On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Ok, let's try again in the weight lattice
(I replaced alphacheck = R.coweight_space().simple_roots()
by alphacheck = R.coroot_space().simple_roots() , otherwise the scalar
product seems wrong. Why? Shouldn't the choice of space
Hi Anne,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:06:39PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
As we now discussed in private, the translation factors for type A_{2n}^{(2)}
with the specifications as given in sage should be 1,1,...,1,1/2.
I just (tentatively) finalized #8811, adding a couple notes about our
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:02:07PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
I just (tentatively) finalized #8811, adding a couple notes about our
discussion, and fixing ReST issues here and there. Please review!
Please have a careful look at _test_reduced_word_of_translation. The
tests started to fail
Hi William, Nicolas
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:59:50PM +0200, Nicolas Borie wrote:
Le mardi 01 juin 2010 à 15:52 -0400, William Laffin a écrit :
I have a few general questions questions:
Are there plans for Uniform-cost, Depth-limited, iterative deepening,
and bidirectional(if
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:20:23AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Mostly, we want to make a change to add a feature, so that one can
specify an additional keyword argument max_entry=k so as to get the
Semistandard Tableaux(p,mu) with entries in 1..k, or max_entry=-1 so
there is no maximum.
From trac :
***
Hi Nicolas,
I'm currently using search forest and I run into some troubles... I also
want to suggest some improvements in the code:
please define method _repr_ (Sage way) rather than __repr__ (Python's
way).
when you need to
Hello,
I am currently working on Quasisymmetric functions, and have run into
the following difficulty.
sage: QS = QuasisymmetricFunctions(QQ)
sage: QS.zero(), QS.zero().parent()
(0, The quasisymmetric functions over Rational Field in the fundamental
basis)
sage: QS.one(), QS.one().parent()
(F[],
Hi Jason,
I am currently working on Quasisymmetric functions, and have run into
the following difficulty.
sage: QS = QuasisymmetricFunctions(QQ)
sage: QS.zero(), QS.zero().parent()
(0, The quasisymmetric functions over Rational Field in the fundamental
basis)
sage: QS.one(),
On 06/02/2010 01:29 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
The problem is that QS is a facade parent (that is its elements belongs to
another parent). Right now TestSuite doesn't properly handles those. This is
ticket #9065.
Great, I looked briefly for such a ticket, but couldn't find it. Thanks
for the
Hi!
Has this questions been resolved? Can we set a positive review on the
patch #8911 and update the pickle jar?
Cheers,
Anne
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi crystal folks,
While reviewing Anne's categorification of crystals #8911, I noticed
that all crystal pickles in Sage's pickle jar
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:08:22PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thank you for finalizing the translation patch! I reviewed it
and found a couple more typos. So please fold the reviewers patch.
I am happy to set a positive review ...
Folded and uploaded to trac.
Please have a careful look at
Hi John, Simon, ...
As promised, I have finally started expanding the categories tutorial
to better guide the would be implementer of a parent. Please have a
look at:
http://combinat.sagemath.org/hgwebdir.cgi/patches/file/tip/categories-tutorial.patch
Suggestions of typical use cases to
Could someone review #8810? Ticket #8811 is now up and
has a positive review.
This is also on the sage-combinat queue as
trac_8810_stanley_symmetric_functions-sp-as.patch
Thanks!
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To
(sorry for the crossposting)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
There is also an alpha1 of sage-4.4.3 here, and two tiny doctests failures
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/build/release/4.4.3/sage-...
Failures on sage.math:
sage -t -long
Hi Nicolas^2,
Thank you both for your thoughtful responses.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Nicolas Borie
nicolas.bo...@math.u-psud.fr wrote:
SearchForest(args) will shortly return a Parent with category at least
EnumeratedSets(). SearchForest is a part of Combinat code whose goal is
to
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:02 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear release managers!
What's the current time line for Sage 4.4.3?
We have been working hard those last days on flushing the
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Burcin Erocal and I wrote a paper
The Sage Project: Unifying Free Mathematical Software to Create a
Viable Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and Matlab
for http://www.math.kobe-u.ac.jp/icms2010/index.html
Here it is:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Martin Rubey
martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de wrote:
A tiny correction to the list on 6, Table 2: as far as I know, sage does
not communicate with axiom, but rather with fricas. But I admit, I am
not 100% certain, what the default installation does. Please
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Martin Rubey
martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Burcin Erocal and I wrote a paper
The Sage Project: Unifying Free Mathematical Software to Create a
Viable Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica and Matlab
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:58 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
The upshot is that maybe I should list both fricas and axiom in the
interfaces table?
