Re: [SA-list] Problem

Hi, The error say's the following "We can't add this entry, since no check has been selected" Regards Dave On 16 Jan 2012, at 20:01, Anthony Laatz wrote: Images are stripped, can you tell us what it says? Thank you, anthony Laatz | appletree Answers p: 800.270.7030 f: 866.827.8802 e:

RE: [SA-list] Problem

Images are stripped, can you tell us what it says? Thank you, anthony Laatz | appletree Answers p: 800.270.7030 f: 866.827.8802 e: ala...@appletreeanswers.com (mailto:ala...@appletreeanswers.com) From: David Wagstaff [mailto:d...@waggy.freeserve.co.uk] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012

RE: [SA-list] Problem adding people to email alert

I’ve installed 6.3.2366 and it does fix the issue. Thank you, Brett Hanson From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:31 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem adding

RE: [SA-list] Problem adding people to email alert

New beta online… Installer isn't yet acting correctly for the groups.grp and samib file. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:03 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Pr

RE: [SA-list] Problem adding people to email alert

OK found the problem. You "only" get it if you first add a PERSON for authentication and then want also to add a person/team to an alert. Next beta upload will hava a fix for it. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Hanson, Brett Sent: Monday, Mar

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

14, 2011 4:32 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management Some development - I realised that the failed check wasn't appearing in the event log because it wasn't set to audit failed login attempts (doh!). So, having enabled that, I've

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

L IS - European Infrastructure Support Tel: +44 1236 502661 Mob: +44 7881 518854 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit From: "Dirk Bulinckx" To: Servers Alive Discussion List Date: 14/03/2011 13:29 Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management Sent by: Serv

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

...@okieurope.com Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 3:02 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management Sorry, don't know why I included the OID errors. Brainfreeze. Using a server which fails, I've done a test looking at the security event log o

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

" To: Servers Alive Discussion List Date: 14/03/2011 12:49 Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List The logging you show is

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

alf Of ian.g...@okieurope.com Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:31 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem with new user management An update to this - quite a few checks seem to be not working with the new setup. I would suspect the syntax of the NTUserid I set in the

Re: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

An update to this - quite a few checks seem to be not working with the new setup. I would suspect the syntax of the NTUserid I set in the person spec, except that it *does* seem to be working on some checks! Very strange. Ian _ Ian K Gray OEL IS - European In

RE: [SA-list] Problem with new user management

The logging you show is mostly about MIB lookups (and this is due to the same installer issue that causes the groups.grp not to be "moved" to the new location). When you get the access denied, can you see on the (remote)system what user is being used for the login? From: Servers Al

RE: [SA-list] Problem with *NIX check

7881 518854 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit "Dirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List 12/05/2008 15:55 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Problem with *NIX check Could it be th

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA6 running as Applikation

Discussion List Betreff: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA6 running as Applikation For your diskspace checks you could also specify a username/password and that way it can run as service using the system account with desktop interaction. When you say "application stopped", could you exp

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA6 running as Applikation

For your diskspace checks you could also specify a username/password and that way it can run as service using the system account with desktop interaction. When you say "application stopped", could you explain a bit more what you mean with that? Also what exact version/build of Servers Alive

RE: [SA-list] Problem running Salive 5.1. Only runs in the background.

Thank You, that worked. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem running Salive 5.1. Only runs in the background

RE: [SA-list] Problem running Salive 5.1. Only runs in the background.

Make sure the telephony service is running Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jalal, Ahmed Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 5:41 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Problem running Salive 5.1. Only r

[SA-list] RE: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION

vers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION I'd second that request! -tom -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:30 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [S

[SA-list] RE: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION

I'd second that request! -tom -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:30 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION Currently this is not possible. This is a chan

[SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION

Currently this is not possible. This is a change we can add for v6 Dirk. -Original Message- From: Brett Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:55 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Problem with SA_CHECKDESCRIPTION I'm having Servers Al

Re: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after upgrade to 5.1 - SOLVED!

