FYI:
I've had both TW Telecom and TW Cable out here soliciting me. Despite the
similar name, they are two completely separate companies. TW Telecom is pretty
much business only. TW Cable is a residential-grade company that also has a
foot in the door of business services.
Scott Rich
This may sound crazy, but could this be something as simple as packet loss
caused by a bad patch cable or wiring in the wall?
I've seen stranger things
Scott.
From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 9:35 AM
To: sipx-users
Subject
Help!
The certificate(s) on my sipx server expired, and now the sipx services won't
start. Sipxconfig is not running.
My production phones are done.
How do I fix!
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-
Yup. They did that to me too. Turning off the "Hold Reminder" seemed to
fix it.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Drouillard [mailto:gerryl...@drouillard.ca]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 1:38 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 3.2.5 firmwar
It works fine here. (Same sipX version. On the Patton, I have R5.7 2011-01-17
H323 RBS SIP, but I've run previous versions without a problem.)
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
From: Nathaniel Watkins [mailto:nwatk...@garrettcounty.org]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:52
I've tried (with 4.2), but was never able to get it to work.
Scott
From: Josh M. Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:59 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 IMAP sync
Has anyone managed to get sipX IMAP sync working with Ex
Hi,
Has anyone gotten Callcentric to work with sipxbridge (4.2.1)? (I'm
experimenting with outgoing calls only).
I can get it to register, but when I make a call, I get a message about an
invalid number being dialed. (I verified I am sending 1+area code+phone
number). I've tried changing al
Also, I noticed that I am getting about 10MB a day in my proxy log with the
following gibberish. Should I be concerned? Everything is working just fine.
CPU utilization is negligible.
Thanks,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
"2010-10-13T14:01:00.179200Z":38686:SIP:ERR:sip.cinf
this is supposed to work, or if there is any way to configure the behavior here.
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-us
ling via the
external SBC.
It sounds as though your firewall is either trying to proxy the media or is not
configured for it at all if you are using sipxbridge.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Scott Richesson
wrote:
--- Repost: Sorry if you've already seen this message ---
Hello,
We ar
e behavior here.
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Yup... I had that problem intermittently. Downgrading to SIP 3.2.2 fixed the
problem.
I believe this is the problem: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XTRN-1046
My phone experiencing the problem was not a remote worker, but it did have 3
sidecars full of BLF's. Perhaps that was slowing down
That setting used to be under the SIP configuration section. Has it been moved
or removed in 4.2? Is it now defaulted to on?
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 5/11/2010 9:34 AM, Scott Richesson wrote:
It finally seems to be working! (for m
It finally seems to be working! (for me anyway) (Polycom SIP 3.2.2, sipx 4.2)
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:19 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Polycom "Transfer on Proceeding&
I think this has already been fixed for 4.2.1:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8231
From: Fowler, Peter (Peter) [mailto:fowl...@avaya.com]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:07 AM
To: Norman Branitsky; Josh Patten
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.2 IMAP inte
I'm glad you got it!
>error: %post(sipxconfig-ftp-4.2.0-018575.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status
I had the same error, and haven't had any problems.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
From: Andreas (Around the Clock Information Systems) [andr
cause ISA will actually uncompress the gz file before returning it to the
sipx server.
Solution: temporarily turn off compression on the ISA server, then clear the
cache on the ISA server.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
-Original Message-
From: Andreas (Around the Clock Information Sy
page,
I get the dreaded "An internal error has occurred" message. See the stack
trace below. Any ideas?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
Error
An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue.
[ +/- ] Exception:
org.apache.hivemind.ApplicationR
Quick question:
During the upgrade from 4.0.4 to 4.2, will the legacy voicemail
messages/greetings/names/etc. be moved to the new voicemail system, or is this
information lost?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users
used over a lower
priority gateway where the location does match?".
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.
ment.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Scott Richesson; jcanfi...@emstar.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] XTRN-229 - Polycom attended transfers.
3.2 firmware has known issues. I would try the EFK approach with 3.1.3RevC.
Tony Gr
Yes--- Just as a test to try to get around this attended transfer problem.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 8:42 AM
To: Scott Richesson; jcanfi...@emstar.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
er to a speed-dial BLF key (required for our attendant).
So, yes, this is an ongoing frustration.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
-Original Message-
From: Jim Canfield [mailto:jcanfi...@emstar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:17 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject:
that this exists in Exchange 2007 only. It was removed in
Exchange 2010! So much for that idea. (Exchange 2007 and 2010 can co-exist
only if 2007 was installed into the domain first).