Yep, sounds good.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 06/ 1/10 09:09 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The fortran package in Sage is really weird.
1) The 'src' directory does not contain
Sage surely benefits from having a very wide range of people who are
developers, ranging in age, motivations, mathematician vs. software
professional, and so on.
Don't make assumptions about the volunteer mathematicians all being
youngsters! (Some of us are over 50, and, I think, amateurs in the
Here is the output:
~ command -v gcc
/usr/local/bin/gcc
~ command -v g++
/usr/local/bin/g++
~ command -v gfortran
/usr/local/bin/gfortran
~ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-
threads=posix --enable-shared
Hi William and Burcin,
This is a very nice presentation of Sage, drawing a very good overall picture
of what is Sage ! I'd like to thank you for the afterword...
Just a little remark citation [Des06] only present a very specific part of
what was MuPAD-Combinat (ie: Symmetric Functions).
Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Martin Rubey
martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de wrote:
A tiny correction to the list on 6, Table 2: as far as I know, sage does
not communicate with axiom, but rather with fricas. But I admit, I am
not 100% certain, what
today, running ./sage -t filename did not succeed on my system. After
a while, I could figure out with some help of Burcin that my setup of
sage was too much using symbolic links. In fact, after I removed sage
from being available via PATH, the above command succeeded.
Could you elaborate?
http://wiki.sagemath.org/AutoToolsSEP
One problem with that is that too many packages in Sage do not honor
things like CC, MAKE, CXX. Cython misbehaves if CFLAGS set.
What does that have to do with autotools? If the subpackages misbehave
then one has to provide proper fixes with or without
http://wiki.sagemath.org/AutoToolsSEP
My primary concern with both of these proposals is that they seek to
widen the gap between developers and users,
Huh?
and I think a huge part of Sage's success in attracting contributors
is erasing that gap.
Sage is not a sucess for me as I stumple
For the reasons Robert Bradshaw mentioned, I don't think the AutoTools
SEP makes a lot of sense for Sage.
Robert also added
Automake would add another level of complexity to the build process, in
particular one which is not understood by many in the community.
to
On Jun 2, 4:08 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Sage surely benefits from having a very wide range of people who are
developers, ranging in age, motivations, mathematician vs. software
professional, and so on.
Don't make assumptions about the volunteer mathematicians all being
You have Axiom from 2005?
You do realize it is updated every 2 months :-)
Tim
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Martin Rubey
martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Burcin Erocal and I wrote a paper
The Sage Project:
Very nice!
Note that Nicolas' last name is Thiéry and not Thiery (unless it is
ASCII-only source code.) :-)
Cheers,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
On 06/ 2/10 12:42 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/AutoToolsSEP
One problem with that is that too many packages in Sage do not honor
things like CC, MAKE, CXX. Cython misbehaves if CFLAGS set.
What does that have to do with autotools? If the subpackages misbehave
then one
On 06/ 2/10 09:08 AM, John Cremona wrote:
Sage surely benefits from having a very wide range of people who are
developers, ranging in age, motivations, mathematician vs. software
professional, and so on.
Yes
Don't make assumptions about the volunteer mathematicians all being
youngsters!
On 06/ 2/10 01:12 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Jun 2, 4:08 am, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Sage surely benefits from having a very wide range of people who are
developers, ranging in age, motivations, mathematician vs. software
professional, and so on.
Don't make assumptions about
Hi,
two small-ish points:
1) I don't get the line:
Awesome singular, pynac, maxima (in progress), gap (in progress)
in Table 2
2) In the sentence
Try the Sage notebook right now by visiting www.sagenb.org, where there are
over 30,000 user accounts and over 2,000 published worksheets.
On Jun 2, 7:43 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Awesome singular, pynac, maxima (in progress), gap (in progress)
I think Awesome might be a new brand name for super-duper
interfaces, as in Awesome (tm)*.
Rob
* All trademarks are copyright by their respective
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
today, running ./sage -t filename did not succeed on my system.
After
a while, I could figure out with some help of Burcin that my setup
of
sage was too much using symbolic links. In fact, after I removed
sage
from being available via PATH,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
today, running ./sage -t filename did not succeed on my system. After
a while, I could figure out with some help of Burcin that my setup of
sage was too much
Hello, everyone !
I guess this is a very stupid question, but I was wondering if it
would be possible one day to have Sage work on Windows except with a
Virtual Machine. I'm not asking that question for myself, as I have
quit using Windows a long time ago, but it would draw many more
users... I
On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:05 AM, ablondin wrote:
Hello, everyone !
I guess this is a very stupid question, but I was wondering if it
would be possible one day to have Sage work on Windows except with a
Virtual Machine. I'm not asking that question for myself, as I have
quit using Windows a long
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:05 AM, ablondin
alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, everyone !
