RE: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-18 Thread Ted Hastings
Toby Rider wrote: Which is too bad, because improvisation is a cool thing. All of those blues solos are built around improvisation on altered pentatonic scales.. If they're altered, are they still pentatonic? Regards, Ted Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music Culture

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-18 Thread Matt Seattle
Jim Dawson wrote: Alan MacDonald.. in fact wrote a thesis on the subject of pibroch and his conclusion was that modern pibroch, to which you refer was actually a fabrication of what real pibroch was. And is not 'real pibroch' also a fabrication?!? Or did it arrive with the rest of the

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-18 Thread Toby Rider
Ted Hastings wrote: Toby Rider wrote: Which is too bad, because improvisation is a cool thing. All of those blues solos are built around improvisation on altered pentatonic scales.. If they're altered, are they still pentatonic? Well, that's a good question.. They call them blues scales

[scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Philip Whittaker
Whenever modes come up, it seems to polarise folk on the list. You need to know about modes v why is it worth knowing about this. I had an experience recently with a tune which we were playing for a particular purpose. It was Morrison's (jig) which is Irish in origin but much loved, with a

[scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Nigel Gatherer
Dan Mozell wrote: I may have missed some of this thread. The bass player wasn't really wrong. Standard notation practice (not folk musicians notation practice) would be to write an E Dorian tune with the E minor/G major key signature of one sharp (F#) and then sharp the individual Cs in the

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread David Greenberg
A double bass player looked at the sheet music and played along with the tune. He then complained that it was in two sharps but was in E minor. My explanation that it was a dorian not an aeolian tune ( I do hope I got this bit right) was greeted with some derision. OK, if modes do not mean

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Toby Rider
Nigel Gatherer wrote: Jim Dawson, I believe, is talking about improvisation which is a whole different colour of horse, and not a subject which immediately comes to mind in a discussion of Scottish music. I remember in my green youth getting very excited about my first exposure to pibroch; I

RE: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Jim Dawson
Nigel Gatherer wrote: Jim Dawson, I believe, is talking about improvisation which is a whole different colour of horse, and not a subject which immediately comes to mind in a discussion of Scottish music. I remember in my green youth getting very excited about my first exposure to pibroch; I

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Toby Rider
Jim Dawson wrote: This might be true amongst...dare I say it...the more senior traditional musicians amongst us, but in my humble opinion that is changing rapidly where younger musicians are concerned. Take Shooglenifty, Peatbog Fairies, Afro Celt Sound System, Sandy Brechin...for example,

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-17 Thread Jack Campin
I had an experience recently with a tune which we were playing for a particular purpose. It was Morrison's (jig) which is Irish in origin but much loved, with a life of its own in Scotland. A double bass player looked at the sheet music and played along with the tune. He then complained that

RE: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Jim Dawson
Toby Rider wrote: That stuff is rubbish, just like top 40 music of every other genre nowadays.. Sad.. Matt Seattle wrote: Craig David's pretty good, no? Exactly.I find it sad and narrow minded that people can rubbish music like this. In fact I do not see any real information regarding

RE: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Jack Campin
Jim Dawson wrote: In fact I do not see any real information regarding modes coming out in this discussion, plenty of show boating about how much music history they know and nothing about how to use modes in real life music. I presume you mean me. I'd already put a fair bit of such

RE: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Jim Dawson
Jack Campin wrote: I presume you mean me. No Jack I was not referring to you, I was simply venting at people being dismissive of certain genres of music without having anything of worth to add to the discussion or even thinking about the reality that some people do like such music (and I am not

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Toby Rider
Jack Campin wrote: I presume you mean me. No Jack I was not referring to you, I was simply venting at people being dismissive of certain genres of music without having anything of worth to add to the discussion or even thinking about the reality that some people do like such music (and I am

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Matt Seattle
Perhaps it's got a bit out of hand, very hot weather here in the Borders at the moment at any rate. Most genres have their 'quality' artistes, and in mentioning Craig David I was referring to top 40 generally, not of course 'country' music. As for understanding modes (etc. etc.) I don't think it

Re: [scots-l] Modal Tunes (but seriously)

2003-07-15 Thread Bruce Olson
Matt Seattle wrote: .. Rambling further.. PW mentions Owsald. There's been a bit of a renaissance and reappraisal of JO recently, with some CDs on the 'serious' end of the market. What I've heard sounds pleasant but lightweight to me, but might not be the best stuff(?). Oswald was