[SA-list] Any issues when upgrading to SA beta from current version (4.0.1376)?

Hi, We've been using SA for over a year with very good results. For several months I've been considering cobbling together some RRDtool support so you can imagine how happy I was to see RRDtool already integrated in the most recent beta release. I don't have to reinvent the wheel, badly. I hav

RE: [SA-list] Ideas on rrdTool & Win 2k

Ahmed, This configuration is for test purposes only. It is not secure at all, but I haven't had the time to look further into it. I'm sending this to get you started, but don't use this config in a production environment. - Create a new directory to hold the web site. - Put rrd_cgi.exe and you

RE: [SA-list] Groupwise mail checks....

I used the SMTP2POP3 to check the external portion of Groupwise. I had it send a mail to the Groupwise GWIA agent via SMTP and then connect to another ISP account and pick it up via POP3. The only thing it didn't check was whether a mail was going from the Post Office to the GWIA via the MTA and th

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

The empty screen problem seems to be related to a file that is missing on the system (groups.grp file). The latest beta (4.0.1542 now on the site) should handle this situation correctly and create a new groups.grp if needed. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

Maybe if somebody could send me such a hostfile I could at least look at it . dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Brereton Sent: 17 November, 2003 4:50 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "lat

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

Same problem, though it was just me -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Brereton Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version I have had this as well...

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

I have had this as well... I installed the Beta, added 8 checks, reloaded the machine and the checks werent there. I tried loading the file that i saved and it still stayed blank... however the checks still work. The group names were ok, but no entries under them Its running on a win2k server

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

It also happenned to me too. thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version Hello Dirk. I downloaded today

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

What do you mean with "can't find anything in my main window"? dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 November, 2003 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version Hel

[SA-list] Problem with the "latest" Best version

Hello Dirk. I downloaded today the latest beta of SA and after installation, reboot and added a diskspacecheck to try out the new check-intervall i can't find anything in my main window. It say that i have 2 UP but nothing in the windows. What's up? Best regards Per Ohlsson

RE: [SA-list] run check if dependor check fails...

OOOPS, sorry, never noticed that bit. Thanks!!! Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/03 09:17AM >>> You have depends on UP and depends on DOWN, so the answer is YES. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: 17 November, 2

RE: [SA-list] run check if dependor check fails...

You have depends on UP and depends on DOWN, so the answer is YES. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: 17 November, 2003 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] run check if dependor check fails... Is the

[SA-list] run check if dependor check fails...

Is there a way to run a check only when it's dependor check fails? I'm looking at the IPX Pings, and the best practices from Novell state: - ABSTRACT: How do you discover whether an IPX server is alive? DETAILED DESCRIPTION The preferred method is to send an IPX PING pac

Re: Rép. : [SA-list] Groupwise mail checks....

I believe that some of the main snmp settings are in the docs for the groupwise monitor utility. Another thing you can also do is have Salive login to the groupwise web monitor and look for specific text. John Carter Senior Network Systems Programmer IT Services Indiana Purdue University Ft. Way

RE: [SA-list] Log File question and alert email question..

Return Receipt Your RE: [SA-list] Log File question and alert email question.. document :

[SA-list] Log File question and alert email question..

Return Receipt Your [SA-list] Log File question and alert email question.. document :

RE: [SA-list] about XP

First of all, I made a silly mistake in my previous e-mail. The system I checked the Security Log was system 1 instead of system 2, sorry. Yes, Dirk, I have tried on system 1 and 3 with and without username/passwd to find the same failure messages. Thanking to Lambrecht Pieter's advice, I also

[SA-list] Ideas on rrdTool & Win 2k

Can anyone help me on using the rrdTool and win 2k - especially how to configure it on IIS.   I've been to the rrdTool site but it seem to be related to Apache.    Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger