Hi all,
I'm new t Scientific Linux but not to Linux, I'm trying SL because I'm
looking for a RHEL 6 free distribution and at CentOS they are still
working.
I tried to install using SL-60-i386-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
into a VirtualBox virtual machine. I verified the ISO using sha256
On 04/13/2011 08:11 AM, Stefano Canepa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new t Scientific Linux but not to Linux, I'm trying SL because I'm
looking for a RHEL 6 free distribution and at CentOS they are still
working.
I tried to install using SL-60-i386-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
into a VirtualBox v
Stefano Canepa wrote on 04/13/2011 11:11 AM:
...
I tried to install using SL-60-i386-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
into a VirtualBox virtual machine. I verified the ISO using sha256sum
and also inside installer but it stops installing MAKEDEV claiming it is
corrupted on DVD.
I have done multip
On 04/13/2011 12:38 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Can't say it is perfect, but "riddled with bugs" seems a bit
exaggerated. My overall experiences with VB have been very positive.
Phil
Not "exaggerated". Years of pain and experience.
Wait until you get your job threatened over it. Fortunate
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 12:38 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>
>> Can't say it is perfect, but "riddled with bugs" seems a bit exaggerated.
>> My overall experiences with VB have been very positive.
>>
>> Phil
>>
> Not "exaggerated". Years of pa
On 04/13/2011 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
wrote:
On 04/13/2011 12:38 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Can't say it is perfect, but "riddled with bugs" seems a bit exaggerated.
My overall experiences with VB have been very positive.
Ph
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
wrote:
> I tried VB 4.0.x, but it was so much slower that 3.2.12 with my XP
> guest that I ripped it back off and replaced it with 3.2.12. I
> will be trying KVM on a new server to see how it fares.
You need to go *straight* to VMWare. D
On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
server if you can.
Why should the better choice be ESX than KVM for somebody who is
familiar with Linux?
Ser
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
>> at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
>> server if you can.
>
> Why should the better cho
On 04/14/2011 03:08 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
server if you
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
>> at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
>> server if you can.
>
> Why should the better cho
Le 15/04/2011 04:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
I've heard good things about KVM performance, but didn't see it in
RHEL/CentOS/SL 5.x. I'll be very intersted to see the results of the
Debian testing I'm doing in the near future.
Hi Nico,
Just for curiosity, what do you consider as KVM soluti
Hi, Todd
KVM unders SL5/6 works quite nice for windows guests, including
terminal session into them.
Virt-manager console is noticeably slow, and has at least one annoying
bug (when win7 guest prompts you to chose whether your network is home
or work or internet, virt-manager freezes ad needs to b
On 04/14/2011 04:41 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/04/13 13:08, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
On 04/13/2011 12:38 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Can't say it is perfect, but "riddled with bugs" seems a bit
exaggerated.
My overall experiences with VB have been very positive.
Phil
Not "exaggerated". Ye
On 04/15/2011 03:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
server if
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 03:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not sto
16 matches
Mail list logo
