Dear Mr. Richesson,
You're a genius! The final solution wasn't quite as simple as you
suggested, but it did lead me down a path that ultimately resolved the
issue. Here were the steps I performed to finally be able to upgrade to
v4.2:
1.) From the ISA Server Management Interface
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your post.
1. Please see screenshot below. What does that setting do if checked and a
new user is created? From the description I would expect that a user
specific conference would be created???
2. I did look at the end-user portal but did not find anything that woul
Hi,
I'm new to sipxecs, upgrading from an old asterisk machine to a
virtualbox vm. So far so good, managed to get the guest additions and
virtio-net going fine. Also internal calling works.
I have 3 ITSP accounts with 2 ITSP's for 3 DID numbers. I have 3 other
ITSP's for out bound calls. Neither
Am I missing something or is there not a way to setup a separate owner access
code on a conference bridge, so that the conference only starts when the owner
logs in?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.
Marcello,
1. You need to pick a number for their conference bridge. If your
users are 200 series, maybe make their conf bridge be the equivalent in
the 400 series.
2. When you log into the web GUI, use the user's ext. as a userid
and the PIN as the password... this will get you t
These may be really dumb question but I was not able to find answers.
1. Under User Group Settings, Conference, you can automatically assign
conferences to new users.
I tested this, added a new user but could not find a "conference extension"
anywhere; so I must be missing a step???
2.
Is there any way to disable the gravatar feature? Some of the default
gravatars are not "fitting," to put it lightly, in a business
environment and might be offensive to some users.
--
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
___
My apology. I'm pulling my foot out of my mouth now
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:xmlsc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 1:16 PM
To: Andreas (Around the Clock Information Systems)
Cc: 'Todd Hodgen'; 'Scott Richesson'; sipx-users@list.sipfo
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 16:07 -0400, Andreas (Around the Clock Information
Systems) wrote:
> sipXecs version 4.0.1-015823 is an unstable developer release?!?!? It was
> installed from ISO like six months ago and updated along the way. I didn't
> realize that the developer releases where even availa
sipXecs version 4.0.1-015823 is an unstable developer release?!?!? It was
installed from ISO like six months ago and updated along the way. I didn't
realize that the developer releases where even available in ISO format.
Hmmm? I always thought that developer releases used odd numbers (i.e.
4.1.X
You are trying to upgrade from an unstable developer release to a stable
release. I'm sure you will find its not supported, tested, validated or
recommended. You may have other issues to contend with as others have
mentioned, however, the basic process that you are beginning with is flawed.
---
See my reply below in-line with yours. . .
Thank you,
Andreas
Systems Engineer
Around the Clock Information Systems
-Original Message-
From: Scott Richesson [mailto:sriches...@cincinnatifan.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 3:29 PM
To: Andreas (Around the Clock Information Systems);
si
Do you use MS ISA Server for your firewall/proxy?
I've found out that if you turn on HTTP compression on the ISA server, things
go bonkers between it and the sipfoundry.org server when you do a yum update.
Something is not quite right with the HTTP headers being passed back and forth,
because I
Try this
cat /etc/yum.repos.d/sipxecs-stable-centos.repo
[centos-5-base]
name=CentOS-5 - Base
mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=$basearch&repo=os
#baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-Cent
Dear sipXecs Users, Experts and Developers,
I've been trying to upgrade from sipXecs version 4.0.1-015823 to 4.2
for over a week now and I get the following error every time:
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable/CentOS/5/i386/RPM/rep
odata/primary.xml.gz: [Errno -1] Meta
Today on my test 4.2 environment I received an alarm email that the
CallResolver-Agent stopped unexpectedly on the secondary HA server and
could not start. Here was the error:
2010.04.30 13:43:04 LOG7[5134:3086362320]: RAND_status claims sufficient
entropy for the PRNG
2010.04.30 13:43:04 LOG7[
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 11:54 -0500, Gabe Casey wrote:
> Thanks although I have no /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxprovision.log on the
> failed server this is the service that is affecting my system.
The error you're seeing indicates that the service cannot start because
its configuration is not the right ver
Thanks although I have no /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxprovision.log on the failed
server this is the service that is affecting my system.
Gabrial Casey
Telecommunications
Franklin American Mortgage Company
501 Corporate Centre Dr.
Suite 400
Franklin, TN 37067
Direct:615-468- 2945
Cell: 615-6
DO NOT IMPORT SUPERADMIN!
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Nathaniel Watkins <
nwatk...@garrettcounty.org> wrote:
> Exactly what Tony said I'd have to do... I was just hoping for an easy out
> :)
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com]
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 10:47 -0500, Gabe Casey wrote:
> I have installed a test system off the 4.0.4 and upgraded to 4.2.
