Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > We also spoke with the Derby folks, and got some tips from them, which
will
> > result in some changes for the database schema. Also, they have a new
> > release coming out with in a week or so, and that would be a good time
to
> > put out a rel
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
2) replaced 2.2.0 with 2.3.0 in download.xml
Whoops ... this and the related text changes on the main page are premature,
until we do release JAMES v2.3. This is the only thing that I feel should be
reverted ... FOR NOW. Everything else is a go. I'd really like to pu
SPF1Data.MAX_DEPTH = 10 not enough
--
Key: JSPF-21
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-21
Project: jSPF
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Reporter: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Normally I wouldn't call a vote for a site update, but I just finished
> committing more than *1000* files updated in our site/trunk repository.
ROFLMAO! :-D
Yes, that's what happens. :-) We've all been there and done that, and had the
same reaction. Welcome to the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-515.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl
> ---
>
> Key: JAME
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-565?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-565:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
Affects Version/s: 2.3.0b3
(was: 2.3.0b2)
> Code review to @deprecate things we already know want to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-449?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-449.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Reopen it with further details if needed.
> RemoteAddr and RemoteHost incorrectly set
> -
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We also spoke with the Derby folks, and got some tips from them, which will
result in some changes for the database schema. Also, they have a new
release coming out with in a week or so, and that would be a good time to
put out a release candidate.
Any update on this?
I
Author: norman
Date: Fri Jul 14 09:11:13 2006
New Revision: 421933
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421933&view=rev
Log:
Remove uneeded methods
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/smtpserver/SMTPServerTest.java
james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/smtpserv
+1
But not as default.
bye
Norman
Am Freitag, den 14.07.2006, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Søren Hilmer:
> +1 (but It should not be a default, the current behaviour is like the RFC
> says, and our default should mirror that)
> --Søren
>
> On Friday 14 July 2006 16:14, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > I'm sorr
Thx for the fix.. But please if you fix a BUG write a junit test too.. I
did this now for you ;-)
Bye
Norman
Am Freitag, den 14.07.2006, 08:44 -0700 schrieb Stefano Bagnara (JIRA):
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-566?page=all ]
>
> Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-566:
> ---
Author: norman
Date: Fri Jul 14 08:58:37 2006
New Revision: 421930
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421930&view=rev
Log:
Add junit test for JAMES-566.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/smtpserver/SMTPServerTest.java
james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-566?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-566:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0b4
(was: 2.3.0b3)
> Fastfail DNSRBL blacklisted messages are rejected even if the sender user is
> successfully S
+1
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:26, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> This time a real, official, standard vote.
>
> Normally I wouldn't call a vote for a site update, but I just finished
> committing more than *1000* files updated in our site/trunk repository.
>
> As you can see from the "funny" comment about
+1 (but It should not be a default, the current behaviour is like the RFC
says, and our default should mirror that)
--Søren
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:14, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> I'm sorry for another vote today, but I found the time only today to
> collect enough informations to proceed.
>
> The
Joachim Draeger wrote:
IMAP is a perfect case for SEDA because often there are a lot of idle
collection and without SEDA you need to keep idle threads allocated.
How much does it cost to keep an idle thread allocated? Is it only using
memory or using a lot of memory or does the JVM need cpu tim
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Joachim Draeger wrote:
How much does it cost to keep an idle thread allocated? Is it only
using
memory or using a lot of memory or does the JVM need cpu time to deal
with them?
Do you recommend using SEDA instead of MINA?
MINA would let you implement a SEDA-style
I'm sorry for another vote today, but I found the time only today to
collect enough informations to proceed.
The vote is to apply the patch attached to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358
(Ok, i will fix tabs to spaces if this get a +1)
Vincenzo, Bernd, Norman and I already agreed we
Am Freitag, den 14.07.2006, 15:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> >> The thread per connection model simply doesn't scale to the level that
> >> would be needed for a decent IMAP server.
> >
> > Why? There are reasons to limit the maximal number of simultaneously
> > running threads. But what
Introduce Logger service and use DI to pass it to subcomponents. Add a default
JUL or LOG4J implementation for command line usage
-
Key: JSPF-20
Thank you Robert!
I just fixed it in our repository, it will published as soon as we'll
update the online export.
Stefano
robert burrell donkin wrote:
PGP detached sigs for source links 404. to fix s/sources/source/
(i had intended to submit this change as a patch but the documentation on
b
Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 20:31 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> > Btw my personal opinion is that James needs new features
>
> > - IMAP
>
> Agreed. And we have a lot of protocol support for it. I have an idea for
> resolving the store issue.
I'm very curious to hear about it! I tried t
+1
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joachim Draeger wrote:
The thread per connection model simply doesn't scale to the level that
would be needed for a decent IMAP server.
Why? There are reasons to limit the maximal number of simultaneously
running threads. But what are the drawbacks of having one thread per
connection?