3:28 AM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after upgrade to 5.1 The code was changed yes. I know that SA works fine with "other" sites that need basic authentication. The fact that IE/firefox works fine doesn't mean that the response from the server is R

RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after upgrade to 5.1

om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael KleinSent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:18 AMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after upgrade to 5.1 Dirk,   I will try to get a sniffer trace for you. By the way, I am able to access the HTT

RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after upgrade to 5.1

changed since the previous version?     MIke     -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:53 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1   From

RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1 Hi Dirk,   I attached the lines from the log pertaining to the error...   Thanks     - Original Message - From: Dirk Bulinckx To: salive@woodstone.nu Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:23 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem wit

Re: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

Hi Dirk,   I attached the lines from the log pertaining to the error...   Thanks     - Original Message - From: Dirk Bulinckx To: salive@woodstone.nu Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:23 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

rk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael KleinSent: Friday, January 27, 2006 11:46 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: Re: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1 It simply puts up a window prompting for a username and password. It's from a DL

Re: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

Mike   - Original Message - From: Dirk Bulinckx To: salive@woodstone.nu Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1 What type of authentication is required by the server?   Dirk.  

RE: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1

What type of authentication is required by the server?   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael KleinSent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:24 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: [SA-list] Problem with URL check after update to 5.1 Hello,   After upgrading

RE: [SA-list] Problem with upgrade

Also going from v4.x to v5.x you don't have to import just OPEN. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:17 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem with upgrade

Re: [SA-list] Problem with upgrade

Maybe this is a stupid question but after you imported did you save? Jason Passow Mississippi Welders Supply [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph: (507) 494-5178 fax: (507) 454-8104 "If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all." Greg D. Moore wrote: Still haven't seen my p

RE: [SA-list] Problem with upgrade

Is the system set to auto-load a file? And does that file contain the 205 entries? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg D. Moore Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:04 PM To: salive@woodstone.nu Subject: [SA-list] Problem with u

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending email alerts

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/09/2005 12:15 Please respond to salive@woodstone.nu To salive@woodstone.nu cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Problem sending email alerts The person with ID6 should be checked to see IF it exists and is enabled.   This ID can't be seen in the interface. I

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending email alerts

    If the new machine is XP, does it have SP2 with the firewall turned on?  Have you given SA permission to send email through the firewall?  I had a similar problem with a PC when I upgraded the anti-virus software.  The new anti-virus had an anti-spam component that did not include my em

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending email alerts

The person with ID6 should be checked to see IF it exists and is enabled.   This ID can't be seen in the interface. In the registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\DBU Consulting\Servers Alive\Person you'll see the different persons that are defined (a KEY per person - key name is the nam

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the Eventlog COM check

Doh!  Why didn't I think of that!   I switched to another one of our Proxies and the file downloaded correctly. Thanks, Dirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/07/2005 11:23 Please respond to salive@woodstone.nu To salive@woodstone.nu cc Subject RE: [SA

RE: [SA-list] Problem with the Eventlog COM check

Are you using a proxy?  If so then it's probably "corrputed" within the proxy-cache. The file on the site is 217232 bytes (just rechecked on the site to be sure).   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Irene WardenSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 12:19 PMTo:

RE: [SA-list] Problem starting as service

@woodstone.nu Betreff: RE: [SA-list] Problem starting as service Is the telephony service running? Are you starting it directly on the system or via a TS (terminal server) session? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: [SA-list] Problem starting as service

Is the telephony service running? Are you starting it directly on the system or via a TS (terminal server) session? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:16 PM To: salive@woodstone.n

RE: [SA-list] Problem with my host file ...

can you send me the hostfile and give me some indication on the entries that have the issue?   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Irene WardenSent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 2:48 PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: [SA-list] Problem with my host file ...

Re: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

ive thx   Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von Dirk Bulinckx Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Jänner 2005 10:53 An: salive@woodstone.nu Betreff: RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ... But a PAUSE command command in the BAT fi

RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

3An: salive@woodstone.nuBetreff: RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ... But a PAUSE command command in the BAT file to see if it's executed or not. From the logfile I'd say that it is executed (from a Servers ALive point of view)   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

:\test.cmd   Mail alerting works fine ...   thx   Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dirk BulinckxGesendet: Dienstag, 18. Jänner 2005 10:15An: salive@woodstone.nuBetreff: RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ... What does the logfile show

RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

Don't try that   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen RyanSent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:45 AMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...   Have you got the same problem if you try this?c

RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

  Have you got the same problem if you try this?cmd /c d:\batch.cmd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PLANK MartinSent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:04 AMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ... Hi,   We just updated

RE: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ...

