Hi
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:42:02PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website. I wrote one recently for
On Nov 6, 4:11 am, Jan Groenewald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about being able to click on tutorial somewhere near new worksheet
in the sage notebook? Which could present you cell by cell with explanatory
text, and then you execute the command to continue, and get a chance to try
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Rob Beezer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the spirit of release early I've added my (incomplete) notes on
graph theory commands to the Documentation Project wiki. These are
You meant group theory not graph theory.
I looked at it briefly.
On page 3, the quotes
David,
Thanks for the peek and the corrections. And thanks for permission to
use material from your group theory write-up, which I found very
helpful as I got started.
Yes, GROUP theory. Graph theory will be next. ;-)
Available off the wiki, but I also meant to include a link:
2008/11/5 Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Martin,
Martin Albrecht wrote:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto.pdf
This is a short tutorial on using Sage to study elementary number
theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. By short, I mean at most
10 pages. If
Hi,
sorry for taking this off-list earlier.
1) Modern cryptography uses many fundamental concepts from number
theory
I think the precise statement would be that public key cryptography uses
many fundamental concepts from number theory. Most of symmetric
cryptography is not based on
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:03 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue,
Hi folks,
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
they are duly acknowledged in the document itself. Please remind me
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
they are duly acknowledged in the
On Nov 5, 3:45 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
wow, looks really good and is nearly exactly what i originally
expected.
It's now linked from
In the spirit of release early I've added my (incomplete) notes on
graph theory commands to the Documentation Project wiki. These are
designed for a first-time student of the subject and are being
developed as I teach such a course this semester. So they should see
frequent updates for the next
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website. I wrote one recently for algebraic
number fields. These tutorials would mostly -- like yours
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website.
Is that a challenge? :-)
On a serious note, I'm planning to do
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website.
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed!
I am still hoping to replace the document const.tex by
cookbook.tex. I'm happy to assemble the chapters but
even happier if someone else does:-)
I'm not sure what the correct procedure is, so I put a
chapter up on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3624
Maybe a wiki page is
As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they have been
taught previously in the
Hi Rob,
Rob Beezer wrote:
As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they have
Thanks, Minh, for the offer to take in my group theory notes. I'll be
back in touch once I have something to dump your way. ;-)
Rob
On Nov 4, 7:11 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A good way to do it is to dump your abstract algebra notes on a novice
like me :-) I'd be more than
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Generating public and private keys
Choosing p and q of such different sizes is really a bad idea and IMHO
shouldn't be encouraged. The hardness of factorisation depends on the size
(and form) of the smaller factor.
On 14 Set, 21:05, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristian,
Thanks for the offer to produce some Sagedocumentation. Did you
meandocumentationin Italian? It's not so clear from what you wrote (I
think you did not mean unless?)
... that should have been an although... :P.
The point
2008/9/19 CristianCantoro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 14 Set, 21:05, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristian,
Thanks for the offer to produce some Sagedocumentation. Did you
meandocumentationin Italian? It's not so clear from what you wrote (I
think you did not mean unless?)
...
John Cremona wrote:
2008/9/19 CristianCantoro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 14 Set, 21:05, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristian,
Thanks for the offer to produce some Sagedocumentation. Did you
meandocumentationin Italian? It's not so clear from what you wrote (I
think you did not
Cristian,
Thanks for the offer to produce some Sage documentation. Did you mean
documentation in Italian? It's not so clear from what you wrote (I
think you did not mean unless?)
Ciao,
John Cremona
(ma non sono Italiano, scusi)
2008/9/13 CristianCantoro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm
Hi,
I'm Cristian Consonni. I wish to contribute to Sage documentations
unless I'm a new user.
(I've produced a very brief Maxima presentation (in italian), you can
find it in Maxima's documentation page)
I hope to hear some news from you soon.
Ciao ciao
Cristian
Hi Harald,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'll keep you updated on
this tutorial in the next few weeks.
great! also linking to pari, R and other tutorials from the sage
documentation page is a good idea if someone wants to understand those
On Aug 27, 1:17 am, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll keep you updated on
this tutorial in the next few weeks.
great! also linking to pari, R and other tutorials from the sage
documentation page is a good idea if someone wants to understand those
modules better.
h
Hi
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
according to the last survey. I think the userbase is already big and
willing
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
according to the last survey. I think the userbase is already big and
willing enough
Howdy,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
according to the last survey. I think the userbase is already big and
willing
On Aug 26, 8:56 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying: I, Harald, am willing to organize this,...
Ok, then I will start this on a wiki page and yes, organizing is
something i'm better than writing text.
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
Hi Harald,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing about Sage
according to the last survey. I think the userbase is already big and
34 matches
Mail list logo
