Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tony Graziano
maybe you should start with this book instead: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1451612575/ref=mp_s_a_3?qid=1329577567sr=8-3 On Feb 18, 2012 9:51 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: I think you need to apologize for your cross attitude with Martin and eZuce. It was rude,

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Remote Phone MWI

2012-02-18 Thread Tommy Laino
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: cacct1odtx6ltmgrv3qvbxikjbyxw0o+kwy53r+x933zhklm...@mail.gmail.com X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 66183 Message-ID: 10287.4f3f1...@forum.sipfoundry.org I know it's

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Nate
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: 4f3f4cd0.80...@sharedcom.net X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 66184 Message-ID: 10288.4f3f2...@forum.sipfoundry.org Tim Ingalls wrote on Fri, 17 February 2012 14:05

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tony Graziano
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Nate nba...@procaresystems.com wrote: Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: 4f3f4cd0.80...@sharedcom.net X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 66184 Message-ID:

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
Thanks, Tim Ingalls Shared Communications, Inc. 801-618-2102 Office On 02/18/2012 12:03 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Tim Ingallst...@sharedcom.net wrote: I appreciate your feedback. You're right. Being specific is helpful. However, I was trying to not be

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
Didn't see your email. My emails are sorted by thread. It probably wouldn't have mattered, though. Your private response was very rude/unintelligible. I posted it publicly because that was my original purpose and I just forgot to hit "reply to all." Let's just

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
Tony, perhaps you missed the insulting comment by Martin, Grow up and take charge and then basically says to go run Asterisk. If you did miss it, I can see how you would rightfully be upset with me. I did not start the rudeness. Martin did. I do not need to be told to grow up and bugger off

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
Thanks Nate. Maybe Tony just missed Martin's offensive comment. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Thanks, Tim Ingalls Shared Communications, Inc. 801-618-2102 Office On 02/17/2012 09:30 PM, Nate wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
My apologies to Todd. I didn't see that his last two messages were private messages to me, and I posted them to the group on accident. Sorry, Todd. I hope you'll forgive me. Thanks, Tim Ingalls Shared Communications, Inc. 801-618-2102 Office On 02/18/2012

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tony Graziano
I didn't miss Martin's post. I think he was shooting straight with you. SipX requires a a certain skill set. I would suggest since you appear to be lacking in either understanding some of the concepts or the ability to implement some of them properly this is not the project for you. I won't speak

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Remote Phone MWI

2012-02-18 Thread Michael Picher
make sure the server behind nat setting is unchecked. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Tommy Laino tomla...@gmail.com wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To:

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread Tim Ingalls
Kyle, Thanks for the awesome info. I guess I'll just give up on the SIP trunking until I find something more stable to make sipXecs work with it. What do you use for your PRI gateways? You're right about the local calls. If you make a lot of them, it makes sense to get unlimited local. Most

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-18 Thread Ken Ridley
Thanks for the help, Ram is on order, but how do I permanently remove/turn off the swap? From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:39 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs Commercial Feasibility

2012-02-18 Thread payodie1969
I was wondering how long it would take to get to this, credit to all, the thread almost went 3 days before it got childish. Typical of this list. Oh wait someone did suggest he should read the book the first day... On 2/18/2012 7:07 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: maybe you should start with this

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-18 Thread Tony Graziano
You don't. On Feb 18, 2012 6:56 PM, Ken Ridley k...@federico.net wrote: Thanks for the help, Ram is on order, but how do I permanently remove/turn off the swap? ** ** *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony