Hi Tom
My
son and I cancelled our 3 year subscription to GD, due to the conflicting
instructional coverage, and some teachers are mere hacks.
I do
intend to purchase the Nov. 2003 issue, just to read your published article,
unless its posted in full on the internet.
Regarding the Top Cl
Tom,
>Now my next project
with GD is to convince them they need to publish a booklet and side article on
top clubmakers just like they do for top teachers of the golf
swing every year.
The initial response on this idea from Mike is positive, but now it has to go to
the higher ups, which
Richard
Please go to www.matweb.com and get your facts on any material.
Looking up 1010 and 1080 carbon steel and the 4140 (a different grade of steel since it contains Chrome) are still all listed with a Youngs Modulus of Elasticity of 2970 PSI.
- Original Message -
From
Wahoo!! Just received my letter from the USGA. I am getting 2 season
grounds passes. Well worth the price!
Jeff
Whole-in-One
Oops, not the USGA, the PGA.
Jeff
Jeff Stephens wrote:
Wahoo!! Just received my letter from the USGA. I am getting 2 season
grounds passes. Well worth the price!
Jeff
Whole-in-One
Title: Message
Tom/Arnie,
What
month is this article in, I would like to purchase it for
myself.
Thanks,
Tom
Byers
Dave,
> BTW, the best-marketing OEM around has been following your prescription
for
> years. Much softer shafts at any given designation (their "R" was
everybody
> else's "L") and more loft than the number stamped on the sole.
Reminds me of an amusing story from a senior friend for whom I reshaft
In a message dated 10/14/03 5:52:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got so confused about what tips work and which ones don't that it's probably hopeless.
All the tips work. You just have to know which ones will correct the fault you have! You DO know what your swing
I
pretty much gave up on reading instruction pieces in the magazinesI got so
confused about what tips work and which ones don't that it's probably
hopeless. My only salvation is that I can build a set of clubs that will
overcome most of my many swing flaws
Royce
-Original Mess
Arnie:
Well since you asked for opinions, you
probably know my opinion on this already!! This was a pretty interesting
project to create and produce for GD. I have to say that their equipment
editor, Mike Stachura, fights tooth and nail to get decent coverage in GD for
equipment orient
In a message dated 10/14/03 3:23:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like you followed the Golf Digest article, and put the item with the
most truth last.
Dave, I certainly did follow the article to the very end and the choice of order was not mine but the publisher's!
At 01:11 PM 10/14/03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most interesting part of this subject article is the contribution by Tom
Wishon which discusses the angle of attach. This part was unfortunately
the LAST page of the entire article and had the most truth in it
My conclusion is to fit "macho
Well, Arrnie, for me with an 85-90 mph speed when healthy, an 8°
Chicago 966SD plays as high as some 12° heads and an SRV II 12° plays
as low as many 9° heads. COG a factor to consider? Carry with my 48", 10°
Integra S450 is about 230 yards on my better hits. Since a longer club will hit
th
http://purefitgolf.com/ have no degree markings.
I am a believer. My old driver was a 260cc, 9.5 degree lofted driver with a regular flex Maltby graphite shaft, 44 inches in length. (I have been swinging that length for twenty plus years.)
I switched to a Wishon 915, 360cc Driver with a 10* loft. Same regular flex (only a few frequency point
I read these articles with great interest since this advice will be followed by many customers. Interesting that in the charts an 11* driver with 115 MPH clubhead speed showed a carry of 259 yards. Of all my customers that have been fitted I have only found 3 who could acheive this kind of clubhead
Hi Guys,
At the risk of raising the spine issue for the umpteenth time I thought I
might mention one lttle alignment technique I tried which worked pretty
well. There seem to be some concern as to just how closely a particlar point
(sorry, plane) on the shaft could be aligned. I'm and NBP at 3:00/9
Dave T.
First, thanks much for taking the time and expending the energy to
respond so completely to my sophomoric question!
There clearly appears to be some strongly held divergent opinions and
theories, regarding residual bends, placement of spines, COG,
etc! Thanks to you and al
Very interesting! I was looking at a similar setup a couple of years
back to see if I could find a relationship between shaft butt torque and
tip displacement. I used a three bearing spine finder I rigged up at
home. There were two bearing about 6" apart at the butt. A small bearing
at the tip was
Dave:
First trip over there was 1989 because Apollo and their then head of
R&D, Graeme Horwood, who now heads up R&D for TT, had agreed to let me
use what at that time was state-of-the-art shaft testing equipment for
doing the beginning of the work that resulted in that shaft book which
was finishe
I can
honestly say that this is the first time I have ever seen a noticeable
difference in performance from a change in shaft. I'm a swinger, not a
hitter, with a swing speed of about 105-mph with a 45-inch driver. I had
previous good luck with the YS-6 and Purple Ice and was a bit hesitant
THANK YOU
Jeremy
Canada
Don Flatgard wrote:
Happy
Thanksgiving week end to all our Canadian friends!!!
22 matches
Mail list logo
