Hi, some guy in OSBC forum told me this issue was well documentd in the SIPX
mailing list. SIPX always replies with a registration interval that is smaller
than the one requested by the UA. If the US does not adhere to the lesser
interval by re-registering, then it will become unregistered for
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 14:33 -0700, Max Clark wrote:
> Scott,
>
> So I would want to map extension 100, 0 and "operator" to this user?
You want to map whatever your incoming call presents to this user.
Whether or not you want those others also to go there depends on the
behavior you want - '0' is
Scott,
So I would want to map extension 100, 0 and "operator" to this user?
Is the trick here to then forward back to the autoattendant with a
different extension number for the non business hours times?
Is it possible to preserve the original caller id on the forward?
Thanks,
Max
On Mon, May 1
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 12:42 -0700, Max Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are currently using an out of office receptionist. When an external
> party calls our main number (or presses 0 for the operator) I need to
> send the call to the external number of the receptionist (10 digit).
> This external for
Hello,
We are currently using an out of office receptionist. When an external
party calls our main number (or presses 0 for the operator) I need to
send the call to the external number of the receptionist (10 digit).
This external forward should take place based on a time of day rule -
otherwise I
Hi Dale,
thanks. The steps you suggested work for me. At least for VM notification.
I will test alarms soon.
What about having in sipxconfig the possibility to specify a SMTP relay
and authentication data if needed?
Thanks again
Alberto
Dale Worley ha scritto:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +02
Scott Lawrence ha scritto:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +0200, Alberto wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
You know that you're using the unstable version...
Perfect
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 13:04 -0400, Jhony Perez wrote:
> I didn't specify that on the incoming dial-peer but only on the
> outgoing to SipXecs, incoming it is up to the calling side to propose
> what codec to use based on what's configure as the prefer codec.
No, when an element makes a call, it ma
Dale Worley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:18 -0400, Jhony Perez wrote:
After trying many things I found what I think it was the last piece of
the puzzle, on the Cisco gateway dial-peer (call leg) that points to the
SipXecs, I specified what codec to use, G711 and now I'm able to call
jus
hazzanz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking at replacing an Asterisk system with sipXecs 4.0 and cannot
> work out how to do the following:
>
> 1) We have two locations and trunk from a central site - one trunk for
> each location
>
> 2) We have custom contexts in Asterisk which direct seven digit
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 08:22 -0700, Charles Chalekson wrote:
> I have just upgrade to 4.0 and am having issues receiving VM properly.
> I will leave a message to one of the users and the VM does not show up
> on the BLF indicator, on the web gui for that user and is not
> delivered through email not
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 08:22 -0700, Charles Chalekson wrote:
> I have just upgrade to 4.0 and am having issues receiving VM properly.
> I will leave a message to one of the users and the VM does not show up
> on the BLF indicator, on the web gui for that user and is not
> delivered through email not
I used sipnet sometime ago.
As far as I remember, User-Agent field in the Invite from sipnet showed
"ComminuGatePro".
But I don't know if sipnet accepts connections from business customers...
Nikolay.
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:36 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Layne Evans wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Everything seems to be working so far far but I have recently run into
>>> this problem with forwarded calls.
I have just upgrade to 4.0 and am having issues receiving VM properly. I
will leave a message to one of the users and the VM does not show up on the
BLF indicator, on the web gui for that user and is not delivered through
email notification that has been set up for that account [it was working
fin
If you are using an unmanaged phone you can just skip the phone
configuration section.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Stephan Bauer wrote:
> Hello Nikolay,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> I can't see that it's working like you said.
> After adding a user I choose Phone. Than I can add new
If you still wanna try it, the sipxconfig.properties is the file you need to
change.
I think the lines you need to remove are:
1. locationsMigrationTrigger.hostname
2. sipImpl.hostIpAddress
3. sipImpl.proxyPort
4. sipImpl.hostName
5. sipImpl.proxyHost
They might be shown at the end
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:18 -0400, Jhony Perez wrote:
> After trying many things I found what I think it was the last piece of
> the puzzle, on the Cisco gateway dial-peer (call leg) that points to the
> SipXecs, I specified what codec to use, G711 and now I'm able to call
> just fine. After do
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +0200, Alberto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
> not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
> I had a look in /var/spool/mail. All alarms directed to
> sipxcha...@localhost are there. All
Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:18 -0400, Jhony Perez wrote:
I wanted to let you guys know that the issue with the Cisco gateway is
resolved.
