>I think the main problem is that there is no "official version" with new
>development.
>Look to MAME emulator - people who make ports just take the original version
>and do the port.
>This is not possible with SimCoupe, since there is no development, and the
>sources are
>not 100% portable.
There
Dnia 00-10-19 Aley Keprt pisze:
> The real reasons are:
> 1. Sam is 8bit, Amiga 16bit, PC 32bit computer
This is not true. When you mean bitness as number of data lines
outside CPU case (usual meaning), the Amiga 1200 and 4000 are
32bit, PC was 8bit (8088), 16bit (8086) and 32bit (80386DX).
Bu
Dnia 00-10-20 Simon Cooke pisze:
> It's not true interlace though -- but you can tell some
> monitors to move the display down a scanline and have true
> interlacing by doing that, and flashing the border white in
> the off-screen area for a short time when you want to jab it
> down a line :)
This
Aley Keprt wrote:
Aley,
Im not offended. Just welcome to my killfile.
Dave.
OK,
I said at the bottom of my mail if people think this is just stupid just
say. Some of you did, good thats why I put it.
I may be naive about the SAM at the moment as Ive had quite a few years
break but to suggest that I am totally naive generally is offensive and
the kind of pointless general
> Dnia 00-10-19 Aley Keprt pisze:
>
> > The real reasons are:
> > 1. Sam is 8bit, Amiga 16bit, PC 32bit computer
> This is not true. When you mean bitness as number of data lines
> outside CPU case (usual meaning), the Amiga 1200 and 4000 are
> 32bit, PC was 8bit (8088), 16bit (8086) and 32bit (
Thanks for your Email. My post was deliberate, it was intended to
provoke
debate because I wanted to find out who feels like any of the
following:-
"the SAM is the machine and there can only be one SAM that is the
creation
of MGT ( amen )"
"the SAM is a style, an OS that we could easily develop o
As the list owner I have seen with leniency on the various (off-)
topics on this list and other irrelevant posting - we are here to
have a good time. However, I will NOT tolerate abusive languag in any
form! Please either take that outside of this list, or, preferrably,
drop it entirely. NOTHING go
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:32:00AM +0100, Dave wrote:
> Amusingly it seems to have gone into a bit of a mini flame war about
> SimCoupe which I happen to like.
You like mini flame wars? OK then...
imc (perhaps not)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:43:03PM +0200, Aley Keprt wrote:
> Although some programmers have good experience with C programming, I must
> radically call for C++.
Not only would I not touch C++ with a bargepole, I also use an
application that someone else wrote in C++ and it's a complete
pain to co
> OK,
>
> I said at the bottom of my mail if people think this is just stupid just
> say. Some of you did, good thats why I put it.
>
> I may be naive about the SAM at the moment as Ive had quite a few years
> break but to suggest that I am totally naive generally is offensive and
> the kind of p
Aley,
You really are a complete t***, aren't you?
All Dave was giving was an idea to regain gloabl knowledge of the SAM... It
wasn't stupid, at all... Maybe a little disconceived, but NEVER stupid! In
either case, it's MUCH MUCH MUCH more than what I f***ing see from you!
Actually, I wouldn't be
Okay, there's nothing wrong to make things just for fun, but I'm affraid
Dave takes this fun things too seriously.
Why give so much energy to do so large projects in our situation (10 years
past Sam)?
So it really looks like that superb-spoon. (imho)
-
I haven't seen one mention about him taking things seriously... Maybe I
missed it somewhere.
As far as I could see, he was using this list in the correct use of an
engineering forum by bouncing ideas around. Slagging him off is never the
best response...
It's all the slagging off in the past that
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:43:03PM +0200, Aley Keprt wrote:
> > Although some programmers have good experience with C programming, I
must
> > radically call for C++.
>
> Not only would I not touch C++ with a bargepole, I also use an
> application that someone else wrote in C++ and it's a comple
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:38:56AM +0100, Ian Collier wrote (again):
> Not only would I not touch C++ with a bargepole [snip]
Oi. Someone at mail.vi-internet.de appears to be reposting messages.
Please stop it...
imc
The Fred Web Pages are now completed with contents, screenshots and
download links for issues 1-82.
Not sure what else to do with them at the moment, any suggestions welcome.
http://www.podboy.demon.co.uk/coupe/fred
Dan.
82 = all existing?
Does anybody know the dates, when Fred magazine started and finished (?)?
--
Bc.Aley [eili] Keprt - entertainment programmer (games&multimedia)
ICQ: 82357182 (evenings) *** phone: +420-68-5387035 (weekends)
> 82 = all existing?
AFAIK, yep.
> Does anybody know the dates, when Fred magazine started and finished (?)?
Well, issue 81 was December 1997 and I think there was a couple of months
before the last one and I think the first was early 1990 - Mr Macdonald?
Dan.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Aley Keprt wrote:
> Okay, it's 1:1. Who's next.?
2 Against.
> Also, C is not so compatible too, since Watcom C - one of the best
> compilers - doesn't follow the standard of (all) other compilers.
Then it's not the best compiler. Any decent C compiler should be ANSI
c
82? Is that including the one I compiled (yes, it was me!) for George Boyle?
If anyones got a copy...???
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Fred Magazine Web Pages
> > 82 = all existing?
>
> AFAIK, yep.
>
> > Does any
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Aley Keprt wrote:
> > Okay, it's 1:1. Who's next.?
>
> 2 Against.
>
> > Also, C is not so compatible too, since Watcom C - one of the best
> > compilers - doesn't follow the standard of (all) other compilers.
>
> Then it's not the best compiler. Any decent C compiler sho
Almost immediately after we get some new faces arrive on the list, together
with a bit of rare enthusiasm, we go back to the old name calling, general
sillyness :(
And I thought Brenchley had pissed off to alt.singles or whatever newsgroup
it was?
And there I was going to the hassle of registerin
-Original Message-
>82? Is that including the one I compiled (yes, it was me!) for George Boyle?
>
>If anyones got a copy...???
I've got a .DSK copy.
Bob Wilkinson.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 6:16 PM
>Subject: Re
- Original Message -
From: Robert Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: Fred Magazine Web Pages
>
> -Original Message-
>
>
> >82? Is that including the one I compiled (yes, it was me!) for George
Boyle?
> >
> >If anyones got a co
25 matches
Mail list logo
