I need to correct myself again, as I made diff against an already
"touched" file. :(
Sorry for this mess.
Here how it must be:
704a705
> static Obj ProtectFname;
723a725,726
> /* For some reason itanium GC seems unable to spot fname */
> ProtectFname = fname;
726a730,731
> ProtectFname = (Ob
more precisely, the following (the original was putting the new global
variable in the wrong place)
704a705
> static Obj ProtectFname;
727a729,731
> /* For some reason itanium GC seems unable to spot fname */
> ProtectFname = fname;
>
730a735,736
> ProtectFname = (Obj)0L;
>
1071a1078
>
1078a
OK, this patch appears to fix the problem, indeed.
Dima
2010/1/11 Stephen Linton :
> Try this patch for saveload.c:
>
> 708a709
>> static Obj ProtectFname;
> 727a729,731
>> /* For some reason itanium GC seems unable to spot fname */
>> ProtectFname = fname;
>>
> 730a735,736
>> ProtectFname =
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Stephen Linton
wrote:
> As far as I can tell, all the relevant code is identical in 4.4.10 + patch
> and 4.4.12. Of course, I may (must, perhaps) have too narrow a definition of
> relevant, but I wonder if its actually a matter of 4.4.10 being lucky in some
> w
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 11:56 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > William,
>> > I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
>> > filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
>> >
On Jan 10, 11:56 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > William,
> > I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
> > filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
> > (so the workspace gets saved, but with a horribly wrong name...)
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> William,
> I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
> filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
> (so the workspace gets saved, but with a horribly wrong name...)
> Should be next to trivial to fix...
> Dima
Sweet.
William,
I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
(so the workspace gets saved, but with a horribly wrong name...)
Should be next to trivial to fix...
Dima
PS. Let's move this discussion over to sage-devel, as already
suggested here
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> William,
>> I emailed you few weeks back asking what exactly you mean by Itanium
>> environment, as I was unable to reproduce your problems on an Itanium
>> cluster I have access to--- at least not with gcc.
>> A
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
William,
I emailed you few weeks back asking what exactly you mean by Itanium
environment, as I was unable to reproduce your problems on an Itanium
cluster I have access to--- at least not with gcc.
At least not in a stand-alone build of GAP.
Intel compilers showed to be tr
> > By the way, anything new about moving to the newest GAP version?
>
> Somebody should post a new spkg. Then I'll test it on Itanium and see
> whether or not it works. If not, then it doesn't go in, but we can at
> least report the problem again to the GAP list.
William,
I emailed you few weeks
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 9, 12:17 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
>> >> > of tools for easy porting of SPK
On Jan 9, 12:17 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>
>
>
> wrote:
> >> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
> >> > of tools for easy porting of SPKGs -- bash, tar, make, gcc, ...
>
> >> well, that's if you want to
On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:10 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
For the record, this was already tried (using a combination of .bat
files
and standalone javascript). The problem is that even fewer people
understood/were familiar with this build sys
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> In fact, I
On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running
Cygwin
(or Mingw - a clone
>
> Anyway, Dima, thanks for sorting my position that a Cygwin port of
> Sage would be very valuable indeed!
+1. All this time I assumed that Cygwin would require the same
convolutions as the current VM or VirtualBox solution - which is fine
for a heavy user, but probably not for someone who just
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
>> > of tools for easy porting of SPKGs -- bash, tar, make, gcc, ...
>>
>> well, that's if you want to do Sage development, isn't it?
>> (I'd be surprised if Sag
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
>> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
>> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
>> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 07:10 -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 11:02 pm, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > > > In fact,
On Jan 8, 11:02 pm, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > > > (
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > > (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes wi
On Jan 8, 10:40 pm, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:59, kcrisman wrote:
> >> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> >> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> >> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes
On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
> > even realising this. Cygwin works quietly behind
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:59, kcrisman wrote:
>> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
>> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
>> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
>> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly be
> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly behind the scenes here.
>
That is very interesting.
On Jan 7, 3:24 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
[...]
> I'm more hopeful about the Sage Python classes--Python and Cython are
> both supported on Windows, and distutils is supposed to handle all the
> linking stuff. I'm not saying there won't be issues though--from what
> I've seen of it the path
On Jan 6, 10:49 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> On Jan 3, 6:13 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > Dave,
> > it makes no sense to compare cygwin and virtualbox by Googlehits.
> > Cygwin is just a tool to port Unix software to Windows quickly
> > and relatively painlessly (at least the "command-line" softwa
Very interesting discussion--I'm glad to see stuff is still happening
on this front, and great to hear from you again Blair.
On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:49 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
On Jan 3, 6:13 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Also, note that many parts of Sage are not developed by Sage
developers, e.g.
On Jan 3, 6:13 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Dave,
> it makes no sense to compare cygwin and virtualbox by Googlehits.
> Cygwin is just a tool to port Unix software to Windows quickly
> and relatively painlessly (at least the "command-line" software
> can usually be ported pretty quickly). Cygwin
On Jan 2, 2:52 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Has andlinux (http://www.andlinux.org/) been relegated to the "been
> there, tried that, didn't work very well" pile?
I just wanted to bring up the same. http://www.colinux.org/ might have
improved and how works the file system integation? Is it better than
Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million
>> hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would
>> suggest to me its a more popular tool today.
>
> Virt
dfg wrote:
> Is this possible and, if yes, could you please explain how this can be
> done or point me in the right direction?
>
Is it possible that you could use Sympy? Does Sympy run on IronPython,
which presumably is easier to use from .NET?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, se
33 matches
Mail list logo