> The only difference in the upgrade were the following files
> polycom_phone1.cfg.rpmnew polycom_sip.cfg.rpmnew
>
> I backed up my production config and placed it on the test
I have installed a test system off the 4.0.4 and upgraded to 4.2.
The only difference in the upgrade were the following files
polycom_phone1.cfg.rpmnew polycom_sip.cfg.rpmnew
I backed up my production config and placed it on the test system with no
issues
the service runs.
I would like to a
Exactly what Tony said I'd have to do... I was just hoping for an easy out :)
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:36 AM
To: Nathaniel Watkins; Scott Lawrence; Tony Graziano
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Su
Definitely B.
Try doing an export of the users / phones to ease the migration.
I don't think a backup will do you that much good.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins
>
{"FreeSWITCH"=>"Running",
"sipXmrtg"=>"Running",
"SipXrest"=>"Running",
"SipXopenfire"=>"Disabled",
"sipXrecording"=>"Running",
"SIPRegistrar"=>"Running",
"sipXprovision"=>"ConfigurationMismatch",
"ParkServer"=>"Running",
"ConfigAgent"=>"Disabled",
"CallResolver"=>"Running",
"ACDServer"=>
> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r2/Upgrade+or+Ins
> tall+Planning+for+4.2+and+XMPP
Very nice, Tony - thank you. And bonus points for the humor...
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Scott Lawrence
> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:33 -0400, Tony Graziano wrot
>
> I think I'll avoid doing that and let the phones reregister
> over time.
> Shouldn't be more than about 10 or so minutes for them to
> reregister I would think.
For remote users, worst case is 5 minutes. For non-remote users, it's 60
minutes.
> On 4/30/2010 8:33 AM, Scott Lawrence wrot
> Sometime i see that one of our phones cannot refresh its
> registration and its registration expires.
What do you mean by 'cannot'? Does it send a registration buit fails the
challenge or does send no REGISTER at all before the expiry?
> After some seconds
> (maybe around 5 seconds ) phone
I think I'll avoid doing that and let the phones reregister over time.
Shouldn't be more than about 10 or so minutes for them to reregister I
would think.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 4/30/2010 8:33 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 201
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 19:37 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Makes me ask myself if a HA upgrade should have a special bootup
> script/procedure to prevent the profile push but allow for a certificate
> handshake/sunc to the other server before assuming any interactive roles
> with users/gateway.
It'
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:02 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
> Now that I reread your post Scott, it make much more sense, and this is
> what we ultimately decided to do. One question that may or may not be
> worth asking, is there an easy way to "copy" registrations over so that
> the mock upgrade sys
> and registration refresh time
>
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:33 +0300, an...@iguanait.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > Do you know why sipxecs has chosen 300 seconds as minimum
> by default?
>
> Registration can create a lot of load on the system - if you
> had a few hundred phones re-registering every
> I built it from 4.2.0 source code. I tried to install
> sipxopenfire-4.2.0-018575 to solve this problem but still got
> the same error.
>
> "/usr/local/sipx/bin/sipxopenfire.sh: line 85:
> /opt/openfire//bin/openfire:
> No such file or directory"
> "/usr/local/sipx/bin/sipxopenfire.sh: line 8
In order to get the xmpp federation stuff working - I'm planning on
re-installing 4.2 - and making my xmpp/sip domain publicly resolvable. Here is
the question:
If I were to
1) Make a backup of my current system configuration
2) Re-install 4.2 from the .iso
3) Make a backup of the fresh instal
In sipx-trace i see something strange for this phone.
Register request is comming from
xxx.xxx.98.39:40200 to sipXproxy, from sipXproxy to Sipregister.
so:
xxx.xxx.98.39:40200 to sipXproxy (Register)
from sipXproxy to Sipregister (Register)
from Sipregister to sipXproxy (401 Unauthorized)
from
Hi,
Sometime i see that one of our phones cannot refresh its registration
and its registration expires. After some seconds (maybe around 5
seconds ) phone reregister successfully.
I checked with sipx-trace and see some 500 Internal Errors in trace. In
sipXproxy.log i see following errors:
SipCl
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:33 +0300, an...@iguanait.com wrote:
>
>
> Do you know why sipxecs has chosen 300 seconds as minimum by default?
Registration can create a lot of load on the system - if you had a few
hundred phones re-registering every 30 seconds that's a lot of messages.
Unless the IP
Thanks you very much for the suggestion. :)
Do you know why sipxecs has chosen 300 seconds as minimum by default?
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 10:41 -0400, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [sipx-users-boun...@list.s
37 matches
Mail list logo
