Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

The SIP inspection is only done for Internet sourced and destined packets, anything over VPN bypasses these rules. Since bandwidth.com is sending me SIP traffic over 5080, the only thing SIP inspection is handling is outbound calling and remote workers connecting to the PBX over the Internet. W

Re: [sipx-users] sipx-users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 38

Tried that and I might be a little closer. Now I get "407 Proxy Authentication Required." On Mon 04.Jan.10 21:12, steven warner wrote: > >The vitelity template is a bit out of date. For me to get it going, I logged >into vitelity and they gave a different proxy to use. I am on >sip23.vitelity.n

Re: [sipx-users] MOH URI

On my Polycom phones no port number is necessary. steven warner wrote: DO I need to add a :port or should the uri be enough? s On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Josh Patten wrote: In 4.0.4 it is ~~mh~ but it might be the other one in the upcoming 4.2 release as I believe the park se

Re: [sipx-users] MOH URI

In 4.0.4 it is ~~mh~ but it might be the other one in the upcoming 4.2 release as I believe the park server is being replaced in that version. steven warner wrote: > All - > > Can I get the definitive answer to the uri for music on hold? > I have seen: > > ~~...@host.domain > > and > > m...@hos

Re: [sipx-users] sipx-users Digest, Vol 71, Issue 38

The vitelity template is a bit out of date. For me to get it going, I logged into vitelity and they gave a different proxy to use. I am on sip23.vitelity.net. On vitelity - go to support, "show sip credentials" or something like that on the support page. It will have what you need for your ac

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

If all of your sites are VPN'd together and subnet-to-subnet communication between sites is transparent over the VPN connection then there should be no need to be messing with the SIP packets in the firewall. That document is the framework for a fault resistant sipX setup. While the setup you

[sipx-users] MOH URI

All - Can I get the definitive answer to the uri for music on hold? I have seen: ~~...@host.domain and m...@host.domain Which is correct for sipxecs? Do I need a special port? Thanks s ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

Based on that DNS document, my assumption is that I should have a local sipX box at each location rather than a cluster residing in the datacenter? Polycom's are on 3.2.2, I will downgrade them to 3.1.3c and see what happens. All phones are showing up registered. What I mean by SIP inspection is th

Re: [sipx-users] multi site deployment

http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/Setting+up+BIND+with+location+based+views+for+sipX this may be helpful for you to implement as it creates a much more redundant setup As far as the other issues you are experiencing, make sure your Polycom phones are on a firmware revision no lat

[sipx-users] sipXrls technical limitations

Just wanted to know if there were any technical limitations to the current RLS server (for BLF) such as limit on number of monitored/monitoring extensions and/or stability issues when scaled to a large number of extensions. Just trying to get my ducks in a row for a mid size expansion (200 exte

[sipx-users] multi site deployment

I come from a Cisco Call Manager background and I am trying to apply the same centralized concept/design for a sipX deployment... I'm just gonna throw what I think would be all relevant facts out there and hopefully one of you guys can point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance. Scenario:

[sipx-users] Vitelity trunk

I'm trying to get my Vitelity trunk working on my freshly re-installed 4.0.4 system. My outbound calls time out and give a fast busy. From sipviewer it looks like the INVITE goes out, but there is no reply. Looking at the packet capture I see sipx sending a SYN to vitelity port 5060, and then vit

Re: [sipx-users] Nonce Validation Failures

Hi Tony, Yes the system passes all preflight tests with the exception of the DHCP 120 option, which I believe in this case would have no affect. I am not sure if the phone supports DNS SRV, is there a way I can tell that by looking through the configuration? The manual isn't that great, but I w

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom firmware upgrade

Thanks to all who answered. I ended up re-installing 4.0.4 from the ISO and then the phones pulled in the new firmware without trouble. The clue that something wasn't quite right was that I could not manually tftp to the sipx box and get a file. Dan On Sun 03.Jan.10 10:53, dan wrote: > >I'm try

Re: [sipx-users] Nonce Validation Failures

In general you will see nonce messages that make you think there is a problem when everything is running smoothly in an otherwise healthy system. I wouldn't consider this explicitly symptomatic, do as you wish. It's always a good idea to make sure DNS is working (preflight check) and compare your s

Re: [sipx-users] Nonce Validation Failures

That error is symptomatic of the issue - you really need to run a network trace or use SIP Viewer and examine the registration sequence. Normally the first REGISTER sent by the UA does not include an authentication header, and SIPXecs responds with a 407 Response. The UA should then attach an aut

Re: [sipx-users] Nortel Option 61c <--> Audiocodes Mediant 1000 PRI

Hooray!! I figured it out. I had to set "ISDN transfer capabilites" to 'Speech' on the PRI circuit and everything was happy. I'll eventually put this on the wiki. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 12/29/2009 5:15 PM, Josh Patten wrote: Al