I guess this is a very stupid question, but I was wondering if it
would be possible one day to have Sage work on Windows except with a
Virtual Machine.
This is definitely possible. Some of
Hi,
There are 161 tickets here listed as needs review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
So review some. :-)
By the way, is anybody interested in crafting an editor system to
help organize matching reviewers with
tickets that need review? This could be some new python code
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/AutoToolsSEP
My primary concern with both of these proposals is that they seek to
widen the gap between developers and users,
Huh?
E.g. The command sage should run Sage and not be misused for
development
There was a post here the other day of someone who run into problems with Sage's
zlib being too old on his MacbookPro running Ubuntu 10.04 (64
bit).
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/525f84daa3513bc/df71738fbc80fda5?hl=enlnk=gstq=update+libz#df71738fbc80fda5
I've
On 2 June 2010 19:28, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There are 161 tickets here listed as needs review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
So review some. :-)
By the way, is anybody interested in crafting an editor system to
help organize matching reviewers
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:57 PM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2010 19:28, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There are 161 tickets here listed as needs review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
So review some. :-)
By the way, is anybody
Dear Sage devs,
There is consensus that no-one cares about oldish crystal pickles,
and it would make the inclusion of #8911 technically easier if we
could drop them.
Hence my question: what's the official procedure for updating the
pickle jar?
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Dear release managers!
What's the current time line for Sage 4.4.3?
We have been working hard those last days on flushing the
Sage-Combinat queue, and have more than 25 patches with positive
review ready for inclusion. Well, there is still some work ahead, with
15 patches under review
The following ticket is not high on my priority list (in fact, its *very* low
down), but only one single byte has changed, so it should not take someone too
long to review it!
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8512
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to
As I understand,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3304
should be just closed, not reviewed, since another ticket took care of
the issue.
Since only release managers should close tickets, I am leaving the
ticket as is and posting here.
Thank you,
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear Sage devs,
There is consensus that no-one cares about oldish crystal pickles,
and it would make the inclusion of #8911 technically easier if we
could drop them.
Hence my question: what's the
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear release managers!
What's the current time line for Sage 4.4.3?
We have been working hard those last days on flushing the
Sage-Combinat queue, and have more than 25 patches with positive
review
Positive review -- thanks for catching that.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The following ticket is not high on my priority list (in fact, its *very*
low down), but only one single byte has changed, so it should not take
someone too long to
Hi There,
Since nobody answered I investigated this further:
Though sphinx is perfectly working with target in the local module he isn't
able to find reference target from other modules even if they are exported in
all.py. For example, if I want to link Parent from anywhere but
Thanks. I've closed this.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3304
should be just closed, not reviewed, since another ticket took care of
the issue.
Since only release managers should
While I have no ideas/suggestions on how to implement it, I think that
it is highly desirable to have such a functionality. In addition to
simplifying life of those who write doctests with links, it will help
to make documentation more stable - if some classes/functions were
moved around modules
I've replied to the sage-release thread...
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release/browse_thread/thread/8df955269e44ead9#
-Leif
On 3 Jun., 00:02, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear release
(sorry for the crossposting)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
There is also an alpha1 of sage-4.4.3 here, and two tiny doctests failures
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/build/release/4.4.3/sage-...
Failures on sage.math:
sage -t -long
On 3 Jun., 00:06, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:
It seems that this is more or less easily feasible. I've a prototype patch to
sphinx which only works for objects (eg: Parent). It won't work on thing like
Parent.rename. I'd like to know if it is a desired feature before
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Burcin isn't the only person that knows how to work on Pynac.
Probably.
I guess I can be more explicit. Getting Ginac to work with Python
data types instead of CLN was my idea and I made it work. I wrote the
first
Right now, the following works:
sage: a=(x+y)
sage: a.arguments()
(x, y)
However, we deprecated the following a long time ago:
sage: a(1,2)
/Users/grout/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/IPython/iplib.py:2073:
DeprecationWarning: Substitution using function-call syntax and unnamed
A related comment:
I like the method name variables for symbolic expressions. On the
other hand, I think the name variable should be avoided in the exact
polynomial rings cases, as in
sage: P.x,y=PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: P.variable_names()
('x', 'y')
In this case, gen_names() is perhaps
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:02 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear release managers!
What's the current time line for Sage 4.4.3?
We have been working hard those last days on flushing the
On 6/2/10 10:40 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
I propose that a.arguments() should return a deprecation warning:
I've put up a rough still-needs-work patch for this at #9126.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
65 matches
Mail list logo
