Julien Puydt wrote:
Le mercredi 21 mars, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Julien Puydt
julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
how can I know which spkg provided a file in sage?
Let's say for example (from sage-4.8) :
I'm for removing these accounts. Hopefully it will also make the loading of the
users page in the trac admin faster!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
Florent Hivert wrote:
This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac
seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0], if
someone has an idea of what is happening.
[0]
I would add
12080 Manin constant
10698 error in padic power series construction
8198 p-adic precision in vector multiplication
Chris
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like ../../../../../whatever (no exageration: up to
*five* levels!).
Shouldn't those be removed, and the right path added to the include
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like ../../../../../whatever (no exageration: up to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:12:56AM +0100, leif wrote:
Florent Hivert wrote:
This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac
seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0],
if
someone has an idea of what is happening.
[0]
Le jeudi 22 mars, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt
julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like
Hi!
I just noticed that the data base for my group cohomology package is
down. It is hosted at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/lmfdb/data/p_group_cohomology/data,
but it is not available - neither via sage.math nor via boxen.math.
What is the problem?
Cheers,
Simon
--
To post to this
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like ../../../../../whatever (no exageration: up to
*five* levels!).
Shouldn't those be removed,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like
Le jeudi 22 mars, Jason Grout a écrit:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like ../../../../../whatever (no exageration:
up
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi!
I just noticed that the data base for my group cohomology package is
down. It is hosted at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/lmfdb/data/p_group_cohomology/data,
but it is not available - neither via sage.math
On 3/22/12 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/22/12 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are
Le jeudi 22 mars, Jason Grout a écrit:
On 3/22/12 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources
(I only
On 3/22/12 10:27 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le jeudi 22 mars, Jason Grout a écrit:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources (I
only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are made with a
filename which looks like
Le jeudi 22 mars, Jason Grout a écrit:
On 3/22/12 10:27 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le jeudi 22 mars, Jason Grout a écrit:
On 3/21/12 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources
(I only checked in the sage spkg) where inclusions are
Hi William!
On 2012-03-22, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea. The directory /home/lmfdb doesn't even have a data
subdirectory.
WHAT? You mean, data that I created in months of CPU time, among them
the first computation of the mod-2 cohomology ring of the third Conway
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William!
On 2012-03-22, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea. The directory /home/lmfdb doesn't even have a data
subdirectory.
WHAT? You mean, data that I created in months of CPU time, among them
Hi William,
On 2012-03-22, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly. I'm curious -- did you attempt to make any backups anywhere ever?
I hope that most of it can be found either in my home directory of
sage.math (where I think I made the computation for the data base of
cohomology rings
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William,
On 2012-03-22, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly. I'm curious -- did you attempt to make any backups anywhere ever?
I hope that most of it can be found either in my home directory of
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:39 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 10:00 pm, Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu
wrote:
In sage 4.8:
sage: NaN - NaN
sage: 0
sage: NaN + NaN
2*NaN
sage: NaN * NaN
NaN^2
Naturally! Since NaN is a symbolic expression, apparently:
Hi,
There are still a few days left to propose a Google Summer of Code
Project to work on Sage. See
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/google/gsoc2012/sage
Dozens of students have already joined the list and started suggesting ideas.
-- William
--
William Stein
Professor of
I was trying to install sage-4.8 from source in ubuntu 10.04. I had
downloaded the sage-4.8.tar archive, created the sage-4.8 directory and
then used the command make. After nearly two hours, I got the report
(only relevant part is shown below):
I am sorry for asking at the wrong forum. I am going to ask this in the
sage-support section. I request the administrator of this forum to delete
this question. Thanks.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
I've removed 500984 unauthenticated accounts. We're getting about one more
each minute; Tom is looking at server logs.
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to resolve the slowness of the users page.
David
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:58, Maarten Derickx
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm for
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:06:47PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
To use this Cython debugger one must start up Sage under gdb.
(Essentially, this is sage -gdb that knows about Python/Cython, which
is really nice.) I don't think one could just drop down into it from
pdb. (Adding Cython support
Hi all,
just to let you know that the videos from the PyData workshop we held
at Google a couple of weeks ago are now online (not all talks are up
yet, so watch the page over the next few days if a talk you wanted to
see isn't posted yet):
Hi there,
Sage documentation still has a lot of dangling links. To check if there are
some please use the recently added option --warn-links as in:
sage --docbuild --warn-links reference html
Beware that it triggers a full recompilation of the doc the first time you add
the option.
On 22 Mrz., 20:01, AD adphy2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sorry for asking at the wrong forum. I am going to ask this in the
sage-support section. I request the administrator of this forum to delete
this question. Thanks.
No, this is in principle the correct list (or discussion group),
likewise
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Barinder has genuine matrices A, B which give a representation of A_4
in 26 dimensions over Q(zeta_11), i.e. A^2=I and B^3 = I and some
commutator relation holds. I was surprised when he told me that
In terms of my coding experience, I know Python and Java, but I haven't had
any experience with javascript yet. From what you've said, I guess this
project won't be suitable for me.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:02:35 PM UTC-7, dpvc wrote:
Jason:
As you know, I have done a lot of thinking
PS1: I had a hard time with my first sentence : there are a lot of
places or there is a lot of places ?! Hopefully what I wrote is
right...
there are many places
Oh, so neither of the first things that came to me was any good? Good
to know...
I'm pretty sure that there are a
I assume the idea is to use selecting from menus/palettes, since that
is the
alternative to keyboard input in Mathematica.
I know of no evidence that this makes it easier (or faster) to input
long and
complicated expressions. Do you?
Studying how to use the mathinput panel (free, in windows)
I don't know where the NaN is being manipulated, there are lots
of design issues that could be addressed using it.
Note that there are huge numbers of NaNs -- a NaN has a reserved
exponent; the fraction part can be used to encode info.
You might also see how infinities are handled.
A NaN can be
36 matches
Mail list logo