Re: [sipx-users] Nonce Validation Failures

I'm not sure that is related to your registration issue. Like the xlite, you are manually configuring the phone. Hardware based phones are more prone to manual configuration errors, since they contain more manually entered variables. Do your preflight tests pass? Does the phone support DNS SRV re

Re: [sipx-users] Nonce Validation Failures

Hi, I seem to be having an error that is possibly because of this as well. I am trying to get a Netcomm V90 IP Phone (http://www.netcomm.com.au/product/voip/v90 ) to register with my SipX Server and I am getting the following errors in the sipregister.log file: "2010-01-04T20:08:17.652139Z":281

Re: [sipx-users] CDR records

Mike Burden wrote: > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CDR records > > From the CDR User Guide: > > > > To configure CDRs, log in to the config server (sipXconfig) web UI as "superadmin". Open the > menu "Calling", then "Configuration", then "Call Detail Records (CDR

[sipx-users] Wiki time

I guess now that the holidays are over with it's time to start getting back in the swing of things and one thing I think all of us want to see is better documentation. I've started adding various things to the new wiki in hopes that they'd receive some comments and suggestions but I don't think

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

Bluetooth doesn't have the range dect does. I run errands while on the phone and answer hangup wirelessly. It has a much better battery performance than most. Its wifi friendly too. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitd

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Softkeys programming

you have to create an "EFK" entry in /etc/sipxpbx/polycom/polycom_sip.cfg here is what I added: You then have to resend profiles on the phones. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 1/4/2010 10:23 AM, Austin Curry wrote: I am trying to

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from our side

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:22 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote:\ > I believe the 5090 is a port used between the proxy and the bridge. I > might get smacked down for that answer, but it is something similar, > and I believe normal. You're correct - sipXbridge uses two ports: 5080 is the ITSP-facing

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

They make a model that does nit also connect to the pc, but it is not much less. I'm sure others have used some different ones, but this was one we needed to completely outfit a high end need, with no lifters. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

*sigh* The powers that be choked at both the price tag and the form factor. He's looking for something more the size of a Bluetooth headset, and around that price (under $100 per unit.) I'm a little dubious about getting acceptable sound/voice quality with those restrictions. I don't want

[sipx-users] Polycom Softkeys programming

I am trying to configure one of the softkeys on the polycom phones with a forward (transfer) key. I am unsure where in the phone profile to set this up? I know the hard key is available, but the client wants to keep the same configuration as it was from a previous provider. It will be used on Pol

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from our side

Voip.ms does work with version 4.0.x as well as version 4.1.x. I've used it with both on several servers, as that is what I test with. I find that I get better results with them if I use their IP address rather than their FQDN. Under Devices/Gateway, ITSP Account, I have all of the defaults mark

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from our side

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Eric Varsanyi wrote: > I've followed the setup as closely as possible from here: > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SIP_Trunking_with_sipXecs:_Overview_and_Configuration > > I am registering successfully with voip.ms and I can receive inbound calls > w/o iss

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

http://www.myitdepartment.net/content/view/48/70/ On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > All the CS70n's that I have used have "hangup" problems in that they hang > up in the middle of the call. I recently switched our helpdesk

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

All the CS70n's that I have used have "hangup" problems in that they hang up in the middle of the call. I recently switched our helpdesk over to Jabra and they love them. They can make it through an entire 8 hour day without a recharge whereas the plantronics would die about 6 hours in on a bus

[sipx-users] Slightly off topic -- Headsets for Polycom IP550

Good morning, Slightly off topic, but I think there are probably a few people in this group that can give me the benefit of their experience. We are looking for cordless headsets to use with our Polycom IP550 phones and a sipXecs IP PBX. Does anyone have a headset that they would recommend

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from ourside

Internet calling is/was not enabled. -Eric On Jan 4, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Also, is ‘Internet Dialing’ enabled? If so, disable and re-send the system > profile. > > Mike > > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org]

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from our side

3.1.3c does not support Polycom 335's and SipXEcs doesn't support differing firmware levels on different phones (the configuration templates are fixed, in 4.1 they are fixed at 3.2.2). The messages w/o the authentication are coming from the sipxbridge process, not the phones, can you give me a

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from ourside

Also, is 'Internet Dialing' enabled? If so, disable and re-send the system profile. Mike From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:32 AM To: Eric Varsanyi Cc: sipx-users@list.sipf

Re: [sipx-users] 407 errors from voip.ms with no response from our side

There are known issues with polycom 3.2.x firmware at this time. I'd suggest using 3.1.3RevC. On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Eric Varsanyi wrote: > I've followed the setup as closely as possible from here: > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SIP_Trunking_with_sipXecs:_Overview_and_Configur