What does the logfile show?     Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PLANK MartinSent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 8:04 AMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: [SA-list] Problem with V5 and executing commands ... Hi,   We just updated our ServersAlive to Version

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

IT does it on Win98 too.   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gene MartinezSent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:48 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs Different platform Win98se, maybe that's the trouble??At 10:33

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

on taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on the information contained herein is done at your own risk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David Bruck Sent: 19 November 2004 03:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David BruckSent: 19 November 2004 03:40To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs 1. The 429 error shouldn't occur, regardless of the alert commands.   2. Com

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

AIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David BruckSent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:40 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs 1. The 429 error shouldn't occur, regardless of the alert commands.   2. Command Alert does NOT work if using batch files.   Not sure what else you can

Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

Dave Bruck - Original Message - From: Dirk Bulinckx To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 12:51 AM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs The commands alert is working and does not use any control so the 429 isn't related to this.

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

] Problem on new installs The commands alert is working and does not use any control so the 429 isn't related to this.     Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David BruckSent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:21 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] Pr

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

The commands alert is working and does not use any control so the 429 isn't related to this.     Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David BruckSent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:21 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem on new ins

Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:35 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs Does this happen immediately on startup, or when a certain type of check or alert occurs? From: David Bruck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:21 PMTo: [

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

Does this happen immediately on startup, or when a certain type of check or alert occurs? From: David Bruck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs Greg,   I reported the same thing, was

Re: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

-- From: Greg A Weigold To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs Installed directly (no TS used here typically) and rebooted... on some of these machines they've been rebooted numerous time

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

ROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs Did you reboot the system? Did you install directly or via a TS session?   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [SA-list] Problem on new installs

Did you reboot the system? Did you install directly or via a TS session?   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A WeigoldSent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:05 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] Problem on new installs This is typically happ

RE: [SA-list] Problem with server PING

This could happen when the reply comes back from a different IP then the one that is pinged. Typicaly with a system with several network cards OR several IP addresses. In 1610 build (latest is on http://beta.woodstone.nu) we log this correctly into the logfile. Dirk. -Original Message

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts (-1.3/4.6)

Monday, November 01, 2004 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts (-1.3/4.6) Okay. When I do a test send twice (I assume you mean hit the "Test it" button in succession), the result and log file is the same. I'll do a trace today and

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts (-1.3/4.6)

aig Ghareeb Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts I changed to our secondary internal serve without any luck, and then to an outside server (ns2.mindspring.com), which also returned the same error message (with DNS I

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts

, November 01, 2004 6:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts I'm on 4.1.1609. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/27/04 12:51:51 AM >>> What exact version of SA are you using? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts

PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts I changed to our secondary internal serve without any luck, and then to an outside server (ns2.mindspring.com), which also returned the same error message (with DNS IP identified appropriately). Like before, I was able to manua

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts

What exact version of SA are you using? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Ghareeb Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts I changed to our

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts

I changed to our secondary internal serve without any luck, and then to an outside server (ns2.mindspring.com), which also returned the same error message (with DNS IP identified appropriately). Like before, I was able to manually nslookup to both of these servers successfully. As the box running

RE: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smtp alerts

Could you try it via another DNS server to see if that gives the same result? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Ghareeb Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Problem sending direct smt

Re: [SA-list] problem sending mail

l deliver the message correctly. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PiCo Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] problem sending mail I suppose YES because I can send e-mail from the same PC

RE: [SA-list] problem sending mail

will deliver the message correctly. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PiCo Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] problem sending mail I suppose YES because I can send e-mail from the sam

RE: [SA-list] problem sending mail

. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PiCo Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SA-list] problem sending mail I suppose YES because I can send e-mail from the same PC where SA is istalled, using a e

Re: [SA-list] problem sending mail

I suppose YES because I can send e-mail from the same PC where SA is istalled, using a e-mail client, to the same address. Only via SA I cant receive e-mail The test says "message sent" but is not true!!! That's the strange ciaooo On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:02:49 +0200, Alistair Francis

RE: [SA-list] problem sending mail

Just a guess... Does the address that you specify in the SA settings correspond to a real mailbox on your mail server? If not, then it could be that your smtp server is accepting the mail for delivery but the destination server is doing a reverse lookup and finding that the mail account doens't e

RE: [SA-list] problem sending mail

And what does the logfile show? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PiCo Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] problem sending mail Hi guys! I'm having a strange behaviour sending e-amil from

RE: [SA-list] Problem publishing WAP page

Can you send me a screenshot showing the FTP settings for a successfull HTML and for the non-successfull WAP page? (offlist that is)   Thanks.   Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 5:38 PMTo: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [SA-list] Problem with COMODBC check

Title: Problem with COMODBC check Thanks a lot. I try this :)   Jan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:51 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with COMODBC check You will get this problem when

RE: [SA-list] Problem with COMODBC check

Title: Problem with COMODBC check You will get this problem when editing a entry and SA is checking at the same time an ODBC COM check.     Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Turyna JanSent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:49 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subjec

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough server storage...

