[sipx-users] SIPxecs 4.0.1 and polycom 330

2009-08-30 Thread Bernardo Ortega
We have installed SIPxecs 4.0.1 and polycom phones are 320/330 with fimware bootROM 3.2.3 and 4.1.2, I do not understand why the phone when is going to reregister they stay in the air though they have 3600 seconds which is the default time. Thanks, ___

[sipx-users] Autoattendant error

2009-08-30 Thread Bernardo Ortega
Hi, We have installed SIPxecs 4.0.1 with AudioCode M1000, the problem is with the call transfers with autoattendant only work when the user is assigned a DID, when DID remove the call is not transferred via autoattendant rings until you leave voice mail. Thanks,

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread li...@grounded.net
>The timestamps on your mail are 12 hours ahead of reality -- you >probably want to fix that. Had to rebuild this workstation yesterday and it somehow lost a day. Thanks for pointing that out. > but it's far > better than having the entire PBX stop functioning when the server loses > its disk dr

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread Dale Worley
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 22:02 -0500, li...@grounded.net wrote: > I'm kinda confused about the project at this point. I moved to this > project because I was tired of messing with asterisk. The promise of > HA, clustering and off loading the media were the motivating factors. > The clustering alone w

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Overrides

2009-08-30 Thread Josh Patten
BLF works flawlessly, but if a user sets a ringtone for the BLF monitored extensions (IE attendant lines), that ringtone setting is lost every time the profiles are sent to the phone. We were dicussing ways to get user preferences to be either uploaded to the server via FTP or for users to set

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Overrides

2009-08-30 Thread Dale Worley
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 17:15 -0500, Josh Patten wrote: > I have some users who are frustrated that their ring and background > preferences are being reverted to factory defaults every time there is a > major bootrom/firmware update and the file system gets wiped, or in the > case of BLF ringing i

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread li...@grounded.net
Hi Matt, On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:11:20 -0400, Matt White wrote: > If your looking for an all encompassing HA solution, it is not part of sipx. No, I'm looking to learn the capabilities of sipx. We'll continue running asterisk systems but I see sipx as having a different role which is why I'm wan

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread Matt White
If your looking for an all encompassing HA solution, it is not part of sipx. HA in sipx at this point provides basic call availability in the event of a failure. So if your PBX dies, at least calls go in and out, the system is still in a partial state. For most people, this is "enough", as bu

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread li...@grounded.net
I'm not a developer so no need to ask in the dev list. As you say, they are well aware. My question is for the end users, to see if anyone else/others have some workarounds to these problems. Thanks. Mike On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:39:25 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > Perhaps your questions are b

Re: [sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread Tony Graziano
Perhaps your questions are better suited the the sipx-dev list... The sipxecs HA option is an OPTION. It is, like sipxecs, a work in progress. If you peek at the tracker there are a number of issues in 4.1/4.2 and even now 5.0 being planned and addressed. I see a number of issues relating to bran

[sipx-users] Where's the high availability?

2009-08-30 Thread li...@grounded.net
I'm kinda confused about the project at this point. I moved to this project because I was tired of messing with asterisk. The promise of HA, clustering and off loading the media were the motivating factors. The clustering alone was a godsend. As I get to know this better, it's looking more like

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Overrides

2009-08-30 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 17:15 -0500, Josh Patten wrote: > Perhaps I should post this to the developers list, but I'll post here > and see what I get > > I have some users who are frustrated that their ring and background > preferences are being reverted to factory defaults every time there is a >

Re: [sipx-users] Redundancy Questions: Data/HTML Sharing

2009-08-30 Thread Picher, Michael
It doesn't do that now... sipxconfig only runs on the master. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of li...@grounded.net Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 6:33 AM To: sipx-users Subject: [sipx-users] Redundan