The issue started when I moved from SipXecs 3.10.3 to SipXecs 4.0. The
issue was that I could call from the SipXecs extensions out t
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:18 -0400, Jhony Perez wrote:
> I wanted to let you guys know that the issue with the Cisco gateway is
> resolved.
>
> The issue started when I moved from SipXecs 3.10.3 to SipXecs 4.0. The
> issue was that I could call from the SipXecs extensions out to the Cisco
> gat
I wanted to let you guys know that the issue with the Cisco gateway is
resolved.
The issue started when I moved from SipXecs 3.10.3 to SipXecs 4.0. The
issue was that I could call from the SipXecs extensions out to the Cisco
gateway and to phones on the Cisco Call Manager Express but when cal
Scott Lawrence nortel.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +0200, Alberto wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
> > not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
>
> You know that you're using the unstable vers
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +0200, Alberto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
> not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
> I had a look in /var/spool/mail. All alarms directed to
> sipxcha...@localhost are there. All
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:27 +0200, Alberto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
> not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
You know that you're using the unstable version...
___
Hello Nikolay,
thank you for your answer.
I can't see that it's working like you said.
After adding a user I choose Phone. Than I can add new phone from the list or
add an existing phone.
Where should I configure a phone manally.
Regards
Stephan
Original-Nachricht
> Datum:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:26 +0800, Ronny Tjoa wrote:
> >From sipviewer:
First - not a big deal but in general it's best to attach any logging
data as a text file attachment rather than cut-and-paste into email.
Doing it this way often mangles the messages (although this time it
wasn't bad enough t
Is there a safe limit to the number of registered lines sipx can configure on
the Polycom 650? In sipxconfig, it says the maximum number is 34.
At the same time does anyone have any real "safe' limits they can share? Number
of lines? Number of BLF's? I've noticed strange things happen when the p
As far as I understand, there is no need to 'add unmanaged phone'.
Just configure a user with number, name, password, etc.
Then configure the phone manually.
HTH,
Nikolay.
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org]
Hello,
I tried to configure a phone with is not managed. The howto
(http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/How_to_configure_Phones) says that I
should choose the "unmanaged phone". But I can't find this.
I tried
sipfoundry-4.0.0-015321-i386.iso
sipfoundry-4.0.1-015351-i386.iso
sipfoundry-4.1.0-
Hallo,
after running all Configuration Diagnostic Tests I got the error "DHCP (Option
120) Test" "No SIP servers supplied."
After enabling the option in windows 2008 DHCP-Server I got the error "Unknown
test result: 1".
The standalone programm preflight never stops DHCP Server Test.
Could any
Hello,
I am looking at replacing an Asterisk system with sipXecs 4.0 and cannot
work out how to do the following:
1) We have two locations and trunk from a central site - one trunk for
each location
2) We have custom contexts in Asterisk which direct seven digit local
number to the appropriate t
I decided to split this from my previous question since I found a
temporary solution for this. This was a little hard for me to find as my
IP550 was working correctly and this sent me off the correct path for a
little while.
The problem is the fact that the polycoms need the whole config from t
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to figure out why my system (CentOs 5.3 - 4.1.0-015538 ) is
not able to send emails (both VM notifications and alarms).
I had a look in /var/spool/mail. All alarms directed to
sipxcha...@localhost are there. All messages sent to some other domain
are present as a return
> > Here are my output and logs..
> >
> [...]
>
> Here is the interesting part (and the reason that sipXconfig is not
> starting):
>
> >
> "2009-05-12T14:13:26.437000Z":3:JAVA:ERR:xx.xx.se:main:000
> 0:ContextLoader:"Context initialization failed"
> > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanC
35 matches
Mail list logo
