Re: SNMP scanner?

On 3 August 2016 at 00:56, ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com> wrote: > On 08/01/2016 06:24 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> On 31 July 2016 at 23:31, ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/30/2016 11:36 PM, Jon Brinkmann wrote:

Re: SNMP scanner?

On 31 July 2016 at 23:31, ToddAndMargo wrote: > On 07/30/2016 11:36 PM, Jon Brinkmann wrote: >> >> Does 'nmap -sX ' fit the bill, e.g. >> 'nmap -sX 192.168.1.1-255'? > > > Only one the one network (192.168.1.0/25 in your example). > > I want EVERYTHING on the network >

Re: Updates of samba4 ?

ate support, > ++ but with a more current update policy > ++ and an overall more recent software. > You are asking a lot for free. > Rupert > > > Stephen John Smoogen schrieb: > >> On 6 June 2016 at 13:00, Rupert Kolb <rupert.k...@med.uni-tuebingen.de> >> wrote: &g

Re: Updates of samba4 ?

On 6 June 2016 at 13:00, Rupert Kolb wrote: > Hi, > > are there any updates for samba4 ? > At the moment in the repo is: > samba4-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 from 13th of april. > > At download.samba.org is a updated version samba-4.2.12 from 2016-05-02 (one > month

Re: T430 (was RE: SL 7.2 - Gnome 3.14 - gnome-terminal - titles)

On 13 May 2016 at 23:37, Carl Friedberg wrote: > Greetings, > > > > My first post in a long time. Today, I installed SL 7.2 (workstation options > > including Gnome) from the 2-DVD distribution downloaded from the > > SL website, onto a Lenovo T430. On reboot, the system

Re: BTRFS

On 5 November 2015 at 04:52, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one prototype of > our system running it (most of our productions are still running older > openSUSE on ext4). > There are several caveats to that. 1)

Re: any 7.2 beta out there?

On 21 September 2015 at 12:52, ToddAndMargo wrote: > ? You seem to ask this every beta, and the answer is the same. Because of the way that the beta is released, there are no rebuilds in CentOS, Scientific Linux etc for it. -- Stephen J Smoogen.

Re: What's the best way to learn RPM packaging?

On 13 August 2015 at 01:35, Phil Wyett philwyett.vende...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joe, I do not know if the following falls in the no good category but I used it a lot to learn how to build my own packages : http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ JM Hi, A decent reference is:

NOTICE: python-six has been removed from EPEL as it is in EL6.7

The package python-six is used as a shim for apps needing python3 command in python2 or python2 command in python3. The recent release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7 brought the package into the 'base' repositories which caused a conflict between the package inside of EPEL and RHEL. When the

Re: Modula 2?

Modula-2 is a pretty 'dead' language. The GNU compiler tool looks to be one of the most up to date from what a google search seems to sya. On 29 June 2015 at 19:59, ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote: Hi All, Is Modula2 available for SL 6 and 7? Found this:

Re: Adding files to the sl repo

On Jun 6, 2015 07:10, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: On 6 June 2015 at 05:03, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: snip RHEL 20 and 21 might . . . snip Either I have been asleep for a very long time or perhaps application of s/RHEL/Fedora/ is appropriate. ;-) Alan

Re: USB 3

On 22 May 2015 at 18:27, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: Konstantin, This is exactly what i was looking for - how to identify if I have usb3 wo taking the box apart. Do you have ports that are blue? Are there ports which are labeled SS. If you have neither (like this Thinkpad t540p) all you

Re: USB 3

On 22 May 2015 at 09:37, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: Gents, does this system have USB 3 ? [code] [root@server ~]# lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux

Re: Other linux

On 24 March 2015 at 18:06, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote: I fully realise that this is a SL list (along with the occasional mention of RHEL, CentOS, etc.). I currently am using X86-64 SL 7 on my workstation. Our primary research compute engine is using X86-64 SL 6 with MPI and Nvidia

Re: Kapersky Equation group compromise

On 17 February 2015 at 22:46, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2015-02-18 6:34 GMT+02:00 Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu: Is there any evidence that the Equation group compromise, the discovery of which was announced by the Kaspersky Lab:

Re: Safe to install Oracle Java 1.8?

On 30 January 2015 at 19:30, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote: On 31/01/15 03:44, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote: Hi hansel! On 2015.01.29 at 19:30:33 -0500, hansel wrote next: If I download the Oracle rpm for 1.8, do the necessary links in /etc/alternatives, remove Open JDK 1.7 and

Re: NVidia drops off bus

On 29 January 2015 at 09:41, Phil Wyett philwyett.vende...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:30 -0800, Joseph Areeda wrote: Hi All, I've been getting random crashes of X on my development workstation with messages like: on console: cpu #X stuck in [X:...] .xsession-errors

Re: SL7: Missing texlive-* packages

On 26 January 2015 at 17:42, Chris Schanzle schan...@nist.gov wrote: On 01/23/2015 07:31 PM, Steve Gaarder wrote: Here's what I'm working on to provide a full complement of TeX goodies on SL7: I installed the latest TeXlive in a network directory accessible to all my SL7 machines. I am

Re: ypbind not registering with rpcbind on SL7

On 7 January 2015 at 17:06, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:21:37PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 14:54, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca wrote: Hehe. I remember when 20 years ago people would say the exact same

Re: ypbind not registering with rpcbind on SL7

On 7 January 2015 at 14:54, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca wrote: Yes, thank you for the references to the Red Hat identity management system. Of course it is based on LDAP, but also it requires use of Kerberos (which we do not have fun with in the AFS/Kerberos environement at

Re: SL7 fvwm

On 5 January 2015 at 09:44, Stephen Berg (Contractor) stephen.berg@nrlssc.navy.mil wrote: I have a user that would like to have an fvwm environment. He doesn't want gnome/kde/xfce/etc etc. Just a simple fvwm login. If I can find a way to have GDM launch his fvwm environment it would be

Re: Update killed samba -

On 2 January 2015 at 13:12, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote: On 01/02/15 14:08, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: The ntp server needs to be able to talk to some server on the network to get time. The Fedora boxes might just be 'lucky' in keeping time if they have no access either

Re: Update killed samba -

On 2 January 2015 at 10:15, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote: On 01/02/15 11:57, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote: Jan 02 10:18:12 box10 kernel: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -113 According to

Re: amaya

On 8 December 2014 at 15:15, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote: I have attempted to build from source the current production release of amaya http://www.w3.org/Amaya/ From the web page: The application was jointly developed by W3C and the WAM project (Web, Adaptation and Multimedia) at

Re: amaya

and possibly HTML 4.0 compliant but after that it was hit or miss depending on how strict you wanted to be. Yasha Karant On 12/08/2014 02:52 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 8 December 2014 at 15:15, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote: I have attempted to build from source the current

Re: RHEL 7 just hit the market place, I'm looking forward to when we can start testing SL 7

On 10 June 2014 20:12, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote: On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Yes a lot of us noticed. Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition. Furthermore they need to strip out all of the Red Hat branding. Expect it to take a

Re: Cannot install wine

You have an architecture problem and am trying to install i686 or x86_64 on a system which wants to be one or the other. Try installing yum install wine.i686 or yum install wine.x86_64 and see if that helps any. If not the see where the conflicts are occuring and if you need the conflicting

Re: Is there any reason why Kudzu rpm is not part of SL

On 18 September 2013 03:09, Edison, Arul (GE Healthcare) aruljeyananth.jamesedi...@ge.com wrote: Hi All, I am trying to use the SL for my application environment and using SL for the same When I install SL , I have found that Kudzuis not part of the SL Is there any reason why