I thi
+1
Norman
Am Freitag, den 14.07.2006, 15:26 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> This time a real, official, standard vote.
>
> Normally I wouldn't call a vote for a site update, but I just finished
> committing more than *1000* files updated in our site/trunk repository.
>
> As you can see from t
This time a real, official, standard vote.
Normally I wouldn't call a vote for a site update, but I just finished
committing more than *1000* files updated in our site/trunk repository.
As you can see from the "funny" comment about the 261 parts it changed
almost all the website.
I publishe
Am Montag, den 10.07.2006, 21:05 -0600 schrieb Mike Heath:
> On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, Joachim Draeger wrote:
>
> > > Maybe such idle connections could be handled by a special thread and if
> > > any real work is starting on a connection, this one is handed over to a
> > > worker thread
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Nevertheless, I think the thread you started serves a purpose by
collecting a "mood board" on some/most of the pending discussions.
And it certainly should not be intended as a way to shut down
discussions.
I really hope this will stop re
Am Montag, den 10.07.2006, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> are you really making that good progress you are already discussing
> advanced features, or are quotas required by IMAP?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Well, the progress is near to alpha for basic commands. What really is
> >>>needed n
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-502?page=all ]
Joachim Draeger updated JAMES-502:
--
Attachment: repository-proposal-3.zip
File: repository-proposal-3.zip includes only the proposal interfaces and the
xdocs + generated html
This is now some
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-566?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini resolved JAMES-566.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The problem was in a misleading long boolean expression in RcptCmdHandler, that
already gave us a similar problem in
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
After meeting Mauro in London we got chatting and eventually
started talking about containers, which lead to talking about Loom/
Phoenix and Plexus. One thing lead to another and I asked if we
could possibly merge the contain and component cod
Author: vincenzo
Date: Fri Jul 14 04:27:06 2006
New Revision: 421873
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421873&view=rev
Log:
A fastfail DNSBRL blacklisted message is rejected even if the sender user is
successfully SMTP AUTHenticated (see JAMES-566).
The correction is to a misleading long bool
Author: vincenzo
Date: Fri Jul 14 04:25:34 2006
New Revision: 421871
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421871&view=rev
Log:
A fastfail DNSBRL blacklisted message is rejected even if the sender user is
successfully SMTP AUTHenticated (see JAMES-566).
The correction is to a misleading long bool
Fastfail DNSRBL blacklisted messages are rejected even if the sender user is
successfully SMTP AUTHenticated
Key: JAMES-566
URL: http://issues.apache.org/
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I think I really well explained what was the goal of the "vote" and
made clear this is not a standard vote but a "vote-like". I used the
[VOTE] subject to attract replies.
To attract replies, you shouldn't use [VOTE], if you don't call for a
vote. Please take people se
Author: norman
Date: Fri Jul 14 02:47:49 2006
New Revision: 421849
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421849&view=rev
Log:
Fix some typos
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/xdocs/documentation_2_3.xml
james/server/trunk/src/xdocs/download.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/src/xdocs/docum
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As a person having SVN karma, would you mind to turn on SVN
notifications for postage
Yes. And, honestly, I'm annoyed. The mailer must be configured BEFORE the
commits are made, not after. As far as I know, we now need a list of every
revision number for all of the co
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
You might want to have some discussion on each item before calling for a
vote. In some of these cases, there may be alternatives to the
choices you
listed.
Example votes
-1 or +1 are the only meaningful votes at the ASF.
I think I really
And now the bulk questions:
A. Deprecate phoenix
+0.8
A1. Replace it with Plexus (http://plexus.codehaus.org/)
-0
A2. Replace it with another Avalon compliant container (name it)
-0
A3. Replace it with Felix (http://incubator.apache.org/felix/)
+0.2
B. Remove avalon
+0.8
B1
Author: bago
Date: Fri Jul 14 02:04:43 2006
New Revision: 421840
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421840&view=rev
Log:
Commented empty/todo pages and links to non existant subproject websites.
We'll enable them as soon as content will appear.
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/site/site.xml
Author: bago
Date: Fri Jul 14 01:34:34 2006
New Revision: 421835
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421835&view=rev
Log:
Changelog updated to 2.3.0b3
Download fixed sources=>source (Thanks to Robert Burrell Donkin)
Menu changed to reflect both 2.2 and 2.3b documentation (JAMES-432)
Modified:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a test, I hope it will work because I don't see another simple
> solution to move forward from the current stall.
>
> I'm starting this vote because I saw that there is a lot moving around
> this issue and
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
About this deprecation issue [you] would like to deprecate some code
and I reply with +++1. If you don't want to deprecate it, well, I'm
ok anyway.
Oh, I want to mark it as deprecated, and see what feedback we get.
My way of think
Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 14:17 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> > Ok i finished my "reorganize" of the packages and classes.
>
> I don't know that you took out the configuration of the pre and post
> handlers. The configuration should be soft. Those are only two lines, and
> should be put
45 matches
Mail list logo
