Folks -
AudioCodes MP114 v5.6
Sipx 4.2
Polycom 550 devices working great, registered, all internal dialing working
fantastic.
Outbound through MP114 working fine.
Inbound calls through the MP114 is where it gets strange. I've configured
two of the lines using the defaults (yes, chose the right ve
Hello,
Was setting up a new 4.2 system (installed from ISO) when I noticed that
my Snom phones were not auto provisioning - for some reason it appears
that the required line " option bootfile-name
"/phone/profile/docroot/{mac}.xml"; " is missing from the dhcpd.conf
which is generated by th
This was resolved by sending profiles to servers. Not sure what caused
the hiccup in the first place.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/1/2010 2:18 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
This is also affecting phone provisioning:
from /var/log/sipxpbx/sip
Thanks. For now I'll inform my users that they can only do forwarding to
local extensions.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/1/2010 3:07 PM, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) wrote:
> Problem should be fixed in revision 18926 of the 4.2 branch.
>
>
>
Problem should be fixed in revision 18926 of the 4.2 branch.
> Josh,
> You came across a real problem. Basically, with XMPP, the
> call will only work if the caller has sufficient permissions
> to make the call whereas with conventional call forwarding
> rules, the permissions of the callee ge
This is also affecting phone provisioning:
from /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxprovision.log:
"2010-06-01T19:12:12.648000Z":601::INFO:it.ippbx.co.brazos.tx.us:SocketListener0-1::Servlet:"GET
/0004f228edad-sipx-device.cfg User-Agent: FileTransport
PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_550-UA/3.2.3.1734"
"20
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Heros Deidda
[h.dei...@sidin.it]
Hello guys,
I'm facing a weird issue.
On a new installation a SCS 3.0 (sipx 4.04) is answering to the audiocode INVITE
with
http://sites.google.com/site/sipxecstipsandtricks/polycom-phones
You should probably do it that way.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/1/2010 9:33 AM, cyrill.rei...@iscoord.com wrote:
Hey Eric,
Thanks for your tip.
I have some problems ge
Josh,
You came across a real problem. Basically, with XMPP, the call will only work
if the caller has sufficient permissions to make the call whereas with
conventional call forwarding rules, the permissions of the callee get used.
I'll look into fixing that.
bob
> -Original Message-
>
Ranga, Dale
The same thing happened when I used IP addresses.
1 REGISTER-287
2 REGISTER-287
3 401-287
4 REGISTER-288 w/nonce
5 401-288
6 200-288
I believe there are three faults.
1. The ITSP (Asterisk) should not send cseq 288 in line 5.
2. sipX should not disregard the 200 OK
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:03 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>
> From: Sven Evensen [sven.even...@onrelay.com]
>
> should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?:
>
> sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1.
> after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1.
> a f
From: Sven Evensen [sven.even...@onrelay.com]
should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?:
sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1.
after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1.
a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGISTER.
sipX sends new REGIST
I see I have a typo in my scenario below.
should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?:
sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1.
after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1.
a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGISTER.
sipX sends new REGISTER with nonce cseq=2.
sipX receives 401 cseq=
You need to go from 3.10 to 4.0 first, you need to send the server profile
and reboot the server. I've seen that too and had to go through each rpm
finding that some had not been installed.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi.
No, as I said, I had similar problems going from 3.10 to 4.0. Essentially the
sipxsupervisor RPM didn't get downloaded. Had I had more time I would have been
able to figure this out and understand it. However as I only have a limited
amount of time to get this done, I figured I'd try 3.10 to 4.2
You stopped and ensured everything was working in 4.0 before going to 4.2
and sent the server profile and rebooted the server?
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Syst
No luck there, I'm afraid. Looks like everything's correct. But I am getting
emails about Ruby connectivity now :
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:560:in `initialize': Connection refused -
connect(2) (Errno::ECONNREFUSED)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:560:in `open'
from /usr/li
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Sven Evensen
[sven.even...@onrelay.com]
The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send you
a snapshot too.
sipX sends REGISTE
I've seen that. Go through the rpm"s one by one and ensure you have
everything, some are likely nmissing.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephon
Hey folks
I upgraded from 3.10.2 to the latest stable build. I did try going from 3.10.x
to 4.0, but that had issues so I rolled back the snapshot and went to the
latest stable.
Yum failed to install the sipxsupervisor so I did a "yum install" on that but
I've found some issues. Firstly, all m
Sure but the issue was it couldn't resolve whatever it was. let us
know how it goes by IP (or adding the hostname/ip to the hosts file?).
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Sven Evensen wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I did portahk.cordiaip.netx on purpose. Since sipX does not have the vey much
> missing featu
Tony,
I did portahk.cordiaip.netx on purpose. Since sipX does not have the vey much
missing feature of "disable SIP trunk", I just added an X on the 6 Sip trunks
that I did not want to register.
Sven
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: 01
My conclusion regarding 401 being ignored is the fact that two 401 are received
on same trunk, then a 200 OK is received, but the trunk is still disabled.
And why does the trunk not try to register again, ever. Until sipXBridge
restarted?
I will try to use IP addresses like you suggest, see if
We have LG 6812s and Cisco 7960s deployed both in the office and remotely. We
also have a handful of Acrobit softphone for the iPhones. Checking the
registrations, some display that they are registered via UDP. Others do not
indicate one are the other, so I assume it's TCP. I do not think it's
Hey Eric,
Thanks for your tip.
I have some problems getting this to work. Here is what I did:
1. I uploaded a .wav file to Device Files as Unmanaged (T)FTP Files and
activated it
2. Then I used Putty to connect to the sipXecs Server
3. There I navigated to /etc/sipxpbx/polycom/mac-address.d/si
Hi Nickolay,
thank you for your answer.
This way it works of course...but this is a workaround because a gateway should
be not be a user.
Heros
Ing. Heros Deidda
Pre-sales VoIP Engineer
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Nikolay Kondratyev"
A: "Heros Deidda" , sipx-users@l
Sorry, I'll post the error in HTML so it doesn't get truncated:
"2010-06-01T13:04:43.249000Z":59987:sipXivr:INFO:it.ippbx.co.brazos.tx.us:Thread-1253::sipxivr:"Mailbox::writeMailboxPreferences:change
Greeting 4676 failed: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX
path building fa
I have a problem where users are unable to set their greeting by dialing
to voicemail, but they can set their greeting from the web portal. I did
some digging in /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxivr.log and found this error when
attempting to set the greeting from voicemail:
"2010-06-01T13:04:43.249000Z":5
Go to http://track.sipfoundry.org, create a user account and then you can open
a jira issue.
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Wen Jun
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:03 PM
> To: 'Tony Grazia
29 matches
Mail list logo