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
-Original Message-
From: Jordan Turner [mailto:jordan.turner1...@yaho
stion, has
anyone else noticed this? If anyone else is experimenting with these versions,
can you check and see if you are losing 5 seconds per day?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
IT Manager
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipf
Yup... I had the exact same problem. I put a cheap switch in between, and it
worked.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
From: heros [mailto:h.dei...@sidin.it]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 9:49 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Audiocodes packet loss when
This may be obvious, but I've solved the far-end echo problems at my company by
decreasing the transmit volume on my Polycom phones.
Polycom does not recommend this, but it did work. In
etc/sipxpbx/polycom/polycom_sip.cfg, change voice.gain.tx.analog.handset to 0
(from 6).
The transmit volume
ailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:10 PM
To: Scott Richesson; mpic...@cmctechgroup.com; scott.lawre...@nortel.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] 4.0.1 Upgrade MWI
and you sent the profile to the server as well?
>>> "Scott Richesson"
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:02 PM
To: Scott Richesson; mpic...@cmctechgroup.com; scott.lawre...@nortel.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.0.1 Upgrade MWI
Scott - it certainly
nging all of the
MWI subscribe info on the lines to be the full SIP URL.
We haven't run into any other problems.
Thanks,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
-Original Message-
From: Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:39 AM
To: Scott
3.1.1C
I just tried updating a phone to 3.1.3C. No change.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Scott Richesson
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.0.1 Upgrade MWI
On Tue
So, I guess two questions:
1) Any idea what has gone wrong?
2) If not, is there a way to change the default for the subscribe
setting, so that I don't have to force this into each phone profile?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
requesting compression on files that are already gzipped.
Anyway, I'll give the update to 4.0.1 another try in the near future.
Thanks for the suggestions,
Scott Richesson
From: Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:09 AM
To: Scott Rich
tallation.
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs_4.0.1_Upgrade
>>> "Scott Richesson" 07/12/09 5:29 PM
>>>
Centos 5.3. Originally installed from the sipX ISO at maybe 3.10.2.
Yes, the OS repo is installed.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi..
Centos 5.3. Originally installed from the sipX ISO at maybe 3.10.2.
Yes, the OS repo is installed.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 5:06 PM
To: Scott Richesson; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
Hi,
I'm trying to run an update from 3.10.3 to 4.0.1. I am getting error:
"Metadata file does not match checksum".
I downloaded the new repo file as shown in the 4.0.1 instructions. I
tried yum clean all & yum clean metadata. No luck.
Any ideas?
Scott Richesson
yum up
: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:04 PM
To: Scott Richesson
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] T.38 Fax Termination
Scott, if I’m understanding your question correctly it sounds like you’re
wanting to have the fax call come in from the PSTN, hit your Mediant 1000, and
then
Tony,
Thanks. That device would certainly work, but I was hoping for something that
didn’t have to go through an analog FXO or FXS.
Scott
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:44 AM
To: Scott Richesson; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re
s.
Our usage is light, so I'm looking for something that costs < $1000.
Any recommendations?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-
I've played around with the 3.1 Polycom firmware and MOH. We have a
Mediant 1000 (firmware 5.20A.043.005). We ended up not deploying the
3.1 firmware yet, due to other issues. But, the MOH worked great, even
through the Audiocodes Gateway.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
From: Jay R
ample:
http://service.cincinnatifan.com/images/Classic-q3.wav
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/ma
Well I have 42 in a group, and it is working fine. I have no idea about
the maximum, though.
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Haefner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:41 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject
lmost zero.
This also seems to have corrected our paging problem. So, it appears
that there is some sort of TCP connection limit I was running up against
in sipX).
(We have close to 100 registered users, sipX 3.10.2)
Scott
-Original Message-----
From: Scott Richesson
Sent: Wednesday, Septembe
up to 200%
a few minutes after that.
This is a production system that we've been running for a couple of
months. The system is working fine except for my paging issue. Any
ideas?
(I tried to attach a snapshot, but the list server didn't seem to accept
my message.)
Scott Rich
Hi,
Does anyone know what a reasonable limit would be for the number of
phones in a paging group?
We have 42 phones in a group, and usually a few of the phones (different
ones each time) do not get the page.
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
es not light up. Short
of adding more expansion modules to our operator's phone, is there
another solution to this problem?
Thank You,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.si
Hello,
Is there any way to configure the maximum mailbox size per user?
(Number of messages, number of minutes, etc.?)
I could not find anything, but I have a user who is reporting that her
voicemail is full.
Thanks,
Scott Richesson
Cincinnati Fan
47 matches
Mail list logo
