eper than we credit.That's quite a percentage. I wonder what the number would be for the public at large. Did anyone ask this group of futurists what their major objection to immortality is? Religious reasons? Eric B. Ramsay
singularity | Archives
| Modify
Your Subscription
hanks.
Eric B. Ramsay
Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Samantha:From what you said above $50M will do the entire job. If that is
all
that is standing between us and AGI then surely we can get on with it in
all haste.
Oh for gawdsake, this is such a tedious discussion. I would
o get from here to Mars
(or wherever) depending on how extravagantly you want to travel but if you
define the problem as "just get there", I am confident the costs will not be
different by a factor of 100 million.
Eric B. Ramsay
Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, M
inion before on what is
required for a technological breakthrough (unless people are not being serious
and I am being naive). I suppose this sort of non-consensus on such a scale
could be part of investor reticence.
Eric B. Ramsay
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Mike Tin
.
>IMO...
So you see the arrival of a Tipping Point as per Malcolm Gladwell. Whether I
physically benefit from the arrival of the Singularity or not, I just want to
see the damn thing. I would invest some modest sums in AGI if we could get a
huge collection plate going around (these collection pla
ire the imagination of someone for whom 10 mil. is a charity
donation?
Eric B. Ramsay
Eric B. Ramsay
Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the concept behind Novamente is
truly compelling enough, it
> should be no problem to make a successful pitch.
>
> Eric B. Ramsay
Gee
d be no problem to make a
successful pitch.
Eric B. Ramsay
Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Much of this discussion is very
abstract, which is I guess how you think about
these issues when you don't have a specific AGI design in mind.
My view is a little different.
If the Nova
Lol. Calm down fella. You are going to give yourself a stroke.
Eric B. Ramsay
"J. Andrew Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Few people would define the developments task as hiring hundreds of
engineers to do things like write device drivers and apps for
defective Chinese
Two guys in a garage would never have built the bomb. The question is whether
or not the two efforts are indeed comparable.
Eric B. Ramsay
Thomas McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/08, Eric B. Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It took Microsoft over
1000 engineers, $6
and give
coherence to the effort.
Eric B. Ramsay
---
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id
is comment? If the people here are intelligent enough
to have meaningful discussions on a difficult topic, then they will be able to
sort out for themselves the "styles" of others.
Eric B. Ramsay
---
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com
orget to
combine program + OS. Thus the rainstorm by itself has no emergent properties.
Eric B. Ramsay
---
singularity
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/11983/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/11983/
Modify Your Subscri
man's sentiment. What a waste of mental energy.
A line of discussion as equally fruitless as solipsism. I am in full agreement
with Richard Loosemore on this one.
Eric B. Ramsay
Stathis Papaioannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 20/02/2008, Richard Loosemore
wrote:
> I am aware of so
I get it:
http://www.jaronlanier.com/aichapter.html
Eric B. Ramsay
"John G. Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:How about â
the movie is going along, year 2028, an AGI goes Singularity and burns to the
center of the earth and converts the
Thanks for the link Tom. Makes me think of Lyndon LaRouche but perhaps that's
not a good analogy.
Eric B. Ramsay
Thomas McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 3:49 PM, Eric B. Ramsay wrote:
> I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
> pro
I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
pronouncement by A.T. Murray. Is there a reason for this (for example is this
person considered fringe or worse)?
Eric B. Ramsay
"A. T. Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MindForth free open AI source
Matt: I need to think about all of this more. In the meantime, determinism may
not be dead. See, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0212095v1 and
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703179v2.
Eric B. Ramsay
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- "Eric B. Ramsay" wrote:
>
ow the photon like a billiard ball instead of two
variations in behaviour with observers thrown in?
Eric B. Ramsay
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- "Eric B. Ramsay" wrote:
> Matt: I would prefer to analyse something simple such as the double slit
> experi
servations.
Eric B. Ramsay
Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- "Eric B. Ramsay" wrote:
> Apart from all this philosophy (non-ending as it seems), Table 1. of the
> paper referred to at the start of this thread gives several consequences of
> a simulation
y speed-of-light in one
multiverse was larger than ours, say WAY larger example 10^100*c. If
intermultiverse communication is possible how would the physics work out if a
simulation or manipulation was conducted from one to the other.
John
From: Eric B. Ramsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Apart from all this philosophy (non-ending as it seems), Table 1. of the paper
referred to at the start of this thread gives several consequences of a
simulation that offer to explain what's behind current physical observations
such as the upper speed limit of light, relativistic and quantum eff
Some of you may be interested in this link (if you haven't already seen the
article).
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0337
Eric B. Ramsay
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/m
I have a Ph.D. in Nuclear Physics and I don't understand half of what is said
on this board (as well as the AGI board). I appreciate all simplifications that
anyone cares to make.
Eric B. Ramsay
Benjamin Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shane,
Thankyou for being patronizing.
strongest definition of what the term
"singularity" implies, then is the universe big enough for two?
Eric B. Ramsay
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=11983
24 matches
Mail list logo