SORRY, SORRY, SORRY, SORRY, SORRY...! I forgot to remove read receipts...! I have duely punished myself... :-( Jamie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Quelch Sent: 14 August 2004 08:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough server storage...

Is this an NT4 server...? If so, I have seen that error many times. The way to fix it is to reinstall the current service pack. Cheers, Jamie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2004 14:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough server storage...

"Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/08/2004 16:45 Please respond to salive To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough server storage... did you try checking the

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough server storage...

did you try checking the MS knowledge base with that error? dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Problem with Perfmon checks : Not enough serv

RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template

EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of James NunnerleySent: Friday, August 13, 2004 10:28 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template If I use:   Will it sort by group then status?   Therefore if I want it to sort by status onl

RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template

.uk From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: 12 August 2004 20:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template   It will sort per group and then per status as indicated within the

RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template

It will sort per group and then per status as indicated within the doc.   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin StoneSent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:21 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with web

RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template

First upgrade, the latest release is v4.1.1609, the latest beta 4.1.1627.  You'll be glad you did.   Second, what do you mean randomly?  Sort order = status will put Down checks at the top.  I don't believe it sorts any status beyond that.  You can sort on other attributes as well such as Gro

RE: [SA-list] Problem with web template

I’ll apologise now folks – for sending the last email with read and delivery receipts…..   -- >From James Nunnerley Comtec Communications Ltd www.comtec-cl.co.uk From: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SMPP pages

ase respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Problem with SMPP pages Just added an option not to use MULTI when sending one SMPP message to multiple recipients (via one alert). Option can be set via the SETUP-ALERT-SMPP   Download: http://b

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SMPP pages

: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:32 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SMPP pages Looks like several providers are having problems with the multi option which is within the specs of smpp. Currently the only work-around (their problem) is to use multiple alerts.     Dirk

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SMPP pages

Looks like several providers are having problems with the multi option which is within the specs of smpp. Currently the only work-around (their problem) is to use multiple alerts.     Dirk.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesda

RE: [SA-list] Problem with NT Service Spooler check

Dirk, Update have solved the problem !! Running the 1607 release now ! Thanks! > First thing to do would be to update to at least 4.1.1591. > > On what os are you running SA and towards what OS are you checking? > > > Dirk. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailt

RE: [SA-list] Problem with NT Service Spooler check

First thing to do would be to update to at least 4.1.1591. On what os are you running SA and towards what OS are you checking? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Swinkels, Boudewijn Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Other Mail

Brett Hanson Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 1:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with Other Mail Yes, The latest beta shows the same behavior. Brett >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/30/2004 3:06:16 PM >>> Are you still having the same with the latest build too? Dir

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Other Mail

Yes, The latest beta shows the same behavior. Brett >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/30/2004 3:06:16 PM >>> Are you still having the same with the latest build too? Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/

RE: [SA-list] Problem with Other Mail

Are you still having the same with the latest build too? Dirk. Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Hanson Sent: Fr

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

:        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service         Classification:         - Roland,   Why was having Win VNC a problem with a security audit ? And you said PCAnywhere wou

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

]Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:55 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server ServiceBut there are a lot of companies, which have to follow special security guidelines and are monitored from time to time from auditors..   :-( In that case i would

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service   But there are a lot of companies, which have to follow special security guidelines and are monitored from time to time from auditors

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

7;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:        (bcc: Roland Schmid/BBL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service         Classification:         A VERY cheap solution would be RealVNC.  Its free from www.realvnc.com, and has programs for w

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

al Message-From: Ferrell, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:18 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service From what I have read.  We would need SA running on a Win 2003 Server, and would have to use the Wind

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

e grow old because we stop playing. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:42 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service Hi, mstsc.exe /console = terminal server c

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell, JimSent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:18 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service From what I have read.  We would need SA running on a Win 2003 Server, and would have to use the Wi

RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service

-317-242-0034 (8-252) + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell phone: 317-716-4541 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:35 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem with SA and W3K/Terminal Server Service Are

  1   2   >