On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
On Aug 28, 4:59 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t
Trying:
G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
line
893:_sage_ G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
Expecting nothing
after maybe a minute. Imho 1 minute for one test is way too much.
buhu :) - there are more than enough tests that take
On Aug 28, 5:17 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying:
G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
line
893:_sage_ G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
Expecting nothing
after maybe a minute. Imho 1 minute for one test is way
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 28, 5:17 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying:
G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
line
893:_sage_ G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 27, 8:57 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
Hi John,
1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
matplotlib, so some things might be going wrong there. I
2008/8/28 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
patch to it.
We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
tickets that were closed in previous milestones since that makes
reconstructing the exact sequence
On Aug 28, 9:24 am, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/28 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnaud,
Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
patch to it.
We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
tickets that were
On Aug 28, 6:30 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Yeah, the above looks odd. Maybe William can tell us what is happening
here.
I think the above is just numerical noise. The Viterbi algorithm
is an
mabshoff wrote:
On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
Not yet! I'll go on until the end of October. BUt there have been some problems
:-(
The engine broke down. For four weeks I'm waiting for the
On Aug 28, 1:18 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
Not yet! I'll go on until the end of October. BUt there have been some
problems :-(
The
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:58 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 28, 1:18 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
Not yet! I'll go on
Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage
The third is this:
File /home/john/sage-3.1.2.alpha1/tmp/matrix_mod2_dense.py, line 267:
sage: hex(hash(A))
Expected:
'0xdeadbeed'
Got:
'-0x21524113'
Hi John, is that on a 32-bit x86 system?
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp:
2008/8/27 Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The third is this:
File /home/john/sage-3.1.2.alpha1/tmp/matrix_mod2_dense.py, line 267:
sage: hex(hash(A))
Expected:
'0xdeadbeed'
Got:
'-0x21524113'
Hi John, is that on a 32-bit x86 system?
Yes. Sorry, I thought that cat
It doesn't actually say 32-bit anywhere that I can see -- is there a
way to tell apart from compiling and running a suitable C program?!
Thanks, I suppose your kernel version 2.6.24-19-generic kind of gives it away,
since it doesn't have a 'amd64' in its name. In any case, I know why the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
Hi
if you have a file called
sys/kernel/vsyscall64
then you are probably using a 64bits system.
I believe.
Philippe
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
i mean /proc/sys/kernel/vsyscall64
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
if you have a file called
sys/kernel/vsyscall64
then you are probably using a 64bits system.
I believe.
Philippe
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
2008/8/27 Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i mean /proc/sys/kernel/vsyscall64
Thanks -- I don't. (And I did know it was a 32-bit machine really.)
John
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
if you have a file called
sys/kernel/vsyscall64
then
In general note that #3813 (the new adaptive plotting code) slows down
a lot of doctests since we end up creating plots with a lot more
points, but much better quality. Mike Hansen has an idea how to fix
that performance issue, but there is no ticket yet. Even with his
_fast_float fixes the slow
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:54 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general note that #3813 (the new adaptive plotting code) slows down
a lot of doctests since we end up creating plots with a lot more
points, but much better quality. Mike Hansen has an idea how to fix
that performance
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
On Aug 27, 12:32 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
It fails to build for silly reasons on iras and cleo (our itaniums):
checking target system type... ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible
2008/8/27 John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008
The following tests failed:
sage -t
On Aug 27, 9:56 pm, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/27 John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnaud,
Since this bugged me (I did the adaptive rendering thing) I timed the
doctests for plot.py on my machine:
sage 3.1.1 vanilla
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py
On Aug 27, 8:57 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
Hi John,
1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008
The following tests
29 matches
Mail list logo
