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
So it still seems that GFDL has some sort of requirement about
distributing
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 at 12:43AM +0800, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Changes to the notebook should be made to the sagenb spkg found at
http://nb.sagemath.org, and updated to the latest version at the
repository (hg pull http://sage.math.washington.edu:8100). Development
on the notebook should be
Here is mine :
gcc version 4.3.2 20081105 (Red Hat 4.3.2-7) (GCC)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Dan Drake wrote:
I think I would be very happy if I wrote my book and someone else wanted
to include a version of one of the chapters into their own work, even if
that work otherwise used ordinary copyright, and if readers of the new
book didn't have access to Transparent copies, or if they
55 matches
Mail list logo
